[amsat-bb] OSCAR-11 Report

2011-04-28 Thread Clive Wallis
OSCAR-11 REPORT   27 April 2011

This report covers the period from 02 March to 27 April 2011 .
During this time the satellite has been heard from 03 to 13
March, 24 March to 03 April, 13 April to 23 April 2011. It is
expected to switch-on again 04 May until 14 May.

Excellent signals have been reported from stations located around
the world, and good copy obtained from decoded telemetry frames.

Transmissions are controlled by the watchdog timer, which has a
20.7 day cycle time, 10.35 days on, 10,35 days off. Solar
eclipses occur during every orbit, when signals are weaker. This
indicates that there is still some capacity remaining in the
battery.

The on-board clock is now very stable.  It gained 12 seconds
during during the current reporting period. This is comparable
with its accuracy when the satellite was fully operational, when
it gained approximately one minute per year. However, there is
still an accumulated loss of 309 days, which has occurred during
eclipses of the last few years.

The VHF beacon frequency is 145.826 MHz.  AFSK FM ASCII Telemetry

Reception reports have been received from Horatio CX8AF, Jerry
WB5LHD and Stefano IZ1GRJ. Many thanks.

At the present time, while OSCAR-11 is operating in a predictable
way, I no longer need direct reports or files by e-mail. However,
could all listeners continue to enter their reports on the
general satellite status website
http://oscar.dcarr.org/index.php. This is a very convenient and
easy to use facility, which shows the current status of all the
amateur satellites, and is of use to everyone. Reports around the
expected times of switch-on and switch-off are of special
interest, especially for times 12:00 - 17:00 and 22:00 - 07:00
UTC, to when the satellite is out-of-range in the UK.

A longer version of this report report is available on my
website, and new listeners to OSCAR-11 should read this for
further information. The URL is www.g3cwv.co.uk/oscar11.htm .
This page contains a links to the longer report, a short audio
clip to help you identify the satellite and a file of the last
telemetry received. The website also contains an archive of news
 telemetry data which is updated from time to time, and details
about using a soundcard or hardware demodulators for data
capture. There is also software for capturing data, and decoding
ASCII telemetry.

If you place this bulletin on a terrestrial packet network,
please use the bulletin identifier $BID:U2RPT155.CWV, to prevent
duplication.

73 Clive G3CWV   xx...@amsat.org (please replace the x's by
g3cwv)





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SO-50 question

2011-04-28 Thread Ronald Nutter
I should know the answer to this one.  I am looking at the satellite data
on SO-50.  How many miles up in orbit is it from the ground (approx). 
Trying to explain to a non-ham how far away the satellite is.

Ron
Ka4kyi

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50 question

2011-04-28 Thread Mark L. Hammond
About 700km above the earth, or 435 miles.  Your range will vary, of
course (it's 700km above you only during a 90 pass! other times, it's
more...)

That's less than the distance between Savannah, GA and Miami, FL!

73,

Mark N8MH

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Ronald Nutter rnut...@networkref.com wrote:
 I should know the answer to this one.  I am looking at the satellite data
 on SO-50.  How many miles up in orbit is it from the ground (approx).
 Trying to explain to a non-ham how far away the satellite is.

 Ron
 Ka4kyi

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




-- 
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Icom D-Star

2011-04-28 Thread Gregg Wonderly
One of the ways to look at the voice codec is as a capacitor, amplifier or 
some other component of you circuit design.  Sure, it's single source, but if 
you are careful about how you put it in, you can provide a switched circuit, 
daughter board or some other path to alternative codecs.  It just depends on 
what your real desire is, and how complicated you want to make your system.
I.e; if you are worried about designing a system with a single source codec, 
don't design it that way.

Sure we have open systems, but we also have single source systems, like 
windows. 
  Many many people are content with saying, if it doesn't run on windows, I'm 
not interested in it because that's all they've ever used.  Or, even worse, I'm 
not supporting anything but windows because I don't know how to do that on 
Linux, or Mac or B-OS or...  Look at what is happening with Apple.  Every 
quarter they are reporting explosive growth in Mac sales (2x from same period a 
year ago for this past quarter) and other items.  That is completely single 
source stuff, but you can run windows or linux on a mac.  People are finding 
value in the package they see and are switching horses so to speak.

