Re: BGP Path Selection [7:34652]
Duh, thanks for straightening out my twisted brain. That's what happens i guess when the reading gets too close to the pages that we miss to see the book. Thanks John. Elmer - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:12 PM Subject: Re: BGP Path Selection [7:34652] > If RtrB is an iBGP peer of RtrA, it will never advertise a route to RtrA > that it learned from RtrA or any other iBGP peer. > > HTH, > John > > >>> "Cebuano" 2/6/02 10:38:01 AM >>> > As per CCO: > BGP selects only one path as the best path. When the path is selected, > BGP > puts the selected path in its routing table and propagates the path to > its > neighbors. > But... > Step 3 - prefer the path with the largest local preference. > Step 4 - If the local preferences are the same, prefer the path that > was > originated by BGP running on this router. > > So if RtrA originated 10.0.0.0, it advertises this to its IBGP peer > RtrB with > a default Local Preference = 100, now if RtrB is configured with a > route-map > that > sets this incoming update's Local Preference to 250, this would result > in > RtrA > installing in its route table "to get to 10.0.0.0 prefer taking the > path that > goes to RtrB"? So now RtrA propagates this info to RtrB? > Please help make some sense of this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34673&t=34652 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Path Selection [7:34652]
If RtrB is an iBGP peer of RtrA, it will never advertise a route to RtrA that it learned from RtrA or any other iBGP peer. HTH, John >>> "Cebuano" 2/6/02 10:38:01 AM >>> As per CCO: BGP selects only one path as the best path. When the path is selected, BGP puts the selected path in its routing table and propagates the path to its neighbors. But... Step 3 - prefer the path with the largest local preference. Step 4 - If the local preferences are the same, prefer the path that was originated by BGP running on this router. So if RtrA originated 10.0.0.0, it advertises this to its IBGP peer RtrB with a default Local Preference = 100, now if RtrB is configured with a route-map that sets this incoming update's Local Preference to 250, this would result in RtrA installing in its route table "to get to 10.0.0.0 prefer taking the path that goes to RtrB"? So now RtrA propagates this info to RtrB? Please help make some sense of this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34656&t=34652 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Path Selection [7:34652]
As per CCO: BGP selects only one path as the best path. When the path is selected, BGP puts the selected path in its routing table and propagates the path to its neighbors. But... Step 3 - prefer the path with the largest local preference. Step 4 - If the local preferences are the same, prefer the path that was originated by BGP running on this router. So if RtrA originated 10.0.0.0, it advertises this to its IBGP peer RtrB with a default Local Preference = 100, now if RtrB is configured with a route-map that sets this incoming update's Local Preference to 250, this would result in RtrA installing in its route table "to get to 10.0.0.0 prefer taking the path that goes to RtrB"? So now RtrA propagates this info to RtrB? Please help make some sense of this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34652&t=34652 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182]
yes. The network statement that the authors used for OSPF would include that interface, so they decided that prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending updates to RouterA by issuing a passive-inteface statement. Think about why they did that - one reason they did that is because RouterA is in a different BGP autonomous system, and one typically prevents IGP updates from going out to an EBGP neighbor. The network from ser0/0 still needs to be advertised out ser0/1 (within the same BGP AS), hence its inclusion in the OSPF process. - Original Message - From: "Alex Lee" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:31 AM Subject: Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182] > Group, > > There is a 'passive-interface Serial0/0' subcommand under 'router ospf 64' > on both RouterB and RouterC. When I do a 'sh ip ospf int s0', I can see > something like 'No Hellos '. > > Am I correct to assume that this 'passive-int serial0/0' is configured to > prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending Hello packets out of their > Serial0/0 interface to RouterA ? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19235&t=19182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182]
Group, There is a 'passive-interface Serial0/0' subcommand under 'router ospf 64' on both RouterB and RouterC. When I do a 'sh ip ospf int s0', I can see something like 'No Hellos '. Am I correct to assume that this 'passive-int serial0/0' is configured to prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending Hello packets out of their Serial0/0 interface to RouterA ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19182&t=19182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
Couple of amendments. Asterisks mark several factors that are Cisco-implementation specific, although there are knobs to turn them to the IETF specified behavior. "Frank Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, >This is the BGP attribute decision process: > >1 BGP Path Selection starts; if the next hop is inaccessible, do not >consider it. > >2 Consider larger BGP administrative weights first. * weight, with a scope of a single router, is Cisco-specific > >3 If the routers have the same weight, consider the route with >higher local preference. > >4 If the routes have the same local preference, prefer the route >that the specified router originated. > >5 If no route was originated, prefer the shorter AS path. * This is Cisco, not IETF, behavior, and can be disabled. The IETF idea seems to have been that local-preference would be set as a consequence of AS path filters. > >6 If the AS paths are of the same length, prefer external paths over >internal paths. > >7 If all paths are external, prefer the lowest origin code (IGP >[Interior Gateway Protocol] >8 If origin codes are the same, prefer the path with the lowest >MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED). A missing metric is treated as zero. -- clarification: HIGHER weight and local preference are better LOWER MED is better * treating the missing metric as 0 is Cisco-specific; the IETF says to treat a missing MED as the highest possible value. ** By default, MEDs are comparable only between the same AS, unless always-consider-med is configured > >9 If IGP synchronization is disabled and only an internal path >remains, prefer the path through the closest IGP neighbor. > >10 Prefer the route with the lowest IP address value for the BGP router ID. * unless BGP load balancing is enabled. If this feature is on, routes that are otherwise identical (i.e., to the same AS) will be added up to the BGP maximum-paths value. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
