Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-26 Thread Philipp Kern 

On 2015-12-25 08:36, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
that links later are starting with gs://, but if people 
think it

should be gcs instead I'll change it.

Why are they gs: when its for gcs?


Because branding changes all the time. \-:

The corresponding tool is also called "gsutil" (although most stuff 
seems to migrate into "gcloud" instead).


Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert 
On 14164 March 1977, Marcin Kulisz wrote:

>> * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2015-12-22, 16:07:
>> >* Package name: apt-transport-gs
>> s/gs/gcs/ ?
> Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't
> really mind to change it to gcs.
> I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to
> emphasise

Which two-letter convention?

apt-transport-https
apt-transport-spacewalk
apt-transport-s3
apt-transport-tor

> that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think it
> should be gcs instead I'll change it.

Why are they gs: when its for gcs?

-- 
bye, Joerg
Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.

Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-23 Thread Marcin Kulisz 
On 2015-12-23 10:33:43, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2015-12-22, 16:07:
> >* Package name: apt-transport-gs
> 
> s/gs/gcs/ ?

Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't
really mind to change it to gcs.
I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to emphasise
that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think it
should be gcs instead I'll change it.
-- 

|_|0|_|  |
|_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam"  |
|0|0|0|  kuLa -  |

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD  58C3 38B3


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-23 Thread Dominique Dumont 
On Wednesday 23 December 2015 09:54:05 Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't
> really mind to change it to gcs.
> I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to emphasise
> that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think
> it should be gcs instead I'll change it.

When I read "apt-transport-gs" package name, I wondered what ghostscript 
(/usr/bin/gs) got to do with apt...

IMHO, "-gcs" suffix is better.

Hope this helps

-- 
 https://github.com/dod38fr/   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/  -o-   irc: dod at irc.debian.org

Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-23 Thread Jakub Wilk 

* Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2015-12-22, 16:07:

* Package name: apt-transport-gs


s/gs/gcs/ ?

--
Jakub Wilk

Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

2015-12-22 Thread Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marcin Kulisz (kuLa)" 

* Package name: apt-transport-gs
  Upstream Author : Dhaivat Pandit 
* URL : https://github.com/ceocoder/apt-gcs
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: go
  Description : APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS

Transport for apt allowing to have private repositories on Google Cloud Storage