Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-23 Thread Barry
On Friday 23 April 2004 01:22, Nate Duehr wrote:
 Jess Roncero Franco wrote:
snip

snip
 Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean
 it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I
 remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its
 use as a generic tool long ago.

 The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply
 slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I
 still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it
 refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the
 dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.

 Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What would help a lot if someone with extensive experience of dselect would 
write a how-to for even recent converts to Debian to be able to figure out 
how to use it.  The popularity of apt-get is its apparent simplicity but its 
documentation is lacking in explaining its limitations.

Barry.




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-23 Thread ingo fischenich
 Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean
 it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I
 remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its
 use as a generic tool long ago.

 The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply
 slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I
 still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it
 refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the
 dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.

 Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 What would help a lot if someone with extensive experience of dselect
 would
 write a how-to for even recent converts to Debian to be able to figure out
 how to use it.  The popularity of apt-get is its apparent simplicity but
 its
 documentation is lacking in explaining its limitations.

I think, the big problem with this upgrade is that it differs too much
from the other kde versions for woody.

Is it really necessary to upgrade to xfree 4.3.0?
The 3.2.0 kde packages dealt well with 4.1.0 and also got along with
libqt3-mt and the 3.2.2 packages now come with libqt3c102-mt.

I think these packages were build on a sid or sarge system and not on a
woody system, is that possible?

   ingo




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-23 Thread Paul Scott
Barry wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2004 01:22, Nate Duehr wrote:
 

Jes?s Roncero Franco wrote:
   

snip
 

snip
 

Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean
it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I
remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its
use as a generic tool long ago.
The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply
slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I
still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it
refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the
dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

What would help a lot if someone with extensive experience of dselect would 
write a how-to for even recent converts to Debian to be able to figure out 
how to use it.  The popularity of apt-get is its apparent simplicity but its 
documentation is lacking in explaining its limitations.
 

Don't bother.  I never figured out how to navigate dselect.  Aptitude is 
much better and is highly recommended by many.

Paul Scott



Re: problem with accent in konsole and konqueror [KDE 3.2.2 on Woody]

2004-04-22 Thread Elmar Höfner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jean,

Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 00:59 schrieb Jean Darcoux:
 My keyboard configuration worked very  well before I updated to
 3.2.2. Now I can't write the à and è characters in kde
 application. This seems to be related to kde, since I am able to
 write theses characters in emacs or gvim, but not in application like
 kwrite, konqueror or the konsole. Strangely, I can write theses
 characters in emacs/gvim even when I am into KDE. With sawfish I have
 no problem, so I don't this is an Xfree configuration problem.

Just a guess, maybe your keyboard layout variant has changed.
In Control Center, go to 'Regional  Accessability', then 'Keyboard 
Layout' and click on the active keyboard layout. After this, check if 
'Layout variant' is (I guess this might be appropriate for you) 
'deadgraveacute'.

HTH,
Elmar


- -- 
| Elmar W. Hoefner
| You can send me encrypted mail. Get my public PGP/GPG key from
| http://www.dfn-pca.de/pgpkserv/
| Key ID: 0xB53008E2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAh3GHWmu377UwCOIRAs7VAKCo9h3ZR0VJUGE9w0EqzDjTws3Z3QCgiknl
y/3KIG4mxX6jGn1zBXxWuIg=
=uXiY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-22 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Miércoles, 21 de Abril de 2004 00:08, Florian Ernst escribió:
 a) apt-get is easily explainable, i.e. telling someone to apt-get
 install package instead of telling to start aptitude / dselect /

Hey! :-) aptitude is really really similar to apt-get in CLI.

In fact, I'm always lost using aptitude's GUI, but aptitude update  aptitude 
dist-upgrade is really easy for apt-get users.

-- 
Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://darkshines.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-22 Thread Nate Duehr
Jesús Roncero Franco wrote:
Ok, I'd remake my question. If today's preferred method of installing and 
upgrading software in debian is apt-get, and it has some problems, why is 
this the first time I heard of it? I mean, from a user perspective, one that 
reads many debian related mailing lists, apt-get is the most recommended 
tool, not aptitude. 
You just missed it.  It's been discussed in debian-devel, on #debian on 
whatever IRC-du-jour IRC server was servicing Debian at the time, and in 
numerous other places (including debian-user) over the years.

Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean 
it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I 
remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its 
use as a generic tool long ago.

The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply 
slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I 
still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it 
refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the 
dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.

Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-21 Thread Dominique Devriese
Jesús Roncero Franco writes:

 Ok, I'd remake my question. If today's preferred method of
 installing and upgrading software in debian is apt-get, and it has
 some problems, why is this the first time I heard of it? I mean,
 from a user perspective, one that reads many debian related mailing
 lists, apt-get is the most recommended tool, not aptitude.

Then you read the wrong mailing lists.  I sometimes work on Debian KDE
bug reports, and using apt-get for major upgrades is a known, and
not-going-to-be-fixed-any-time-soon bug.

 Anyway, how do the debian kde guys make it to do it almost painless?

Well erm, making the dependency statements as simple as possible
helps, but apt-get dist-upgrade currently still fails on upgrading
from woody to testing iirc, and we have no idea how to fix it.

cheers
domi




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-21 Thread Dominique Devriese
Hendrik Sattler writes:

 The latter is much, much more informative and better tells me about
 the current situation. aptitude is even wrong here (the lynx package
 is only removed, not purged). From dpkg: rc lynx 2.8.4.1b-1

I have no idea about the interface of all these things.  Furthermore,
it's about which tool you want to use to upgrade, apt-cache is purely
an informational tool.

 However, it still has a low version number, there may be reasons for
 it.

AFAIK, it's considered stable.

 PS: Please DO NOT send me a copy of an answer per PM

gg:Mail-Followup-To:

cheers
domi




problem with accent in konsole and konqueror [KDE 3.2.2 on Woody]

2004-04-21 Thread Jean Darcoux
Hi all
My keyboard configuration worked very  well before I updated to 3.2.2. Now I 
can't write the à and è characters in kde application. This seems to be 
related to kde, since I am able to write theses characters in emacs or gvim, 
but not in application like kwrite, konqueror or the konsole. Strangely, I 
can write theses characters in emacs/gvim even when I am into KDE. With 
sawfish I have no problem, so I don't this is an Xfree configuration 
problem.

Your help will be apprecied
Jean
_
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !  
http://fr.ca.search.msn.com/




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-21 Thread Dominik Karall
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 02:00, Michael Peddemors wrote:
 Korganizer ate my calendar.. (Backup your .ics, actually my fault, anyone
 upgrading should always backup their .kde directory, JUST IN CASE, however
 it still should not have ate it.)

I did a backup, but I think something is wrong with korganizer, cause I can't 
save anything. I have tried to restore my old ics files, but on startup, 
korganizer deletes my entrys again :/

does anybody know how to fix this problem?

greets dominik

PS: all icons in the menubars are double too..




RE: problem with accent in konsole and konqueror [KDE 3.2.2 on Woody]

2004-04-21 Thread Jean Darcoux
I forget to say that I am using french-canadia keyboard (kde-i18n-fr 
package)

_
MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis !  
http://messenger.fr.msn.ca/




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Dominique Devriese
Michael Peddemors writes:

 Korganizer ate my calendar.. (Backup your .ics, actually my fault,
 anyone upgrading should always backup their .kde directory, JUST IN
 CASE, however it still should not have ate it.)

Can you file a bug report about that on bugs.kde.org, so people there
can try to diagnose and fix ?

First of all, apparently you're using apt-get install for upgrading
packages.  This is a bad idea.  Use dselect, aptitude, synaptic, these
do a much better job at automatically handling dependencies.

 OpenOffice no longer wants to install

 Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
   openoffice.org1.1-bin: Depends: libfreetype6 ( 2.1.0) but
   2.1.5-1woody2 is
 to be installed

That of course has nothing to do with KDE.  However, you need to
remove the old openoffice.org1.1-bin, as it is replaced by
openoffice.org-bin.  See above, this would have been fixed by a proper
pkg mgt tool.

 kdeaddons won't install... Not sure why.. (Actually, NOW it does,
 but only after installing kdeaddons-kfile-plugins, not sure why that
 didn't automagically work)

See above: use a proper mgt tool.

 Fonts all changed..  (maybe new defaults, and didn't keep the old
 settings.)

No idea.

 komba2 is now gone..(That I understand, I guess)

That's strange, it is still there on my system.

