Re: 3Ware 9500 install issues

2006-03-26 Thread Markus Boas
Load teh 3w- I not how but it works.

Ryven

Am Sonntag 26 März 2006 04:42 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Greetings:

 I have a machine that I'm trying to install Debian onto.  The hardware
 consists of:

 Tyan K8WE Motherboard
 (2) Opteron 270 CPUs
 4GB memory
 3Ware 9500S with 4(RAID5) HDs

 The driver for the 3Ware card (3w-9xxx) isn't loaded by the installer, so
 there is no device /dev/sda to install onto.  Using the second virtual
 console to manually load the 3w-9xxx driver doesn't help.  The driver loads
 correctly, but it doesn't detect the disk array.  This behavior occurs with
 the Beta 2 Etch netboot image, and with the nightly build also.  The Sarge
 image doesn't work either, but it fails even earlier in the process.

 I thought that perhaps some of the drivers that were getting loaded were
 interfering with the operation of the 3w-9xxx driver, so I tried the
 install in expert mode and didn't let the installer load all of those ide
 chipset drivers, but it didn't help.  I tried a PXE network install so that
 I could load no IDE drivers, but no dice either.

 I don't know if it is a problem with this particular kernel version or
 what.  I tried the Ubuntu 5.10 live CD which has 2.6.12, and it is able to
 load the 3w-9xxx driver and see /dev/sda properly.

 After loading the driver manually, dmesg reports that version 2.26.02.004
 is loaded.

 Can anyone offer any insight?

 Thanks.



Re: is it em64t ?

2006-01-07 Thread Markus Boas
Just an example

powerrechner:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 4
model name  :   Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 3000.261
cache size  : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm 
constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips: 6007.19
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 4
model name  :   Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 3000.261
cache size  : 1024 KB
physical id : 3
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm 
constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips: 6000.44
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 2
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 4
model name  :   Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 3000.261
cache size  : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm 
constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips: 6000.42
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 3
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 4
model name  :   Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 3000.261
cache size  : 1024 KB
physical id : 3
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm 
constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips: 6000.44
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

This is a dual Xeon with ht.
Also an em64t.

Am Samstag 07 Januar 2006 20:43 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
 On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:00:44AM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
  processor   : 0

 [snip]

  physical id : 0
  siblings: 2

 [snip]

  processor   : 1
  physical id : 0
  siblings: 2

 [snip]

 Both CPUs are physical ID 0 and both say they are part of a set of 2
 siblings.  I am quite sure that means it is using hyperthreading, and is
 not dual core or dual cpu.  Just hyperthreading.

 Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: recommended scsi card for Debian/AMD64/Sarge

2005-11-28 Thread Markus Boas
Am Montag 28 November 2005 22:21 schrieb Freels, James D.:
 I have an existing Debian/Amd64/Sarge system which includes sata hard
 drives, but has a tape drive connected to a separate Adaptec 29160N
 Ultra160 SCSI adapter scsi card dedicated to that task.  I am using the
 2.6.14 kernel with the new aic7xxx driver.  I have reported here my
 problems with this setup and I am considering replacing this scsi card
 with one that will do the job without errors.

 what scsi card is recommended to work for this arch ?  I don't need
 blinding speed since the tape drive at best will due 80 MB/s burst
 speed.  I just need one that will work without error.

 What are other Debian/Amd64 scsi users using ?

 --
 James D. Freels, Ph.D.
 Oak Ridge National Laboratory
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ICP

Adaptec is not in the moment intressted on 64.
My Controller was able to juse the i2o interface but for my was it a reson to 
seel the card.

Markus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Motherboard with many SATA ports: MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum ?

2005-11-28 Thread Markus Boas
Am Montag 28 November 2005 23:20 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
 On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:48:50PM -0500, Chris DiVirgilio wrote:
  I believe you can.  You can definitely put a 4x PCIe card into a 16x
  slot, I'm not sure it the SLI-ishness makes a difference.  That's
  probably the question you're asking.

