Re: New package of GWAMA

2014-12-15 Thread Dylan
Hi all,
I finished my package of gwama [1]. I put some upstreams examples files
(which are provides outside the source archive) in debian/upstream.docs/ ,
I don't know if it's the good way to integrate them.

Could you check the package and if it's ok, upload it?

Best regards,
Dylan

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/gwama.git


Re: r-cran-ape updated with the last upstream version - Need a sponsor to upload it

2014-12-15 Thread Dylan
Hi Andreas,

2014-12-12 15:46 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille :
>
>
> Uploaded to experimental (due to freeze policy).  Thanks for your work
> on this
>


Thank you.


Dylan


Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread s . jodogne
> > So, there would be a global CLASSPATH that is shared across all the
> > JVMs available in Debian, and that is implicitly used by the
> > ImageJ package? Anyone could confirm this?
> 
> As far as I know any JAR that's found in /usr/share/java will be
> included in CLASSPATH.  (Please correct me if I'm wrong).

After some inspection, the launch script for imagej (/usr/bin/imagej) overrides 
the default classpath at line 225 [1]. As a consequence, having the JAR package 
of json-simple in "/usr/share/java" is unfortunately insufficient. I finally 
managed to "dynamically link" against the libjson-simple-java package by 
creating a symbolic link from "/usr/share/java/json-simple.jar" to 
"/usr/share/imagej/plugins" using dh_link. I think this is a better solution 
than patching the /usr/bin/imagej script.

As discussed previously, I have also removed the source code of json-simple by 
introducing "Files-Excluded" in d/copyright.

Both lintian and pbuilder are OK with the new version of the package [2]. 
Andreas, please would you kindly give another look at the package?

Thanks,
Sébastien-


[1] 
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/debian/imagej.sh?revision=16435&view=markup
[2] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med?view=revision&revision=18540


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1272276775.7185447.1418659096078.javamail.r...@chu.ulg.ac.be



Re: Gimias status

2014-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Mathieu,

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:31:53PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> [CC me please]
> 
> Does anyone knows what happen to gimias in Debian ?
> 
> I see some interest in the past:
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/Meeting/Southport2012
> 
> but nothing since...

I'm reading

  "Packaging CSnake which is the build system for Gimias. Almost finished. 
Patches ready to push to upstream (Martin, Tim) "

that packaging *CSnake* is almost finished.  If you want to know more
I'd suggest CCing Tim Booth since he is not following the list closely.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141215140549.ge...@an3as.eu



Gimias status

2014-12-15 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
[CC me please]

Does anyone knows what happen to gimias in Debian ?

I see some interest in the past:

https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/Meeting/Southport2012

but nothing since...

Thx for updates,


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/ca+7wuswslg545dw1z1ksqt2-cx4pyjps75z-8aguardyjcy...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#772949: RFS: imageio/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Library for reading and writing a wide range of image formats

2014-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:47:18AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I have added this package to the debian-science imageanalysis and
> debian-med imaging-dev tasks.

Cool.  Thanks a lot

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141215121948.gd...@an3as.eu



Re: Bug#772949: RFS: imageio/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Library for reading and writing a wide range of image formats

2014-12-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
I have added this package to the debian-science imageanalysis and
debian-med imaging-dev tasks.

Cheers,
- Ghis


Re: unstable/experimental freeze policy

2014-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sascha,

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:01:26AM +, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> > You always need to outweight policy with sane reasons / common sense.
> > If you think GenomeTools and its dependencies will pretty surely not
> > feature any RC bug we will probably not need to keep new versions out of
> > unstable.  But how can you surely know this?
> 
> Well, I cannot prove it... but as there is currently only one package
> depending on it and I'm both its upstream author and maintainer, I think
> I'm fairly sure ;)

There is no reason to assume that RC bugs can only occure in upstream
code.  There are a lot of chances that packaging issues and cross
package problems occure even if the upstream code is perfectly fine.
 
> > I think by waiting a certain time to see whether some QA tools have
> > run once or twice which is probably in a one month time frame.
> 
> Oh, I didn't know these tools also run on experimental. In this case I
> completely agree!

Well, this is a misunderstanding.  The QA tools are running on testing
and unstable and I would wait a bit to be sure that several runs will
not show anything problematic.  If this is the case we could think about
"violating" freeze policy and upload to unstable.

