Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 08:07:20PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > On Dec 30, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Zenaan Harknesswrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:20:02PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 > "juan" wrote: > brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" > >>> > >>> lol > >>> > >>> Tor is for people[1] like you[2] > >>> > >>> [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry > >>> [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you > >> > >> Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links > >> to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. > >> > >> How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because > >> theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who > >> methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". > >> Freudian fantasy slip? > >> John > > > > I guess, with such diplorum and subtlety, you must be referring to, in > > your case, your frustating experiences watching not your wife, but your > > boyfriend when you came home early unannounced 14 years ago? > > > > Don't worry mate, you'll get over it one day ... perhaps when you're 88 > > and stuck in a rocking chair. > > Naturally the biggest bag of shit on the list comes in to defend the term > cuck :) No "term" needs defending - either it's useful or not. Your choice words on the other hand are fit for the New York Times. Nice to see you didn't get triggered by my response, and didn't divert the point either. Might be labelled a shill otherwise ...
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> On Dec 30, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Zenaan Harknesswrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:20:02PM -0500, John Newman wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 "juan" wrote: brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" >>> >>> lol >>> >>> Tor is for people[1] like you[2] >>> >>> [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry >>> [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you >> >> Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links >> to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. >> >> How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because >> theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who >> methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". >> Freudian fantasy slip? >> John > > I guess, with such diplorum and subtlety, you must be referring to, in > your case, your frustating experiences watching not your wife, but your > boyfriend when you came home early unannounced 14 years ago? > > Don't worry mate, you'll get over it one day ... perhaps when you're 88 > and stuck in a rocking chair. Naturally the biggest bag of shit on the list comes in to defend the term cuck :) Your little fantasy is sweet. I hope you didn't get spunk on the keyboard while typing it out one handed.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:15:54 - "The Cuckq"wrote: hey, what does a scumbag like you do here, apart from trolling?
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 19:13:24 - "The Cuckq"wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30 2016 10:37:02 > > "juan" >juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote: > > broken link > > Here are your fixed links lol: > > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Asperger's_Syndrome > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/You > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Cucks > > They are broken by auto case change and cloudflamer Thanks "The Cuckq" - You just made my point again, for the third time. Your "https://encyclopediadramatica.se; link is broken. Just as broken as you are. So let me spell it out for you, you world champion of fucking retards : in my previous message and in this one I don't *literally* mean that the links are broken. It is a "poetic license". Look up what that means in 4-chan.
Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> On Fri, Dec 30 2016 10:37:02 > "juan" >juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote: > broken link Here are your fixed links lol: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Asperger's_Syndrome https://encyclopediadramatica.se/You https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Cucks They are broken by auto case change and cloudflamer
Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> On Wed, Dec 28 2016 14:49:04 > "juan" indented: > that's where people like me [1] get their > 'science' eh. https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Science Precisely You might learn a lot about yourself, and others [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Asperger's_Syndrome
Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> On Wed, Dec 28 2016 17:20:02 > "John Newman" wrote: > "cuck" It's 'The Cuckq' to you, fam > How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Meme Read up sonny, you might learn[1] something > trump-loving losers Like you? Isn't that why your beloved DNC got "Hakced"? lol [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Learn_the_difference
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 07:42:28PM -, The Cuckq wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 > > "juan" wrote: > > brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" > > lol > > Tor is for people[1] like you[2] > > [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry > [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you Dude, you're a fucking moron. Taking the nick "cuck" and posting links to ED just kills anything you might have had to say. How did such a fucking moronic meme catch on? Probably because theres a bunch of fucking dipshit trump-loving losers out there who methinks doth protest too much about "niggers fucking their wives". Freudian fantasy slip? > > > > > > -- John signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:42:28 - "The Cuckq"vomited: > https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ that's where retarded, 8-year-old, 4-chan fascists get their 'science' eh.
Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> On Wed, Dec 28 2016 05:33:39 > "juan" wrote: > brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq" lol Tor is for people[1] like you[2] [1]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/cuckoldry [2]: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/you
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
The Grugq was an 0day reseller who transitioned to Infosec/Opsec bobblehead. Still maintaining close ties to the hand that feeds. On December 28, 2016 4:25:47 AM CST, The Cuckqwrote: >> the.grugq at gmail.com: >> panacea > >No shit. Prevention is the point of Tor, not damage mitigation, i.e., >"healing" > >> privacy activist cult > >TIL: privacy = cult > >> I got triggered > >What a fagq > >> strong security posture > >It is only posturing, isn't it > >> security (and/or privacy) > >Without security there is no privacy; isn't this guy a philosopher >king; wtf > >> VPN provides the same protections > >Bullshit, VPNs are guaranteed to fail > >Tor is at least a gamble, until trust-aware path selection enables a >better experience > >> Tor has only one use case to evade the authorities > >This fuckq with the pro-LEA false narratives > >> VPNs are (typically) not actively malicious > >Neither are "whites" > >> and you have no good reason to use it >> except as an evasion tool against state authorities > >Again with the false narratives > >> Tor Browser Bundle is the worst browser possible > >I guess he never used IE/Edge or Chrome > >What a newb > >> Anonymity is essentially a property of a system that ensures any user >> is equally likely to be the source of an event > >This guy is fucking retarded > >Not knowing who dun it doesn't mean it could be anybody > >> Diversity is obviously less good for anonymity > >Seeing a user as a regular Chrome, FF, or Safari user does more for >anonymity than Tor homogeneity > >> Global Passive Adversary > >It is clear that they are actively attacking people, why use inaccurate >labels -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: Grugq: Tor No Panacea
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 10:25:47 - "The Cuckq"wrote: > > > privacy activist cult > > TIL: privacy = cult fake privacy activist cult indeed, perfectly illustrated by brain dead scumbags like "The Cuckq"
Grugq: Tor No Panacea
> the.grugq at gmail.com: > panacea No shit. Prevention is the point of Tor, not damage mitigation, i.e., "healing" > privacy activist cult TIL: privacy = cult > I got triggered What a fagq > strong security posture It is only posturing, isn't it > security (and/or privacy) Without security there is no privacy; isn't this guy a philosopher king; wtf > VPN provides the same protections Bullshit, VPNs are guaranteed to fail Tor is at least a gamble, until trust-aware path selection enables a better experience > Tor has only one use case to evade the authorities This fuckq with the pro-LEA false narratives > VPNs are (typically) not actively malicious Neither are "whites" > and you have no good reason to use it > except as an evasion tool against state authorities Again with the false narratives > Tor Browser Bundle is the worst browser possible I guess he never used IE/Edge or Chrome What a newb > Anonymity is essentially a property of a system that ensures any user > is equally likely to be the source of an event This guy is fucking retarded Not knowing who dun it doesn't mean it could be anybody > Diversity is obviously less good for anonymity Seeing a user as a regular Chrome, FF, or Safari user does more for anonymity than Tor homogeneity > Global Passive Adversary It is clear that they are actively attacking people, why use inaccurate labels
Grugq: Tor No Panacea
https://medium.com/@thegrugq/tor-and-its-discontents-ef5164845908 Tor and its Discontents Problems with Tor usage as panacea This post deals with problems related to Tor usage that are not technical. I try to look at the human side of things, and I’m quite concerned by the meme of Tor as “panacea solution to arbitrary infosec problems.” I don’t particularly want to fight the privacy activist cult that has developed around Tor, but I feel compelled to state my concerns. (Also, I got triggered by Dan Guido who is writing on the same topic.) ...