 I would be surprised if it did make a difference myself, but I don't
 have such a board or such a card to try.  But given most board configure
 it as 16x and 1x or 8x and 8x, it actually might not be a bad way to get
 a cheap consumer board that can run a very nice PCIe raid card. :)  Of
 course if you are silly you could run the video card in 16x and the
 other slot in 1x and just starve the raid card with only 500MB/s of
 bandwidth.  Not sure why they use 4x and 8x connectors on the raid
 cards.  PCIe 16x does seem to be just PCIe with more lanes, but maybe I
 am guessing wrong and the 16x slots are special for video in some
 manner.  Hopefully not though.

 Len Sorensen

Areca for my. It has 4 Lines and it's much more than need.
Just thinking that one disk not more than 70 MB/s deliver you need an 12 port 
raid kontroller to produce an so high stream.

Markus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Temporary 'lock-up' under heavy write, MegaRAID RAID-5

2005-11-09 Thread Markus Boas
Am Mittwoch 09 November 2005 12:25 schrieb Joost Kraaijeveld:
 On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:46 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
  The above system is incredibly fast under almost all conditions, except
  when writing very large files (say, 100s of MB, or even GB).  When

 

  Any other suggestions or reports of similar experiences?

 Sorry, no solution, but a me too post. I have similar experience with a
 2-way Opteron, 3Ware9500 SATA RAID5 with 5 disks: short updateing
 transactions with PostgreSQL fly, long updates start fast but after a
 few seconds everthing locks up, and the update lasts forever.

Adaptec 3410s had at starting  the same troble. Also Raid 5 with 5 disks.
By updateing the Bios of the raid-controller it is better.
Dual Xeon

Ryven



 --
 Groeten,

 Joost Kraaijeveld
 Askesis B.V.
 Molukkenstraat 14
 6524NB Nijmegen
 tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
 fax: 024-3608416
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 web: www.askesis.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fast clock wreaks havoc on amd64 dual core - hp1250n

2005-10-22 Thread Markus Boas
Am Samstag 22 Oktober 2005 03:52 schrieb Nathan O. Siemers:
 Hello all,

 I've spent the last 5 days trying to fix an issue with a brand new
 hp a1250n dual core athlon64 machine.  ATI motherboard with embedded
 radeon xpress 200 graphics.  I've installed the pure64 sarge
 distribution.  This is my first 64 bit debian attempt, although I am
 running a 2 cpu opteron workstation with suse at work.

 The system in many ways okay, but there is a serious problem with
 interrupts and clock speed which wreaks general havoc on the machine.
 The clock is running about 2x speed - I think perhaps two clock ticks
 (from each core?) are happening for each one that should.  X windows
 keyboard behavior is quite erratic, I often get 2-4 chars repeated for
 each key typed.  I believe this is consistent with lots of interrupt
 activity?

 Summary of my experiments so far:

 2.6.13.4 kernel

 1. turning off smp  in kernel compile configuration does not correct the
 problem.

 2. no_timer_check and/or notsc does not reliably correct the problem - I
 have seen some help for periods of time.

 3. moving from athlon64 to generic x86_64 during kernel compile does
 nothing

 4.  no_timer_check pci=noacpi pci=routeirq kernel boot option corrects
 the 2x clock speed problem, but breaks at lot of other things - I am
 running this at the moment so I can use the computer (but my firewire
 drive is not recognized, for example).

 5.  PM_timer kernel compile option does nothing

 6.  Changing timer frequency does nothing.

 I wanted to check with older 2.6 kernels but experience a failed boot on
 stock debian 2.6.8 amd64-smp kernel, I don't this is indicative of a
 problem other than misconfiguration of grub or devfs subsystems (there
 is a pivot_root at boot time that fails)...

 some interesting log entries:

 kern.log:
 Oct 18 14:57:48 localhost kernel: Losing some ticks... checking if CPU
 frequency changed.

 Oct 18 23:36:50 line kernel: Your time source seems to be instable or
 some driver is hogging interupts
 Oct 19 05:40:05 line kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 2048Hz.
 Oct 19 05:49:33 line kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 2048Hz.

 This seems like it could be related to kernel bug 3927:

 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927

 which has been marked as resolved but my reading suggest that a
 sufficient number of people found workarounds to let the bug subside
 rather than fixing it...

 In any case, my deep appreciation to anyone who has a solution after
 days of kernel recompiles and rebooting with various boot options.
 Happy to send more detailed logs and kernel compile options if there is
 interest.

