Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Nathan Vegdahl
Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:

Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
And ridding it of the weird and obscure quirks it currently has.  I
could be wrong, but that seems like one of the biggest production
bottlenecks that Blender currently faces.  It certainly made a lot of
things painful on Sintel.

We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
anyway, just via Python scripts.  But it was a terrible user
experience, error prone, and impractical for doing any kind of complex
animation since it had to be scripted.

--Nathan

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
 Hi all,

 Here are the notes from today's meeting in irc.freenode.net #blendercoders.

 1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release

 - Planning for release didn't change:
  http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects

 - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
   https://developer.blender.org/T38371

 - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
 https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/

 - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths (like 
 Japanese).
 https://developer.blender.org/T35176
 Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.

 - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or update 
 scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need help.

 - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the 
 'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It still 
 needs to be reviewed though.

 2) Other projects

 - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender 
 Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
 http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/

 - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be online 
 this week.

 - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render in 
 Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
 http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK

 A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR render 
 future:
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr

 Thanks,

 -Ton-

 
 Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
 Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
 Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands



 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Pablo Vazquez
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Vegdahl ces...@cessen.com wrote:

 Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:

 Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
 making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.


+!


 We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
 layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
 overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
 anyway, just via Python scripts.


For simulation and pretty much everywhere. Changing Scales from a wounded
dragon to a healthy one is just a matter of a couple py lines. If something
like this could have a better user experience and control, it would be huge.



 --Nathan

 On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  Here are the notes from today's meeting in irc.freenode.net#blendercoders.
 
  1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
 
  - Planning for release didn't change:
   http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
 
  - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
https://developer.blender.org/T38371
 
  - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
  https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
 
  - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths
 (like Japanese).
  https://developer.blender.org/T35176
  Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
 
  - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or
 update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need
 help.
 
  - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the
 'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It
 still needs to be reviewed though.
 
  2) Other projects
 
  - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender
 Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
  http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
 
  - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be
 online this week.
 
  - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render
 in Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
  http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
 
  A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR
 render future:
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Ton-
 
  
  Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
  Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
  Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
 
 
 
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Bassam Kurdali
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:48 -0800, Nathan Vegdahl wrote:
 Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:
 
 Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
 making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
 And ridding it of the weird and obscure quirks it currently has.  I
 could be wrong, but that seems like one of the biggest production
 bottlenecks that Blender currently faces.  It certainly made a lot of
 things painful on Sintel.
+1 -though maybe 'proxy' itself doesn't need to remain, just a way of
overriding in a more generic way - I guess it could be called proxy, but
I'm thinking 'more like the way' python overriding works, but in the UI
instead: I guess that's what you mean by 'RNA layering system' below.
 
 We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
 layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
 overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
 anyway, just via Python scripts.  But it was a terrible user
 experience, error prone, and impractical for doing any kind of complex
 animation since it had to be scripted.
We have been making custom scripts with UIs in wires for empathy for the
same thing: basically creating local scene properties and a toolbox
interface, to override specific linked properties. It is pretty solid,
but, you do have to plan ahead for every single override, creating a
bottleneck on scripters/riggers to make things available. It also is
cumbersome from an animation perspective (you would have to do on frame
change update handlers for any properties you need animated) - but the
fact that this stuff can be kludged via python is encouraging that it
might be implementable as a 'proper' design.
 
 --Nathan
 
 On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  Here are the notes from today's meeting in irc.freenode.net #blendercoders.
 
  1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
 
  - Planning for release didn't change:
   http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
 
  - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
https://developer.blender.org/T38371
 
  - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
  https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
 
  - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths (like 
  Japanese).
  https://developer.blender.org/T35176
  Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
 
  - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or 
  update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need 
  help.
 
  - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the 
  'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It 
  still needs to be reviewed though.
 
  2) Other projects
 
  - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender 
  Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
  http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
 
  - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be online 
  this week.
 
  - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render in 
  Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
  http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
 
  A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR render 
  future:
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Ton-
 
  
  Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
  Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
  Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
 
 
 
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Francesco Paglia
I strongly rely on linked libraries but as pointed out by Bassam if you
don't carefully plan everything you have no chance to locally override
specific properties.
Unfortunately I'm always in a hurry and there's never time to cope with
complex python scripts...
The ability to proxyfy properties, or whatever you like to call it,
 would be one of the major improvement I could benefit!



2014-02-13 19:59 GMT+01:00 Bassam Kurdali bas...@urchn.org:

 On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:48 -0800, Nathan Vegdahl wrote:
  Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:
 
  Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
  making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
  And ridding it of the weird and obscure quirks it currently has.  I
  could be wrong, but that seems like one of the biggest production
  bottlenecks that Blender currently faces.  It certainly made a lot of
  things painful on Sintel.
 +1 -though maybe 'proxy' itself doesn't need to remain, just a way of
 overriding in a more generic way - I guess it could be called proxy, but
 I'm thinking 'more like the way' python overriding works, but in the UI
 instead: I guess that's what you mean by 'RNA layering system' below.
 
  We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
  layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
  overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
  anyway, just via Python scripts.  But it was a terrible user
  experience, error prone, and impractical for doing any kind of complex
  animation since it had to be scripted.
 We have been making custom scripts with UIs in wires for empathy for the
 same thing: basically creating local scene properties and a toolbox
 interface, to override specific linked properties. It is pretty solid,
 but, you do have to plan ahead for every single override, creating a
 bottleneck on scripters/riggers to make things available. It also is
 cumbersome from an animation perspective (you would have to do on frame
 change update handlers for any properties you need animated) - but the
 fact that this stuff can be kludged via python is encouraging that it
 might be implementable as a 'proper' design.
 
  --Nathan
 
  On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   Here are the notes from today's meeting in irc.freenode.net#blendercoders.
  
   1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
  
   - Planning for release didn't change:
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
  
   - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
 https://developer.blender.org/T38371
  
   - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
   https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
  
   - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths
 (like Japanese).
   https://developer.blender.org/T35176
   Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
  
   - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or
 update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need
 help.
  
   - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the
 'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It
 still needs to be reviewed though.
  
   2) Other projects
  
   - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender
 Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
   http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
  
   - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be
 online this week.
  
   - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR
 render in Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
   http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
  
   A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR
 render future:
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
  
   Thanks,
  
   -Ton-
  
   
   Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
   Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
   Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
  
  
  
   ___
   Bf-committers mailing list
   Bf-committers@blender.org
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers




-- 
Francesco Paglia
Vfx and Production Supervisor

mobile  +39 347.82.12.473
e-mail   f.paglia...@gmail.com
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Bassam Kurdali
+0001 ;)
Oh one more thing:
The current system relies heavily on groups + proxies for overrides.

Among the current limitations of the system right now is that there is
no way to make an instance 'unique' with flexibility: cycles has some
tricks for shaders, but animation is copied to all instances.

While this is good for rendering huge scenes, it is a limitation for
doing e.g. crowds- could be part of the discussion as well, at least on
how to make such things possible.

Cheers
Bassam
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 16:37 -0200, Pablo Vazquez wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Vegdahl ces...@cessen.com wrote:
 
  Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:
 
  Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
  making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
 
 
 +!
 
 
  We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
  layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
  overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
  anyway, just via Python scripts.
 
 
 For simulation and pretty much everywhere. Changing Scales from a wounded
 dragon to a healthy one is just a matter of a couple py lines. If something
 like this could have a better user experience and control, it would be huge.
 
 
 
  --Nathan
 
  On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   Here are the notes from today's meeting in irc.freenode.net#blendercoders.
  
   1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
  
   - Planning for release didn't change:
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
  
   - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
 https://developer.blender.org/T38371
  
   - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
   https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
  
   - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths
  (like Japanese).
   https://developer.blender.org/T35176
   Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
  
   - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or
  update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need
  help.
  
   - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the
  'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It
  still needs to be reviewed though.
  
