Bug#763513: marked as done (RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 07 Oct 2014 04:24:42 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #763513, regarding RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 763513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i2util" * Package name: i2util Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Aaron Brown * URL : http://software.internet2.edu/sources/I2util/ * License : Apache License, Version 2.0 Section : libdevel It builds those binary packages: i2util-tools - Internet2 utility tools libi2util-dev - Internet2 utility library (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/i2util Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i2util/i2util_1.2-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: Initial release (Closes: #753894) I'm the maintainer of the package 'bwctl' which is already part of the official debian archive. I'm hoping to get the newest version of 'bwctl' into the archive. The newest version depends on 'i2util' (the old version did not!). My sponsor for 'bwctl' has been unresponsive for the last months, hopefully someone else can step in to make the upload happen in time before the freeze. Thanks to anyone who is willing to help! Best Regards, Raoul Gunnar Borenius -- - Raoul Gunnar Borenius Phone : +49 711 63314-206 DFN-Verein, Geschäftsstelle Stuttgart Fax: +49 711 63314-133 Lindenspürstr.32 E-Mail : boren...@dfn.de D-70176 Stuttgart WWW: http://www.dfn.de - - Deutsches Forschungsnetz -- - Germany's National Research and Education Network - - smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package i2util version 1.2-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2014-10-06) than the package in NEW (2014-10-06), so there is currently no package to sponsor. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/i2util_1.2-1.html http://mentors.debian.net/package/i2util Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no". If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 763513 or open a new RFS.--- End Message ---
Bug#764271: marked as done (RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC])
Your message dated Tue, 07 Oct 2014 04:24:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #764271, regarding RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 764271: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764271 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgaiagraphics" Package name: libgaiagraphics Version : 0.5-3 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index License : LGPL-3.0+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgaiagraphics-dev - Gaia common graphics support - development headers libgaiagraphics1 - Gaia common graphics support libgaiagraphics1-dbg - Gaia common graphics support - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgaiagraphics Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgaiagraphics/libgaiagraphics_0.5-3.dsc More information about libgaiagraphics can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index. Changes since the last upload: * Change build dependency from libjpeg8-dev to libjpeg-dev for jpeg-turbo transition. (closes: #763479). * Drop lintian override for no-upstream-changelog, shouldn't override pedantic tags. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. Regards, Bas Couwenberg --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libgaiagraphics version 0.5-3 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/libgaiagraphics--- End Message ---
Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]
Hi Tom! Thanks for packaging librocket for Debian. I've got a couple things for you to fix as the next steps. 1. You should delete all of those .ex files in the debian directory. Those are just examples of things that you might need to do. 2. Your changelog should close an ITP bug - in your case, #764252. 3. If you are using compat = 9 (which you should!), you need to depend on debhelper >= 9. 4. Your VCS fields contain a repository which doesn't exist. You should setup the collab-maint repository and push the packaging's git repository there. 5. Your standards version isn't the latest version - you should update it to 3.9.6. 6. Your packages should have a short description and a longer description that should be enough information for a user to decide whether they want to install the package. Check out Debian Policy 3.4 for more details there. 7. Your patches are missing DEP-3 headers; check out the patch tagging guidelines at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/. Lintian is a very helpful tool for finding some of these problems, and has more than I detailed above, as well as some general warnings that might point to bigger problems. I recommend it highly; it's saved my butt on many an occasion! Thanks again for your help packaging librocket for Debian; when you've got another upload that fixes the problems, send the bug a mail and someone will swing by and take another look. Sincerely, -- Harlan Lieberman-Berg ~hlieberman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1412648016.4070.6.ca...@gmail.com
Bug#762189: Bug#742344: Info received (Inclusion of German debconf template translation possible?)
