Bug#680024: marked as done (unblock: xli/1.17.0+20061110-4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:08:21 +0100
with message-id <1341292101.23073.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680024: unblock: xli/1.17.0+20061110-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #680024,
regarding unblock: xli/1.17.0+20061110-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: 677...@bugs.debian.org

Please unblock package xli, which fixes an important bug and
implements the hardening release goal.

Thanks,
Ryan

The git history of these changes is available here:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/xli.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/debian/1.17.0%2B20061110-4

And the entire diff is here:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/xli.git;a=commitdiff;h=044ca1e59bd87033d1566a05aa916dcaca2a787f;hp=7589afe00021df42a1b04754da800f2b8c7a7e69

Here is the description of the new patch, "disable-libjpeg-scaling":

This patch changes xli to no longer try to use libjpeg's scaling
functionality, handling zooming JPEGs like any other image type.

It seems there was a regression in libjpeg's scaling functionality
between libjpeg62 and libjpeg8, see: http://bugs.debian.org/677113

Here is the full changelog entry:

xli (1.17.0+20061110-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Update my email address in Maintainer field
  * Add disable-libjpeg-scaling patch to disable using libjpeg for
scaling, which broke after upgrading from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8
(Closes: #677113)
  * Add Vcs-* fields, maintaining the package within collab-maint
  * Use dpkg-buildflags in debian/rules to enable hardening

 -- Ryan Niebur   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:37:10 -0700

Finally, the unblock needed:

unblock xli/1.17.0+20061110-4

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 17:36 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Please unblock package xli, which fixes an important bug and
> implements the hardening release goal.
[...]
> xli (1.17.0+20061110-4) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * Update my email address in Maintainer field
>   * Add disable-libjpeg-scaling patch to disable using libjpeg for
> scaling, which broke after upgrading from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8
> (Closes: #677113)
>   * Add Vcs-* fields, maintaining the package within collab-maint
>   * Use dpkg-buildflags in debian/rules to enable hardening

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


--- End Message ---

Freeze exception for luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3

[Norbert Preining]

Dear Release Managers,

I would like to ask for a freeze exception for
luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3
Compared to the version currently in testing there are three changes:
* a fix for a typesetting issue (#680015)
  filed as normal, but is actually important to critical, as
  every document thatuses radicals and usual TeX fonts (not new
  otf fonts) will break

* use dpkg-maintscript-helper (via debian/luatex.maintscript)
  to remove oldconfig file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/20luatex.cnf which
  is not used since long.

* fixes to the manpage that man does not give warnings


Detailed description


* a fix for a typesetting issue (#680015)
The bug fix for the first item comes from the upstream svn, here
is the respective commit comment:
/-- upstream svn commit comment 
r4449 | khaled | 2012-07-02 20:15:46 +0200 (Mon, 02 Jul 2012) | 13 lines
Changed paths:
   M /trunk/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/mlist.w

Fix regression introduced in r4361

Radical rule thickness calculation was wrong for composite radicals with
old fonts. When get_delim_box() was rewritten, a special correction for
the radicals were lost. That block of code is now in make_radical()
itself.

A simple test:
$$y=\sqrt{\displaystyle\int \over x}$$
\bye

Related:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/61952/729
---

I tried the test case that can be found at the stackexchange link
plus the simple example from the above commit message, and they are
all fixed.



* remove oldconfig file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/20luatex.cnf

this config file was shipped in 2009 but is not used anymore. Removal
is done by using dpkg-maintscript-helper:
- add debian/luatex.maintscript wiht the contents:
rm_conffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/20luatex.cnf 0.70.1.20120524-3~
  since we didn't remove it till now
- adjust build deps to debhelper (>= 8.1.0~) and add
  Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} for proper dpkg version


* fixes to the manpage that man does not give warnings

fix manpage warnings by replacing
.rb
with 
.RB
as the former gives a warning "macro not defined".


I attach the full debdiff to this email.