Good point Peter. >From: "Peter Van Oene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Frank Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: bgp path selection criteria >Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:32:32 -0500 > >Keep in mind that Weight is Cisco proprietary. Most routers begin with >local pref as the first tie break. > >*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > >On 11/27/2000 at 8:18 AM Frank Wells wrote: > > >This is the BGP attribute decision process: > > > >1 BGP Path Selection starts; if the next hop is inaccessible, do not > >consider it. > > > >2 Consider larger BGP administrative weights first. > > > >3 If the routers have the same weight, consider the route with higher >local > >preference. > > > >4 If the routes have the same local preference, prefer the route that the > >specified router originated. > > > >5 If no route was originated, prefer the shorter AS path. > > > >6 If the AS paths are of the same length, prefer external paths over > >internal paths. > > > >7 If all paths are external, prefer the lowest origin code (IGP [Interior > >Gateway Protocol] > > >8 If origin codes are the same, prefer the path with the lowest > >MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED). A missing metric is treated as zero. > > > >9 If IGP synchronization is disabled and only an internal path remains, > >prefer the path through the closest IGP neighbor. > > > >10 Prefer the route with the lowest IP address value for the BGP router >ID. > > > > > >>From: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: bgp path selection criteria > >>Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 03:38:56 -0500 > >> > >> > >> > >>hi , > >> > >> > >>Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or > >>local preference > >> > >> > >>From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not >so , > >>why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes > >>many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local > >>preference > >>to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if >we > >>do this but this is not happening > >> > >>Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH >is > >>shorter > >> > >>why is that so? > >> > >> > >>Jason > >> > >>_ > >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>_ > >Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : >http://explorer.msn.com > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
Keep in mind that Weight is Cisco proprietary. Most routers begin with local pref as the first tie break. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 11/27/2000 at 8:18 AM Frank Wells wrote: >This is the BGP attribute decision process: > >1 BGP Path Selection starts; if the next hop is inaccessible, do not >consider it. > >2 Consider larger BGP administrative weights first. > >3 If the routers have the same weight, consider the route with higher local >preference. > >4 If the routes have the same local preference, prefer the route that the >specified router originated. > >5 If no route was originated, prefer the shorter AS path. > >6 If the AS paths are of the same length, prefer external paths over >internal paths. > >7 If all paths are external, prefer the lowest origin code (IGP [Interior >Gateway Protocol] >8 If origin codes are the same, prefer the path with the lowest >MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED). A missing metric is treated as zero. > >9 If IGP synchronization is disabled and only an internal path remains, >prefer the path through the closest IGP neighbor. > >10 Prefer the route with the lowest IP address value for the BGP router ID. > > >>From: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: bgp path selection criteria >>Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 03:38:56 -0500 >> >> >> >>hi , >> >> >>Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or >>local preference >> >> >>From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , >>why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes >>many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local >>preference >>to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we >>do this but this is not happening >> >>Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is >>shorter >> >>why is that so? >> >> >>Jason >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Yee, Jason wrote: > Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or > local preference Local preference! See Halabi's book P.168 > >From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , > why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes > many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local preference > to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we > do this but this is not happening > > Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is > shorter Here you lost me; what does it mean "prefixes goes to another provider's link"? Please consider that the higher the local preference, the "more preferred" is the route; can you please send to the list the output of "sh ip bgp for one of the prefixes you are having problem with ? The output should be something like this: (fake example ) 3300 3300 3300 3300 8933 137, (aggregated by 137 193.206.129.254), (received & used) 195.206.65.137 (metric 6) from 195.158.226.160 (192.121.158.8) Origin IGP, localpref 134, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate, best Community: 1755:80 1755:666 1755:1000 1755:2000 Originator: 192.121.158.8, Cluster list: 195.158.226.160 3300 3300 3300 3300 8933 137, (aggregated by 137 193.206.129.254), (received & used) 195.206.65.137 (metric 6) from 195.158.226.161 (192.121.158.8) Origin IGP, localpref 104, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate Community: 1755:80 1755:666 1755:1000 1755:2000 Originator: 192.121.158.8, Cluster list: 195.158.226.161 In this example the first route is chosen for its highest local preference.. Can you post an example of your output??? Cheers, Saverio _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
This is the BGP attribute decision process: 1 BGP Path Selection starts; if the next hop is inaccessible, do not consider it. 2 Consider larger BGP administrative weights first. 3 If the routers have the same weight, consider the route with higher local preference. 4 If the routes have the same local preference, prefer the route that the specified router originated. 5 If no route was originated, prefer the shorter AS path. 6 If the AS paths are of the same length, prefer external paths over internal paths. 7 If all paths are external, prefer the lowest origin code (IGP [Interior Gateway Protocol] From: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: bgp path selection criteria >Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 03:38:56 -0500 > > > >hi , > > >Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or >local preference > > >From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , >why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes >many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local >preference >to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we >do this but this is not happening > >Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is >shorter > >why is that so? > > >Jason > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bgp path selection criteria
