[boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the boost::signal sample crashes
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you mean your threads snipped: Yes i've seen it. IMO it is more complicated and YES it has compile time problems, unless you put traits implementation in cpp files and move #include OS headers to cpp files, but in this case you have Yes, it was my suggestion. I have put traits implemenations in cpp file in my proposal. #include OS headers are in cpp files as well. Sorry if my description was not clear. I hope you agree that in this case, there are not any performance issues? link-to-correct-library problems again. We have it anyway. My solution didn't claim to resolve it completely, did it? However if I use thread_core.h directly and provide my own trait (my toy OS), it resolves the link-to-correct-library problems automatically, does it? Not really. Example: Link to static or dynamic (i mean import lib) thread library problem. This decision can be made only by linker option or by #pragma comment. IMHO, traits can't help here. snip Win32 has really different thread models. I have mentioned it several times in my posts. They have normal threads and fibers, do they? Ah ... sorry i've missed this point. AFAIK fibers are present only on particular OSes. If i don't mind they are supported for all windows starting from win2k. This means that they are not portable to other OSes and boost::thread has nothing to do with them. If i don't mind boost main objective is portability. Anyway, if your implementation can't fix link-to-correct-library problems ... than what we are discussing ? :) I was thinking that THIS was discussion subject. Am i wrong ? regards, bohdan ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Re: GUI/GDI template library
--- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Finally your lib may become non-template ( i mean cpp files) ... If it becomes not-template, I'll stop working on it :). cpp files are allowed for the layer 1 code and compilation-time optimization wrappers only, that's it! Both has little to do with the library itself. What about simple boost::gui ? I would like to have an unique name without the boost prefix. Eugene __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Re: swappable user defined types and STLport libraries
Fernando Cacciola wrote: BTW, I have a question: According to BCB, the primary swap is hidden when some swap is declared directly in std even for ADL. That is, not even this works: using std::swap; swap(x,y); is this conformant? Yes, declaring things in std is undefined behavior. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Shifted ptr review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philippe, could you please contact me in case you are still interested in shifted_ptr being reviewed. TIA Thomas BOOST Review Wizard. - -- Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001 http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/MS6j0ds/gS3XsBoRApt5AJ0QSBaiYuWEHYHTlAgQtAHnRU3ImwCdGaqL 81EsBPFzXJDbi/JRSUX6l3A= =zG0I -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] [regex] Escaping a search string?
Hi John, Hi .*, Given that I have a string 's' from somewhere, I'd like to create a regular expression where some part must match that string. The problem is, the 's' could contain characters that have a special meaning in regular expressions. Is there some support function that can provide an escaped version of 's'? Something that transforms my.*string into my\.\*string? If there isn't, would it be possible/easy to provide one? Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Gcc problem in variant library
Hi all, I've tried to use the variant library to implement some new functionality inside the Boost.Spirit library. I must say, I'm impressed. Very well done! I've stumbled over a problem though: gcc (Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)) reports: In file included from D:/cvs/boost/boost/variant/variant.hpp:25, from D:/cvs/boost/boost/variant.hpp:22, from D:/cvs/spirit/boost/spirit/core/non_terminal/impl/grammar.ipp:29, from D:/cvs/spirit/boost/spirit/core/non_terminal/grammar.hpp:23, from D:/cvs/spirit/boost/spirit/core.hpp:49, from grammar_tests.cpp:18: D:/cvs/boost/boost/variant/detail/forced_return.hpp:57: default argument specified in explicit specialization Is it my fault? Other compilers (VC7.1) work well. Regards Hartmut ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Re: the boost::signal sample crashes