> > So if you are sure the Debian import Freeze for Ubuntu will be Feb
> > 2015 it might be the best compromise to upload GenomeTools (and its
> > dependencies) in mid January which should be sufficient to a) reach
> > Ubuntu and b) uncover any RC bugs in testing.
> 
> Absolutely! The Ubuntu import freeze for vivid is on Feb 19th
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/ReleaseSchedule) so mid January
> definitely sounds good.

So we can agree upon uploading mid January (latest at our sprint :-)).

See you

 Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141215113047.gc...@an3as.eu



Re: unstable/experimental freeze policy

2014-12-15 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Andreas,
>> I have just uploaded a new version of a package (new GenomeTools
>> upstream version) to experimental
[...]
>> do you see much in the way of uploading this package to unstable as well?
> 
> You always need to outweight policy with sane reasons / common sense.
> If you think GenomeTools and its dependencies will pretty surely not
> feature any RC bug we will probably not need to keep new versions out of
> unstable.  But how can you surely know this?

Well, I cannot prove it... but as there is currently only one package
depending on it and I'm both its upstream author and maintainer, I think
I'm fairly sure ;)

> I think by waiting a certain time to see whether some QA tools have
> run once or twice which is probably in a one month time frame.

Oh, I didn't know these tools also run on experimental. In this case I
completely agree!

> So if you are sure the Debian import Freeze for Ubuntu will be Feb
> 2015 it might be the best compromise to upload GenomeTools (and its
> dependencies) in mid January which should be sufficient to a) reach
> Ubuntu and b) uncover any RC bugs in testing.

Absolutely! The Ubuntu import freeze for vivid is on Feb 19th
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/ReleaseSchedule) so mid January
definitely sounds good.

Thanks and best regards,
Sascha


-- 
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548eb176.9020...@steinbiss.name



Re: Help required for webapp on Tomcat8

2014-12-15 Thread Olivier Sallou

On 12/15/2014 10:18 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 15/12/2014 10:00, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
>
>> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>> at
>> org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.process(StandardJarScanner.java:291)
> Hi Olivier,
>
> This looks like this bug:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56923
>
> If you have symlinks in WEB-INF/lib you have to add  allowLinking="true"/> in your context.
Correct. In fact I had in a first step removed the allowLinking, and "of
course" , there were missing jar files for the webapp (I forgot about a
few libs). Anyway, the deploy error message was not really clear :-(

Anyway, thanks for the hint, this was the issue.

Olivier
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

-- 
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548eaac6.7090...@irisa.fr



Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:00:09AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > I admit I know to less about Java but the "merge" you are mentioning
> > in a) is not clear to me.  If you Build-Depend on libjson-simple-java
> > the JAR which is in Debian's CLASSPATH will be available as well for
> > the installed package if you Depend from libjson-simple-java.  So
> > I see no reason for patching.
> > 
> > Any more educated Java programmer will be explain better most
> > probably.
> 
> So, there would be a global CLASSPATH that is shared across all the JVMs 
> available in Debian, and that is implicitly used by the ImageJ package? 
> Anyone could confirm this?

As far as I know any JAR that's found in /usr/share/java will be
included in CLASSPATH.  (Please correct me if I'm wrong).

Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141215091853.gb...@an3as.eu



Re: Help required for webapp on Tomcat8

2014-12-15 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/12/2014 10:00, Olivier Sallou a écrit :

> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.process(StandardJarScanner.java:291)

Hi Olivier,

This looks like this bug:

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56923

If you have symlinks in WEB-INF/lib you have to add  in your context.

Emmanuel Bourg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548ea74b.6040...@apache.org



Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread s . jodogne
> I admit I know to less about Java but the "merge" you are mentioning
> in a) is not clear to me.  If you Build-Depend on libjson-simple-java
> the JAR which is in Debian's CLASSPATH will be available as well for
> the installed package if you Depend from libjson-simple-java.  So
> I see no reason for patching.
> 
> Any more educated Java programmer will be explain better most
> probably.

So, there would be a global CLASSPATH that is shared across all the JVMs 
available in Debian, and that is implicitly used by the ImageJ package? Anyone 
could confirm this?

Thanks,
Sébastien-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1297900209.7049289.1418634009506.javamail.r...@chu.ulg.ac.be



Help required for webapp on Tomcat8

2014-12-15 Thread Olivier Sallou
Hi, 
after receiving a bug to switch biomaj-watcher to Tomcat8, I made the required 
updates, but my webapp has deployment error on Tomcat 8. I ask here for help to 
ease the switch to v8 (from v6). 