Everywhere in life we get to make choices, measure the good vs bad with our own 
skills and experiences etc. In the end, our choices and experiences are 
controlled if not limited by any decision we make.

Don't think about this from the single vendor perspective.  Think about this 
from the what can I do with this technology perspective that is that heart of 
HAM radio experimentation.

Clearly ICOM is now understanding that if you can't access a repeater with 
digital data services, then paying 2x the cost of an analog rig of the same 
caliber just doesn't make sense to most people.  Also, as this discussion has 
illustrated, some of us have no interest in the whole of digital coded data and 
voice.

Gregg Wonderly

On 4/27/2011 9:33 PM, Tony Langdon wrote:
 At 11:33 AM 4/28/2011, you wrote:

 I'd like to point out that it's difficult, at best, to participate when
 you can't roll your own.  There are many codecs available out there
 today that don't require purchasing a license to use.  The biggest
 problem right now is that D-Star isn't backward compatible or you could
 implement one of those freely-licensed codecs now and let people design
 their own implementation.

 Tell that to the likes of G4KLX, KI4LKF, the ircDDB team, PA4YBR, the
 designers and builders of various GMSK modems, and even AA4RC and
 Moe, who designed the DV Dongle hardware (not to mention those who
 are building their own Dongles).  Sure, the codec is proprietary, but
 there are implementations available, from a bare chip (at around $20)
 to the DV Dongle for people to play with.  And there's a LOT of
 tinkering to be done without even decoding the audio, as many of the
 above people can attest to first hand.  As far as I'm concerned, this
 argument is a furphy.  There are open source implementations for just
 about everything else - gateways, repeaters, GMSK modem (using a
 soundcard), routing advertisements (ircDDB), everything except DPlus
 (though there is an open source functional equivalent - DExtra).

 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
 http://vkradio.com

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50 question

2011-04-28 Thread Gould Smith
Hi Ron,

Use a tracking program to help explain this.  The altitude/height for SO-59 
varies between 615-704 km above the earth because of the orbit. The range 
depends upon the maximum elevation that the satellite reaches on each pass.
At the beginning of a pass for SO-50 the range is around 3000km and for each 
pass the range will decrease until it is at TCA. The range at a 90 degree 
pass over a QTH will be the same as the altitude.
The signal will have quite a bit of path loss difference due to the large 
(3000 to 700 km) distances experienced during a pass. Generally the 
beginning and ending signal will be around 3000km and the signal at TCA 
depends upon the maximum elevation for that pass.

Gould
- Original Message - 
From: Ronald Nutter rnut...@networkref.com
To: amsat amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:21 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 question


I should know the answer to this one.  I am looking at the satellite data
 on SO-50.  How many miles up in orbit is it from the ground (approx).
 Trying to explain to a non-ham how far away the satellite is.

 Ron
 Ka4kyi

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] More UT1FG/MM photos

2011-04-28 Thread John Papay
Walner, WP4NYS, sent more photos taken with his phone
during their visit with Yuri UT1FG/MM on the Mottler.
Lots of electronics on that ship.  Thanks Walner!
   http://www.papays.com/sat

73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: A0-51 Reports

2011-04-28 Thread Clint Bradford
NICK ... As soon as I pointed my Elk at AO-51 ... I killed it ...

A pro-Arrow argument if I've ever heard one ... (grin)

But seriously ... Think I wasn't a little trepidatious the first time I 
activated SO-50? I mean,
what if I didn't do it right? Gawd, it would crash right here in my koi pond 
... the 
satellite police would quickly arrive ... the 'cuffs would be too tight ...

Clint, K6LCS 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Surplus cavity bandpass filters from the AO-10 era?

2011-04-28 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message -
From: Bill Dzurilla billdz@yahoo.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7:00 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Surplus cavity bandpass filters from the AO-10 era?

 In attempting to make a list of ham equipment I have owned in the past, I
 recalled with fondness a surplus cavity bandpass filter I used with OSCAR
 10.  At the time, in the 1980s, these were cheap and quite popular with
 satellite users.  I was living in downtown New Orleans, and the filter,
 which was mounted at the antenna next to the mast-mounted preamp, totally
 eliminated my problems with birdies and local cross-mod.

 Does anyone recall this filter and perhaps have a photo or info?