 Nathan

Just a little workaround.
You need an smp numa kernel. Compile it this 500 hz.

Markus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installing amd64 on Adaptec 2015S (SmartRAID V) with dpt_i2o

2005-09-01 Thread Markus Boas
Am Donnerstag 01 September 2005 20:22 schrieb Neil Gunton:
 Paul Brook wrote:
 CentOS 4.1 does work, with i2o_blocks, but I would much rather be running
 Debian. Please help...
 
  You could install debian from your CentOS installations using
  debootstrap.
 
  http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apcs04.html
 
  Paul

 Thanks very much for the pointer. This looks promising, and I am trying it
 out along with some other avenues... I'll post again once I've worked out
 the easiest way to bootstrap this system.

 Thanks again,

 -Neil
I have done this way. Works smooth. Only a bit strange in the /dev/i2o/*

:-)

Last time i called withe Adaptec they say my that they will not build the 
dt_i2o on 64 bit. For me the reason my Adaptec 3410 to remove of my maschine.

Cu
Ryen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SATA RAID5 adaptor other than 3ware? Thanks alot!

2005-07-20 Thread Markus Boas
Am Mittwoch 20 Juli 2005 16:25 schrieb Gauthier DELERCE:
 I use Areca controler (1210, 4 ports pciExpress, SATA2), perfect
 solution. you need to patch your kernel with the areca patch ( included
 in mm4 patch).  The areca tools to monitor the controler runs fine on
 debian-pure64.

 I recommand this product,   also I have very bad experience with 3ware
 sata controller which offer very low performances.


 --
 SARL GDID
 Gauthier DELERCE
 Phone: +33 6 85 42 01 62 Fax: +33 4 76 00 97 06
 2 pl du cdt Nal, 38700 LA TRONCHE  FRANCE

Not realy on the last two kernel rc's it is include.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCSI I2O Driver on ISO's?

2005-07-08 Thread Markus Boas
Am Freitag 08 Juli 2005 16:02 schrieb Erik Mouw:
 On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:41:21AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
  On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Eduardo wrote:
   is there any ISO with support for i2o SCSI? Netinstall hasn't support
   for this driver.
 
  Isn't i2o a system used by many scsi controllers?

 Not at all.

   Which one in
  particular?
 
 From linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/message/i2o/Kconfig :

 The Intelligent Input/Output (I2O) architecture allows hardware
 drivers to be split into two parts: an operating system specific
 module called the OSM and an hardware specific module called the
 HDM. The OSM can talk to a whole range of HDM's, and ideally the
 HDM's are not OS dependent. This allows for the same HDM driver to
 be used under different operating systems if the relevant OSM is in
 place. In order for this to work, you need to have an I2O interface
 adapter card in your computer. This card contains a special I/O
 processor (IOP), thus allowing high speeds since the CPU does not
 have to deal with I/O.

 There's only one I2O scsi driver that is able to handle all I2O scsi
 cards.


 Erik

For my example, I use it on the Apatec 3410 because no 64 kernel-modules are 
on stage.
The useing is a bit unusual but it works.

Ryven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCSI I2O Driver on ISO's?

2005-07-08 Thread Markus Boas
Am Freitag 08 Juli 2005 16:34 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
 On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:10:57PM +0200, Eduardo wrote:
  adaptec 2010S raid card
  RAID SCSI cards from Adaptec use this driver.

 Well if the drivers are the ones in drivers/message/i2o/ then yes the
 installer does in fact leave all of them out.

 I recently built a netinst for sarge amd64 that uses 2.6.11-9-amd64
 instead of the 2.6.8-11 used currently on the official cd, which a few
 people have used successfully to install on machines that didn't work
 with 2.6.8.  I could try and add the i2o drivers to it as well and
 rebuild it with that setup if you would like to try that.  As long as
 the i2o uses the standard /dev/sd* scsi driver devices, I imagine it
 would actually work.  Of course I have no hardware to test that on, but
 I am willing to spend an hour or so updating my netinst image.

 The other option is to use another drive/controller while installing,
 then use the i2o in the full kernel installed to transfer to i2o and
 switch to booting from that.