I define a context xml with a docBase. I do not understand why it fails now 
any help would be appriciated to help package kept in Jessie. 

My context XML is like: 

 
 
 
.. (only other parameters) 

Here is Catalina log: 

15-Dec-2014 09:46:54.081 SEVERE [localhost-startStop-1] 
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal ContainerBase.addChild: 
start: 
org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component 
[StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[/BmajWatcher]]
 
at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.start(LifecycleBase.java:154) 
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:724) 
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:700) 
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:714) 
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:581) 
at 
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployDescriptor.run(HostConfig.java:1685)
 
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) 
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException 
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.process(StandardJarScanner.java:291)
 
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.scan(StandardJarScanner.java:158)
 
at 
org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.processJarsForWebFragments(ContextConfig.java:1855)
 
at org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.webConfig(ContextConfig.java:1119) 
at 
org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.configureStart(ContextConfig.java:771)
 
at 
org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.lifecycleEvent(ContextConfig.java:305)
 
at 
org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSupport.java:117)
 
at 
org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleBase.java:90)
 
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.startInternal(StandardContext.java:5120)
 
at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.start(LifecycleBase.java:150) 
... 10 more 

15-Dec-2014 09:46:54.092 SEVERE [localhost-startStop-1] 
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor Erreur lors du 
déploiement du descripteur de configuration 
/etc/tomcat8/Catalina/localhost/BmajWatcher.xml 
java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start: 
org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component 
[StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[/BmajWatcher]]
 
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:727) 
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:700) 
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:714) 
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:581) 
at 
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployDescriptor.run(HostConfig.java:1685)
 
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) 
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 

15-Dec-2014 09:46:54.093 INFO [localhost-startStop-1] 
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor Deployment of 
configuration descriptor /etc/tomcat8/Catalina/localhost/BmajWatcher.xml has 
finished in 613 ms 



Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sébastien,

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:14:15AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > which should be avoided.  Could you imagine to rather "link" (I think
> > linking is not the proper term in the Java world) against this
> > library
> > rather than using the code copy.
> 
> I see 2 possibilities at this point:
> (a) Build-Depends (without Depends) on libjson-simple-java and "merge" the 
> content of its JAR into the orthanc-imagej package during the build, or
> (b) Build-Depends + Depends on libjson-simple-json, and modify ImageJ's 
> internal CLASSPATH to point to the libsjon-simple-java's JAR.
> 
> I do see how to implement option (a) by myself, but not option (b), as it 
> involves patching a configuration file during installation/removal. Do you 
> think that option (a) is sufficient wrt. Debian package policy?

I admit I know to less about Java but the "merge" you are mentioning 
in a) is not clear to me.  If you Build-Depend on libjson-simple-java
the JAR which is in Debian's CLASSPATH will be available as well for
the installed package if you Depend from libjson-simple-java.  So
I see no reason for patching.

Any more educated Java programmer will be explain better most probably.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141215085346.ga...@an3as.eu



Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas,

> sorry for my silence for longer than usual.  I'm recovering slowly
> from
> my vacation (basically for the sake of OpenStreetMap work after the
> trip
> ;-)).

:)


> I had a look into the package.  It builds fine and is lintian clean
> and
> I simply assume that it is working (I have no idea how I could
> personally test).  However, the source contains a code copy of the
> package
> 
>libjson-simple-java

I hadn't spotted this Debian package!


> which should be avoided.  Could you imagine to rather "link" (I think
> linking is not the proper term in the Java world) against this
> library
> rather than using the code copy.

I see 2 possibilities at this point:
(a) Build-Depends (without Depends) on libjson-simple-java and "merge" the 
content of its JAR into the orthanc-imagej package during the build, or
(b) Build-Depends + Depends on libjson-simple-json, and modify ImageJ's 
internal CLASSPATH to point to the libsjon-simple-java's JAR.

I do see how to implement option (a) by myself, but not option (b), as it 
involves patching a configuration file during installation/removal. Do you 
think that option (a) is sufficient wrt. Debian package policy?

Thanks,
Sébastien-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1292254558.7023374.1418631255576.javamail.r...@chu.ulg.ac.be