 73, Bill NZ5N

Hi Bill, NZ5N

I suspect that it was a surplus Filter Band Pass F-204/U built for the U.S.
Army by Budd Lewyt Electronics. It is a double cavity filter about 10 long.

The cavities are two in series and the diameter of each gold plated cavity
is 2 while the front panel is blue color 6 wide and 2.5 high with two
tuning black knobs with calibrated dials in channel numbars.

In the bach panel there are two N connectors for input and output.

Originally a set of six or eight cavities was placed into a rack to cover
from about 100 MHz to about 450 MHz.

I have two of them with the original frequency range 374 to 404 MHz and it
was necessary for me to short it by a few millimeters on a milling machine
to get them resonate to 436 MHz for the uplink on OSCAR-10 and OSCAR-13

By the way I was never able to find in the surplus market the model that
resonates to 145 MHz because they were very popular and were used for FM
repeaters but they are cheap and all of them have the same 10 lenght so
that it is easy to mount it at the antenna next to the mast-mounted
preamplifier.

If I am correct please let me know.

Tanks

73 de

i8CVS Domenico

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92

2011-04-28 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi John!

 There are 75 QSL cards in the mail now from Hector, CO6CBF.  Just
 two of them are in envelopes received by Hector, however, he reports
 that since that time, he has received several envelopes from the US.

My CO6CBF QSL card and SASE arrived at my PO box today.   The
envelope appeared to have made the round-trip intact, going first to
Cuba and then for the return trip through Miami and Cleveland.  Many
thanks to John for being the maildrop to get the cards distributed, and -
of course - to Hector for being there for the QSO and then sending the
QSL cards with his friend to the US.

73!





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Icom D-Star -to- A-STAR Gateway

2011-04-28 Thread Bob Bruninga
 Tell that to the likes of G4KLX, KI4LKF, the ircDDB team, 
 PA4YBR, the designers and builders of various GMSK modems, 
 and even AA4RC and Moe, who designed the DV Dongle hardware... 

The real thing that would explode D-star onto the world stage would be if
they implemented an A-STAR gateway into the D-STAR system.  That is a means
to gateway to existing analog users with existing radios.  Then everyone
everywhere could participate in callsign-to-callsign voice contact just like
D-star.

The A-Star gateway does this.  It uses the built-in (APRS) digital signaling
in any of the 8 current models of Kenwood and Yaesu APRS radios to provide
the seamless interface.  The APRS radios can be configured to send out their
CALLSIGN with each release of PTT, thus giving the automatic callsign
identification (Like Dstar).  Further, APRS radio users can signal who they
want to talk to by simply entering an APRS message to the intended callsign
target.

This way, the A-STAR gateway provides the same end-user-to-end-user-by
callsign VOICE calling as Dstar.  On the D-star side of the gatway, all the
A-STAR gateways look like just another D-star repeater.  But on the Analog
side of the A-STAR gateway, it looks like a normal Analog repeater.  
BUT, the analog repeater is listening for the PTT burst with the callsign
ID's.  And the A-star gateway interprets incoming callsign message requests
as requests for a voice link and sets it up as if it was a D-star system.

See how.  www.aprs.org/avrs.html

This is all part of the Automatic Voice Relay Network concept that ties
together all linked voice systems into a universal-by-callsign VOIP system.
It is where APRS has been headed since 2001.  And it is why all the recent
radios from Kenwood and Yaesu can include their operating frequency in their
ID packet and why they can also QSY to a commanded frequency on an incoming
message with the press of a single button.

We just need someone to write the A-star gateway software into the D-star
network.

Bob, WB4APR

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Icom D-Star -to- A-STAR Gateway

2011-04-28 Thread Tony Langdon
At 06:38 AM 4/29/2011, Bob Bruninga wrote:
  Tell that to the likes of G4KLX, KI4LKF, the ircDDB team,
  PA4YBR, the designers and builders of various GMSK modems,
  and even AA4RC and Moe, who designed the DV Dongle hardware...

The real thing that would explode D-star onto the world stage would be if
they implemented an A-STAR gateway into the D-STAR system.  That is a means
to gateway to existing analog users with existing radios.  Then everyone
everywhere could participate in callsign-to-callsign voice contact just like
D-star.