Best wishes

Norbert

Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

BANTEER
A lusty and raucous old ballad sung after a particulary spectacular
araglin (q.v.) has been pulled off.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
diff -Nru luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/changelog 
luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/changelog
--- luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/changelog 2012-06-14 07:44:17.0 
+0900
+++ luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/changelog 2012-07-03 09:11:16.0 
+0900
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+luatex (0.70.1.20120524-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * pick from upstream luatex-svn: fix rendering of radicals with
+old fonts (Closes: #680015)
+  * remove old conffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/20luatex.cnf
+(add Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} for dpkg-maintscript-helper)
+  * fix man page warnings
+
+ -- Norbert Preining   Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:11:08 +0900
+
 luatex (0.70.1.20120524-2) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * depend on tex-common >= 3.12 to get partial single package upgrades
diff -Nru luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/control 
luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/control
--- luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/control   2012-06-14 07:43:10.0 
+0900
+++ luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/control   2012-07-03 08:01:28.0 
+0900
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian TeX Maintainers 
 Uploaders: Frank Küster , Norbert Preining 

-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), flex, bison, zlib1g-dev, libpng-dev, 
libjpeg-dev, pkg-config, sharutils, libpoppler-private-dev, libpoppler-cpp-dev, 
libfontconfig1-dev, libkpathsea-dev (>= 2012)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.1.0~), flex, bison, zlib1g-dev, libpng-dev, 
libjpeg-dev, pkg-config, sharutils, libpoppler-private-dev, libpoppler-cpp-dev, 
libfontconfig1-dev, libkpathsea-dev (>= 2012)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-tex/luatex/trunk
 Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-tex/luatex/trunk/
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 
 Package: luatex
 Architecture: any
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
 Depends: tex-common (>= 3.12), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
 Recommends: texlive-luatex
 Replaces: luatex-snapshot
diff -Nru luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/luatex.1 
luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/luatex.1
--- luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/luatex.1  2009-04-30 00:03:34.0 
+0900
+++ luatex-0.70.1.20120524/debian/luatex.1  2012-07-03 09:10:57.0 
+0900
@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@
 ..
 .TP
 .BI "\-\-lua=" FILE
-.rb
+.RB
 The lua

Requesting freeze exception for alpine

[Asheesh Laroia]

Hello lovely wheezy freezers and distro releasers,

I'd like to request an exception for alpine 2.02+dfsg-1 to enter testing. 
I'd actually prefer to create a 2.02+dfsg-2 that fixes a security bug, if 
that's okay: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653238


2.02+dfsg-1 has the following debian/changelog entry:

alpine (2.02+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * ACK'd non-maintainer upload by tolimar. (Thank you!)
  * Removed Windows (and other) binaries from ldap/binaries/* and
pico/msmem.c and alpine/ldap32.dll. This is now documented in
debian/copyright. (Closes: #641479)
  * Configuring debian/rules for hardening flags, as per release goal.
(Therefore, this release adds a versioned dpkg dependency.)
  * Set urgency to medium due to fix for release-critical bug.
  * Bump the Standards-Version to 3.9.3; no changes since 3.9.1 affect
this package.

 -- Asheesh Laroia   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:44:02 -0600

The debdiff would be polluted by the removed files, but here is the diff 
between the debian/ directories.


Again, I'd prefer to (with your blessing) upload a 2.02+dfsg-2 that fixes 
a non-critical security vulnerability, 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653238 .


(To clarify my understanding: if I fix other issues that aren't suitable 
for a freeze exception, it's best to upload those to experimental?)


Thanks!

diff -urN older/alpine-2.02/debian/changelog 
newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- older/alpine-2.02/debian/changelog  2011-12-02 08:16:13.0 -0600
+++ newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-07-02 17:49:33.0 
-0600
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+alpine (2.02+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * ACK'd non-maintainer upload by tolimar. (Thank you!)
+  * Removed Windows (and other) binaries from ldap/binaries/* and
+pico/msmem.c and alpine/ldap32.dll. This is now documented in
+debian/copyright. (Closes: #641479)
+  * Configuring debian/rules for hardening flags, as per release goal.
+(Therefore, this release adds a versioned dpkg dependency.)
+  * Set urgency to medium due to fix for release-critical bug.
+  * Bump the Standards-Version to 3.9.3; no changes since 3.9.1 affect
+this package.
+
+ -- Asheesh Laroia   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:44:02 -0600
+
 alpine (2.02-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium

   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -urN older/alpine-2.02/debian/control newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/control
--- older/alpine-2.02/debian/control2010-11-01 23:59:27.0 -0600
+++ newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/control   2012-07-02 17:45:53.0 
-0600
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 Uploaders: Andreas Tille , Luke Faraone 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libldap2-dev, libpam0g-dev, libncurses-dev,
  libssl-dev, autotools-dev, ca-certificates, automake, autoconf, libtool, 
libkrb5-dev,
- cdbs, aspell
-Standards-Version: 3.9.1
+ cdbs, aspell, dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)
+Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
 Vcs-Browser: 
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/ext-maint/alpine/trunk/?rev=0&sc=0
 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/ext-maint/alpine/trunk/
diff -urN older/alpine-2.02/debian/copyright 
newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/copyright
--- older/alpine-2.02/debian/copyright  2010-10-15 21:37:55.0 -0600
+++ newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/copyright 2012-07-02 17:49:47.0 
-0600
@@ -6,6 +6,26 @@
 the re-alpine project 's
 current tarball.