Hi Helge On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:50:41PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Daniel, > on September 19th you marked this translation bug pending. Any ETA for > an upload? > > Or should I arrange for an NMU? > I have prepared a QA upload which includes all the new debconf translations and submitted an RFS [1] to both debian-mentors and debian-qa, but have received no feedback on this. Hopefully this ping may trigger, a DD to look at the prepared package and upload it! Regards, Daniel Lintott [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762189 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006211705.ga26...@mail.serverb.co.uk
Bug#764271: RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgaiagraphics" Package name: libgaiagraphics Version : 0.5-3 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index License : LGPL-3.0+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgaiagraphics-dev - Gaia common graphics support - development headers libgaiagraphics1 - Gaia common graphics support libgaiagraphics1-dbg - Gaia common graphics support - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgaiagraphics Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgaiagraphics/libgaiagraphics_0.5-3.dsc More information about libgaiagraphics can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index. Changes since the last upload: * Change build dependency from libjpeg8-dev to libjpeg-dev for jpeg-turbo transition. (closes: #763479). * Drop lintian override for no-upstream-changelog, shouldn't override pedantic tags. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. Regards, Bas Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006184024.9011.94280.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "librocket" * Package name: librocket Version : 1.3-1 Upstream Author : CodePoint Ltd, Shift Technology Ltd, and contributors * URL : http://librocket.com * License : MIT Section : libdevel It builds those binary packages: librocket - User interface middleware package based HTML and CSS librocket-dev - librocket devel package librocket-python - librocket python support package To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/librocket Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/librocket/librocket_1.3-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: Initial release Regards, Tom Mason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMK3W+TvCH8rG0_ZvC1i5AZOo6PwEkn=-lxkcljqfr1zosf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763513: RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP]
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:38:41AM +0200, Raoul Borenius wrote: > > > dget -x > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i2util/i2util_1.2-1.dsc > > I don't think you need > > > > DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 > > include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk > > > > with compat 9, is there any reason for those lines? > > No, you're absolutely right. Fixed version is on mentors. Thanks, uploaded. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#763810: marked as done (RFS: cruft/0.9.18 NMU)
Your message dated Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:49:28 +0200 with message-id <1412614168.14482.11.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU has caused the Debian Bug report #763810, regarding RFS: cruft/0.9.18 NMU to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 763810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763810 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated "cruft" package. This includes fixes for all the changes that happened since 2011, like devtmpfs, systemd, ... * Package name: cruft Version : 0.9.16+nmu1 Upstream Author : Marcin Owsiany * URL : https://github.com/a-detiste/cruft * License : no change Section : admin Here is a colordiff: https://github.com/porridge/cruft/pull/3/files It builds those binary packages: cruft - program that finds any cruft built up on your system To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cruft/cruft_0.9.16+nmu1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. -- System Information: Distributor ID: Raspbian (also applicable for vanilla Debian) Description:Raspbian GNU/Linux testing (jessie) Release:testing Codename: jessie Architecture: armv6l Kernel: Linux 3.12.28+ (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Am Monday, den 06.10.2014, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > I fixed the changelog, I only kept what was really fixed in 0.9.18 > > > > > -> d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for > > > > you usually. So check if can be cleaned up > > > I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors. > > > Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/... & /etc...) > > > > You did not touch that file... > > Removing any line from d/dirs breaks the build; > I reverted changes to this file. > > > As said, if you are quick, I will upload today. (Otherwise after my > > VAC.) > > Ok thanks, theres is a new upload on mentors.d.o uploaded. Thanks for your contribution! -- tobi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
I fixed the changelog, I only kept what was really fixed in 0.9.18 > > > -> d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for > > > you usually. So check if can be cleaned up > > I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors. > > Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/... & /etc...) > > You did not touch that file... Removing any line from d/dirs breaks the build; I reverted changes to this file. > As said, if you are quick, I will upload today. (Otherwise after my > VAC.) Ok thanks, theres is a new upload on mentors.d.o signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
Am Monday, den 06.10.2014, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > Hi, > > > -> Change the Orphaning Bug to an Intent-To-Adopt-Title (ITA:) one and > > set yourself as owner (see https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o > > and https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control; bts(1) is also a useful > > tool for manipulating bug status) > > Done, I wish I knew bts existed before. > > > -> Close the Bug in your d/changelog. (some entry like "New maintainer > > (Closes: #763888) -- (d/ is short for the debian/ directory in your > > package) Not what I meant. It's still a QA-Upload they way you writing it in d/changelog but you are adopting. Write: cruft (0.9.18) unstable; urgency=medium * New Maintainer (Closes: #763888) * Overhaul ruleset for recent kernels & systemd (...) * Closes: #702853 : explain cgroups,devtmpfs and other special fs * Bump DebHelper compat from 5 to 9 (note the line removed in the last section) > > > -> Set yourself as Maintainer in d/control (and remove the likely > > inactive Uplpoader; he can be added in case of again) > Ok See previous mail with the lintian error. > > > > I already solved 3 bugs, they will be automaticaly closed by the amended > > > changelog. > > Thats the way to go. If you like, you can also tag those bugs "pending" > In fact, those fixes are already included in the last upload from Marcin > that is already in sid. If they already closed by a previous, the approach is different: Manually close them by sending a mail to xx-d...@bugs.debian.org and noteing with the Fixed command (see https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#fixed ) Do not close bugs in the changelog when it not the new version that fixes it! > > (cruft-ng) > > Just one remark: Depends should be only used when > > appropriate -- refer to Policy §7.2 -- so only if cruft-ng requires > > cruft to operate) > It does well requires all the _rules_ from the explain/ & filters-unex/ > directories. The proper way to do it would be to have an > arch-indepedant "cruft-data" package with theses rules, > with two arc-dependant "cruft" & "cruft-ng" that depend on this. Good idea, and thats not so much work to do it, if you just need to copy files into a different package. (dsclaimer: i didn't check if my claim is right in this case). But lets keep that on the TODO for the moment, and talk about that when introducing cruft-ng, as there is no need before that. > Though, this is much work; I guess that people willing to rewrite > cruft could also just do a "git clone ; cd ; make" to try it out. > > -> d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for > > you usually. So check if can be cleaned up > I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors. > Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/... & /etc...) You did not touch that file... As said, if you are quick, I will upload today. (Otherwise after my VAC.) -- tobi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
Am Monday, den 06.10.2014, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > > Ok, the list is not really long. Good job! > > Please update the package, replay to this mail and say what you changed, > > put it to mentors, and give me a ping. > https://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft - 2014-10-06 05:09 > Ähm, there is an lintian error.. orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders The reason is that your d/control should read: Maintainer: Alexandre Detiste (Remove Uploaders!) Please reupload NOTE: I'm on vacation starting from tomorrow. So only a few hours left before I need to pause sponsoring (until Oct 18) (I will in parallel check the rest of the package) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
Hi, > You should sometime read them I have already read them many times in random order; I will browse those again from start to begin to see if i missed something important. > As [1] is emtpy, I will be a little more verbose below, apologizes if I > tell you something you already know. Indeed. I have till now very little experience with packaging. I just built some dummy ones with equivs. > -> Change the Orphaning Bug to an Intent-To-Adopt-Title (ITA:) one and > set yourself as owner (see https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o > and https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control; bts(1) is also a useful > tool for manipulating bug status) Done, I wish I knew bts existed before. > -> Close the Bug in your d/changelog. (some entry like "New maintainer > (Closes: #763888) -- (d/ is short for the debian/ directory in your > package) Ok > -> Set yourself as Maintainer in d/control (and remove the likely > inactive Uplpoader; he can be added in case of again) Ok > > I already solved 3 bugs, they will be automaticaly closed by the amended > > changelog. > Thats the way to go. If you like, you can also tag those bugs "pending" In fact, those fixes are already included in the last upload from Marcin that is already in sid. (cruft-ng) > Just one remark: Depends should be only used when > appropriate -- refer to Policy §7.2 -- so only if cruft-ng requires > cruft to operate) It does well requires all the _rules_ from the explain/ & filters-unex/ directories. The proper way to do it would be to have an arch-indepedant "cruft-data" package with theses rules, with two arc-dependant "cruft" & "cruft-ng" that depend on this. Though, this is much work; I guess that people willing to rewrite cruft could also just do a "git clone ; cd ; make" to try it out. > NM is to become a DD. Ok, I mixed it up; I thought taht was needed to recognize the gpg key. >> (Lintian Error ) > This error will go away after you adopted the package (as described > above) > Ok > -> d/changelog: > > There was an upload Oct3 -> you need to rebase your d/changelog to > include the changes from 0.9.17 > (skip the unreleased nmu) Ok, I did the rebase, the nmu is gone > Standard Version 3.9.6 is out ;-) Ok > Regarding VCS-*, they need some update as you need to keep them actual Marcin transfered me the "root" GitHub repository after I deleted my fork, I adapted the URL everywere. > (Note: Seems that Marcin did not push the tag for 0.9.17 -- please make > sure to tag this release. Tool recommendation: git-buildpackage I set the tag. > -> d/copyright > > Comment: should go, not needed. > > You need to add your name to the "*" section > (as you are also becoming upstream, I guess. Its a native package > afterall :)) Ok, I just didn't want to rush it/hurt people feelings; It's nothing technical. This is correct now. I removed the links to the wiki & alioth page; those are not much usefull anyway. > -> d/cruft.lintian-overrides > Please remove the lines when no longer needed, not just only comment it. Ok > -> d/docs is empty > Remove file if not needed. Ok > -> d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for > you usually. So check if can be cleaned up I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors. Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/... & /etc...) > Ok, the list is not really long. Good job! > Please update the package, replay to this mail and say what you changed, > put it to mentors, and give me a ping. https://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft - 2014-10-06 05:09 > > -- > Tobi Thanks for the review Alexandre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3197009.dka1B10lbq@antec