Bob, you're going to get a LOT of resistance to this from the D-STAR 
community.  The idea has merit, and APRS could provide a data channel 
for passing routing information.  Unfortunately, there's a lot of 
purists out there in the D-STAR world.  You might get more traction 
for the idea by going to the ircDDB community, where there's a higher 
proportion of experimenters.  Your A-STAR gateway would likely need 
to be registered with ircDDB (USTRUST/K5TIT certainly wouldn't 
register it), so it would look like a D-STAR gateway to the 
network.  The more I think about it, the more I think there's 
something in this.


The A-Star gateway does this.  It uses the built-in (APRS) digital signaling
in any of the 8 current models of Kenwood and Yaesu APRS radios to provide
the seamless interface.  The APRS radios can be configured to send out their
CALLSIGN with each release of PTT, thus giving the automatic callsign
identification (Like Dstar).  Further, APRS radio users can signal who they
want to talk to by simply entering an APRS message to the intended callsign
target.

Can the message be sent on every key down?  i.e. store the message 
and then program the radio to repeat the same message every time you 
hit PTT?  This is what would be needed to use D-STAR's callsign 
routing.  I noticed there's quite a few APRS capable radios out there 
now.  I was almost tempted to buy one, but that came after knowing I 
have to watch the budget for the time being.  It's on the wish list.


This is all part of the Automatic Voice Relay Network concept that ties
together all linked voice systems into a universal-by-callsign VOIP system.
It is where APRS has been headed since 2001.  And it is why all the recent
radios from Kenwood and Yaesu can include their operating frequency in their
ID packet and why they can also QSY to a commanded frequency on an incoming
message with the press of a single button.

Unfortunately, in Australia, we will have to keep D-STAR (and any 
A-STAR gateways would be considered as part of D-STAR for this 
purpose) separate to IRLP and Echolink, because bridging the two 
would lead to a very high risk of licence breaches, due to how our 
regulations work, combined with the bands that the IRLP and Echolink 
systems are on (A-STAR gateways would be advertised as such and CTCSS 
access to avoid accidental access by Foundation calls and the legal 
implications thereof).


We just need someone to write the A-star gateway software into the D-star
network.

I suggest you ask around the ircDDB community, as that's where the 
software development and home brew gateway efforts are centred, 
because there's much more room for experimentation there than on 
K5TIT.  The idea is interesting and certainly has merit.

73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] YouTube - O/OREOS Nanosat Project - Richard Quinn (SETI Talks)

2011-04-28 Thread Trevor .
O/OREOS Nanosat Project - Richard Quinn (SETI Talks) 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TE5vZf7w3ec 

73 Trevor M5AKA


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] MMDS Downconv Information

2011-04-28 Thread Giulio P. AOL

 

 Hi Guys, i have a couple of California Amplifier Part. 130015 and 13001, does 
anyone have some info's on how to modify the internal IF (2278 Mhz) to a new 
value below 2000 Mhz? 
Thanks

Giulio AB2VY
Toms River NJ 08756


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 reports

2011-04-28 Thread Jeremy Bomkamp
A pro-Arrow argument if I've ever heard one ... (grin)

But seriously ... Think I wasn't a little trepidatious the first time I 
activated SO-50? I mean,
what if I didn't do it right? Gawd, it would crash right here in my koi pond 
... the 
satellite police would quickly arrive ... the 'cuffs would be too tight ...

Clint, K6LCS But you know what they say, they are tight now but they will 
stretch a little when you get used to them
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

2011-04-28 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message -
From: Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:10 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] MMDS Downconv Information

  Hi Guys, i have a couple of California Amplifier Part. 130015 and 13001,
does anyone have some info's on how  to modify the internal IF (2278 Mhz)
to a new value below 2000 Mhz?
 Thanks

 Giulio AB2VY
 Toms River NJ 08756

Hi Giulio, AB2VY

The friend Al, W8KHP

w8...@amsat.org  or tok...@myranch.com

was recently looking for the same information, see belowe.

http://www.mail-archive.com/amsat-bb@amsat.org/msg13048.html

He probably already found what you need.

73 de

i8CVS Domenico

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Stunning Interactive Sky Image

2011-04-28 Thread Clint Bradford
This stunning 360 degree panorama of the night sky was stitched together from 
37,000 images by a first-timer astrophotographer.


http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/index/~3/zfQSWSOoTy4/

'Cuse me while I close my jaw ... which had dropped open while experiencing 
this.

