Re: [Cooker] subversion-0.14.5-0.r3578.2mdk

2002-11-06 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi.

On Wed 2002-11-06 at 20:37:52 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
[...]
> > > Yes I noticed that. I wonder if it has something to do with wrong
> > > sonames or something?
> >
> > I checked the source. libsvn_ra (the part that loads ra modules)
> > searches for files with pattern:
> >
> >   libsvn_ra_%s-%d.so
> 
> and?

I just meant to add that the source indeed only looks for the ra-.so
files that do not end with numbers. Not really anything new, as this
was guessable by their usage as modules, already.

And now I shut up, because I don't have a clue about building rpms
and/or dynamic libraries.

Regards,

Benjamin.




msg80849/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] subversion-0.14.5-0.r3578.2mdk

2002-11-06 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdagen den 6 november 2002 20.14 skrev Benjamin Pflugmann:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed 2002-11-06 at 19:53:46 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > onsdagen den 6 november 2002 19.05 skrev Benjamin Pflugmann:
>
> What did I? ;-)

kmail is funny, sometimes on certain occasions "onsdagen" (On Wednesday) 
becomes "onsdayen" :-)

"skrev" means "wrote" or "crutch" on Swedish, it's your pick ;)

> > > On Wed 2002-11-06 at 16:56:30 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > # sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0
> > > /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so
> > >
> > > fixed the problem regarding local repositories for me, for now.
> >
> > Yes I noticed that. I wonder if it has something to do with wrong
> > sonames or something?
>
> I checked the source. libsvn_ra (the part that loads ra modules)
> searches for files with pattern:
>
>   libsvn_ra_%s-%d.so

and?

> [...]
>
> > > The libsvn_ra_*.so files are modules (remote access methods). I don't
> > > know about any policies, but I apache also has such .so modules:
> >
> > At least apache don't produces modules like this:
> >
> > libsvn_ra_local-1.so -> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0
> > libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 -> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0.0.0
> > libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0.0.0
> >
> > Maybe I just should ignore Mr. Lint in this case...
>
> IMHO, libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 & Co. shouldn't have been produced, but I
> don't really know anything that stuff.

Me neither, I hope someone can explain what I should do. Meanwhile I will fix 
this broken package by ignoring Mr. Lint.

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks

Check the "Modules For Apache2" status page at: 
http://www.deserve-it.com/modules_for_apache2.html





Re: [Cooker] subversion-0.14.5-0.r3578.2mdk

2002-11-06 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi.

On Wed 2002-11-06 at 19:53:46 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> onsdagen den 6 november 2002 19.05 skrev Benjamin Pflugmann:

What did I? ;-)

> > On Wed 2002-11-06 at 16:56:30 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
[...]
> > # sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so
> >
> > fixed the problem regarding local repositories for me, for now.
> 
> Yes I noticed that. I wonder if it has something to do with wrong
> sonames or something?

I checked the source. libsvn_ra (the part that loads ra modules)
searches for files with pattern:

  libsvn_ra_%s-%d.so

[...]
> > The libsvn_ra_*.so files are modules (remote access methods). I don't
> > know about any policies, but I apache also has such .so modules:
> 
> At least apache don't produces modules like this:
> 
> libsvn_ra_local-1.so -> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0
> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 -> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0.0.0
> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0.0.0
> 
> Maybe I just should ignore Mr. Lint in this case...

IMHO, libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 & Co. shouldn't have been produced, but I
don't really know anything that stuff.

Regards,

Benjamin.




msg80844/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] subversion-0.14.5-0.r3578.2mdk

2002-11-06 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdagen den 6 november 2002 19.05 skrev Benjamin Pflugmann:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed 2002-11-06 at 16:56:30 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I just got an e-mail saying subversion didn't work.
>
> Yes. The protocol modules are not found.
>
> # sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so
>
> fixed the problem regarding local repositories for me, for now.

Yes I noticed that. I wonder if it has something to do with wrong sonames or 
something?

> > I tracked it down to that "*.so" files is needed for normal
> > operations, and from what I can tell these files belong to a devel
> > subpackage. What should I do?
>
> The libsvn_ra_*.so files are modules (remote access methods). I don't
> know about any policies, but I apache also has such .so modules:

At least apache don't produces modules like this:

libsvn_ra_local-1.so -> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0
libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 -> libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0.0.0
libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0.0.0

Maybe I just should ignore Mr. Lint in this case...

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks

Check the "Modules For Apache2" status page at: 
http://www.deserve-it.com/modules_for_apache2.html





Re: [Cooker] subversion-0.14.5-0.r3578.2mdk

2002-11-06 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi.

On Wed 2002-11-06 at 16:56:30 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I just got an e-mail saying subversion didn't work.

Yes. The protocol modules are not found. 

# sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so.0 /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_local-1.so

fixed the problem regarding local repositories for me, for now.

> I tracked it down to that "*.so" files is needed for normal
> operations, and from what I can tell these files belong to a devel
> subpackage. What should I do?

The libsvn_ra_*.so files are modules (remote access methods). I don't
know about any policies, but I apache also has such .so modules:

# rpm -ql apache-modules
[...]
/usr/lib/apache/mod_access.so
/usr/lib/apache/mod_actions.so
/usr/lib/apache/mod_alias.so
/usr/lib/apache/mod_asis.so
[...]

HTH,

Benjamin.




msg80838/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Cooker] subversion-0.14.5-0.r3578.2mdk

2002-11-06 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hi.

I just got an e-mail saying subversion didn't work. I tracked it down to that 
"*.so" files is needed for normal operations, and from what I can tell these 
files belong to a devel subpackage. What should I do?

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks

Check the "Modules For Apache2" status page at: 
http://www.deserve-it.com/modules_for_apache2.html