Re: Question about incident scripts

2012-09-30 Thread ratul banerjee
Jose,

 The best way to provide technical instructions to service desk is through
RKM. If you have a well managed Product and operational categorization in
your system, the associated RKM articles will show after the incident is
created and they can take advantage of that. Using RKM helps you have
central well managed,most accurate and updated information. Service desk
can download or copy the information for offline reference.

Ratul

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén <
arsl...@theremedyforit.com> wrote:

> ** My intention is to add some kind of technical instruction to the
> script. Thus the service desk staff can follow it before escalating the
> incident to second layer.
> Don't know if it's the best option, but it's the one i'm exploring right
> now.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Jose Manuel Huerta
> http://theremedyforit.com/
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tauf Chowdhury wrote:
>
>> **
>> Jose,
>> This won't solve your dilemma with the initiator script but I've noticed
>> a trend of users moving away from this functionality and going more towards
>> using a KMS whether it be RKM or some other knowledge management tool. The
>> attachment and even the script you're talking about is really just a
>> knowledge artifact and should be tracked as such. When you maintain it in
>> the initiator script area, it just adds another layer of administration
>> overhead for whoever is managing the knowledge base. Again, sorry this
>> doesn't answer your question but it's an alternative.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 30, 2012, at 7:38 AM, "Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén" <
>> arsl...@theremedyforit.com> wrote:
>>
>>  ** When I say users, I mean remedy users. That's the support staff.
>>
>> Currently to start an initiator script they click on the menu, and the
>> sript selector opens. They can select an script and edit the text. But they
>> can't see the attachments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jose Manuel Huerta
>> http://theremedyforit.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Roger J  wrote:
>>
>>> s. If your end users are actually using the Incident form to create
>>> their own Incidents you would need to give them permissions that they
>>> should not have to see a script.
>>
>>
>> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Question about incident scripts

2012-09-30 Thread Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén
My intention is to add some kind of technical instruction to the script.
Thus the service desk staff can follow it before escalating the incident to
second layer.
Don't know if it's the best option, but it's the one i'm exploring right
now.

Thanks again!

Jose Manuel Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/




On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tauf Chowdhury  wrote:

> **
> Jose,
> This won't solve your dilemma with the initiator script but I've noticed a
> trend of users moving away from this functionality and going more towards
> using a KMS whether it be RKM or some other knowledge management tool. The
> attachment and even the script you're talking about is really just a
> knowledge artifact and should be tracked as such. When you maintain it in
> the initiator script area, it just adds another layer of administration
> overhead for whoever is managing the knowledge base. Again, sorry this
> doesn't answer your question but it's an alternative.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 30, 2012, at 7:38 AM, "Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén" <
> arsl...@theremedyforit.com> wrote:
>
> ** When I say users, I mean remedy users. That's the support staff.
>
> Currently to start an initiator script they click on the menu, and the
> sript selector opens. They can select an script and edit the text. But they
> can't see the attachments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jose Manuel Huerta
> http://theremedyforit.com/
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Roger J  wrote:
>
>> s. If your end users are actually using the Incident form to create their
>> own Incidents you would need to give them permissions that they should not
>> have to see a script.
>
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Question about incident scripts

2012-09-30 Thread Tauf Chowdhury
Jose,
This won't solve your dilemma with the initiator script but I've noticed a
trend of users moving away from this functionality and going more towards
using a KMS whether it be RKM or some other knowledge management tool. The
attachment and even the script you're talking about is really just a
knowledge artifact and should be tracked as such. When you maintain it in
the initiator script area, it just adds another layer of administration
overhead for whoever is managing the knowledge base. Again, sorry this
doesn't answer your question but it's an alternative.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 30, 2012, at 7:38 AM, "Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén" <
arsl...@theremedyforit.com> wrote:

** When I say users, I mean remedy users. That's the support staff.

Currently to start an initiator script they click on the menu, and the
sript selector opens. They can select an script and edit the text. But they
can't see the attachments.

Thanks,

Jose Manuel Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/




On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Roger J  wrote:

> s. If your end users are actually using the Incident form to create their
> own Incidents you would need to give them permissions that they should not
> have to see a script.


_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Question about incident scripts

2012-09-30 Thread Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén
When I say users, I mean remedy users. That's the support staff.

Currently to start an initiator script they click on the menu, and the
sript selector opens. They can select an script and edit the text. But they
can't see the attachments.

Thanks,

Jose Manuel Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/




On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Roger J  wrote:

> s. If your end users are actually using the Incident form to create their
> own Incidents you would need to give them permissions that they should not
> have to see a script.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Question about incident scripts

2012-09-29 Thread Roger J

Scripts are for Support Personnel not end users. If your end users are actually 
using the Incident form to create their own Incidents you would need to give 
them permissions that they should not have to see a script.