Clint, K6LCS
 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92

2011-04-28 Thread David Maciel


Need to ask something, may be silly to some:

- The ARRL can give an account of LoTW  for Hector ...?
or hector can create ..? is it possible ..?

That would be the best solution for him, and also find a QSL manager.

Thanks if anyone can answer the first question.

if you think I can help in mexico to be a bridge to Hector via airmail 
I'm ready to help, many years ago sent a box to Cuba for the Cuban
Federation of Amateur radio equipment too old, no problem, not if 
Now everything has changed from Mexico to Cuba.


Dave
XE3DX

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Working To Hector CO6CBF

2011-04-28 Thread David Maciel

I am away from home for 20 days, Hector informed me that sent a 
QSL card to me when I go home I know if I get the mail. then I will 
reply confirming for the EK36, EK19 and EK18. I have worked for
these grids.

David
XE3DX


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

2011-04-28 Thread jmfranke
Start at:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=ruu=http://www.cqham.ru/ao40_equip.htmei=mrGkTJHfOJDSsAO6ypT-Dgsa=Xoi=translatect=resultresnum=9ved=0CDwQ7gEwCDgKprev=/search%3Fq%3DCalamp%2B31732%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26prmd%3Div


John  WA4WDL

--
From: i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:29 PM
To: Amsat - BBs amsat-bb@amsat.org; Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

 - Original Message -
 From: Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:10 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] MMDS Downconv Information

  Hi Guys, i have a couple of California Amplifier Part. 130015 and 13001,
 does anyone have some info's on how  to modify the internal IF (2278 Mhz)
 to a new value below 2000 Mhz?
 Thanks

 Giulio AB2VY
 Toms River NJ 08756

 Hi Giulio, AB2VY

 The friend Al, W8KHP

 w8...@amsat.org  or tok...@myranch.com

 was recently looking for the same information, see belowe.

 http://www.mail-archive.com/amsat-bb@amsat.org/msg13048.html

 He probably already found what you need.

 73 de

 i8CVS Domenico

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92

2011-04-28 Thread Rick Tejera
Mine came today as well, again, john, thanks for facilitating this. 
Much appreciated

Clear Skies

Rick Tejera
Editor SACnews,
Public Outreach Coordinator
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix, Arizona
www.saguaroastro.org
saguaroas...@cox.net 
K7TEJ, AMSAT 38452

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Yanko P. Yankov
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 16:36
To: amsat...@wd9ewk.net
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92

Hi John! 

I received my CO6CBF QSL card as well . Thank you for forwarding the card to
me :o) Very special thanks to Hector for activating that gird . 

Yanko aka NX9G 

- Original Message -

From: Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) amsat...@wd9ewk.net 
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 2:27:31 PM 
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92 

Hi John! 

 There are 75 QSL cards in the mail now from Hector, CO6CBF. Just 
 two of them are in envelopes received by Hector, however, he reports 
 that since that time, he has received several envelopes from the US. 

My CO6CBF QSL card and SASE arrived at my PO box today. The 
envelope appeared to have made the round-trip intact, going first to 
Cuba and then for the return trip through Miami and Cleveland. Many 
thanks to John for being the maildrop to get the cards distributed, and - 
of course - to Hector for being there for the QSO and then sending the 
QSL cards with his friend to the US. 

73! 





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK 
http://www.wd9ewk.net/ 

___ 
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

2011-04-28 Thread jmfranke
You might want to check those numbers, I believe the second might be a 
common model 130001 downconverter. I am working on an article showing how to 
modify the local oscillator and to use the FB506 prescaler as part of a 10 
Hz to 2.8 GHz frequency counter.

John  WA4WDL

--
From: i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:29 PM
To: Amsat - BBs amsat-bb@amsat.org; Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

 - Original Message -
 From: Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:10 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] MMDS Downconv Information

  Hi Guys, i have a couple of California Amplifier Part. 130015 and 13001,
 does anyone have some info's on how  to modify the internal IF (2278 Mhz)
 to a new value below 2000 Mhz?
 Thanks

 Giulio AB2VY
 Toms River NJ 08756

 Hi Giulio, AB2VY

 The friend Al, W8KHP

 w8...@amsat.org  or tok...@myranch.com

 was recently looking for the same information, see belowe.

 http://www.mail-archive.com/amsat-bb@amsat.org/msg13048.html

 He probably already found what you need.