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 12:53 PM 8/6/2003, Russell Hind wrote: Beman Dawes wrote: I don't think people were against the idea of solving the problem, but rather there is a need for a unified prefix/suffix header solution such as John is suggesting. Developers need a canned solution; they can't be asked to code #ifdefs and pragmas for compilers they know nothing about. I thought people were against it for reasons of setting up test cases and such, not because of the implementation. Well, some of us are trying to get out of doing additional work:-) Not really. Prefix/suffix headers certainly work well for self-contained libraries (i.e. regex). The problem is that we have both inline and out-of-line libraries that depend on each other, and some of our users ( e.g. me :-) ) only need the first category. To make out-of-line libraries plug and play we may have to prefix/suffix all* inline libraries as well, making their users pay for something they do not need. * Under the assumption that they are potential future dependencies. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: Wrong version.hpp in Boost 1.30.1 download
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 01:13 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0 Oh well. I guess there are some details missing from the release manager's responsibilities on the release procedure page. Can you (or Beman, who I think usually does the releases) add these directions to CVS? You may want to ask Beman if there are any other details not yet mentioned in the docs. I'll try to update it. The problem is that the actual checklist I use is quite a bit longer, and a lot of the steps are specific to my environment. For example, it gives the steps needed to run the particular graphical FTP program I use. A good argument for scripting all of this stuff as Daryle suggested, IMO. http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/lib/module-ftplib.html wink -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: the boost::signal sample crashes
Peter Dimov wrote: The main problem with shared_ptr 1.30.x and below is that the single- and multithreaded versions are incompatible. The CVS version is now binary compatible on Windows, so 1.31 will work across different threading models; still, the correct default for Borland should probably be to do a multithreaded build. By the way, this can't be fixed with prefix/suffix headers. No, you still need single/multi-threaded builds, but with out headers, I then need to add in 4-byte alignment builds, 8-byte alignment builds, different builds for different calling conventions etc. It doesn't get easy, especially for existing projects. We either end up making a custom build of the boost libs for each project? That would become a maintanence nightmare. How would you feel if you had to re-build your compiler's RTL just so you could change some project options? But I don't want to enforce a set. I want (for example) shared_ptr to use whatever set the user has specified and not to override his settings. Then we put options in to ignore the pre-post config headers so users can user there own settings if they wish, but it appears to me that most people don't care what options are set, they would just rather have it work, and currently, its very easy to break things as soon as you use a compiled lib. Thanks Russell ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] using graphviz with the BGL
Is there documentation anywhere that explains how to build and link graphviz
for MSVC .NET for use with the BOOST graph library?
I am trying to compile the example ospf-example.cpp from the BOOST graph
library in MSVC .NET. I am using BOOST 1.30.0. I built the graphviz library
using bjam with the vc7 toolset. I am getting a compile error:
c:\boost_1_30_0\boost\tuple\detail\tuple_basic_no_partial_spec.hpp(83):
error C2679: binary '=' : no operator found which takes a right-hand operand
of type 'const
boost::detail::adj_list_genGraph,VertexListS,OutEdgeListS,DirectedS,VertexP
roperty,EdgeProperty,GraphProperty,EdgeListS::config::edge_iterator' (or
there is no acceptable conversion)
with
[
Graph=boost::adjacency_listboost::vecS,boost::vecS,boost::directedS,boost::
no_property,boost::propertyboost::edge_weight_t,int,boost::no_property,boo
st::no_property,boost::listS,
VertexListS=boost::vecS,
OutEdgeListS=boost::vecS,
DirectedS=boost::directedS,
VertexProperty=boost::no_property,
EdgeProperty=boost::propertyboost::edge_weight_t,int,boost::no_property,
GraphProperty=boost::no_property,
EdgeListS=boost::listS
]
I think this error is due to the fact that MSVC does not support partial
template specialization. Also, when I comment out all of the code except for
the first 3 lines of the main, I get the error :
dijkstra_link_state_routing error result returned from 'cl.exe'
(dijkstra_link_state_routing is the name of the solution that contains the
file ospf-example.cpp).
Any suggestions anyone could offer would be appreciated. Below is the code
for ospf-example.cpp. It is the same as the code on the BOOST website.
