Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
On 23 Jul 2001 22:16:17 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Priscilla
Oppenheimer") wrote:
>At 09:53 PM 7/23/01, Sammi wrote:
>>Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input.
>>
>>I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons.
>>During the transition I will have a few 1900
>
>I don't think the 1900s support 802.1q!? That will be your first problem.
I love this work ;-)
Thanks for the heads up.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13448&t=13325
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
At 09:53 PM 7/23/01, Sammi wrote:
>Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input.
>
>I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons.
>During the transition I will have a few 1900
I don't think the 1900s support 802.1q!? That will be your first problem.
Priscilla
>and a couple of 2800
>switches in the network and it seems I'll have less trouble with the
>802.1Q.
>
>On 23 Jul 2001 15:39:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ed Horley") wrote:
>
> >The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the
> >enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config:
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html
> >
> >Hope that helps.
> >
> >
> >""Arun"" wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Hi
> >> ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in
> >that
> >> but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use
> >> Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which
one
> >> is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this .
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Arun Sharma
> >> ""Sammi"" wrote in message
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup.
> >> > I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core
> >> > will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these
> >> > access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will
> >> > connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will
> >> > connect to end stations.
> >> >
> >> > Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking?
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13447&t=13325
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input.
I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons.
During the transition I will have a few 1900 and a couple of 2800
switches in the network and it seems I'll have less trouble with the
802.1Q.
On 23 Jul 2001 15:39:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ed Horley") wrote:
>The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the
>enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config:
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>
>""Arun"" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Hi
>> ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in
>that
>> but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use
>> Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one
>> is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this .
>>
>> regards
>> Arun Sharma
>> ""Sammi"" wrote in message
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup.
>> > I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core
>> > will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these
>> > access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will
>> > connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will
>> > connect to end stations.
>> >
>> > Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13446&t=13325
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html Hope that helps. ""Arun"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in that > but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use > Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one > is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this . > > regards > Arun Sharma > ""Sammi"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup. > > I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core > > will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these > > access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will > > connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will > > connect to end stations. > > > > Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13417&t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
Hi ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in that but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this . regards Arun Sharma ""Sammi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup. > I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core > will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these > access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will > connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will > connect to end stations. > > Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13342&t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
