Re: [Apertium-stuff] genv*dix.py need conversion
Perfect! And when could they be available in the apertium.org website? Currently, the old versions are working, which i.a. do not include cat to ita and cat to por_br. Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dv., 4 d’oct. 2019 a les 15:56: > This is all fixed, and I have pushed new versions of all the core tools to > Debian. They're working their way through the queues. > > -- Tino Didriksen > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 14:32, Hèctor Alòs i Font > wrote: > >> Sorry, but which is the current situation of this thread? Is there still >> an issue that prevents the publication of the new versions of cat-ita and >> por-cat? >> Hèctor >> > ___ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] genv*dix.py need conversion
This is all fixed, and I have pushed new versions of all the core tools to Debian. They're working their way through the queues. -- Tino Didriksen On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 14:32, Hèctor Alòs i Font wrote: > Sorry, but which is the current situation of this thread? Is there still > an issue that prevents the publication of the new versions of cat-ita and > por-cat? > Hèctor > ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
Re: [Apertium-stuff] genv*dix.py need conversion
Sorry, but which is the current situation of this thread? Is there still an issue that prevents the publication of the new versions of cat-ita and por-cat? Hèctor Missatge de Kevin Brubeck Unhammer del dia ds., 14 de set. 2019 a les 13:35: > Daniel Swanson > čálii: > > > With regards to metalrx features, wouldn't it be better (and in some ways > > easier) to incorporate them directly into lrx-comp? > > > > I just opened a PR for adding : > > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-lex-tools/pull/32. and > > would be a bit trickier, but should still be fairly doable. > > I'd definitely prefer that – my metalrx.xslt was never meant as > anything but a stopgap until Someone fixed it in C++, thanks =D > ___ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