+Some files have been removed to comply with the Debian Free Software
+Guidelines. See Debian bug #641479 
+for more history. Particular files that were removed are:
+
+* pico/msmem.c. Reason: File has, at best, ambiguous permission to distribute.
+
+A lot of "ldap" binaries with no obvious source code within the
+tarball, and that are not needed to do a build. Here is a list of them:
+
+* alpine/ldap32.dll
+* ldap/binaries/debug/ldap32.lib
+* ldap/binaries/debug/libldap.dll
+* ldap/binaries/debug/libldap.lib
+* ldap/binaries/debug/ltest32.exe
+* ldap/binaries/debug/ltest.exe
+* ldap/binaries/release/ldap32.dll
+* ldap/binaries/release/ldap32.lib
+* ldap/binaries/release/libldap.dll
+* ldap/binaries/release/libldap.lib
+
 Upstream Authors: University of Washington - http://www.washington.edu/alpine/
   and others

@@ -28,6 +48,6 @@
 `/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0'.

 The Debian packaging is
- © 2006-2008 Asheesh Laroia 
+ © 2006-2012 Asheesh Laroia 
  © 2008, Andreas Tille  and
 is licensed under the GPL, see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
diff -urN older/alpine-2.02/debian/rules newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/rules
--- older/alpine-2.02/debian/rules  2010-10-15 17:35:29.0 -0600
+++ newer/alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/rules 2012-07-02 16:31:55.0 -0600
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk

+export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
+export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND 

Bug#680024: unblock: xli/1.17.0+20061110-4

[Ryan Niebur]

Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: 677...@bugs.debian.org

Please unblock package xli, which fixes an important bug and
implements the hardening release goal.

Thanks,
Ryan

The git history of these changes is available here:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/xli.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/debian/1.17.0%2B20061110-4

And the entire diff is here:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/xli.git;a=commitdiff;h=044ca1e59bd87033d1566a05aa916dcaca2a787f;hp=7589afe00021df42a1b04754da800f2b8c7a7e69

Here is the description of the new patch, "disable-libjpeg-scaling":

This patch changes xli to no longer try to use libjpeg's scaling
functionality, handling zooming JPEGs like any other image type.

It seems there was a regression in libjpeg's scaling functionality
between libjpeg62 and libjpeg8, see: http://bugs.debian.org/677113

Here is the full changelog entry:

xli (1.17.0+20061110-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Update my email address in Maintainer field
  * Add disable-libjpeg-scaling patch to disable using libjpeg for
scaling, which broke after upgrading from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8
(Closes: #677113)
  * Add Vcs-* fields, maintaining the package within collab-maint
  * Use dpkg-buildflags in debian/rules to enable hardening

 -- Ryan Niebur   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:37:10 -0700

Finally, the unblock needed:

unblock xli/1.17.0+20061110-4

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: another FSO transition

[Sebastian Reichel]

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Everything built okay and the old libraries have been decrufted from
> unstable. I aged the source uploads a little so that we could get
> things transitioned more quickly; as of tonight's britney run, the
> new packages are in wheezy, so I think we can call this done.

thanks :)

-- Sebastian


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#680006: marked as done (nmu: openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2012 01:09:03 +0200
with message-id <20120702230903.gf8...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680006: nmu: openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #680006,
regarding nmu: openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

gb openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5 . mips

there were also FTBFS on powerpc and kfreebsd-i386 with various obscure signs
-- they all completed just fine now.  So to not waste admin's time (and
mine) in setting up the build env, it would be great if we could try
another build run before getting hands dirty.
it builds otherwise across all ports

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Yaroslav Halchenko  (02/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> gb openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5 . mips

Give backs aren't requested through binNMU requests, closing this bug
report accordingly.

You want to talk to wb team or specific buildd maintainers.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Re: nbd freeze exception?

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hello,

Wouter Verhelst  (02/07/2012):
> No, this isn't a request for a freeze exception, yet. I'd just like to
> test the waters before I start working on this: […]

I think the [2] pointer in the freeze announce covers your question. FTR
that was: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#679778: unblock: spandsp/0.0.6~pre20-2

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 02.07.2012 07:22, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>> > Please unblock package spandsp
> [...]
>>> On that basis, the changes from both -1 and -2 are relevant to the
>>> unblock.  While the changes between the current testing package and  
>>> -1
>>> aren't huge, the changelog isn't really very helpful in terms of  
>>> helping
>>> me decide whether they're appropriate for an unblock as it just says
>>> "new upstream version".
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to expand (briefly should be fine) on what the
>>> changes in the new upstream version are?
>>
>> As of now there are two separate issues:
>
> Apologies if my question wasn't clear.  I was asking for more detail on  
> why 0.0.6~pre20 is a better candidate for release than the version  
> that's currently in wheezy, other than by sheer virtue of being "newer".

There's no real changelog. However the difference between pre18 and
pre20 is not big.

pre19: 
https://gitorious.org/spandsp/spandsp/commit/926c6eec0a2955dffccea3992232d0a064f4a5f6
A bugfix commit. IIRC the fix in t4_rx.c was discovered by faxes that
managed to crash Asterisk.


pre20: 
https://gitorious.org/spandsp/spandsp/commit/83f249c1a0172d3246a2ffb69fb534f725bdbca3
Again: bugfixes. Sadly I'm not sure what for, exactly (that git tree is
something I produce from tarballs and I have no better changelos,
sadly).


-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
tzaf...@cohens.org.il ||  best
tzaf...@debian.org|| friend



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702223916.gl12...@pear.tzafrir.org.il

Requesting freeze exception for snappy 1.0.5-2

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

Hi,

I'm looking to see if it would be possible to get a freeze exception for
snappy (producing libsnappy1 and libsnappy-dev). testing has had 1.0.4-1 for
a long time; 1.0.5-1, a new upstream release (containing mostly performance
improvements) has been in unstable for about three months, but has failed to
compile on armel due to a bug specific to Debian ARM-systems (the only ARM
systems I use regularly are Ubuntu and Android systems), and no bug was filed
for this. Thus, it has not transitioned to testing, despite no bugs filed
against the package. I filed an FTBFS bug, #679964, myself when the DDPO
report arrived (just after the freeze!), for tracking purposes. 

The debdiff between 1.0.5-1 and 1.0.5-2 is simple, and I'll be putting it
upstream as soon as it goes through code review at work. Here it is:

--- snappy-1.0.5/debian/changelog
+++ snappy-1.0.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+snappy (1.0.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Disable unaligned accesses on ARMv4, not just ARMv5 and ARMv6.
+Fixes unit test segfaults and subsequent FTBFS on armel.
+(Closes: #679964) 
+
+ -- Steinar H. Gunderson   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:30:10 +0200
+
 snappy (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- snappy-1.0.5.orig/snappy-stubs-internal.h
+++ snappy-1.0.5/snappy-stubs-internal.h
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@
 // This is a mess, but there's not much we can do about it.
 
 #elif defined(__arm__) && \
+  !defined(__ARM_ARCH_4__) && \
+  !defined(__ARM_ARCH_4T__) && \
   !defined(__ARM_ARCH_5__) && \
   !defined(__ARM_ARCH_5T__) && \
   !defined(__ARM_ARCH_5TE__) && \

1.0.5-2 has built successfully (which includes running an extensive unit
test battery, which was what caught the bug and stopped the package from
building on armel in the first place) on all release architectures,
including arm, armel and armhf.

Thanks for considering :-)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702214627.ga24...@samfundet.no

Bug#679041: marked as done (transition: wireshark)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:12:27 +0100
with message-id <1341267147.8481.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#679041: transition: wireshark
has caused the Debian Bug report #679041,
regarding transition: wireshark
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679041: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679041
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I'd like to upload the latest version of wireshark to unstable.
Updating from 1.6.8 to 1.8.0 brings a new ABI with a new soname for
all the libs. Having Wireshark 1.8.x in Wheezy is important because
upstream's support for 1.6.x ends on June 7, 2013 [1] and Wireshark
needs regular security updates.

The only source package affected is netexpect, for which I am in contact
with its maintainer, Eloy Paris.

I have uploaded wireshark 1.8.0~rc1 to the NEW queue through a sponsor
and plan uploading 1.8.0 to unstable right after RC1 gets accepted.

Ben file:

title = "wireshark";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libwireshark-dev|libwsutil-dev|libwiretap-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libwireshark2|libwsutil2|libwiretap2/;
is_pad = .depends ~ /libwireshark1|libwsutil1|libwiretap1/;


[1]: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 00:10 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:

> I'd like to upload the latest version of wireshark to unstable.
> Updating from 1.6.8 to 1.8.0 brings a new ABI with a new soname for
> all the libs. Having Wireshark 1.8.x in Wheezy is important because
> upstream's support for 1.6.x ends on June 7, 2013 [1] and Wireshark
> needs regular security updates.
> 
> The only source package affected is netexpect, for which I am in contact
> with its maintainer, Eloy Paris.

