Re: pinning for easy downgrading
mtms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am I wrong or pure64/sarge points to sid and the real Sarge you are referring to is in debian-pure64/testing instead? yes. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New netinst iso
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin- I apologize for the mixup: Oops: That was actually an error reading the Release file not Packages file as previously here: The 18 Feb sarge-amd64-netinst.iso Installer error message said: error reading /cdrom/dists//Release I am fairly sure that would be the same as this showing the same type of failure: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ cat /mnt/iso9660/dists/sarge/Release attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, want=260716, limit=224649 Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 65178 That was more important. It indicates your iso is to small. I took the 18 Feb image downloaded from alioth and mounted that to loop iso9660 and found the above. That must be the same error as during the CDROM run of the Installer. Here is the 18 Feb image that caused the problem: 2cb2cc2fe9544547dac49d0b8a26dd31 sarge-amd64-netinst.iso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/archive/install-images$ cat sarge-amd64-netinst.iso.md5sum 530f958e147737a3c9fc372a36a3c233 sarge-amd64-netinst.iso And this prooves it is corrupt. Sorry, this is my fault I think. The file on Alioth is 18MB short of what it should be. Must have missed rsync dying on the upload. I should add an md5sum check after the upload to my script. sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 118516672 88% 15.46kB/s0:16:46 Try again in a few minutes. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
monolithic Installation Report
Installation Report (resending) Hello Everybody- I am sending email from a fresh sid install from pure64 using the 18 Feb 2005 sid-amd64-monolithic.iso installer. This install was my first to complete using any monolithic image. The base installation was halted twice when my DSL modem crashed and needed to be reset. Fortunately, I went back to the menu and the installer now resumed the install instead of starting over. The modem crashed at 14% and 17% and then the installer went to completion. The netcfg broadcast address was correct during the entire installation. There are never any crashes except when using D-I. The broadcast address must be unrelated to the crashes. Here is the ifconfig after the first crash of the DSL modem. eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2F:E0:3A:27 inet addr:192.168.2.64 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:17727 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:11146 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:26370714 (25.1 MiB) TX bytes:798070 (779.3 KiB) Interrupt:17 Memory:fba0-0 Here is the current ifconfig after finishing installation and login: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2F:E0:3A:27 inet addr:192.168.2.64 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:44415 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:28913 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:66897852 (63.7 MiB) TX bytes:2077083 (1.9 MiB) Interrupt:17 Memory:fba0-0 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:560 (560.0 b) TX bytes:560 (560.0 b) The CDROM ejected and I rebooted using my custom kernel and the network is fine. This installation was made to my AMD64 ASUS A8V using VIA ide and sata controller. The sk98lin ethernet was installed automatically and no manual tweaks made. Again, this is my first installation to complete using the monolithic installer. [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm having trouble with a GigaByte GA-K8VT800(Pro) Motherboard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 19. Februar 2005 18:04 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am puzzled,as I have 2 machines perfectly working with this mobo;I bougt the second one just because the first worked so well. That mb works here too. Look at your BIOS setup if the onboard ethernet device is enabled. - -- Greetings / Gruss Andreas Richter http://www.oszine.de GPG-KeyID 0x7BA12DD9 Fingerprint D2E9 202B F4F0 EB16 25DE 5FF7 0CF2 3C57 7BA1 2DD9 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGGyGDPI8V3uhLdkRAnMJAJ9H/u6wphWDW+FAf3moxQPtrbQAKgCdE1/k 86VsiiD43gLFe1nLVMAbkUE= =s/Al -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sarge Installation Report
Hello Everybody- This is a fresh installation of sarge using the sarge-amd64-netinst.iso of 20 Feb 05. My hardware is AMD64 with ASUS A8V Deluxe Pro and VIA sata+ide controllers. Here is my sources.list used for this installation: #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free The installation was fast and effective for my hardware. I made an ext3 filesystem and continued without grub and without any bootloader. Most people would use grub. The installation proceeded easily through ejecting the CDROM and reboot. I rebooted using my custom 2.6.10 kernel using loadlin instead of the dist kernel. The installation was completed without difficulty. I skipped the selections because of my familiarity with dselect instead of aptitude and did not choose any specialty. I started dselect and chose the 2.6.8-kernel-source with the ncurses5-dev,kernel-package and bzip2 packages to build my kernel. I used make menuconfig and mounted my sid partition to copy my current config for the new unified kernel without having any modules. The new kernel has already finished compiling and packaged into a deb a little while ago. I now have a legal sarge installation! I didn't test everything. Everything I used worked. :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
I made an upgrade with atp-get after having installed some packages. I got some dependency problems, so I tried fzr:/# apt-get check Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64) but 2.3.2.ds1-20 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. fzr:/# apt-get install -f Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc6 Suggested packages: glibc-doc The following packages will be upgraded: libc6 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 59 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/4318kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 87507 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package xmms-kde Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The problem is that I can't remove xmms-kd3, but I can't force any installation. HELP! Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