   2) Other projects
  
   - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender
  Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
   http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
  
   - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be
  online this week.
  
   - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render
  in Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
   http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
  
   A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR
  render future:
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
  
   Thanks,
  
   -Ton-
  
   
   Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
   Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
   Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
  
  
  
   ___
   Bf-committers mailing list
   Bf-committers@blender.org
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 
 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Daniel Salazar - patazstudio.com
Hopefully this can also apply to point data itself so we can use
AnimAll functionality on a proxyfied group!
Daniel Salazar
patazstudio.com


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bassam Kurdali bas...@urchn.org wrote:
 +0001 ;)
 Oh one more thing:
 The current system relies heavily on groups + proxies for overrides.

 Among the current limitations of the system right now is that there is
 no way to make an instance 'unique' with flexibility: cycles has some
 tricks for shaders, but animation is copied to all instances.

 While this is good for rendering huge scenes, it is a limitation for
 doing e.g. crowds- could be part of the discussion as well, at least on
 how to make such things possible.

 Cheers
 Bassam
 On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 16:37 -0200, Pablo Vazquez wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Vegdahl ces...@cessen.com wrote:

  Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:
 
  Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
  making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
 

 +!


  We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
  layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
  overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
  anyway, just via Python scripts.
 

 For simulation and pretty much everywhere. Changing Scales from a wounded
 dragon to a healthy one is just a matter of a couple py lines. If something
 like this could have a better user experience and control, it would be huge.


 
  --Nathan
 
  On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   Here are the notes from today's meeting in 
   irc.freenode.net#blendercoders.
  
   1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
  
   - Planning for release didn't change:
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
  
   - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
 https://developer.blender.org/T38371
  
   - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
   https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
  
   - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths
  (like Japanese).
   https://developer.blender.org/T35176
   Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
  
   - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or
  update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need
  help.
  
   - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the
  'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It
  still needs to be reviewed though.
  
   2) Other projects
  
   - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender
  Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
   http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
  
   - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be
  online this week.
  
   - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render
  in Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
   http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
  
   A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR
  render future:
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
  
   Thanks,
  
   -Ton-
  
   
   Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
   Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
   Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
  
  
  
   ___
   Bf-committers mailing list
   Bf-committers@blender.org
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 
 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Bassam Kurdali
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:24 -0600, Daniel Salazar - patazstudio.com
wrote:
 Hopefully this can also apply to point data itself so we can use
 AnimAll functionality on a proxyfied group!
 Daniel Salazar
 patazstudio.com
+1000
we were talking about this recently and mentioned that this will make
blender animations *better* not just 'easier'. Why? 
working on local characters is terrible for workflow, but you can do so
much little nuanced secondary stuff that isn't in the rig, essentially
sculpting your character with shapes, anim, warp modifiers, etc.

groups/linked files are so needed for making a bigger project feasible,
but it kind of means that you have to throw out the 'good stuff' - or
resort to horrendously massive rigs and/or cumbersome workarounds.


 
 
 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bassam Kurdali bas...@urchn.org wrote:
  +0001 ;)
  Oh one more thing:
  The current system relies heavily on groups + proxies for overrides.
 
  Among the current limitations of the system right now is that there is
  no way to make an instance 'unique' with flexibility: cycles has some
  tricks for shaders, but animation is copied to all instances.
 
  While this is good for rendering huge scenes, it is a limitation for
  doing e.g. crowds- could be part of the discussion as well, at least on
  how to make such things possible.
 
  Cheers
  Bassam
  On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 16:37 -0200, Pablo Vazquez wrote:
  On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Vegdahl ces...@cessen.com wrote:
 
   Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:
  
   Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
   making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
  
 
  +!
 
 
   We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
   layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
   overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
   anyway, just via Python scripts.
  
 
  For simulation and pretty much everywhere. Changing Scales from a wounded
  dragon to a healthy one is just a matter of a couple py lines. If something
  like this could have a better user experience and control, it would be 
  huge.
 
 
  
   --Nathan
  
   On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
Hi all,
   
Here are the notes from today's meeting in 
irc.freenode.net#blendercoders.
   
