RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]

2002-10-24 Thread Roberts, Larry
I think the problem is that the 4006 is an IOS switch. I haven't worked with
VoIP on a set based switch yet, so I don't know much about configuring
them for this stuff.



Thanks

Larry
 

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Mellone [mailto:jmellone;speakeasy.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


Larry,

I noticed you have the command switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q. 

Do you need to configure the interface/port as a trunk when you do the set
port auxiliaryvlan command (catos) or the switch voice vlan command (ios
switch)? According to Cisco's website, you don't for a catos switch, but you
do for an ios switch:
 
Check this out:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network/dgcamp
us.htm#xtocid364019

NO TRUNKING HERE ON CATOS SWITCH:

Voice VLAN Configuration

To configure the VVID from the Catalyst software CLI, use the set port
auxiliaryvlan command. You can use this command to set the VVID on a single
port, on a range of ports, or for an entire module. The following example
shows how to display the command syntax:

Console (enable) set port auxiliaryvlan help

Usage: set port auxiliaryvlan 



(vlan + 1..1000)


In the following example, the VVID is set to 222 for ports 2/1 through 2/3.
When the phone powers up, the switch instructs it to register with VLAN 222.

Console (enable) set port auxiliaryvlan 2/1-3 222

Auxiliaryvlan 222 configuration successful.


The following examples show how to display which ports are in which
auxiliary VLAN:

Console show port auxiliaryvlan 222

AuxiliaryVlan auxVlanStatus Mod/Ports

- - -

222 222 1/2,2/1-3

Console show port 2/1

Port AuxiliaryVlan AuxVlan-Status

- - --

2.1 222 active



-

TRUNKING HERE ON IOS SWITCH:

 

The following is an example of VVID configuration on Catalyst switches
running Cisco IOS at the interface level (for example, Catalyst 3524-PWR and
2900XL):

interface FastEthernet0/1

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport trunk native vlan 

switchport mode trunk

switchport voice vlan 

spanning-tree portfast

switchport mode trust



- Jennifer
PS - are you going to trust the CoS going from phone to switch?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56225t=56049
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]

2002-10-24 Thread Roberts, Larry
Sorry for the late reply. Our e-mail was backup up and I am not going
through over 300 emails from the Groupstudy lists.

We have the Cisco eq. working fine and I am currently trying to get the
Avaya stuff to work. Unfortunately I don't have access to the eq directly,
so I have to work with the on site tech to configure things.

Once I get it working I will let everyone know, or if not, why it doesn't
work...

Thanks

Larry
 

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Mellone [mailto:jmellone;speakeasy.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


Larry,

Don't mind me, I'm not challenging the configs, just trying to learn -
sometimes Cisco's website can be very unclear to me ;-)

I forgot to ask - How are those Avaya phones working out compared to Cisco
phones?

- Jennifer




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56224t=56049
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]

2002-10-23 Thread Jennifer Mellone
Larry,

I noticed you have the command switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q. 

Do you need to configure the interface/port as a trunk when you do the set
port auxiliaryvlan command (catos) or the switch voice vlan command (ios
switch)? According to Cisco's website, you don't for a catos switch, but you
do for an ios switch:
 
Check this out:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network/dgcampus.htm#xtocid364019

NO TRUNKING HERE ON CATOS SWITCH:

Voice VLAN Configuration

To configure the VVID from the Catalyst software CLI, use the set port
auxiliaryvlan command. You can use this command to set the VVID on a single
port, on a range of ports, or for an entire module. The following example
shows how to display the command syntax:

Console (enable) set port auxiliaryvlan help

Usage: set port auxiliaryvlan 



(vlan + 1..1000)


In the following example, the VVID is set to 222 for ports 2/1 through 2/3.
When the phone powers up, the switch instructs it to register with VLAN 222.

Console (enable) set port auxiliaryvlan 2/1-3 222

Auxiliaryvlan 222 configuration successful.


