Re: NWA Development and Sources?

2010-03-17 Thread D . Gassen
Sorry for the late answer... I was trying some stuff...

On Mar 11, 2010, at 19:22 , Nicola Mfb wrote:

> [...]
 I really like the concept of it (love it, actually) but not being able to 
 connect to WEP "secured" networks is not that great. I cannot find any 
 sources for it.
>>> 
>>> Are you able to connect to your WEP network using wpa_supplicant
>>> manually? in that case NWA should work or it needs a trivial fix.
>> 
>> I do get
>> 
>>> AppletController "Cannot set network options
>>> Did not receive correct message arguments."
>>> Unaccepted options: QMap(("key_mgmt", QVariant(QString, "WEP") ) ( 
>>> "priority" ,  QVariant(QString, "0") ) ( "ssid" ,  QVariant(QString, 
>>> "bishop") ) ( "wep_key0" ,  QVariant(QString, "**") 
>>> ) ( "wep_key1" ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( "wep_key2" ,  QVariant(QString, 
>>> "") ) ( "wep_key3" ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( "wep_tx_keyidx" ,  
>>> QVariant(QString, "0") ) )
>>> AppletController cannot add network QVariant(QString, "GWN") QVariant(, )
> 
> Thats a dbus error reply from wpa_supplicant.
> Just guessing (I cannot check now) try to remove empty wep keys from
> .nwa.conf, or in general remove from it pair values in "Unaccepted
> options" that are not present in your wpa_supplicant.conf.

Ok, I tried the following:

1. Removed the attributes wep_key1, wep_key2 and wep_key3 in .nwa.conf

2. Set the attributes wep_key1, wep_key2 and wep_key3 to the same value as 
wep_key0 in .nwa.conf

3. Moved my /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf out of the way

None of these, unfortunately, did make any difference.

Could it maybe be because I give the key as a hex string (26 characters)? Do I 
have to prefix it with something to indicate it's a hex string? (I tried 
"0x..." but that didn't work either)

Btw, is there *any* documentation on the dbus interface of wpa supplicant? The 
only thing I could find was this statement:

> The wpa_supplicant dbus interface isn't particularly well documented [...]

> [...]
> 
>> I do actually have problems with the ar6000 driver if I do *not* blacklist 
>> it (in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist). I do see kernel panics in the syslog and 
>> Wifi usually does not work (fsoraw fails to aquire the WiFi resource and I 
>> don't get the eth0 interface). I *seem* to have less problems if I load the 
>> driver later manually.
>> 
>> I am running andy-tracking 3db70757d6fabb17 with my own config (DEBUG 
>> options disabled) but I have the same results with the current kernel from 
>> SHR-U. Is that aforementioned patch included?
> 
> Not yet.

Paul's patch did make a big difference in the stability of the driver, however, 
I also needed
Hm, blacklisting didn't help. The driver stopped working for me later that day. 
It seems that Paul's patch made the driver more stable once it's working (have 
yet to see a PANIC).

The problem that I encountered with the ar6000 driver seems to be described 
here:

> http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2327

and when I added the suggested patch the driver loaded pretty well.

Dirk



> 
>Niko
> 
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: NWA Development and Sources?

2010-03-11 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:56 AM, D. Gassen  wrote:
[...]
>> now seems to be rock solid. Please try the patch and report on trac any 
>> issues, this should
>> accelerate the upstream landing.
>
> Do you have a URL handy by any chance?

It's on openmoko trac:

https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/attachment/ticket/2333/0001-ar6000-minimise-possibility-of-race-in-ar6000_ioctl_.patch

[...]
>>> I really like the concept of it (love it, actually) but not being able to 
>>> connect to WEP "secured" networks is not that great. I cannot find any 
>>> sources for it.
>>
>> Are you able to connect to your WEP network using wpa_supplicant
>> manually? in that case NWA should work or it needs a trivial fix.
>
> I do get
>
>> AppletController "Cannot set network options
>> Did not receive correct message arguments."
>> Unaccepted options: QMap(("key_mgmt", QVariant(QString, "WEP") ) ( 
>> "priority" ,  QVariant(QString, "0") ) ( "ssid" ,  QVariant(QString, 
>> "bishop") ) ( "wep_key0" ,  QVariant(QString, "**") 
>> ) ( "wep_key1" ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( "wep_key2" ,  QVariant(QString, 
>> "") ) ( "wep_key3" ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( "wep_tx_keyidx" ,  
>> QVariant(QString, "0") ) )
>> AppletController cannot add network QVariant(QString, "GWN") QVariant(, )

Thats a dbus error reply from wpa_supplicant.
Just guessing (I cannot check now) try to remove empty wep keys from
.nwa.conf, or in general remove from it pair values in "Unaccepted
options" that are not present in your wpa_supplicant.conf.

[...]

> I do actually have problems with the ar6000 driver if I do *not* blacklist it 
> (in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist). I do see kernel panics in the syslog and Wifi 
> usually does not work (fsoraw fails to aquire the WiFi resource and I don't 
> get the eth0 interface). I *seem* to have less problems if I load the driver 
> later manually.
>
> I am running andy-tracking 3db70757d6fabb17 with my own config (DEBUG options 
> disabled) but I have the same results with the current kernel from SHR-U. Is 
> that aforementioned patch included?