 Lost 'psi' as it needs libqt3-mt, but that will remove
 everything.. as we now use libqt3c102-mt (Strange the naming for
 qt3-dev-tools stayed the same)

If you're going to be using unstable, you should also use psi from
unstable.  See above: use a proper pkg mgt tool.

 Something replaces kdepim-libs.. I had to remove that one, it got
 jammed up as well..

This is intended.  See above: use a proper pkg mgt tool.

cheers
domi




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Michael Peddemors
On April 20, 2004 01:14 am, you wrote:
 Michael Peddemors writes:
  Korganizer ate my calendar.. (Backup your .ics, actually my fault,
  anyone upgrading should always backup their .kde directory, JUST IN
  CASE, however it still should not have ate it.)

 Can you file a bug report about that on bugs.kde.org, so people there
 can try to diagnose and fix ?

I always tend to file bug reports.. :)

First of all, you can see that this is just a general idea so others who are 
going to jump in and try an 'apt-get upgrade' might face... Also, the 

 First of all, apparently you're using apt-get install for upgrading
 packages.  This is a bad idea.  Use dselect, aptitude, synaptic, these
 do a much better job at automatically handling dependencies.

The packages themselves are meant to handle dependencies, that is the beauty 
of Debian isn't it?

 That of course has nothing to do with KDE.  However, you need to
 remove the old openoffice.org1.1-bin, as it is replaced by
 openoffice.org-bin.  See above, this would have been fixed by a proper
 pkg mgt tool.

I expected that, that is why the dependency forced a certain version of 
libfreetype.  But others may not expect it.

  kdeaddons won't install... Not sure why.. (Actually, NOW it does,
  but only after installing kdeaddons-kfile-plugins, not sure why that
  didn't automagically work)

Again, this is to point out that 'apt-get upgrade' doesn't work in this case, 
and people have to watch out.

  Lost 'psi' as it needs libqt3-mt, but that will remove
  everything.. as we now use libqt3c102-mt (Strange the naming for
  qt3-dev-tools stayed the same)

 If you're going to be using unstable, you should also use psi from
 unstable.  See above: use a proper pkg mgt tool.

If you notice, I am NOT using unstable, but WOODY..
Again, I am doing testing of the upgrade, for our clients are going to run 
into the same issues..   This is to point out that there are some dependency 
problems that prevent an apt-get upgrade, or apt-get install in moving to 
this version of KDE..

I have the ability to deal with these issues, others on the list may not.

-- 
Catch the Magic of Linux...

Michael Peddemors - Senior Systems Developer 
LinuxAdministration - Internet Services
NetworkServices - Programming - Security
Wizard IT Services http://www.wizard.ca 
Linux Support Specialist - http://www.linuxmagic.com
LinuxMagic is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

(604)589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company.




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread jedd
On Tue April 20 2004 10:00 am, Michael Peddemors wrote:
 ] Hmm.. THis was the worst KDE upgrade in a long while..
 ] Had to delete 1/2 of KDE to get the upgrade to work, from KDE 3.2.0 to 3.2.2

 I went from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 and lost my bookmarks (and a few other
 things, as detailed in a message to this list some weeks back).
 Nothing that I wasn't prepared for (backups are a usual part of your
 schedule, right?) and nothing that you don't expect when using new
 software.

 ] Korganizer ate my calendar.. (Backup your .ics, actually my fault, anyone 
 ] upgrading should always backup their .kde directory, JUST IN CASE, however 
it 
 ] still should not have ate it.)

 That's really weird.  I haven't seen any hiccups with my jedd.ics file at
 all under any of the upgrade scenarios.  I'm using the unstable branch,
 but I don't see why, at a user-level, you'd lose that file.  Did it rename
 or copy the old file?  Did you look in your ~/.kde/share/apps/korganizer
 directory to see if there's a backup?

 Really, you should be doing backups of all your irreplaceable data,
 particularly prior to a major upgrade.

 ] OpenOffice no longer wants to install

 I'd suggest this is a Debian / woody problem, not a KDE one.

 ] kdeaddons won't install... Not sure why.. (Actually, NOW it does, but only 
 ] after installing kdeaddons-kfile-plugins, not sure why that didn't 
 ] automagically work)

 Using apt-get install .. ?  It won't automatically install new packages.
 I usually do 'apt-get upgrade -u' and look at all the things that won't
 install automatically, and then go and 'install' a few of those once the
 main lump's been installed, and slowly whittle down the 'can't install
 these yet' packages section.