The following examples show how to display which ports are in which
auxiliary VLAN:

Console show port auxiliaryvlan 222

AuxiliaryVlan auxVlanStatus Mod/Ports

- - -

222 222 1/2,2/1-3

Console show port 2/1

Port AuxiliaryVlan AuxVlan-Status

- - --

2.1 222 active


-

TRUNKING HERE ON IOS SWITCH:

 

The following is an example of VVID configuration on Catalyst switches
running Cisco IOS at the interface level (for example, Catalyst 3524-PWR and
2900XL):

interface FastEthernet0/1

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport trunk native vlan 

switchport mode trunk

switchport voice vlan 

spanning-tree portfast

switchport mode trust



- Jennifer
PS - are you going to trust the CoS going from phone to switch?



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56182t=56049
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]

2002-10-23 Thread Jennifer Mellone
Larry,

Don't mind me, I'm not challenging the configs, just trying to learn -
sometimes Cisco's website can be very unclear to me ;-)

I forgot to ask - How are those Avaya phones working out compared to Cisco
phones?

- Jennifer


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56183t=56049
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]

2002-10-22 Thread John Brandis
Damn phones,

Don't they make you feel stupid sometimes. Great work Larry.

jb

-Original Message-
From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts;expanets.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:57 AM
To: John Brandis
Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


The Fix was to run a newer version of code on the phones. 
We swapped to p00303020213 and that fixed it, or so it appears. We will know
more after testing tomorrow.

Larry


-Original Message-
From: John Brandis [mailto:john.brandis;solution6.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:26 PM
To: 'Roberts, Larry'
Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


My problem which is hopefully something to look into, was that there was a
config on the phones themselves that played havoc  with what I was telling
the switch to do. Hopefully this will solve your problems as it does not ,
according to your config and what TAC suggests, and issue with the config of
the 4006.




-Original Message-
From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts;expanets.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:21 PM
To: John Brandis
Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


Running Cisco 7960's and some Avaya phones as well, although I don't know
their model number.

I don't remember what I did to help, but glad I could do it! 
If I come up with an answer I will let you know..

Larry


-Original Message-
From: John Brandis [mailto:john.brandis;solution6.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:39 PM
To: 'Roberts, Larry'
Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


I am very interested as I just purchased a 4006 to do the exact same setup.

Whats the phone type you are using, hopefully not a NEC ?

John
Sydney, Australia

Ps: thanks for helping with my VoIP issues last month.



-Original Message-
From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts;expanets.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]


Hey folks, Im hoping that one of you can help me with a problem. 
I have a 4006 with a SUPIII running 2 VLAN's. The Data VLAN is VLAN 1 and
the Voice VLAN is VLAN 200. I have a DHCP server on VLAN 1 with the proper
scopes defined. My problem is that the phone is getting a VLAN 1 ip address,
not a VLAN 200.

Standard IP phone config:

interface FastEthernet x/x
 description IP Phone
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport voice vlan 200
 no snmp trap link-status
 spanning-tree portfast


Now if I hardcode the switchport to VLAN 200 with a switchport access vlan
200 and switchport mode access, it works fine.

I did a debug on the SUPIII and I see the bootp request come in on VLAN 200,
and I can see the SUP III set the GIADDR to the VLAN 200 address.

I had the onsite tech take a look at the phone, and it see's itself as on
VLAN 200, so I don't understand why the request is being met with a VLAN 1
ip. 

I know that the scopes are correct because hard coding the interface makes
it work. I know that the VLAN interface configuration is correct because it
works when the port is hard coded to the correct interface.

I suspected that CEF was preventing the router from setting the GIADDR of
the packet, but debug shows it doing it so now I am lost.

I tried the standard  no ip route-cache / mroute-cache  but that hasn't
helped. I don't know if it's a software bug or what, but I am at a loss.

Anybody done this before ? I have several 3500's running this configuration
and they work fine, so I am beginning to wonder if it isn't in the SUP III
that is causing the issue. Perhaps it says its rewriting the GIADDR, but its
not.

IOS used: System image file is bootflash:cat4000-is-mz.121-12c.EW.bin

Any help/thoughts/verbal abuse is appreciated. 
I have a TAC case open to see what I'm doing wrong, but they aren't seeing
anything config wise being the problem so I thought I would try the experts
over here.

Thanks

Larry
**

visit http://www.solution6.com

UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

*
This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot
use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case, please
notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of
Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
*




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56116t=56049
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations