Re: [Cooker] Konqueror can't handle HTML??

2001-04-28 Thread Rajesh Veerappan

Try installing autoirpm, that should take care of any dependency problems
automatically, atleast it did for me.

On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:

 So sprach michael am Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:00:34PM -0800:
  Can I do a rpm -e *.rpm from the directory i installed from and expect 
  to get my working box back?
 
 Well, the grave error you've made was to --force --nodeps the installation. 
 Dependencies are in there with a reason, you know...  Before erasing the
 rpm's, why don't you try to fix the dependencies first?
 
 Alexander Skwar
 





Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-04 Thread Rajesh Veerappan

Installing nautilus-trilobite will fix the eazel services problem.

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, joabb2 wrote:

 I refuse to use Netscape since a telco isp tried to shove it
 down my throat and wouldnt budge.
 Konqureor starts out at 14k/bps and gradually rises to a max of 292k/bps
 after ten minutes.
 I know it has something to do with handshaking and number of packets
 received with out error but haven't a clue where to start debugging
 
 BTW initialized Gnome, Eazel and evolution got my email going
 once. Now clicking on icon says eazel is misspelled  :?
 Thank you for reply
 
 JoAnne
 - Original Message -
 From: "Vadim Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [Cooker] new install
 
 
  On Tuesday 03 April 2001 07:49, joabb2 wrote:
  |   BTW  I still use win/Gozilla for d/ld. get 500-600k/bps.
  |   cant get more than 292k/bps with Linux :((
  |   (yes traceroute and ping are about same)
  |
 
  Do you use Netscape/Mozilla inder Linux?
  Try Konqueror.
 
  I am on dialup, and transfer rate (on ftp download) is higher for me under
  Linux, comparing to Win98.
  I am using KDE 2.1 / Konqueror 2.1.
 
  |   JoAnne
 
  --
 
  Vadim Plessky
  http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
  http://kde2.newmail.ru/index_rus.html  (Russian)
  Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it!
  http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
 
 
 
 





Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake/urpmi comments

2001-04-02 Thread Rajesh Veerappan

Something else that would be nice to have:
urpmi.updateall

to update all installed media insted of manually updating whatever number
of ftp servers you have added. If it could somehow be made to ignore cdrom
media, that would kick even more ass, since I'm assuming cdrom media
doesn't get changed every day.

Raj

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Con Kolivas wrote:

 Running 
 Linux-Mandrake Cooker-i586 20010402  1:33
 
 rpmdrake 1.3-28
 urpmi 1.5-26
 
 Looking real good now! Great job folks.
 
 Problem with urpmi - if I do an update on a directory with a bad RPM (say one 
 with zero bytes because it was never downloaded) urpmi gives up and then 
 corrupts that database, and doesn't read the rest of the directory. rpmdrake 
 will then segfault during startup. Removing that database entry saves the 
 other entries. 
 
 urpmi does not cope too well with multiple versions of the same package in 
 the database.
 
 urpmi still gets the file location wrong if I install from a subdirectory 
 from a harddisk based install
 
 In rpmdrake - if it tries to install an RPM and a conflict arises, if you 
 cancel the prompt to not install the RPM then the wizard thinks you have 
 successfully installed the package (even though you haven't).
 
 in rpmdrake - once you update/install a package, it remains selected unless 
 you deselect it.
 
 rpmdrake cannot seem to distinguish between a source package and a binary one 
 - both entries are listed identically if they are the same application!
 
 In the old rpmdrake I had the ability to do a search on file listings and 
 package descriptions as well as the package names - this is a sorely missed 
 feature.
 
 To be able to use rpmdrake or urpmi as the sole package management utility 
 there needs to be a way to install one package that is not listed in the 
 database - ie if I download j2sdk.rpm I should be able to urpmi j2sdk.rpm 
 without having to add it to the database. I know it's too late for this given 
 the freeze but I'm just saying it would be nice.
 
 Keep up the good work!
 Con.
 





RE: [Cooker] Content of mirors

2001-03-23 Thread Rajesh Veerappan

Ahh, you obviously haven't read all the complaints on Slashdot from
Aussies :) There was one guy who did a traceroute on his neighbor and the
packet was going all the way to New York before coming back! It all
depends on which other ISPs your ISP is peering with at the NAP(?).

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Eaon wrote:

 Forget all the fancy topology junk, I just mirrored off it one night, and
 was pulling upwards of 700K/s.  That's getting close to topping out the max
 speed of my cable modem.  What more evidence do I need than that?
 
 Besides, just take a wild guess, what is going to be closer, topology-wise,
 to me, a mirror in the same city as me, or one on the other side of the
 Atlantic (and continent, since Alberta is on the west side of North
 America)?  Can you give any example when it would be a shorter route to
 cross the planet than to go down the block?
 
 I wasn't just guessing about how good it was before I said something, I have
 been known on occasion to research (what little I had to do) what I say
 before I say it.
 
 Unfortunately it wasn't until the mirror was "done", i.e. downloaded all
 that it could, that I found out that the thing was broken.  It goes as far
 as xearth (IIRC) in the Mandrake/RPMS directory, and everything
 alphabetically beyond that is not there (I checked against another mirror
 (ciril.fr) that I knew was good).  images and boot directories are empty
 too.
 
 Eaon
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JJ
  Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 2:08 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Cooker] Content of mirors
 
 
  Just because it's close (physically)(sic) to you does not
  indicate how close it
  actually is in internet topography, try a traceroute to the
  LOWEST/FASTEST path!
 
  Eaon wrote:
 
   While we are on the subject of messed up mirrors, Cadvision
   (ftp.cadvision.com) is listed on the cooker mirrors page, but
  their mirror
   of broken.  It looks like it failed to finish mirroring on Jan
  30th, and no
   one has started it back up again and fixed it.  I've tried
  emailing them but
   got no response (and mirroring from them, with their server
  center being 20
   blocks from my home, would be far more efficient than pulling
  from anywhere
   else).  Does anyone else have a contact there they could talk to and get
   this fixed?
  
   And incidentally, the Cooker page says Cadvision is in the U.S.
   It isn't.
   It is located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  But now I'm just being
   patriotic.  ;-)
  
   Otherwise, the University of Alberta (in Edmonton, 300 KMs
  north of Calgary)
   has a big, fat sunsite mirror and a big, fat pipe, but no mandrake-devel
   (7.2 and iso's, yes, devel, no).  Has anyone considered asking
  them if they
   would add cooker to their site?
  
   Eaon
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Guillaume Rousse
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 1:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Content of mirors
   
   
Who's in charge of mirror at mandrakesoft ?
How is it possible that some mirrors, as rsync.proxad.net, have more
content than primary mirrors (sunsite.uoi.no or sunet.se) ? They
have sparc
 alpha packages, for instance.
--
Guillaume Rousse
   
Murphy's law : If anything can go wrong, it will.
O'Tool's commentary : Murphy was an optimist.