Not yet.

Niko

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: NWA Development and Sources?

2010-03-11 Thread D. Gassen

On Mar 11, 2010, at 17:11 , Nicola Mfb wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:14 PM, D. Gassen  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Does anybody know if NWA is still being developed? According to the page on 
>> the OpenMoko Wiki (http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NWA) it seems that it was 
>> more like a proof of concept.
> 
> Yes, it was born to make brainstorming, that's the reason sources were
> not released. Anyway I got no partecipation in that nor in wiki
> "Discussion Board" in several months, I guess becouse it's QT based.
> Developing was stopped due to lack of interest and kernel problems,
> but now Paul Ferster patched ar6000 module, and Ben reported that NWA
> now seems to be rock solid. Please try the patch and report on trac any 
> issues, this should
> accelerate the upstream landing.

Do you have a URL handy by any chance?

> NWA is now one of the neophysis wifi manager candidate, so I'm going
> in the next weeks to improve and clean it and finally release sources,
> so please be patient.
> 
>> Was it replaced by something else?
>> 
>> I really like the concept of it (love it, actually) but not being able to 
>> connect to WEP "secured" networks is not that great. I cannot find any 
>> sources for it.
> 
> Are you able to connect to your WEP network using wpa_supplicant
> manually? in that case NWA should work or it needs a trivial fix.

I do get

> AppletController "Cannot set network options
> Did not receive correct message arguments." 
> Unaccepted options: QMap(("key_mgmt", QVariant(QString, "WEP") ) ( "priority" 
> ,  QVariant(QString, "0") ) ( "ssid" ,  QVariant(QString, "bishop") ) ( 
> "wep_key0" ,  QVariant(QString, "**") ) ( "wep_key1" 
> ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( "wep_key2" ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( 
> "wep_key3" ,  QVariant(QString, "") ) ( "wep_tx_keyidx" ,  QVariant(QString, 
> "0") ) )  
> AppletController cannot add network QVariant(QString, "GWN") QVariant(, )


for both WEP networks that I have defined in .nwa.conf. However, this might be 
caused by the middleware since today for one time only nwa *was* able to 
associated with "bishop".

The WPA-PSK network at home works flawlessly. I have the same networks 
configured in /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf and I can associate with 
the WEP networks without problems:

> r...@freerunner:~# fsoraw -r WiFi -- /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant  
> -c/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf -ieth0
> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
> CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS 
> Trying to associate with 00:19:aa:14:d9:60 (SSID='bishop' freq=2452 MHz)
> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
> Associated with 00:19:aa:14:d9:60
> CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:19:aa:14:d9:60 completed (auth) [id=3 
> id_str=]



I do actually have problems with the ar6000 driver if I do *not* blacklist it 
(in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist). I do see kernel panics in the syslog and Wifi 
usually does not work (fsoraw fails to aquire the WiFi resource and I don't get 
the eth0 interface). I *seem* to have less problems if I load the driver later 
manually.

I am running andy-tracking 3db70757d6fabb17 with my own config (DEBUG options 
disabled) but I have the same results with the current kernel from SHR-U. Is 
that aforementioned patch included?

Dirk


> 
> Niko
> 
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: NWA Development and Sources?

2010-03-11 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:14 PM, D. Gassen  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know if NWA is still being developed? According to the page on 
> the OpenMoko Wiki (http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NWA) it seems that it was 
> more like a proof of concept.

Yes, it was born to make brainstorming, that's the reason sources were
not released. Anyway I got no partecipation in that nor in wiki
"Discussion Board" in several months, I guess becouse it's QT based.
Developing was stopped due to lack of interest and kernel problems,
but now Paul Ferster patched ar6000 module, and Ben reported that NWA
now seems to be rock solid.
Please try the patch and report on trac any issues, this should
accelerate the upstream landing.
NWA is now one of the neophysis wifi manager candidate, so I'm going
in the next weeks to improve and clean it and finally release sources,
so please be patient.

> Was it replaced by something else?
>
> I really like the concept of it (love it, actually) but not being able to 
> connect to WEP "secured" networks is not that great. I cannot find any 
> sources for it.

Are you able to connect to your WEP network using wpa_supplicant
manually? in that case NWA should work or it needs a trivial fix.

 Niko

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


NWA Development and Sources?

2010-03-11 Thread D. Gassen
Hi all,

Does anybody know if NWA is still being developed? According to the page on the 
OpenMoko Wiki (http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NWA) it seems that it was more 
like a proof of concept.

Was it replaced by something else?

I really like the concept of it (love it, actually) but not being able to 
connect to WEP "secured" networks is not that great. I cannot find any sources 
for it. The Subversion host mentioned in the binary package 
(svn://svn.noko.dnsalias.org/;module=nwa;proto=https) seems to be non-existant 
(I don't get a reply from svn.noko.dnsalias.org) and the homepage

> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/noko/index.php?title=Main_Page

(if that's the one) doesn't mention nwa at all.

Thanks for any pointers,
Dirk
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community