Thanks,
Trevon Fuller
//===
// Copyright 2001 Jeremy G. Siek, Andrew Lumsdaine, Lie-Quan Lee,
//
// This file is part of the Boost Graph Library
//
// You should have received a copy of the License Agreement for the
// Boost Graph Library along with the software; see the file LICENSE.
// If not, contact Office of Research, Indiana University,
// Bloomington, IN 47405.
//
// Permission to modify the code and to distribute the code is
// granted, provided the text of this NOTICE is retained, a notice if
// the code was modified is included with the above COPYRIGHT NOTICE
// and with the COPYRIGHT NOTICE in the LICENSE file, and that the
// LICENSE file is distributed with the modified code.
//
// LICENSOR MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
// By way of example, but not limitation, Licensor MAKES NO
// REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY
// PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR THAT THE USE OF THE LICENSED SOFTWARE COMPONENTS
// OR DOCUMENTATION WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS
// OR OTHER RIGHTS.
//===
#include fstream // for file I/O
#include boost/graph/graphviz.hpp // for read/write_graphviz()
#include boost/graph/dijkstra_shortest_paths.hpp
#include boost/lexical_cast.hpp
int
main()
{
using namespace boost;
GraphvizDigraph g_dot;
read_graphviz(figs/ospf-graph.dot, g_dot);
typedef adjacency_list vecS, vecS, directedS, no_property,
property edge_weight_t, int Graph;
typedef graph_traits Graph ::vertex_descriptor vertex_descriptor;
Graph g(num_vertices(g_dot));
property_map GraphvizDigraph, edge_attribute_t ::type
edge_attr_map = get(edge_attribute, g_dot);
graph_traits GraphvizDigraph ::edge_iterator ei, ei_end;
for (tie(ei, ei_end) = edges(g_dot); ei != ei_end; ++ei) {
int weight = lexical_cast int (edge_attr_map[*ei][label]);
property edge_weight_t, int edge_property(weight);
add_edge(source(*ei, g_dot), target(*ei, g_dot), edge_property, g);
}
vertex_descriptor router_six;
property_map GraphvizDigraph, vertex_attribute_t ::type
vertex_attr_map = get(vertex_attribute, g_dot);
graph_traits GraphvizDigraph ::vertex_iterator vi, vi_end;
for (tie(vi, vi_end) = vertices(g_dot); vi != vi_end; ++vi)
if (RT6 == vertex_attr_map[*vi][label]) {
router_six = *vi;
break;
}
std::vector vertex_descriptor parent(num_vertices(g));
// All vertices start out as there own parent
typedef graph_traits Graph ::vertices_size_type size_type;
for (size_type p = 0; p num_vertices(g); ++p)
parent[p] = p;
#if defined(BOOST_MSVC) BOOST_MSVC = 1300
std::vectorint distance(num_vertices(g));
property_mapGraph, edge_weight_t::type weightmap = get(edge_weight, g);
property_mapGraph, vertex_index_t::type indexmap = get(vertex_index, g);
dijkstra_shortest_paths
(g, router_six, parent[0], distance[0], weightmap,
indexmap, std::lessint(), closed_plusint(),
std::numeric_limitsint::max(), 0, default_dijkstra_visitor());
#else
dijkstra_shortest_paths(g, router_six, predecessor_map(parent[0]));
#endif
[boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the boost::signal sample crashes
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] snip Sorry, you are wrong. This discussion subjects were the link problem and be able to to use boost::thread with my toy OS and/or with different threading models without mocking with boost sources. Now i see. I suppose 'link' question is closed ... ? About your OS support : i don't beleive boost developers will change current implemenatation design ... porting to some new OS isn't too frequent operation. If you really have problems on porting boost::thread to your library i can propose to organize current boost::thread sources to make ports more easy. I mean better organization of code/files. Ex: put os implemenatations is separate folders like 'posix', 'win32' Additionaly it would be nice to add some guidelines on how to do port (patching files and build system). IMHO, this solution is almost identical to implementing custom ThreadTraits and it is pleasant for lazy programmers soul :). regards, bohdan ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: boost::fs?
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 03:59 PM 8/5/2003, David Abrahams wrote: Why are we using such a cryptic namespace name? I mean, I can understand wanting to abbreviate template_metaprogramming, but filesystem doesn't seem too bad and you could use filesys; people will use namespace aliases anyway. The Filesystem Library is in namespace boost::filesystem. A namespace alias of fs:: is used in an example on one of the doc pages, and in some of the test and implementation code. Is that a concern? Yes! People will be very confused, IMO. I clearly was. Sorry to complain, but fs has been rubbing me the wrong way since I started using it. Why are you using it then? I just double checked, and it doesn't appear in any of the filesystem headers. Ah, I haven't compiled anything yet. ;- -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: GUI sublanguage ?
Bohdan wrote: [...] There are a lot of good reasons why we would not always want to have total control. Not always means sometimes not ? According to this logic your gui language is layer built on top of interface proposed by me ... just for convenience. Right ? I looks like a competition between the two of you... I want my applications to be as simple as possible, and to all look the same. Generally GUI applications are semantically complicated. Forget about universal cure from this. Everithing you can do is to symplify development in some cases. It doesn't make sense to start positionning every widget manually like this. What if you find you're interface ugly (p = 0.90) the first time and you have found a better idea? You are going to retype the position of every widgets in the whole application?!? If you are planning to do this, I suggest to use another GUI application which will generate the spaghetti part of you're code. If the GUI library picks the 'best' settings for the platform automatically, the individual programmer doesn't have to think about it. Everything just works like it should. To take a few things from your snippet that are suspect to me: w.width( 400 ); w.height( 200 ) Where do 400 and 200 come from? This seems arbitrary to me. The GUI system should be able to tell how to size itself. Have you invented universal algorithm for window size/position ? It is possible to use horizontal / vertical / grid layout recursively which will deduce the position of your widgets given your criterias. Another container-like widget; i.e. container oriented design. With experience it becomes easy. [...] Generally runtime gui styles (flat, 3d ...) can be more helpful, because changing look-and-feel in application options is very frequent situation for serious GUI applications. Please don't be too obsessed by compile time, it is not very good way for GUI toolkit. I agree, you should draw some line between compile-time / run-time. Not to much run-time though. [...] - GUI code is difficult, tedious, and error prone even for simple tasks, I want to make it simple (for simple tasks) Agree! But only for simple tasks. You mean the opposite... The time required for complex applications would be exponential. [...] Philippe ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] [Boost-bugs] [ boost-Bugs-784698 ] date_time MSVC: no__declspec(dllexport)
Bugs item #784698, was opened at 2003-08-07 04:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=107586aid=784698group_id=7586 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: date_time MSVC: no __declspec(dllexport) Initial Comment: Microsoft compiler specific. The date and time library doesn't declare any of its classes for export, which means that they get stripped from the DLLs that are produced. Temporary workaround is to use the static library, however for those of use wanting to make a big ol' bag o' boost everything-included dll, this is a problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=107586aid=784698group_id=7586 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ Boost-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-bugs ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: GUI/GDI template library
Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] That sounds good. What if we called the lower layer boost::gui and the upper layer boost::sgtl? It stands for 'standard'. Maybe that's a little pretentious for us at this early stage :) gtl would probably be better. I suspect that if we get to a review some people may request something more verbose. IMO, gtl can be mixed up with boost graph library. May be guitl ? regards, bohdan ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: Filesystem: create_directories
David Abrahams wrote: void create_directories( const path ph ); Precondition: ph.empty() || forall p: p == ph || is_parent(p, ph): is_directory(p) || !exists( p ) Postcondition: exists(ph) is_directory(ph) void establish_directory( const path ph ); has the right mix of senses. see http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=establish re (5th attempt to post this useless suggestion, guess the issue has decomposed by now... i gotta read a book about this internet thing someday) ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Release Manager's Checklist added
At 02:10 PM 8/7/2003, Joerg Walter wrote: - Original Message - From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Monitor inspection report to verify problems are being dealt with. Unsure about that. I remember some mails from a wizard ;-) Yes, but the release manager has to help too. Or at least monitor progress. * Monitor regression tests to verify that errors are dealt with. Unsure about that. ublas has some test failures (for ICC on windows for example) which nobody is going to fix probably. OTOH this is the only verification if cvs is consistent. The actual process for future releases is going to be more sophisticated than in the past. For key compilers (those on major platforms with few enough bugs that it is possible to look at errors in detail), we can try to account for failures (as boost problems, compiler bugs, whatever). For example, see the random library tests at http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32.html There are seven failures. Jens has looked each failure, and each has been classified. (Except Borland classification which will show up tomorrow.) You could say each failure has been accounted for. Thus the release manager can see at a glance that this library is ready for release. * Monitor mailing lists to verify that patches are being dealt with. Doesn't sf have a tracker for patches? * Monitor mailing lists and bug tracker to verify that bug reports are being dealt with. Doesn't sf have a tracker for bugs? Yes, to both but we aren't using them fully and/or properly. Also, people post patches and bug reports direct to the mailing lists. Sometimes they get handled promptly, sometimes not. I've got at least a dozen email messages to the main list flagged as awaiting response, plus lots of S/F reports too. I keep meaning to research the best way to track bugs/patches, but haven't found the time. Note that the best way may just mean learning to use existing SourceForge features better. * Monitor CVS commits to verify content gets committed as planned. Yep, seems like this one is a problem. Prereleases? Some kind of task list is more what I had in mind. SourceForge has such a feature already; we aren't using it. Thanks for the questions. Even though programming is much more fun, we need to do a certain amount of management to ensure release quality. --Beman ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
--- Gregory Colvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps Perseus, who slew the Medusa, the snake-haired monster of so frightful an aspect that no living thing could behold her without being turned into stone. Perseus avoid being turned to stone by clever use of indirection -- he avoided looking directly at Medusa, instead looking only at her reflection in the mirror of his polished shield. http://www.online-mythology.com/perseus_medusa/ Perseus is cool. Unfortunately it is taken on sourceforge and there are already a lot of s/w stuff with this name. Eugene __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
RE: [boost] Re: GUI/GDI template library
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about simple boost::gui ? I would like to have an unique name without the boost prefix. I think the boost namespace is a requirement for any boost library. Sorry, I didn't mean to put the library out of the boost namespace. The namespace will be boost::sgtl. I just wanted the name itself to be uniq w/o attaching boost:: to it. Eugene Eugene __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
RE: [boost] Re: Re: GUI/GDI template library
--- Drazen DOTLIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that the interest for this kind of library has been shown (or not, whatever) could the interested parties please coordinate their efforts using other means than boost mailing list? IIUC this list is for issues with existing code (problems, usage patterns etc) and for submissions that have some code. I am already having problems keeping up with the list as is... I am sorry for plaguing your mail box. We are going to open a sourceforge project and move this discussion there. Please bear with us for couple more days, please... Basically we just need to agree on the name. Eugene __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage; Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI template library]
I am sorry but I am having trouble following the discussion; it is spreaded everywhere in my newsreader recursively. What is the new name you have finally found? I would like to suggest adding an adjective or symbol that represents something clean and / or efficient with hidden features (secondary effects of a powerful design). Do you have a sourceforge branch set up yet? Thanks, Philippe ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[boost] Re: Wrong version.hpp in Boost 1.30.1 download
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0 Oh well. I guess there are some details missing from the release manager's responsibilities on the release procedure page. Can you (or Beman, who I think usually does the releases) add these directions to CVS? You may want to ask Beman if there are any other details not yet mentioned in the docs. Daryle ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
