methods for summarizing routes in FATKID ospf401
Hi, Just trying out ospf401 on fatkid, and was reading the hints about summarizing. Here's the hint "There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OSPF routes. One way summaries between areas. The other summarizes between Autonomous Systems. Do you know a third way to summarize routes, which works for any router, running any routing protocol? How about a fourth?" http://www.fatkid.com/html/401_advanced_opsf_-_hints.html Does anyone know the 3rd or other ways and could kindly let me know? Clue Less. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DLSW filtering
Hi Nigel,
Firstly, thanks for your help on this question. But I think if using
dmac-output-list, it should be done on R2 to control only the
specified mac on Ring 1 it talking to hosts on Ring 2.
Just curious (and been picky), it there any way of just configuring on
R1 to achieve this?
On 3 Apr 2001 09:40:49 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Nigel
Taylor") wrote:
>Clueless,
> You should be able to do this using the dmac-ouput-list option
>defined with
>your "dlsw remote-peer" statement with R2. This would identify the MAC's
>you'd like
>to filter by ACL 700-799.. ie..
>
>R1:
>
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 <--- local token ring interface
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2 dmac-output-list 701 <--- Peer statement
>for R2's token ring interface.
>
>access 701 permit 3000.3000.0000 ..
>
>HTH
>
>Nigel..
>- Original Message -
>From: Clue Less <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 7:47 AM
>Subject: DLSW filtering
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Got a question on DLSW filtering. Say all interfaces below are
>> configured for DLSW (ie e0 and tok 0 of R1, e0 and tok 0 of R2).
>>
>> How to configure on R1 so that only hosts on Ring 1 with mac address
>> 3000.3000. can talk to hosts on Ring 2?
>>
>> Hosts on Ring 1 with other Mac address should still be able to talk to
>> hosts on e0 of R2.
>>
>> |---e0 R1 tok0---Ring 1
>>|
>>|
>> IP cloud
>>|
>>|
>> |---e0 R2 tok0---Ring 2
>>
>> Clue Less.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DLSW filtering
Hi all, Got a question on DLSW filtering. Say all interfaces below are configured for DLSW (ie e0 and tok 0 of R1, e0 and tok 0 of R2). How to configure on R1 so that only hosts on Ring 1 with mac address 3000.3000. can talk to hosts on Ring 2? Hosts on Ring 1 with other Mac address should still be able to talk to hosts on e0 of R2. |---e0 R1 tok0---Ring 1 | | IP cloud | | |---e0 R2 tok0---Ring 2 Clue Less. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list
Hi Hans, and all, Firstly, let me just clarify that this question is just a learning exercise. I know the standard access-list would work, but I want to find out how to limit the mask as well. It could be my fault if I didn't make this clear initially. Now back to the meat: I've tried your access-list 116 below, and it sure worked for me. Hans, is there any doco that describe distribute-list with extended ACL you know? All the one I looked at didn't talk about the subnet mask. I've modified slightly to help myself understand this, the final access-list 120 is below: access-list 120 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.1.1.0 This one is the most specific and will only allow a route with 10.1.1.0 with /24 to be distributed out. Tested. This one should BLOCK: 10.1.1.0 / 25 route haven't test 10.1.0.0 / 16 route haven't test If anyone know any other route apart from 10.1.1.0 can sneak out with this list, I'm interested to know. Just when I think I know ip extended access-list. Sure is different in the way the extended access-list work then the URL I included earlier: http://www-1.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/OpenForum/dispnewqa.pl/6352 Thanks for the input! Clue. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bridge vlan
I'm not much of a switching person, but here's my $0.02:
Adding a separate bridge device connecting the 2 vlan can do the job.
But why not just connect a cross over cable between the 2 vlan. Not
sure the pros and cons on this.
If you want 1 big broadcast domain (which is what you're doing), you
can just make it 1 vlan instead though.
Clue.
On 3 Oct 2000 12:57:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Donald B
Johnson Jr") wrote:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00F8_01C02D38.9988ED00
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Do you want to add a physical bridge device to a switched network =
>providing VLANs.
>Duck
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00F8_01C02D38.9988ED00
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
>http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
>
>
>
>
>
>Do you want to add a physical bridge device to a switched network =
>providing=20
>VLANs.
>Duck
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00F8_01C02D38.9988ED00--
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple default gateways, same result?
Just on a Like Hubert was saying, the route for ethernet is redundant. But just on the side note, if you're pointing to another network of the e0 eg. ip route 123.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 e0, you want to make sure the next hop router on e0 will answer proxy arp. Because that's what the router arps for 123.0.0.0 what it wants to route to it. Clue. On 3 Oct 2000 16:37:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hey all, > >For study purposes I have configured a 'remote' router (Cisco 2501) with >the following: > >E0: 10.48.2.1 255.255.255.0 > >S0.1: 10.201.0.73 255.255.255.252 point-to-point (FR @ 128K CIR) > >The 'corporate' router (Cisco 3640) is configured as follows: > >E0: 10.1.1.2 255.255.0.0 > >S0/0.1: 10.201.0.74 255.255.255.252 point-to-point (FR) > >I would like to assign the default gateway for the remote router as >follows: > >ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0.1 1 > >I was wondering how this differs from using: > >ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.201.0.74 1 > >In addition, what advantage/disadvantages might I reap if I also configure >the 'remote' with the following line: > >ip route 10.48.2.0 255.255.255.0 ethernet0 > >Are there any potential problems with the above line? > > >Thank you, >Raul De La Garza III >CCNA NNCSS MCSE CNE >Senior Network Engineer >EmCare Incorporated >Work 214.712.2085 >Mobile 817.991.7889 >FAX 214.712.2444 >Pager 877.270.9755 >e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Brave men are all vertebrates: they have their softness on the surface and >their toughness in the middle. ?G.K. Chesterton > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list
Hi all, Could someone shed some light on how to use EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list? I'm trying to allow only 10.1.1.0/24 route to be distributed by eigrp 90. Below is config and debug ip eigrp output. I thought ACL 110 is a bit "relaxed" but should have allow the 10.1.1.0/24 route to be distribute out. But it got DENIED. ACL 10 worked. Initially, I had "access-list 110 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0" which I thought would be the most specific. But this didn't work also. I found the URL below from Open Forum: http://www-1.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/OpenForum/dispnewqa.pl/6352 If anyone have some good link on this topic, please kindly send them in! Any comment welcome! ClueLess. r7#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-DS-L), Version 11.3(11a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 20-Sep-99 07:43 by jjgreen Image text-base: 0x03040474, data-base: 0x1000 Partial config: ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Loopback1 ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 ! router eigrp 90 network 10.0.0.0 network 137.20.0.0 distribute-list 110 out no auto-summary ! ip classless ! access-list 10 permit 10.1.1.0 access-list 110 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any With distribute-list 110 out: 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 137.20.50.0/24 - denied by distribute list 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - denied by distribute list 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list With distribute-list 10 out: 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 137.20.50.0/24 - denied by distribute list 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - do advertise out Ethernet0 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: Int 10.1.1.0/24 metric 128256 - 256 128000 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Messages log
It's on the UniCD Dwell down depending on which version of IOS: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/index.htm Clue On 29 Sep 2000 18:22:36 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ElephantChild) wrote: >On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Elvis DomÃnguez wrote: > >> I need a book to know the meaning of messages logging (errors, warning >> codes) from router or switches. > >System Messages Reference, or Error Messages Reference, or System Error >Messages Reference, or something like that (may be Manual instead of >Reference). There's an online version too, IIRC. > >-- >Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you want to experience >true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty Rhoades. > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bridging Question
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#xtocid2213520
Clue
On 30 Sep 2000 17:01:40 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ejay Hire")
wrote:
>Pardon me while I blatantly expose my Ignorance.
>
>From the SRB/DLSW chapter in the book "Cisco IOS Essentials". I am led to
>believe that DLSw only works with Token-Ring based traffic. Is this
>correct, or is it possible to take encapsulate (NetBios) Ethernet traffic,
>shuttle it accross the IP backbone, and then drop it to a remote bridge
>peer?
>
>Thanks,
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Ejay Hire
>
>CCNA seeking internetworking employment. (Not just because I'm at work on
>Saturday...)
>_
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF - Bad News!
Oops, "ip ospf point-to-point" is the command I was thinking about, as
Lauren mentioned. Not point-to-multipoint.
versions needed as per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/9.html#QB
On 27 Sep 2000 08:10:59 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clue Less) wrote:
>All the "O" routes are more specifc than the "D" routes, so they are
>suppose to be in the routing table. I'm assuming they're ip addresses
>on loopback interfaces with /24 mask. You may want to try putting "ip
>ospf network point-to-multipoint" (if the version of IOS support this)
>and see if it makes a difference.
>
>Clue.
>
>On 27 Sep 2000 01:07:08 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Chuck Larrieu")
>wrote:
>
>>Well, I couldn't resist. I had the router pod set up for a RIP to EIGRP
>>migration test yesterday. I am not sure that the results will soothe your
>>concerns, Mr. Cthulu.
>>
>>I would post configurations, but the file size exceeds what Paul allows.
>>Those who are interested, contact me off line, and I will send you a text
>>file with configurations and routing tables.
>>
>>Following is a routing table resulting from placing OSPF onto a router
>>already running EIGRP. Note that OSPF routes with a mask of /32 are being
>>placed into the routing table. I am not sure why this is happening. Several
>>tweaks have failed to eliminate these routes. Nor did changing the EIGRP
>>distance to 115 ( higher than OSPF's 110 ) eliminate EIGRP routes from the
>>routing table.
>>
>>So now I have to wonder what is happening.
>>
>>If no one has a quick and good explanation, I'll try to post configs and
>>fool with this some more. Possibly I can place the routers on line and let
>>folks poke around
>>
>>Look forward to some more discussion. Customer visits tomorrow, so I won't
>>be back on line until very late in the day.
>>
>>Chuck
>>
>>
>>Router# show ip route
>>Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
>> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
>> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
>> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
>> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
>>area
>> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
>> P - periodic downloaded static route
>>
>>Gateway of last resort is not set
>>
>> 192.168.8.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>D 192.168.8.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:32, Serial1
>>O IA192.168.8.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:44, Serial1
>> 192.168.9.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>O IA192.168.9.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:45, Serial1
>>D 192.168.9.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:32, Serial1
>> 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>D 192.168.10.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:33, Serial1
>>O IA192.168.10.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:46, Serial1
>> 192.168.11.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>O IA192.168.11.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:46, Serial1
>>D 192.168.11.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:33, Serial1
>> 192.168.4.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>D 192.168.4.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>>O IA192.168.4.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
>> 192.168.5.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>O IA192.168.5.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
>>D 192.168.5.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>> 192.168.6.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>D 192.168.6.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>>O IA192.168.6.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
>> 192.168.7.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>>O IA192.168.7.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
>>D 192.168.7.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>>C192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
>> 192.168.254.0/24 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
>>C 192.168.254.4/30 is directly connected, Serial1
>>D 192.168.254.0/24 is a summary, 23:15:36, Null0
>>D 192.168.254.0/30 [90/2681856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:35, Serial1
>>C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>>C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connecte
Re: Up/up but no connection
Those 22 bytes would probably be the keepalive for HDLC if that's what
you're running. Interface would only go up/up if layer 1 & 2 is good,
in the case of HDLC it will need to see keepalive from the other end.
"debug serial interface" on both end would be a good one to check
this.
Personally, I haven't seen one end is up/up and the other is up/down.
I can only see this happen if the telco has misroute one end to
another site which happens to have the same setting. If anyone know
any other cases, please share with us.
Clue.
On 28 Sep 2000 20:34:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Scott Meyer")
wrote:
>Odd problem that has been solved to discuss.
>
>I had a customer with 2 routers connected by a full T1. Adtran TSU CSU/DSU
>was splitting off 5 channels for voice and sending the rest to the router
>for data. Routers had no connection to the voice. Data was down but voice
>was working fine.
>
>This was a working setup, not a new install.
>
>Router A had a Up/up on the interface, was getting 22 byte packets in. No
>input errors. Not seeing any IGRP packets. I could not ping the serial
>interface on router B.
>Router B had up/down on the interface, sending (22 byte packets) and I didnt
>check if it was recieving packets, but getting lots of CRC input errors. If
>I did a local loopback on the Nx56/64 port on the Adtran, I would come up/up
>and ping myself with no CRC errors. If I pulled the T1 outta the smartjack
>and put in a hardloop, I'd be up/down and getting CRC. Replaced the Nx56/64
>module and all was well.
>
>The question is, what is the 22 byte packets coming in? What conditions need
>to be met for the protocol to go up? I've never seen it up/up and not have a
>connection.
>
>Scott Meyer
>CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, etc
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I screwed up?
In case you're still working on it, you might want to firstly make
sure the IOS is indeed deleted. You can check this at rommon> by
dir flash:
If the IOS is not there the URL below should help:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/cnfgnote/2600mem.htm#xtocid682718
tftp is the faster way to go
Clue.
On 27 Sep 2000 22:10:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Cornell Dyce")
wrote:
>Help!
>
>I just passed the CCNA and got a job one week ago. Today I was given a 2600
>router ( IOS 12.0 - BP 11.3) to do some basic configurations.
>
>After the configurations I copy running-config to startup-config.
>I noticed a message that said somthing like..You must delete Flash before
>the configuration can be saved... I hit the return key and I think the flash
>was deleted or somthing.
>
>Now everytime I restart the router I get the following message:
>
>UNABLE TO LOAD FLASH
>
>How can I get the flash back?
>
>THANKS FOR YOUR HELP
>Cornell
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF - Bad News!
All the "O" routes are more specifc than the "D" routes, so they are
suppose to be in the routing table. I'm assuming they're ip addresses
on loopback interfaces with /24 mask. You may want to try putting "ip
ospf network point-to-multipoint" (if the version of IOS support this)
and see if it makes a difference.
Clue.
On 27 Sep 2000 01:07:08 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Chuck Larrieu")
wrote:
>Well, I couldn't resist. I had the router pod set up for a RIP to EIGRP
>migration test yesterday. I am not sure that the results will soothe your
>concerns, Mr. Cthulu.
>
>I would post configurations, but the file size exceeds what Paul allows.
>Those who are interested, contact me off line, and I will send you a text
>file with configurations and routing tables.
>
>Following is a routing table resulting from placing OSPF onto a router
>already running EIGRP. Note that OSPF routes with a mask of /32 are being
>placed into the routing table. I am not sure why this is happening. Several
>tweaks have failed to eliminate these routes. Nor did changing the EIGRP
>distance to 115 ( higher than OSPF's 110 ) eliminate EIGRP routes from the
>routing table.
>
>So now I have to wonder what is happening.
>
>If no one has a quick and good explanation, I'll try to post configs and
>fool with this some more. Possibly I can place the routers on line and let
>folks poke around
>
>Look forward to some more discussion. Customer visits tomorrow, so I won't
>be back on line until very late in the day.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>Router# show ip route
>Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
>area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
>Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 192.168.8.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>D 192.168.8.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:32, Serial1
>O IA192.168.8.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:44, Serial1
> 192.168.9.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>O IA192.168.9.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:45, Serial1
>D 192.168.9.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:32, Serial1
> 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>D 192.168.10.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:33, Serial1
>O IA192.168.10.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:46, Serial1
> 192.168.11.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>O IA192.168.11.1/32 [110/129] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:46, Serial1
>D 192.168.11.0/24 [90/2809856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:33, Serial1
> 192.168.4.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>D 192.168.4.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>O IA192.168.4.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
> 192.168.5.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>O IA192.168.5.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
>D 192.168.5.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
> 192.168.6.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>D 192.168.6.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>O IA192.168.6.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
> 192.168.7.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>O IA192.168.7.1/32 [110/65] via 192.168.254.5, 00:05:47, Serial1
>D 192.168.7.0/24 [90/2297856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:34, Serial1
>C192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> 192.168.254.0/24 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
>C 192.168.254.4/30 is directly connected, Serial1
>D 192.168.254.0/24 is a summary, 23:15:36, Null0
>D 192.168.254.0/30 [90/2681856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:35, Serial1
>C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
>C192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback3
>Router#
>Router#
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>Cthulu, CCIE Candidate It's Not Dagon
>Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:29 AM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF
>
>Hey, Brian,
>
>Thanks for the info. I have some comments/clarification.
>
>
>>EIGRP carries a lower administrative distance vs. EIGRP.
>CR: You mean EIGRP (90) has a lower AD than OSPF (110)?
>
>
>So you can
>>basically turn up OSPF on your routers, and then when it all looks kosher,
>>what I would do is raise the administrative distance of EIGRP above
>>OSPF..this will cause the EIGRP routes to phase out and OSPF to
>>be used. If it all goes crazyyou can revert by simply moving
Re: ISDN - I can't ping bri0
Not sure, could you do a 'debug isdn q931' and 'debug ppp neg' to find
out how far it gets?
Clue.
On 26 Sep 2000 21:58:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ron S") wrote:
>Can you please help here ?
>From routerA I try to ping RouterB and ping is unsuccessfull ?
>
>#show dialer displays "Last status:Fail", Last called: 00:00:16
>
>#show isdn status seems OK on both routers;
>State=MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED
>spid1 sent, spid1 valid...
>
>#show int bri0
>bri0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)...
>
>
>
>
>
>ROUTERA
>hostname RouterA
>!
>enable password cisco
>username RouterB password 7 03075
>isdn switch-type basic-ni1
>!
>int s0
>no ip add
>!
>int bri0
>ip add 196.1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>encap ppp
>isdn spid1 5101 8995101
>isdn spid2 5102 8995102
>dialer idle-timeout 90
>dialer map ip 196.1.1.2 name RouterB broadcast 8995201
>
>dialer load-threshold 1
>dialer-group 1
>no fair-queue
>ppp auth chap
>ppp multilink
>!
>no ip classless
>dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>!
>line con 0
>password cisco
>login
>line aux 0
>line vty 0 4
>login
>!
>end
>
>
>ROUTERB
>
>hostname RouterB
>!
>enable password cisco
>username RouterA password 7 03075
>isdn switch-type basic-ni1
>!
>int s0
>no ip add
>!
>int bri0
>ip add 196.1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
>encap ppp
>isdn spid1 5101 8995201
>isdn spid2 5102 8995202
>dialer idle-timeout 90
>dialer map ip 196.1.1.1 name RouterA
>
>dialer-group 1
>no fair-queue
>ppp auth chap
>ppp multilink
>!
>no ip classless
>dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>!
>line con 0
>password cisco
>login
>line aux 0
>line vty 0 4
>login
>!
>end
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what is unmumbered?
If you're asking about "ip unnumbered", here's some info on it:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html
Clue
On 22 Sep 2000 02:16:21 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("rsma") wrote:
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isdn backup
Hi Erik,
I am just trying this out at this stage. For discussion sake, say I
want to get from r3 to network 2.0.0.0 which is on ethernet of R5:
r3-s0/0--primarys2 r5 ---e1 (2.0.0.0/8)
di1---backup---di1
till using unnumber loop 0 for both primary and backup int.
If static route is to be use, what should it look like?
Your first solution below is using floating static, which I know it
would work. But is there a way to do it without floating static?
Cause if floating static is use, the "backup" command seems
unneccessary.
Not exactly sure what you mean on the second solution, could you
provide sample config?
I got eigrp instead of static route to work earlier, was a bit
surprise to see r3, r5 form neighbor even though they're on different
subnet. r3 (3.0.0.3) & r5 (5.0.0.5). does anyone know if this is
right?
ClueLess.
On 21 Sep 2000 12:34:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Erik Mintz")
wrote:
>What are you trying to backup here? I don't see any routing. Start with a
>working primary first and I can probably give you suggestions for a
>solution.
>Roughly, what you need are two static routes with different weights so the
>primary is favored, and the backup is much more costlier, or, set the dialer
>as the default route with a static 0.0.0.0 pointing to the primary, that
>way, when the primary disappears, the static leaves the table and the dialer
>goes up. remember to write an access list on the dialer to prevent dialing
>for RIP updates, etc. depending on what type of traffic you have traversing
>the router.
>
>
>-Erik
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Clue Less" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 10:25 AM
>Subject: isdn backup
>
>
>| Greetings all,
>|
>| Got a question on routing with ISDN backup. Could
>| someone shed some light on how to properly implement
>| the backup command with routing?
>|
>| I'm using the backup command, and ip unnumber for both
>| primary and backup interfaces.
>|
>| int loop 0 R3 int s0/0-primary--int s2 R5
>| int loop 0 (5.0.0.5)
>| int di1---backup---int di1
>|
>| Below is config.
>|
>| What static route can I use to complete the routing to
>| the remote end? Because unnumbered addresses is use,
>| I'm unsure what the static route should look like.
>| The only thing I can think of is using floating
>| static, but that sort of defeat the purpose of the
>| backup command.
>|
>|
>| ClueLess
>|
>| !
>| hostname r3
>| !
>| interface Loopback0
>| ip address 3.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
>| no ip directed-broadcast
>| !
>| interface Serial0/0
>| backup interface Dialer1
>| ip unnumbered Loopback0
>| no ip directed-broadcast
>| clockrate 64000
>| !
>| interface BRI0/0
>| no ip address
>| no ip directed-broadcast
>| encapsulation ppp
>| dialer pool-member 3
>| isdn switch-type basic-ts013
>| isdn answer1 :3
>| ppp authentication chap
>| !
>| interface Dialer1
>| ip unnumbered Loopback0
>| no ip directed-broadcast
>| encapsulation ppp
>| dialer remote-name r5
>| dialer string :5
>| dialer pool 3
>| dialer-group 1
>| ppp authentication chap
>| !
>| dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>|
>| r3#sh ip route
>| Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M
>| - mobile, B - BGP
>|D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA -
>| OSPF inter area
>|N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA
>| external type 2
>|E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external
>| type 2, E - EGP
>|i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS
>| level-2, * - candidate default
>|U - per-user static route, o - ODR
>|
>| Gateway of last resort is not set
>|
>| 3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>| C 3.0.0.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
>| r3#
>|
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isdn backup
Greetings all, Got a question on routing with ISDN backup. Could someone shed some light on how to properly implement the backup command with routing? I'm using the backup command, and ip unnumber for both primary and backup interfaces. int loop 0 R3 int s0/0-primary--int s2 R5 int loop 0 (5.0.0.5) int di1---backup---int di1 Below is config. What static route can I use to complete the routing to the remote end? Because unnumbered addresses is use, I'm unsure what the static route should look like. The only thing I can think of is using floating static, but that sort of defeat the purpose of the backup command. ClueLess ! hostname r3 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 3.0.0.3 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/0 backup interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 3 isdn switch-type basic-ts013 isdn answer1 :3 ppp authentication chap ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name r5 dialer string :5 dialer pool 3 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit r3#sh ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default U - per-user static route, o - ODR Gateway of last resort is not set 3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 3.0.0.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 r3# __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