You can try updating xmms-kd3 as well, or removing it and installing it at a later time. To remove it in the same command you use to upgrade libc you can add xmms-kd3- (no quotes) to the apt-get install command-line. Hope it helps. Erik Norman wrote: I made an upgrade with atp-get after having installed some packages. I got some dependency problems, so I tried fzr:/# apt-get check Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64) but 2.3.2.ds1-20 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. fzr:/# apt-get install -f Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc6 Suggested packages: glibc-doc The following packages will be upgraded: libc6 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 59 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/4318kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 87507 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package xmms-kde Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The problem is that I can't remove xmms-kd3, but I can't force any installation. HELP! Erik -- Javier Kohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: K3b - various troubles
I also have problems with k3b; it doesn't work at all for me. When I open it up, as either root or a normal user, the interface screen appears. But when I move the mouse to any of the options, such as New Data CD (or any of the others), nothing happens when I click. The mouse, and keyboard, have no effect on anything in the screen; it is completely unresponsive. I've tried running k3bset, but that doesn't help. I do find various messages on the terminal. Sometimes I only get: k3b: WARNING: KGenericFactory: instance requested but no instance name or about data passed to the constructor! Other times I get the following: QPixmap: Cannot create a QPixmap when no GUI is being used QPixmap: Cannot create a QPixmap when no GUI is being used QPixmap: Cannot create a QPixmap when no GUI is being used kbuildsycoca running... Reusing existing ksycoca kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'OpenOffice.org1.1/math.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'application/vnd.sun.xml.writer.math' (Lines similar to this last line go on for a very long time) I get the above messages also when trying to run k3bsetup. After I eventually get out by ctrl-c, I get a message on the terminal: Mutex destroy failure: Device or resource busy ICE default IO error handler doing an exit(), pid = 5076, errno = 0 I have completely deleted k3b and reinstalled it a couple of times, to no avail. dpkg -l |grep k3b gives me: ii k3b0.11.20-1 A sophisticated KDE cd burning application ii k3b-i18n 0.11-2 Internationalized (i18n) files for k3b ii k3blibs0.11.20-1 The KDE cd burning application library - run dpkg -l |grep kde gives me: ii kdebase-bin3.3.2-1KDE Base (binaries) ii kdebase-data 3.3.2-1KDE Base (shared data) ii kdelibs-bin3.3.2-2KDE core binaries ii kdelibs-data 3.3.2-2KDE core shared data ii kdelibs4 3.3.2-2KDE core libraries In my apt.sources I have deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main contrib non-free Any suggestions as to what my problem is? Thanks, Ric
Re: K3b - various troubles
v0n0 wrote: 1. When I start K3b with a non-root login, it opens but after the system check suddenly closes. From the shell I can read only 'Alarm clock', which I don't know what it means. My user is included in group 'burn' that is autorized ti use cdrecord etc. Kinda strange! This problem was solved upgrading from .19 to .20! -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel: 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Mail: Thunderbird Chat: Kopete (ICQ) 150487234 Put the fan back into computing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: K3b - various troubles
Am Sonntag, 20. Februar 2005 16:17 schrieb v0n0: 1. When I start K3b with a non-root login, it opens but after the system check suddenly closes. From the shell I can read only 'Alarm clock', which I don't know what it means. My user is included in group 'burn' that is autorized ti use cdrecord etc. Kinda strange! Hallo Alessandro, does this occur when starting from root login too? The message 'Alarm clock' might be a warning from cdrecord. It stops working when the free license timed out, or when you try to start an alpha version that is older than one year. Which version of cdrecord do you use? I tried cdrecord-proDVD_2.01-pre_x86_64 but that gave the above message (Der Wecker klingelt when started with german locale. I then started cdrecord-proDVD_2.01.01_i686 in a chroot environment, which works fine. The free license (environment variable, set in cdrecord-wrapper.sh) expires in March 2005, then you have to download the new version of cdrecord-wrapper.sh or get the new content of that variable. 2. The dvd support is lacking some features like dvd+r simulation. Apart this, when I burn on a dvd+r (didn't try dvd-r) some files from my hdd, after the process (that doesn't report any error) I try to read it but...it's like it is blank! Obviously I can see on the surface that it ws written...is this problem just reported from anybody? I didn't try dvd+r so far, as i only bought dvd-r. dvd-r works fine with cdrecord-prodvd. ciao, Ulf pgp8z4egFdC40.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: K3b - various troubles
Ulf Elsner wrote: Hallo Alessandro, does this occur when starting from root login too? no, it didn't The message 'Alarm clock' might be a warning from cdrecord. It stops working when the free license timed out, or when you try to start an alpha version that is older than one year. Which version of cdrecord do you use? I did an apt-upgrade a few minutes ago, but I don't know if my cdrecord was upgraded, how is k3b instead. So I don't know if this was related to cdrecord. I tried cdrecord-proDVD_2.01-pre_x86_64 but that gave the above message (Der Wecker klingelt when started with german locale. Which debian package can you find this cdrecord-proDVD in? When I installed x-cd-roast, it requested it to burn dvds! I didn't try dvd+r so far, as i only bought dvd-r. dvd-r works fine with cdrecord-prodvd. I'd want to use dvd+r, because are more compatible and have higher quality. ciao, Ciao! -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel: 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Mail: Thunderbird Chat: Kopete (ICQ) 150487234 Put the fan back into computing signature.asc Description: PGP signature signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