1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
   
- Planning for release didn't change:
 http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
   
- Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
  https://developer.blender.org/T38371
   
- Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
   
- Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths
   (like Japanese).
https://developer.blender.org/T35176
Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
   
- Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or
   update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need
   help.
   
- Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the
   'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It
   still needs to be reviewed though.
   
2) Other projects
   
- Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender
   Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
   
- Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be
   online this week.
   
- After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render
   in Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
   
A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR
   render future:
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
   
Thanks,
   
-Ton-
   

Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   www.blender.org
Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
   
   
   
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
   ___
   Bf-committers mailing list
   Bf-committers@blender.org
   http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
  
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 
 
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 ___
 

[Bf-committers] Camera options proposal (Cycles)

2014-02-13 Thread ertuqueque
Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place for this proposal/discussion or
if the Cycles mail list would've been better, but I'd like to propose a
couple of feature/parameters for the cameras in Cycles. I'm posting a link
(Google Drive) to a short PDF I prepared with the proposal and interface
mockups.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9-4MQo-2HDqUVJvWmg2bEJTd1k/edit?usp=sharing

Thank you in advance.
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Camera options proposal (Cycles)

2014-02-13 Thread Dalai Felinto
Hi Robin,

For your first option you may be interested on the following patch:
https://developer.blender.org/T35428

It adds the ability of adding a deformation map to your lens.
It's not as neat as a drag  drop control, but it should be able to
get to the effect you are looking for.

Cheers,
Dalai
--
blendernetwork.org/dalai-felinto
www.dalaifelinto.com


2014-02-13 20:36 GMT-02:00 ertuqueque ertuque...@gmail.com:
 Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place for this proposal/discussion or
 if the Cycles mail list would've been better, but I'd like to propose a
 couple of feature/parameters for the cameras in Cycles. I'm posting a link
 (Google Drive) to a short PDF I prepared with the proposal and interface
 mockups.

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9-4MQo-2HDqUVJvWmg2bEJTd1k/edit?usp=sharing

 Thank you in advance.
 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes, February 9, 2014

2014-02-13 Thread Nathan Vegdahl
 +1 -though maybe 'proxy' itself doesn't need to remain, just a way of
 overriding in a more generic way

Agreed.  As useful as the proxy system has been, it's really time to
put it to rest in favor of something much more flexible, robust, and
generic.

 I'm thinking 'more like the way' python overriding works, but in the UI
 instead: I guess that's what you mean by 'RNA layering system' below.

Yes, that's what I meant. :-)  I also think it's important to plan for
even more flexibility than that.  An 'RNA layering system' would be
the foundation, and provide some nice basic guarantees about things
you can do override locally.  But ultimately we also want to support
things like locally added/overridden shape keys, vertex groups,
modifiers, materials, physics... the list goes on.

But even just basic RNA value overriding would be a good start.

And it doesn't have to be an all-at-once kind of thing.  It can be a
migratory kind of thing.  E.g. the proxy system can still be
maintained in parallel until things actually get to the point where
it's fully redundant.

In any case, I just wanted to get the conversation started, because
this is one of those un-sexy problems that's easy to overlook and
ignore because it's not fun.  But it desperately needs to be addressed
at some point (I'm hoping sooner rather than later).

--Nathan


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Bassam Kurdali bas...@urchn.org wrote:
 On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:48 -0800, Nathan Vegdahl wrote:
 Regarding the Gooseberry meeting:

 Is this a good time to finally revisit the proxy system as well?  I.e.
 making it useful for all object types and data, not just Armatures.
 And ridding it of the weird and obscure quirks it currently has.  I
 could be wrong, but that seems like one of the biggest production
 bottlenecks that Blender currently faces.  It certainly made a lot of
 things painful on Sintel.
 +1 -though maybe 'proxy' itself doesn't need to remain, just a way of
 overriding in a more generic way - I guess it could be called proxy, but
 I'm thinking 'more like the way' python overriding works, but in the UI
 instead: I guess that's what you mean by 'RNA layering system' below.