 ] Fonts all changed..  (maybe new defaults,  and didn't keep the old settings.)

 I haven't seen any font changes in unstable (3.2.0 - 3.2.1 - 3.2.2) at
 a user-level.  I think perhaps one font changed for the default user, but
 not for any existing user.  Perhaps that's because I'd changed the default
 fonts (all 7? of them) a while back for the various font-types offered in
 the kontrol-centre.

 ] Aspell no longer likes it.. I think I backed up a version?

 If you really want to install two-day-old KDE versions, you should probably
 consider moving to something more recent than a 12-month old version of
 Debian.  unstable(sid) is really not that scary a place to be -- and you'll
 find more people are in that part of the world than the woody/unstablekde
 region, so you tend to get saner upgrades and better support.  Sad, but true.

 ] Lost 'psi' as it needs libqt3-mt, but that will remove everything.. as we 
now 
 ] use libqt3c102-mt (Strange the naming for qt3-dev-tools stayed the same)

 I've had a few packages that wanted to disappear and come back in another
 form .. but psi hasn't been one of them.

 ] Something replaces kdepim-libs.. I had to remove that one, it got jammed up 
as 
 ] well..

 Yes, libkdepim1.  apt-get upgrade or apt-get dist-upgrade is preferable
 to apt-get install's .. as a general rule, too.

 Jedd.




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello Michael!

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:00:06AM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote:
 On April 20, 2004 01:14 am, you wrote:
  First of all, apparently you're using apt-get install for upgrading
  packages.  This is a bad idea.  Use dselect, aptitude, synaptic, these
  do a much better job at automatically handling dependencies.
 
 The packages themselves are meant to handle dependencies, that is the beauty 
 of Debian isn't it?

Well, actually the Debian package format allows to state dependencies
(ranging from hard Depends: via medium Recommends: to soft Suggests:)
rather than letting the packages handle those themselves.

A higher level tool like dselect, aptitude, synaptic, and apt-get as
well, can parse these statements and conduct the best way of
proceeding from these, and if user action needs to be taken present
the user a reasonable set of choices. Some higher level tools are
»smarter« in doing so than others, though, especially when upgrading
a large suite of packages including adding and removing supplementary
stuff...

So in conclusion I concur with Dominique.

Just some nitpicking,
cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Dominique Devriese
Michael Peddemors writes:

 If you notice, I am NOT using unstable, but WOODY..  Again, I am
 doing testing of the upgrade, for our clients are going to run into
 the same issues..  This is to point out that there are some
 dependency problems that prevent an apt-get upgrade, or apt-get
 install in moving to this version of KDE..

 I have the ability to deal with these issues, others on the list may
 not.

Perhaps you missed the point of my last mail:

DO NOT USE APT-GET FOR MAJOR UPGRADES !

cheers
domi




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Tuesday 20 April 2004 18:09 schrieb Dominique Devriese:
 Michael Peddemors writes:
  If you notice, I am NOT using unstable, but WOODY..  Again, I am
  doing testing of the upgrade, for our clients are going to run into
  the same issues..  This is to point out that there are some
  dependency problems that prevent an apt-get upgrade, or apt-get
  install in moving to this version of KDE..
 
  I have the ability to deal with these issues, others on the list may
  not.

 Perhaps you missed the point of my last mail:

 DO NOT USE APT-GET FOR MAJOR UPGRADES !

Hmm, upgrading KDE is a major upgrade?

Additionally, I disagree with you. I do not like dselect. aptitute may be good 
but the interface really sucks

HS

-- 
Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de
oder über pgp.net

PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.org




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Michael Peddemors
Not to start a flame, but upgrading only KDE from a 3.2.0 to a 3.2.2 would not  
be expected to be a major upgrade..  PS, the problem with the OpenOffice 
compatability still exists on Woody with 3.2.2, because of the libfreetype..
What apt sources do use for OpenOffice that doens't have these issues?

On April 20, 2004 09:09 am, Dominique Devriese wrote:
 Michael Peddemors writes:
  If you notice, I am NOT using unstable, but WOODY..  Again, I am
  doing testing of the upgrade, for our clients are going to run into
  the same issues..  This is to point out that there are some
  dependency problems that prevent an apt-get upgrade, or apt-get
  install in moving to this version of KDE..
 