-Original Message-
From: Jose Manuel Huerta Gu
 illén 
To: arslist 
Sent: Sat, Sep 29, 2012 3:48 pm
Subject: Question about incident scripts


**Hi listers,


I have, what I think, a very silly question. How can users access to the 
attachments of an script?


When you create an incident script you can attach some troubleshooting 
documentation. My intention was to allow users that read the script to download 
the docs. But seems impossible. So, What's the intention of these attachments?


We are using ITSM 7.6.0 with ARS 7.5.0. 


Regards,

Jose Manuel Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/




_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com  ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Question about incident scripts

2012-09-29 Thread Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén
Hi listers,

I have, what I think, a very silly question. How can users access to the
attachments of an script?

When you create an incident script you can attach some troubleshooting
documentation. My intention was to allow users that read the script to
download the docs. But seems impossible. So, What's the intention of these
attachments?

We are using ITSM 7.6.0 with ARS 7.5.0.

Regards,

Jose Manuel Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Incident Scripts

2011-05-25 Thread Benedetto Cantatore
In your case this is a disadvantage, but makes sense for the companies
that want to provide scripts that are specific to only certain support
groups.  
 
I did this for templates; I created a dummy group and made every
support person a member of that group.  That way whenever I needed to
make a template available to all, I merely permission it for that group.
 I think that should work for you as well for scripts.
 
Ben Cantatore
Remedy Manager
(914) 457-6209
 
Emerging Health IT
3 Odell Plaza
Yonkers, New York 10701

>>> moe.abdela...@gmail.com 05/25/11 11:46 AM >>>

** 
Is there any reason behind the way BMC developed this piece as being
locked/accessible only to explicit groups?

In our situation, we have 214 support groups and we need to associate
about 23 scripts. That means 23*214 = 4922 script mappings that need to
be loaded into the system. Imagine if the number tripled, that means
69*214 = 14766 mappings.

Does anyone else suffer from this limitation or restriction?
Any work around or we need to do our own customization to make the each
script available to all groups?
 
ARS: 7.5.04
ITSM: 7.6.00
DB: Oracle 10g 
-- 
Mohamed Abdelaziz

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Incident Scripts

2011-05-25 Thread Danny Kellett
Hi,

 

We recommend a shared template and a shared scripts group. Then we added our
support people to that group as standard. Then all the shared
templates/scripts are for the shared group.

 

Hope this helps

Regards

Danny

 

Single Sign On (SSO) for the BMC Remedy AR System and ITSM

http://www.javasystemsolutions.com/jss/ssoplugin

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mohamed Abdelaziz
Sent: 25 May 2011 16:47
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Incident Scripts

 

** 

Is there any reason behind the way BMC developed this piece as being
locked/accessible only to explicit groups?

 
In our situation, we have 214 support groups and we need to associate about
23 scripts. That means 23*214 = 4922 script mappings that need to be loaded
into the system. Imagine if the number tripled, that means 69*214 = 14766
mappings.

 
Does anyone else suffer from this limitation or restriction?

 
Any work around or we need to do our own customization to make the each
script available to all groups?

 

ARS: 7.5.04

ITSM: 7.6.00

DB: Oracle 10g 

-- 
Mohamed Abdelaziz

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Incident Scripts

2011-05-25 Thread Mohamed Abdelaziz
Is there any reason behind the way BMC developed this piece as being
locked/accessible only to explicit groups?


In our situation, we have 214 support groups and we need to associate about
23 scripts. That means 23*214 = 4922 script mappings that need to be loaded
into the system. Imagine if the number tripled, that means 69*214 = 14766
mappings.


Does anyone else suffer from this limitation or restriction?

Any work around or we need to do our own customization to make the each
script available to all groups?

ARS: 7.5.04
ITSM: 7.6.00
DB: Oracle 10g

-- 
Mohamed Abdelaziz



-- 
Mohamed Abdelaziz

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Incident Scripts

2011-05-25 Thread Mohamed Abdelaziz
Is there any reason behind the way BMC developed this piece as being
locked/accessible only to explicit groups?


In our situation, we have 214 support groups and we need to associate about
23 scripts. That means 23*214 = 4922 script mappings that need to be loaded
into the system. Imagine if the number tripled, that means 69*214 = 14766
mappings.


Does anyone else suffer from this limitation or restriction?

Any work around or we need to do our own customization to make the each
script available to all groups?

ARS: 7.5.04
ITSM: 7.6.00
DB: Oracle 10g

-- 
Mohamed Abdelaziz

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"