Hi I hope I understand your problem correctly but I will try, first of all the local preference is a more powerful attribute than the AS_path. There is a significant difference between them, local preference is not a transitive attribute which means that when your update leaves your AS it strips off the local preference value and the other AS will not take it in to account in the path selection, the local preference attribute is only transitive in side the AS. The prepend option is used to "cheat" the other BGP router to think that the way is longer. When using that option you can only hope that there isn't any more powerful attribute than shortest path. There is no attribute that will change other AS's path selection, every AS makes his own paths decision, that's way your local preference setting didn't took effect on the path selection of your clients. I hope it answer your question Gil -Original Message- From: Yee, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ??? ? 21 ?? 2000 10:39 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: bgp path selection criteria hi , Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or local preference >From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local preference to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we do this but this is not happening Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is shorter why is that so? Jason _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
Local Preference 1st. (see pgs 158 & 159 of Internet Routing Architectures 2nd Ed.) Adam Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:38 AM Subject: bgp path selection criteria > > > hi , > > > Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or > local preference > > > From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , > why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes > many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local preference > to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we > do this but this is not happening > > Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is > shorter > > why is that so? > > > Jason > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bgp path selection criteria
hi , Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or local preference >From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local preference to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we do this but this is not happening Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is shorter why is that so? Jason _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bgp path selection criteria
I found this the other night... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/25.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yee, Jason Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:39 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: bgp path selection criteria hi , Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or local preference >From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local preference to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we do this but this is not happening Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is shorter why is that so? Jason _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection criteria
Local preference is only significant with your AS. Thus, if traffic destined for this customer hit your AS, you would use local preference as the first piece of criteria (outside of weight in cisco I believe) to determine which of your available next hops into that customer you would post in your table. Outside of your AS, you generally only dealing with the AS-PATH attribute for path selection. Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 11/21/2000 at 3:38 AM Yee, Jason wrote: >hi , > > >Anyone here knows which BGP path criteria takes precedence ? AS_PATH or >local preference > > >>From what I read it is local preference , but in actual fact it is not so , >why I said this is because I have a customer who prepends their prefixes >many times then advertise them to us but on our side we set local preference >to customers' routes to 90 which in fact will always come back to us if we >do this but this is not happening > >Instead the prefixes go to another providers' link because their AS-PATH is >shorter > >why is that so? > > >Jason > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection
Of course not! p.s: weight then local preference etc. --- Kikpasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope not, because I can't remember my self > > kerry > > "Yee, Jason" wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > Anyone who has taken the Routing 2.0 exam can tell > me do we need to remember > > the bgp path selection order , like using local > preference first, follow by > > weight etc. > > > > I find it hard to remember > > > > thanks > > > > Jason > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection
Yes. You do. But just the general idea. ""Yee, Jason"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 859B90209E2FD311BE5600902751445D2E7DA3@LYNX">news:859B90209E2FD311BE5600902751445D2E7DA3@LYNX... > hi, > > Anyone who has taken the Routing 2.0 exam can tell me do we need to remember > the bgp path selection order , like using local preference first, follow by > weight etc. > > I find it hard to remember > > > thanks > > Jason > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection
Let's just say that BGP is an essential aspect of the exam, and if you don't have BGP wired you will need near perfect scores on the rest of the test to pass... HTH, Casey, CCNP >From: Kikpasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Kikpasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: bgp path selection >Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 03:48:40 +0100 > >I hope not, because I can't remember my self > >kerry > >"Yee, Jason" wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > Anyone who has taken the Routing 2.0 exam can tell me do we need to >remember > > the bgp path selection order , like using local preference first, follow >by > > weight etc. > > > > I find it hard to remember > > > > thanks > > > > Jason > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Get a sneak preview of the new MSN: http://preview.msn.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bgp path selection
I hope not, because I can't remember my self kerry "Yee, Jason" wrote: > > hi, > > Anyone who has taken the Routing 2.0 exam can tell me do we need to remember > the bgp path selection order , like using local preference first, follow by > weight etc. > > I find it hard to remember > > thanks > > Jason > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bgp path selection
hi, Anyone who has taken the Routing 2.0 exam can tell me do we need to remember the bgp path selection order , like using local preference first, follow by weight etc. I find it hard to remember thanks Jason ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