  I have the ability to deal with these issues, others on the list may
  not.

 Perhaps you missed the point of my last mail:

 DO NOT USE APT-GET FOR MAJOR UPGRADES !

 cheers
 domi

-- 
Catch the Magic of Linux...

Michael Peddemors - Senior Systems Developer 
LinuxAdministration - Internet Services
NetworkServices - Programming - Security
Wizard IT Services http://www.wizard.ca 
Linux Support Specialist - http://www.linuxmagic.com
LinuxMagic is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

(604)589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company.




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Dominique Devriese
Hendrik Sattler writes:

 Am Tuesday 20 April 2004 18:09 schrieb Dominique Devriese:
 Michael Peddemors writes:
  If you notice, I am NOT using unstable, but WOODY..  Again, I am
  doing testing of the upgrade, for our clients are going to run
  into the same issues..  This is to point out that there are some
  dependency problems that prevent an apt-get upgrade, or apt-get
  install in moving to this version of KDE..
 
  I have the ability to deal with these issues, others on the list
  may not.

 Perhaps you missed the point of my last mail:

 DO NOT USE APT-GET FOR MAJOR UPGRADES !

 Hmm, upgrading KDE is a major upgrade?

Yes.  Meaning that it needs uninstalling other packages and installing
new ones instead.

 Additionally, I disagree with you. I do not like dselect. aptitute
 may be good but the interface really sucks

It's not about an interface, it's about apt-get's logic being
insufficient to properly figure out the correct solution for
dependency problems.  Use either dselect, aptitude, or whatever other
pkg mgt app you prefer, that has proper dependency resolution code,
but NOT APT-GET.  All the bugs in the OP's mail were caused by this.
If you want to use apt-get anyway, then at least use apt-get
dist-upgrade.

cheers
domi




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Jesús Roncero Franco
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 20:39, Dominique Devriese wrote:
 Yes.  Meaning that it needs uninstalling other packages and installing
 new ones instead.

  Additionally, I disagree with you. I do not like dselect. aptitute
  may be good but the interface really sucks

 It's not about an interface, it's about apt-get's logic being
 insufficient to properly figure out the correct solution for

Well, then how are the official debian sid packages made? Those seem to 
upgrade fine.
Maybe it is that people is too used to apt-get dist-upgrading quite easily. 
Why then debian relies on apt-get and not on aptitude :-?

-- 
 jabber: golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] bulmalug.net 
 Out: 14.25 ºC --  In: 22.62 ºC




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello!

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:40:50PM +0200, Jesús Roncero Franco wrote:
 Maybe it is that people is too used to apt-get dist-upgrading quite easily. 
 Why then debian relies on apt-get and not on aptitude :-?

Does Debian?

Please see for example the Release Note for Woody at
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-dselectupgrade
and following.

For easy and well-defined tasks apt-get is just fine, but otherwise
I'd rely on some »smarter« tool.

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Jesús Roncero Franco
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 22:56, Florian Ernst wrote:
 Hello!

 On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:40:50PM +0200, Jesús Roncero Franco wrote:
  Maybe it is that people is too used to apt-get dist-upgrading quite
  easily. Why then debian relies on apt-get and not on aptitude :-?

 Does Debian?

Well, it does for me! At least, it upgrades well from kde 3.2.0 to kde 3.2.1, 
etc.

 Please see for example the Release Note for Woody at
 http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-dse
lectupgrade and following.

 For easy and well-defined tasks apt-get is just fine, but otherwise
 I'd rely on some »smarter« tool.

Ok, I'd remake my question. If today's preferred method of installing and 
upgrading software in debian is apt-get, and it has some problems, why is 
this the first time I heard of it? I mean, from a user perspective, one that 
reads many debian related mailing lists, apt-get is the most recommended 
tool, not aptitude. 

Anyway, how do the debian kde guys make it to do it almost painless? Could it 
be done the same way?

Just being curious, not wanting to start a flame about this! :)


-- 
 jabber: golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] bulmalug.net 
 Out: 14.25 ºC --  In: 22.62 ºC




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Dominique Devriese
Jesús Roncero Franco writes:

 On Tuesday 20 April 2004 20:39, Dominique Devriese wrote:
 Yes.  Meaning that it needs uninstalling other packages and
 installing new ones instead.

  Additionally, I disagree with you. I do not like
  dselect. aptitute may be good but the interface really sucks

 It's not about an interface, it's about apt-get's logic being
 insufficient to properly figure out the correct solution for

 Well, then how are the official debian sid packages made? Those seem
 to upgrade fine.  Maybe it is that people is too used to apt-get
 dist-upgrading quite easily. Why then debian relies on apt-get and
 not on aptitude :-?

First, there are difficult apt versions, apt's logic is already a
little bit better in sarge and sid.  It's just very bad in woody, and
Debian officially recommends to not use it for upgrading to sarge.

Second, there's a difference between apt-get dist-upgrade on the one
hand and apt-get install and apt-get upgrade on the other hand.
The OP was using the latter, and these are completely unsufficient for
major upgrades, which is what I was trying to make very clear with the
capitalised text.  apt-get dist-upgrade is not all too bad ( in
sarge ), but still does not succeed in completely figuring out the
dependencies properly in all situations.

Third, the reason why Debian relies on apt-get ( meaning that
apt-get is priority important, not at all meaning that Debian can't be
used without apt-get ), and not on aptitude is simply that apt came
first.  Aptitude is strictly better, and if hit had been available at
the time, I'm sure aptitude would have been chosen over apt-get.

Fourth, just a last comment: as a developer who has looked at the dpkg
and apt code ( and you may believe me or not, I don't care, I'd just
like to make this clear ): Debian's packaging tools are pretty poorly
coded.  People often argue about how great apt-get is, compared to Red
Hat's and Mandrake's tools, but what they mean is that the Debian
package repository is pretty good, this has nothing to do with apt.
The problems with dpkg, apt and aptitude are, briefly:
1 They do not properly make use of any sort of database.  dpkg uses
  its data in a very slow manner.  Apt-get uses a different database,
  and uses it in a very slow manner as well.  Both suck.
2 They don't provide certain extremely useful features like keeping
  track of which packages were *explicitly* installed and which
  weren't, in order to provide much more useful dependency resolution.
3 They don't have a proper graphic, user-friendly interface.  This is
  partly fixed by certain recent programs like aptitude, synaptic and
  others, but none of these succeed in reaching the level of ease of
  use necessary for ordinary users, partly because of the above
  reasons as well.

Anyway, IMHO, a lot of things here require fixing.  If I had time, I'd
love to write a proper apt replacement, but I don't have time,
unfortunately.

cheers
domi




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello again!

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:18:12PM +0200, Jesús Roncero Franco wrote:
 On Tuesday 20 April 2004 22:56, Florian Ernst wrote:
  Please see for example the Release Note for Woody at
  http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-dse
 lectupgrade and following.
 
  For easy and well-defined tasks apt-get is just fine, but otherwise
  I'd rely on some »smarter« tool.
 
 Ok, I'd remake my question. If today's preferred method of installing and 
 upgrading software in debian is apt-get, and it has some problems, why is 
 this the first time I heard of it? I mean, from a user perspective, one that 
 reads many debian related mailing lists, apt-get is the most recommended 
 tool, not aptitude. 

I'd guess it's because of
a) apt-get is easily explainable, i.e. telling someone to apt-get
install package instead of telling to start aptitude / dselect /
synaptic / kpackage / $whatever, search for the package and select it
for installation is way easier (yes, I know, at least aptitude and
dselect can be controlled from the command line).
b) it's pretty straightfoward, unlike for example dselect.
c) it's there on _every single system_.

But that's only guesswork... Well, after all as seen in the Release
Notes apt-get isn't quite recommended for this particular major
release upgrade. *shrugs*

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Tuesday 20 April 2004 23:33 schrieb Dominique Devriese:
[...]

After purging and reinstalling aptitude with apt-get ;), I could make it work 
(previously, something was messed up because it wanted to install about 100 
new packages without me doing anything).
Maybe you know about one issue with aptitude: it shows me the available 
versions of a package:
c   --\ lynx

none2.8.5-1
p   2.8.5-1
p   2.8.4.1b-1
i   lynx-ssl 1:2.8.4.1b-3
p   lynx-cur 2.8.5-20

However, I'd rather like the apt-cache output:
$ apt-cache policy lynx
lynx:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.8.5-1
  Version Table:
 2.8.5-1 0
500 http://ftp.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de testing/main Packages
-10 http://ftp.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de unstable/main Packages
 2.8.4.1b-1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

The latter is much, much more informative and better tells me about the 
current situation. aptitude is even wrong here (the lynx package is only 
removed, not purged). From dpkg:
rc  lynx  2.8.4.1b-1

However, it still has a low version number, there may be reasons for it.