 73 de

 i8CVS Domenico

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

2011-04-28 Thread jmfranke
Or try:

http://www.cqham.ru/image2/cal-amp-dc_big.gif

John  WA4WDL

--
From: jmfranke jmfra...@cox.net
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:10 PM
To: i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it; Amsat - BBs amsat-bb@amsat.org; 
Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

 Start at:

 http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=ruu=http://www.cqham.ru/ao40_equip.htmei=mrGkTJHfOJDSsAO6ypT-Dgsa=Xoi=translatect=resultresnum=9ved=0CDwQ7gEwCDgKprev=/search%3Fq%3DCalamp%2B31732%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26prmd%3Div


 John  WA4WDL

 --
 From: i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it
 Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:29 PM
 To: Amsat - BBs amsat-bb@amsat.org; Giulio P. AOL 
 giulio...@aim.com
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MMDS Downconv Information

 - Original Message -
 From: Giulio P. AOL giulio...@aim.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:10 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] MMDS Downconv Information

  Hi Guys, i have a couple of California Amplifier Part. 130015 and 
 13001,
 does anyone have some info's on how  to modify the internal IF (2278 
 Mhz)
 to a new value below 2000 Mhz?
 Thanks

 Giulio AB2VY
 Toms River NJ 08756

 Hi Giulio, AB2VY

 The friend Al, W8KHP

 w8...@amsat.org  or tok...@myranch.com

 was recently looking for the same information, see belowe.

 http://www.mail-archive.com/amsat-bb@amsat.org/msg13048.html

 He probably already found what you need.

 73 de

 i8CVS Domenico

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
 program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92

2011-04-28 Thread KM9U
It was great to receive Hector's very nice QSL card in the mail today!
I have started uploading my contacts to LOTW for the benefit of those that 
use it. However, it is of no use to me because:
1) I am not an ARRL member so I am not eligible to apply for their awards. 
The QSL cards I receive are, themselves, my awards. I have nothing against 
the ARRL but all the money I have budgeted for amateur radio organizations 
goes to AMSAT.
2) The internet, email, etc., are great but can't provide the thrill I get 
when I open my mailbox and find a real, honest-to-goodness QSL card. Yes, I 
know postage and printing costs money and if I didn't spend the money on 
postage, paper, and ink, I could afford to donate more to AMSAT.

Evidently, many of you agree with me because, to date, I have mailed 423 QSL 
cards and have received 304. That is a much higher percentage than 
verifications I have gotten via LOTW.

73,
Chuck, KM9U

- Original Message - 
From: David Maciel xe...@prodigy.net.mx
To: Grupo Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 21:48
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92




 Need to ask something, may be silly to some:

 - The ARRL can give an account of LoTW  for Hector ...?
 or hector can create ..? is it possible ..?

 That would be the best solution for him, and also find a QSL manager.

 Thanks if anyone can answer the first question.

 if you think I can help in mexico to be a bridge to Hector via airmail
 I'm ready to help, many years ago sent a box to Cuba for the Cuban
 Federation of Amateur radio equipment too old, no problem, not if
 Now everything has changed from Mexico to Cuba.


 Dave
 XE3DX

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Hector CO6CBF EL92

2011-04-28 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Chuck!

 It was great to receive Hector's very nice QSL card in the mail today!
 I have started uploading my contacts to LOTW for the benefit of those that
 use it.

Great!  Thanks for those uploads to LOTW.

 Evidently, many of you agree with me because, to date, I have mailed 423 QSL
 cards and have received 304. That is a much higher percentage than
 verifications I have gotten via LOTW.

That might not be entirely correct.  LOTW has only been available for
VUCC applications for 3 months, and many satellite operators have
not bothered with LOTW until that announcement.  I do enjoy sending
and receiving QSL cards, and have not stopped that even though I am
also uploading QSOs to LOTW.  More stations are uploading satellite
QSOs to LOTW, and now ARRL needs to start processing the VUCC
applications it has (among those, my initial satellite VUCC application).

73!





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb