Re: BGP as-path access-lists
Andre, A quick search on CCO reveals this link. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t1/cliparse.htm Brad Steinman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Andre Fecteau Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 1:13 PM Subject: BGP as-path access-lists Hello, I have been recently placed in the awkward position of making some changes to our BGP configuration. The problem is that I understand how bgp works for the main part, but I don't have any information on the meaning of the symbols used in the following as-path access-lists (^, $, _, ., +, (), *). Could someone tell me what each of them mean? Could someone also point me to a Cisco page that explains them in detail? I have been searching and cannot find anything except examples that include these symbols. Unfortuneately these examples have not helped my understanding. I have a good idea as to what they probably mean, but I need to know their exact meaning. It is difficult to manage something you don't have a clear understanding of! ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ ip as-path access-list 4 permit ^(_6774) +$ ip as-path access-list 10 permit .*5413$ ip as-path access-list 6 permit ^ (_3414) + (_2423) +$ HELP!!! Andre
Re: Passed the written... again
Could you compare (quality/style/etc) the questions were presented with - to the sample questions at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/sample_routing.html I'm assuming you tested for R&S, I hope I'm not wrong. (i'm new to this list) Brad Steinman [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Sena, Elver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Cthulu, CCIE Candidate'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 12:27 PM Subject: RE: Passed the written... again : Are you sure you are not talking about the CID. :-) : : -Original Message- : From: Cthulu, CCIE Candidate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] : Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 8:39 AM : To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: Passed the written... again : : : Hi, all : : I took and passed the CCIE written exam again yesterday. I found out last : week that I had to retake it in order to schedule my lab; the previous exam : I took "expired" due to the time elapse. : : I did not study, so I can not recommend any reference materials, etc. I : will say that since I have been studying for the lab, rather than the : written, that helped a little. : : : About the exam itself, and without violating the NDA, it sucked. Cisco, : if you are reading this, elimination through obscurity is not something to : brag about. Sure, I could test and fail an auto mechanic by asking him : obscure questions about buggy whips, but that does not test the true worth : of the auto mechanic. : : Some of the questions are awful, loaded with subjective phrases and : ambiguous syntax and grammer.There were a few good questions that : addressed the technology of what we do. It seemed to me that you were often : put in a situation where you have to pick the answer that sucked the least. : : : To give you an idea, pretending that this was a math exam, some of the : questions looked like this: : : : 1. How many sides are contained in a left-handed square? : A. 4 sides if there are 2 triangles present : B. None, a circle has 4 sides. : C. A right handed square has 4 sides. : D. All of the above. : : : 2. Chuck bought 5 bananas at the supermarket. Priscilla bought 2 apples. : Howard robbed Pamela the cashier. How much did Chuck pay for the apples? : A. The bananas were 1 dollar a pound. : B. False, the apples were really peaches. : C. Howards got 5-10, with time off for good behavior. : D. The log lady likes apples too. : : : : I am exaggerating slightly, but not by much. Just as important as knowing : the stuff, is the ability to decipher the questions and answers, and to get : inside the minds of the test writers (you be Clarice, the test writer is : Hannibal). : : Anyways, that is all I got to say about that. Good luck to all! : : Charles _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 500-CS...HELP!! [7:2414]
Hmm. I have a CS500 as well. Looking at my config and comparing to the info you have provided, I have some suggestions. Note that you may have already done this - as I cant see ur config or every command you've entered. 1. Are you using (ex.)'telnet 1.1.1.1 2001' to rev telnet to the 0 line? Note that the CS500 ports are from labeled 0-15 where as their corresponding tty lines are 1-16. 2. Cabling problem? If you are connecting to a 2500 series, you will only need a std rollover cable between the two. 3. Use 'stopbits 1' for your tty lines. Default is not 1, 1.5 I think? Probably wont help the immediate problem though... -Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: 500-CS...HELP!! [7:2414] > Ok GUYS n GALS, > I got a simple dilemma, but I can't seem to get the solution. I know its > staring me in the face! :) I bought a 500-CS off ebay and I config with > TRANS IN ALL, but it doesn't take so I use TRANS IN TELNET and TRANS OUT > TELNET on the console of my test router and on the async line I have the > cable plugged to and use IP ADD 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 as a loopback int. > When I try a Reverse Telnet, it opens, but I get a blank screen and NO > CURSOR > for my router? WHAT GIVES? > Thanks, > Rob H. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2419&t=2414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Differences between TACACS+ and Cisco ACS [7:2245]
Where would one find this freeware TACACS+ server software? Didn't see it on CCO Software Center -Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Perry J. Lucas" To: Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 8:58 PM Subject: RE: Differences between TACACS+ and Cisco ACS [7:2245] > I just tried to purchase Cisco ACS for Solaris and was told that it is > no longer available on that platform. The only part number they had was > for version 2.6 was for Windows NT/2000. We elected to go with a > Cisco's freeware TACACS+... > > ""Sean Young"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everyone, > > > > The company I am working for is considering purchasing Cisco ACS > > software. This piece of software will be running on Solaris platform. > > Currently, I am using TACACS+ (self-supported software with source > code) > > on our environment running on both Solaris and linux platforms > (Primary > > TACACS is on Solaris and backup is on Linux). We've modified the > source > > code so that each user has his/her own privilige password so that we > > have a record of who is doing what on the network devices (accounting > > purpose). Everything is running smoothly and the company is happy > with > > the result. > > > > In my opinion, learning CLI in Unix/linux is not an easy task to > master. > > Because of this, I am solely responsible for the TACACS servers. > Finding > > someone to train for this thing is NOT an easy thing (thanks to > Microsoft > > mentality of POINT-and-CLICK attitude of new people coming into the IT > > field these days). I've tried to train several people for this task > but > > it was unsuccessful. Because of this, the company is considering of > > migrating the TACACS server from Solaris/Linux over to Microsoft > Windows > > platforms (YIKES) so that we can find additional support staffs. > > The software package that we consider is Cisco ACS. I have several > > questions regarding this package: > > > > 1) Is this software stable on a Windows platform? (Sorry I have to > ask) > > 2) How long does it take to train a newbie to be efficient with Cisco > >ACS running on Winblows platform? > > 3) Does Cisco ACS support enable privilege for each individual user > (i.e > >does each user have his/own enable password)? > > > > If anyone has done it before or have a similar experience, I would > like > > to hear from you. > > > > Many thanks. > > Sean > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2420&t=2245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference between Cat 3900 and 3920 [7:4299]
Some people have mentioned specifically that there's a Cat3920 in lab test. Not having used one before, is the Cat3900 equivalent to the 3920 - at least for the purposes of the lab exam? -Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4299&t=4299 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support 640-506
Anyone know the passing score for this exam? Brad Steinman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
