RE: [Cooker] Licq latest versions
hi, i just think that hackicq is a bad idea... maybe a better idea would be to put an icq in the contribs that has support for socks5. geoff. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 7:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Licq latest versions > > > David Carvalho wrote: > > > [...] > > > > omething that mirribleis did on there end to mess > > > > with us i'm sure, witht he fix though all is back to > normal. fyi the version included with > > > > air is very outdated and decrepit compared to the latest > cvs versions wich have mutli-person > > > > chat etc. > > > > > > > > -DarkWlf > > > > > > ok one more post on this... > > > > > > If someone will accept me to post the new licq rpms as well > as the qt2.1 rpms that are needed > > > for the lastest cvs versions.. > > > > > > > > if you wish I will once again upload the srpms for the cvs > version of licq, and qt2.1beta2 > > > (what would you like the version numbering to be for the cvs > of licq?? should it be hacklicq? > > > and date? or the coming release version as in hacklicq-0.77-1mdk? > > > > IMHO , Licq is the nicest way to communicate trough the ICQ protocol. > > It's far away the best clone. > > At least 90% of Mandrake customers suffer from this Qt 2.02 (or 2.1, for > > the cvs) + Licq Qt plugin issue. If someone starts this project u > > described above , I'm pretty sure it will increase the popularity of mdk > > distro. > > hacklicq+date would be nice , thus it's constantly in development and > > many important features and bugfixes (like this AOL trick on Licq > > clients) , even *unstable*, are only avaiable in the cvs snapshots. > > And sorry for the terrible english :) > > just let Me know if the srpms will be accepted this time and what > the offical versioning should be > and i will be happy to post and matain the hacklicq , I would be > able to do prolly a nightly build > or something to that affect if needed. > > -John > >
Re: [Cooker] Licq latest versions
David Carvalho wrote: > [...] > > omething that mirribleis did on there end to mess > > > with us i'm sure, witht he fix though all is back to normal. fyi the version >included with > > > air is very outdated and decrepit compared to the latest cvs versions wich have >mutli-person > > > chat etc. > > > > > > -DarkWlf > > > > ok one more post on this... > > > > If someone will accept me to post the new licq rpms as well as the qt2.1 rpms that >are needed > > for the lastest cvs versions.. > > > > > if you wish I will once again upload the srpms for the cvs version of licq, and >qt2.1beta2 > > (what would you like the version numbering to be for the cvs of licq?? should it >be hacklicq? > > and date? or the coming release version as in hacklicq-0.77-1mdk? > > IMHO , Licq is the nicest way to communicate trough the ICQ protocol. > It's far away the best clone. > At least 90% of Mandrake customers suffer from this Qt 2.02 (or 2.1, for > the cvs) + Licq Qt plugin issue. If someone starts this project u > described above , I'm pretty sure it will increase the popularity of mdk > distro. > hacklicq+date would be nice , thus it's constantly in development and > many important features and bugfixes (like this AOL trick on Licq > clients) , even *unstable*, are only avaiable in the cvs snapshots. > And sorry for the terrible english :) just let Me know if the srpms will be accepted this time and what the offical versioning should be and i will be happy to post and matain the hacklicq , I would be able to do prolly a nightly build or something to that affect if needed. -John
Re: [Cooker] Licq latest versions
[...] omething that mirribleis did on there end to mess > > with us i'm sure, witht he fix though all is back to normal. fyi the version >included with > > air is very outdated and decrepit compared to the latest cvs versions wich have >mutli-person > > chat etc. > > > > -DarkWlf > > ok one more post on this... > > If someone will accept me to post the new licq rpms as well as the qt2.1 rpms that >are needed > for the lastest cvs versions.. > > if you wish I will once again upload the srpms for the cvs version of licq, and >qt2.1beta2 > (what would you like the version numbering to be for the cvs of licq?? should it be >hacklicq? > and date? or the coming release version as in hacklicq-0.77-1mdk? IMHO , Licq is the nicest way to communicate trough the ICQ protocol. It's far away the best clone. At least 90% of Mandrake customers suffer from this Qt 2.02 (or 2.1, for the cvs) + Licq Qt plugin issue. If someone starts this project u described above , I'm pretty sure it will increase the popularity of mdk distro. hacklicq+date would be nice , thus it's constantly in development and many important features and bugfixes (like this AOL trick on Licq clients) , even *unstable*, are only avaiable in the cvs snapshots. And sorry for the terrible english :)