Forgot to CC this to the list. -Original Message- From: Eric Cranley Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:54 AM To: 'Erik Norman' Subject: RE: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? Looks like a conflict over /usr/lib64. I'm having the same problem right now, but between libc6 and base-files, and I've hosed my system. (I'm sure I just made a large majority of the list groan and/or laugh at me.) My understanding is that you can force the install with dpkg, using the following: dpkg - dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb I would check elsewhere before doing this though, because my intranet server will tell you that I've hosed this before. For anyone on the list that's dealt with this, it this suggested solution correct? Also, I have a system where some idiot (me) temporarily uninstalled base-files in order to upgrade libc6. If I did this same command from an ubuntu AMD64 live cd for libc6 and base-files, but with the -root= option, fix the problem for me? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Erik Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:29 AM To: debian-amd64 Subject: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? I made an upgrade with atp-get after having installed some packages. I got some dependency problems, so I tried fzr:/# apt-get check Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64) but 2.3.2.ds1-20 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. fzr:/# apt-get install -f Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc6 Suggested packages: glibc-doc The following packages will be upgraded: libc6 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 59 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/4318kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 87507 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package xmms-kde Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The problem is that I can't remove xmms-kd3, but I can't force any installation. HELP! Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
Eric Cranley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Forgot to CC this to the list. -Original Message- From: Eric Cranley Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:54 AM To: 'Erik Norman' Subject: RE: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? Looks like a conflict over /usr/lib64. I'm having the same problem right now, but between libc6 and base-files, and I've hosed my system. (I'm sure I just made a large majority of the list groan and/or laugh at me.) My understanding is that you can force the install with dpkg, using the following: Then you either didn't upgrade in a long time (and we warned about this) or you used force-overwrite on base-files during the short time libc6 and base-files where out of sync the same long time ago or downgraded or something. I knew moving the link would create problems. There just isn't a way to make it foolproof with dpkg. Lets hope you are the last stragler. MfG Goswin PS: I recommend you reinstall libc6 and then dist-upgrade to be on the save side. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? SOLVED
I have resolved the problem I used the Synaptic Package Manager to remove the package with the broken dependency, then I removed xmms-kde and xmms. Upgrade (without problems) Install xmms-kde and xmms and all other packages which were removed at the same time (kde kdeaddons kdenetwork kicker-applets kopete mplayer-amd64 xmp-xmms) - no problems. apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Problem solved. Thanx for any help! On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 12:40 -0500, Eric Cranley wrote: Forgot to CC this to the list. -Original Message- From: Eric Cranley Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:54 AM To: 'Erik Norman' Subject: RE: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? Looks like a conflict over /usr/lib64. I'm having the same problem right now, but between libc6 and base-files, and I've hosed my system. (I'm sure I just made a large majority of the list groan and/or laugh at me.) My understanding is that you can force the install with dpkg, using the following: dpkg - dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb I would check elsewhere before doing this though, because my intranet server will tell you that I've hosed this before. For anyone on the list that's dealt with this, it this suggested solution correct? Also, I have a system where some idiot (me) temporarily uninstalled base-files in order to upgrade libc6. If I did this same command from an ubuntu AMD64 live cd for libc6 and base-files, but with the -root= option, fix the problem for me? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Erik Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:29 AM To: debian-amd64 Subject: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? I made an upgrade with atp-get after having installed some packages. I got some dependency problems, so I tried fzr:/# apt-get check Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64) but 2.3.2.ds1-20 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. fzr:/# apt-get install -f Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc6 Suggested packages: glibc-doc The following packages will be upgraded: libc6 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 59 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/4318kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 87507 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package xmms-kde Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The problem is that I can't remove xmms-kd3, but I can't force any installation. HELP! Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