 Len Sorensen

Nice stuff.
On my mashine the hd's are with i2o on /dev/i2o/hda and so on.
By the way, they are scsi-disc. :-)

Ryven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Official ATI Driver : problem build fglrx module

2005-07-07 Thread Markus Boas
Am Donnerstag 07 Juli 2005 23:00 schrieb Basile STARYNKEVITCH:
 Le Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:49PM +0200, Sylvain Archenault écrivait/wrote:
  I would like to know if there is somebody who have succeeded to compile
  the module. I download the driver on ati official website :
  fglrx64_4_3_0-8.14.13-1.x86_64.rpm
 
  When i tun make.sh in /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod I've got this :
 
 
CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/nvidia-agp.o
  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/nvidia-agp.c:57: error: static
  declaration of '__fgl_agp_try_unsupported' follows non-static declaration
  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/agp_backend.h:92: error: previous
  declaration of '__fgl_agp_try_unsupported' was here
  make[2]: *** [/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/nvidia-agp.o] Erreur 1
  make[1]: *** [_module_/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x] Erreur 2
  make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /usr/src/linux-2.6.12.2 »

 I've also got similar problems, with a 2.6.13-rc2 kernel.

 I've also got further compilation errors. In some file[s] I replaced
 pci-slot_name with pci-smart_name (details may be wrong, this is
 from my human memory).

 Out of curiosity, what is the chipset Sylvain is compiling for? Mine
 is described in message
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/06/msg00788.html

 And I don't succeed in running X (either Xorg -latest CVS- or Xfree
 34.2 (from Debian/Sid/AMD64)) in 1280x800 resolution. I can give up 3D
 acceleration...

 Regards.

Hi
the prob with /2.6.x/nvidia-agp have be done with a patch.
At the end I have a fglx.ko but I can't load it.

Ryven



Re: Skype?

2005-07-05 Thread Markus Boas
Am Dienstag 05 Juli 2005 14:24 schrieb John Goerzen:
 On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:25:12PM +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
  Same here, has been running skype for about 6 months now. 32bit chroot,
  works like a charm :-)

 I know this is a bit OT, but can somebody explain to me the allure of
 Skype when there is a huge SIP community, with soft phones, hard phones,
 and even the asterisk PBX in Linux?
Skype != SIP 
Skype use a close souce protocol. :-(

asterisk takes part of sip


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bootsector not writable?

2005-06-10 Thread Markus Boas
xfs?
grub need a little parition. best ext2/ext3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bootsector not writable?

2005-06-10 Thread Markus Boas
Is the raid already builded?


Am Freitag 10 Juni 2005 16:33 schrieb Andre Timmermann:
 Am Freitag, den 10.06.2005, 22:02 +0800 schrieb Cameron Patrick:
  Are you sure you're
  telling the BIOS to boot from the one that Linux thinks is sda

 Oh sorry, I forgot to write that I am using a RAID5. The BIOS and the OS
 ist just seeing one big SCSI-drive.

 And the the BIOS wants to boot from the raidcontroller, so I think it is
 not a problem of reading the MBR, it is a problem of writing a correct
 one.

 Greetz,
 Andre


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: dpt-i2o

2005-06-06 Thread Markus Boas

 | Hi I need the dpt-i2o modul to install.
 | What is the best way to install in this cause?

 Just use i2o_block instead, it should work fine.

I didn't know until jet, but it works. 
With the modul I was able it mount the /dev/sdaX.
The new problem is that the i2o_block ist at the time of installation not 
avalibel. It is in the installed kernel :-(
It is a checken egg problem.
So I installed on a seperatet ide disc. In two different partions, so one can 
boot and the other can copied. The only problem is a new inird.img
When I solved it I can boot from my raid-arry.

Thx Ryven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gpg

2005-06-03 Thread Markus Boas
An which keyserver is the gpg key of the amd64 mirror.
I search für the 
pub   1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24
Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD  ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED
  uid  Debian AMD64 Archive Key 
debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
  sub   2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24
but I found him not.
thx
Ryen



dpt-i2o

2005-05-28 Thread Markus Boas
Hi I need the dpt-i2o modul to install.
What is the best way to install in this cause?
Thx
Ryven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]