 We had discussed at the time changing it to some kind of RNA
 layering system, where linked data could have its RNA values locally
 overridden.  We were essentially doing that on Sintel for simulation
 anyway, just via Python scripts.  But it was a terrible user
 experience, error prone, and impractical for doing any kind of complex
 animation since it had to be scripted.
 We have been making custom scripts with UIs in wires for empathy for the
 same thing: basically creating local scene properties and a toolbox
 interface, to override specific linked properties. It is pretty solid,
 but, you do have to plan ahead for every single override, creating a
 bottleneck on scripters/riggers to make things available. It also is
 cumbersome from an animation perspective (you would have to do on frame
 change update handlers for any properties you need animated) - but the
 fact that this stuff can be kludged via python is encouraging that it
 might be implementable as a 'proper' design.

 --Nathan

 On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  Here are the notes from today's meeting in irc.freenode.net #blendercoders.
 
  1) Work on upcoming 2.70 release
 
  - Planning for release didn't change:
   http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects
 
  - Image Editor panels are being reshuffled now:
https://developer.blender.org/T38371
 
  - Crucial bugs to be done are now listed in a special page:
  https://developer.blender.org/project/view/35/
 
  - Showstopper bug is for Windows with non-Ascii character file paths (like 
  Japanese).
  https://developer.blender.org/T35176
  Campbell Barton and Tamito Kajiyama will check on it.
 
  - Note! Python scripters who added toolbar buttons should check and/or 
  update scripts, because of news tabs there. Connect Campbell if you need 
  help.
 
  - Sketchfab will submit an add-on to be included in release, using the 
  'commercial services' deal we've reviewed and accepted last August. It 
  still needs to be reviewed though.
 
  2) Other projects
 
  - Ton Roosendaal wrote a report of the developer meeting in Blender 
  Institute, to map out issues for the next film project:
  http://gooseberry.blender.org/developer-meeting-pipeline-and-tools/
 
  - Lukas Toenne started to work on a cleanup compositor code, will be 
  online this week.
 
  - After the meeting, there was a discussion on the status of NPR render in 
  Blender, and the 'BEER' project from Bong Wee Kwong.
  http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:LightBWK
 
  A new mailing list has been added to discuss work on Blender's NPR render 
  future:
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-npr
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Ton-
 
  
  Ton Roosendaal  -  t...@blender.org   -   

Re: [Bf-committers] Camera options proposal (Cycles)

2014-02-13 Thread Sergey Sharybin
The barrel thing you're proposing could work fro martistics POV, but it's
not gonna to be any useful for VFX pipeline.

Currently Libmv uses third degree radial distortion, and internally it's
also capable of handling tangential distortion as well. Further, in the
future we might look into supporting more distortion models which will be
presumably easier for inversion/calibration and so.

So if someone is to work on this front please keep in mind that Cycles are
to deal with different distortion models.


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Dalai Felinto dfeli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Robin,

 For your first option you may be interested on the following patch:
 https://developer.blender.org/T35428

 It adds the ability of adding a deformation map to your lens.
 It's not as neat as a drag  drop control, but it should be able to
 get to the effect you are looking for.

 Cheers,
 Dalai
 --
 blendernetwork.org/dalai-felinto
 www.dalaifelinto.com


 2014-02-13 20:36 GMT-02:00 ertuqueque ertuque...@gmail.com:
  Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place for this proposal/discussion
 or
  if the Cycles mail list would've been better, but I'd like to propose a
  couple of feature/parameters for the cameras in Cycles. I'm posting a
 link
  (Google Drive) to a short PDF I prepared with the proposal and interface
  mockups.
 
 
 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9-4MQo-2HDqUVJvWmg2bEJTd1k/edit?usp=sharing
 
  Thank you in advance.
  ___
  Bf-committers mailing list
  Bf-committers@blender.org
  http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
 ___
 Bf-committers mailing list
 Bf-committers@blender.org
 http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers




-- 
With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers