Re: Off Topic - Quietest Cisco Switch [7:53800]

2002-09-21 Thread David Wong

I would say no, there is no such thing from Cisco.  It would be good though.

You have to ignore it or not use it.  I had such complaints from my users
saying they couldn't concentrate.  A week later asking the same Q, the users
said they are used to the noise already.

hktco

- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Larus" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: Off Topic - Quietest Cisco Switch [7:53800]


I can narrow down the field by telling you that my Catalyst 2828-EN (2820
series-- modular brother of the 1900-series) is NOT quiet.  Mine makes so
much noise I avoided using it (and my Cat 5000), and used a combination of
quieter 3Com switch, 3Com hub, and crossover cables.  This was a mistake and
prevented me from getting lots and lots of practice carving out VLANs on
switches early on in my preparation.

(Both of these white elephants are for sale, if anyone is interested.)

Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014
540-368-2601

""Charlie Wehner""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm looking to buy a switch for my apartment.  (Right now, the 2950T
24port
> 10/100/1000Base-T looks promising.)
>
> However, the amount of noise this thing produces is a concern.  I want to
> put it in my living room (Actually, it's the only room... I live in a
> studio.) so I can't have this thing cranking away while I'm trying to
watch
> a movie, have a date over (Ya, it does happen sometimes... it's a
miracle.)
> or when I'm trying to go to sleep.  Does anyone know which switches are
the
> quietest?  I would like it to support the enhanced image.  Anyone else run
> into this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Charlie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53802&t=53800
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2503 PPPoE/DHCP Client (DSL)/NAT [7:52568]

2002-09-02 Thread David Wong

As far as I know, 2500 series router cannot act as a PPPoE client. The
function of PPPoE client are bundled only to 800, 1600, 1700, 2600, 3600
series (incomplete list), but not 2500.

To verify, goto http://www.cisco.com/go/fn and perform a feature search for
"pppoe client". Then you can see which platforms/IOS versions do support
PPPoE client.

As for DHCP client and NAT, 2500 series support both of the functions.

hktco

- Original Message -
From: "Robert Cluett" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 5:17 AM
Subject: 2503 PPPoE/DHCP Client (DSL)/NAT [7:52568]


Has anyone successfuly implemented a 2500 series router acting as a PPPoE
DHCP Client in an DSL environment.  I'd like to remove my Linksys entirely
from my network since it provides too little functionality and control.  If
anyone has done so I would be interested in seeing how they configured this
and under what IOS image.  Thanks in advance.

Robert D. Cluett




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52569&t=52568
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Traceback message [7:39887]

2002-03-29 Thread David Wong

I have read a caveat of IOS 12.2(8)T and it mentions about traceback
message. What is a traceback message? How bad is it? Does it relate to
performance, security or other issues? Does it worth to sacrifice CEF
in order to stop traceback messages? Thanks!

hktco
+
CSCdw40174

If the fast switching is enabled on a dialer interface, traceback
messages are generated with every echo reply.

Workaround: Disable fast switching on the dialer interface. 
+




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39887&t=39887
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: hi [7:4536]

2001-05-15 Thread David Wong

I didn't sign up for this discussion group. Someone used my email client
when I was away. But you guys talked about a lot of CRAPS over this thread.
Is that what you guys signed up for ? At least someone should think this is
way off your topics & wasting all other people's time to read these
nonsense...

- Original Message -
From: "Natasha" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: hi [7:4536]


> Now that this thread ran it's course I wonder if we'll ever hear from
> Mr. Wong again?
>
> >
> > David Wong wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello gang,
> > >
> > > I am new.
> > >
> > > jc2
>
>
> --
> Natasha Flazynski
> CCNA, MCSE
> http://www.ciscobot.com
> My Cisco information site.
> http://www.botbuilders.com
> Artificial Intelligence and Linux development
> 
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4651&t=4536
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



hi [7:4536]

2001-05-15 Thread David Wong

Hello gang,

I am new.

jc2




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4536&t=4536
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]