I thought I had already upgraded base-files and libc6 after the move. I'll give your suggestion a try. I need to reinstall base-files as well (I removed it in a spectacular display of stupidity.) I can't even login at the console right now, hence the part about using a live cd. I'll definitely write up a report on how I fixed it if I'm successful. -Original Message- From: Goswin von Brederlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 1:27 PM To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? Eric Cranley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Forgot to CC this to the list. -Original Message- From: Eric Cranley Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:54 AM To: 'Erik Norman' Subject: RE: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? Looks like a conflict over /usr/lib64. I'm having the same problem right now, but between libc6 and base-files, and I've hosed my system. (I'm sure I just made a large majority of the list groan and/or laugh at me.) My understanding is that you can force the install with dpkg, using the following: Then you either didn't upgrade in a long time (and we warned about this) or you used force-overwrite on base-files during the short time libc6 and base-files where out of sync the same long time ago or downgraded or something. I knew moving the link would create problems. There just isn't a way to make it foolproof with dpkg. Lets hope you are the last stragler. MfG Goswin PS: I recommend you reinstall libc6 and then dist-upgrade to be on the save side. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
Eric Cranley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thought I had already upgraded base-files and libc6 after the move. I'll give your suggestion a try. I need to reinstall base-files as well (I removed it in a spectacular display of stupidity.) I can't even login at the console right now, hence the part about using a live cd. I'll definitely write up a report on how I fixed it if I'm successful. Removing the old base-files removed the /lib64 - /lib link. That means all dynamically linked binaries fail to find the ld. /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /bin/ln -s /lib /lib64 of from a live CD just ln -s /lib /mountpoint/lib64. After that the system should work again and reinstalling libc6 will get the /lib64 link owned by libc6 correctly. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
Erik Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The system has been running for about 48 hours now, I did not think of upgrading now, since I was still installing and configuring all the programs I need/want. Since I am newbie to Debian (I have used Fedora before) there is still much I must learn. Then how did you get the libc6 and libc6-dev versions mixed up? Apt-get should never have let you do this to your system without sufficient force options (and you would know if you used them) so I'm quite baffeled. There probably is some plausible explaination I'm just not seeing. This is one of those This should never happen bugs that do happen non the less sometimes. Anyway, I hope you got it fixed now. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
You are my savior. Thank you. Now before I continue with the upgrade I should have done two months ago, are there any other major package conflicts I should be aware of? I installed the system as sid in the first week of December. I pinned the system to testing last week, and this morning's problem was the first upgrade I tried. Here's what apt-get upgrade wants to do: The following packages will be upgraded: apache apache-common apache-utils apt-utils console-common console-data console-tools cpio dash dialog discover1 discover1-data dselect exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light gettext-base grub initrd-tools initscripts libconsole libcupsys2-gnutls10 libdb3 libdb4.2 libdbi-perl libdiscover1 libgc1 libgcc1 libkrb53 libltdl3 libmysqlclient12 libsigc++-1.2-5c102 login mailx mdadm module-init-tools modutils mysql-client mysql-common mysql-server netbase passwd perl perl-base perl-modules php4 rdate samba samba-common sysv-rc sysvinit webmin webmin-inetd webmin-samba The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: e2fslibs e2fsprogs libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libcomerr2 libgcrypt11 libgnutls11 liblzo1 libreadline4 libss2 libtasn1-2 libuuid1 mount procps util-linux zlib1g 55 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 18 downgraded, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Is there anything I should really becareful of or install in a specific order? Thanks again for your help. -Original Message- From: Goswin von Brederlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 3:12 PM To: Eric Cranley Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back??? Eric Cranley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thought I had already upgraded base-files and libc6 after the move. I'll give your suggestion a try. I need to reinstall base-files as well (I removed it in a spectacular display of stupidity.) I can't even login at the console right now, hence the part about using a live cd. I'll definitely write up a report on how I fixed it if I'm successful. Removing the old base-files removed the /lib64 - /lib link. That means all dynamically linked binaries fail to find the ld. /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /bin/ln -s /lib /lib64 of from a live CD just ln -s /lib /mountpoint/lib64. After that the system should work again and reinstalling libc6 will get the /lib64 link owned by libc6 correctly. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Enigmail
Hi, is anybody using Enigmail successfully with Thunderbird? It doesn't work at all here: the keymanager doesn't work, signatures and encryption I had lots of problems too! in the first install and then with the upgrade to tb1.0. I coulnd't do nothing... but reinstalling and reinstalling again! then it worked! I also tried official mozilla extension instead of debian enigmail package, but it didn't work neither! Then I tried a couple of times reinstalling the debian package and it worked... sorry, can't help further. good luck maxxer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???
Eric Cranley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are my savior. Thank you. Now before I continue with the upgrade I should have done two months ago, are there any other major package conflicts I should be aware of? I installed the system as sid in the first week of December. I pinned the system to testing last week, and this morning's problem was the first upgrade I tried. Here's what apt-get upgrade wants to do: The following packages will be upgraded: apache apache-common apache-utils apt-utils console-common console-data console-tools cpio dash dialog discover1 discover1-data dselect exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light gettext-base grub initrd-tools initscripts libconsole libcupsys2-gnutls10 libdb3 libdb4.2 libdbi-perl libdiscover1 libgc1 libgcc1 libkrb53 libltdl3 libmysqlclient12 libsigc++-1.2-5c102 login mailx mdadm module-init-tools modutils mysql-client mysql-common mysql-server netbase passwd perl perl-base perl-modules php4 rdate samba samba-common sysv-rc sysvinit webmin webmin-inetd webmin-samba The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: e2fslibs e2fsprogs libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libcomerr2 libgcrypt11 libgnutls11 liblzo1 libreadline4 libss2 libtasn1-2 libuuid1 mount procps util-linux zlib1g 55 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 18 downgraded, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Is there anything I should really becareful of or install in a specific order? Thanks again for your help. Nothing I'm aware of or as catastrophic as the libc6/base-files problem that basically kills the system. Please note that I'm running sid on my main system with sarge chroots for tests and buildd though. If something doesn't work you can always go back to the sid versions (lower the pin below 1000 then). MfG Goswin PS: Sarge needs users to find any remaining problems. The more the better. So thanks for doing it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New netinst iso
On Sat, Feb 19 2005 at 19:18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: D-I defaults to use sarge and complains if not found. For that reason even the sid CDs use sarge. I also added links for testing, sid, unstable to cover all bases. Just to be clear: 1. If installed from sid-amd64-netinst.iso (apt is pointed to testing) -- is it sarge or sid? 2. If I installed the system from sid-amd64-netinst.iso and want to use sarge -- do I need to downgrade libc6 or do something else? 3. What is the difference between installations from sarge and sid netinst iso. Thanks! PS: Thanks for uploading md5sums. -- ~dd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unknown Devices in lspci
Guys, This probably isn't anything to worry about cause my system works great and everythings happy but when I run lspci, my device list shows up with a bunch of stuff that's unknown. See: # lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e1 (rev a1) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e0 (rev a2) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e4 (rev a1) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e7 (rev a1) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e7 (rev a1) :00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e8 (rev a2) :00:05.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00df (rev a2) :00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00ea (rev a1) :00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e5 (rev a2) :00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00ee (rev a2) :00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e2 (rev a2) :00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00ed (rev a2) :00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV 36 [GeForce 5700 Ultra] (rev a1) :02:09.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Winfast TV2000 XP (rev 05) :02:09.2 Multimedia controller: Conexant: Unknown device 8802 (rev 05) :02:0c.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 46) :02:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) Is that normal? I'm sure it's fine... just checkin' with those who know. Thanks, -Greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unknown Devices in lspci
Greg Grotsky wrote: Guys, This probably isn't anything to worry about cause my system works great and everythings happy but when I run lspci, my device list shows up with a bunch of stuff that's unknown. See: Try running 'update-pciids', it will fetch new data for you to pciids.sf.net and then you might have a little more known devices. :) Is that normal? I'm sure it's fine... just checkin' with those who know. Thanks, -Greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