HS

PS: Please DO NOT send me a copy of an answer per PM

-- 
Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de
oder über pgp.net

PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.org


pgpP8W1u2LzRJ.pgp
Description: signature


Re: KDE 3.2.2 for woody?

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Bona
Noèl Köthe wrote:

 Am Fr, den 16.04.2004 schrieb Ian Eure um 22:17:
 Does anyone have a source for this? 3.2.0 is the latest I've been able to
 find.
 
 afaik:
 3.2.2 will be released tomorrow and on the kde.org server woody binary
 packages will be available, too.
 
It's out now - but it comes with XFree 4.3 packages. Anyone know why?




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for woody?

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Stucki
 afaik:
 3.2.2 will be released tomorrow and on the kde.org server woody binary
 packages will be available, too.

 It's out now - but it comes with XFree 4.3 packages. Anyone know why?

I'm wondering, too. This doesn't look very professional, I have already seen
one first comment of a guy who has a broken installation now.

- michael




KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Peddemors
Hmm.. THis was the worst KDE upgrade in a long while..
Had to delete 1/2 of KDE to get the upgrade to work, from KDE 3.2.0 to 3.2.2

Korganizer ate my calendar.. (Backup your .ics, actually my fault, anyone 
upgrading should always backup their .kde directory, JUST IN CASE, however it 
still should not have ate it.)

OpenOffice no longer wants to install 

Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openoffice.org1.1-bin: Depends: libfreetype6 ( 2.1.0) but 2.1.5-1woody2 is 
to be installed

kdeaddons won't install... Not sure why.. (Actually, NOW it does, but only 
after installing kdeaddons-kfile-plugins, not sure why that didn't 
automagically work)

Fonts all changed..  (maybe new defaults,  and didn't keep the old settings.)

Aspell no longer likes it.. I think I backed up a version?

komba2 is now gone..(That I understand, I guess)

Lost 'psi' as it needs libqt3-mt, but that will remove everything.. as we now 
use libqt3c102-mt (Strange the naming for qt3-dev-tools stayed the same)

Something replaces kdepim-libs.. I had to remove that one, it got jammed up as 
well..


apt-get install aspell
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming. SIC, did this on kdeaddons as well

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  aspell: Depends: aspell-bin but it is not going to be installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
mistress:/home/michael# apt-get install aspell-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libaspell15
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libaspell10 libpspell4
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  aspell-bin libaspell15
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 398kB of archives. After unpacking 926kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Get:1 http://download.kde.org stable/main libaspell15 0.50.3-9woody10 [321kB]
Get:2 http://download.kde.org stable/main aspell-bin 0.50.3-9woody10 [76.5kB]
Fetched 398kB in 6s (59.4kB/s)
(Reading database ... 33561 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libaspell10 ...
Removing libpspell4 ...
Selecting previously deselected package libaspell15.
(Reading database ... 33488 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libaspell15 (from .../libaspell15_0.50.3-9woody10_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package aspell-bin.
Unpacking aspell-bin (from .../aspell-bin_0.50.3-9woody10_i386.deb) ...
Setting up libaspell15 (0.50.3-9woody10) ...

Setting up aspell-bin (0.50.3-9woody10) ...


-- 
Catch the Magic of Linux...

Michael Peddemors - Senior Systems Developer 
LinuxAdministration - Internet Services
NetworkServices - Programming - Security
Wizard IT Services http://www.wizard.ca 
Linux Support Specialist - http://www.linuxmagic.com
LinuxMagic is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

(604)589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company.




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for woody?

2004-04-18 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Fr, den 16.04.2004 schrieb Ian Eure um 22:17:
 Does anyone have a source for this? 3.2.0 is the latest I've been able to 
 find.

afaik:
3.2.2 will be released tomorrow and on the kde.org server woody binary
packages will be available, too.

-- 
Nol Kthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


KDE 3.2.2 for woody?

2004-04-16 Thread Ian Eure
Does anyone have a source for this? 3.2.0 is the latest I've been able to 
find.