I aged wireshark and netexpect a little so we could get this transition
finished; as of tonight's britney run, wireshark 1.8 is in wheezy.

Regards,

Adam


--- End Message ---

Bug#673538: libobjc3 -> libobjc4 transition

[Yavor Doganov]

At Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:02:17 +0100,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 21:20 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Uploading gnustep-base/1.22.1 with the libobjc4 patch will allow
> > the package to be built with gcc-4.7 on x86 archs, and with
> > gcc-4.6 on the other (where 4.6 is still the default).  [...]  The
> > patch is ABI compatible, so no recompilation should be necessary;
> > I can confirm this after my runtime tests.
> 
> That would presumably be one or both of the patches from
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667868#12 ?

Yes, both of them.

> If we postponed the main transition(s) until wheezy+1, would the
> gnustep-base upload be the only thing required for wheezy?

Yes, it would be the only thing needed if we talk about the core
GNUstep packages (-make, -base, -gui, -back).  We'll have to fix the
RC bugs in the other packages, but that goes without saying.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obnxhm8v.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org

Bug#680006: nmu: openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5

[Yaroslav Halchenko]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

gb openmeeg_2.0.0.dfsg-5 . mips

there were also FTBFS on powerpc and kfreebsd-i386 with various obscure signs
-- they all completed just fine now.  So to not waste admin's time (and
mine) in setting up the build env, it would be great if we could try
another build run before getting hands dirty.
it builds otherwise across all ports

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120702215259.18007.65427.report...@novo.onerussian.com

Bug#680005: RM: src:dkim-milter/2.8.2.dfsg-1.1

[Scott Kitterman]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

dkim-milter is RC buggy and has been superceded by a fork, opendkim.  It's
unmaintained upstream (the former dkim-milter upstream is now the opendkim
upstream) and the former author recommends opendkim instead in all cases.

We should not release Wheezy with this package.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120702215230.12913.17820.reportbug@Scott-Latitude-E6320

Re: another FSO transition

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 19:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 02:52 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: 
> > NEW:
> >  libfsotransport 0.11.1-2
> >  libgsm0710mux 0.11.2-1
> 
> No longer NEW thanks to speedy processing by ftp-team. :-)
> 
> > uploaded:
> >  fso-gsmd 0.11.3-2
> 
> I've scheduled binNMUs for fso-deviced, with a dep-wait on
> libfsotransport3.

Everything built okay and the old libraries have been decrufted from
unstable.  I aged the source uploads a little so that we could get
things transitioned more quickly; as of tonight's britney run, the new
packages are in wheezy, so I think we can call this done.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1341267137.8481.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#680001: Acknowledgement (unblock: freeglut/2.6.0-3)

[Michael Gilbert]

debdiff attached this time.


freeglut.patch
Description: Binary data

Bug#680001: unblock: freeglut/2.6.0-3

[Michael Gilbert]

Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal

Please unblock package freeglut

It fixes 3 bugs: an rc issue (#678571), a release goal (#677735), and
an old bug (#331244).

Thanks,
Mike

unblock freeglut/2.6.0-3



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MOiOuqS1MF0AA=or9yjt1qg4prtbkh73h2qa_rjona...@mail.gmail.com

NEW changes in proposedupdates

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: 
nvidia-graphics-drivers_195.36.31-6squeeze1_multi.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: powertop_1.11-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.13.0-7_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1slnkz-0004cw...@franck.debian.org

Bug#679994: release.debian.org: unblock: cmigemo/20110227-6

[Youhei SASAKI]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi, Please unblock package cmigemo. 

The cmigemo (= 20110227-5) provides transitional package "migemo" in
order to smooth upgrade from squeeze to wheezy. Because original
"migemo" is removed from Debian archives.
  - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677073
  - http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/migemo/news/20120701T163917Z.html

However, current cmigemo (=20110227-5, in unstable) had RC bug #679756 
  - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679756

Thus, I fix it and upload 20110227-6 into unstable.
I attached debdiff output. 

Please unclock cmigemo/20110227-6.

Sincerely yours,
Youhei 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (80, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog
--- cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog   2012-06-29 16:30:23.0 +0100
+++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog   2012-07-02 16:47:35.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+cmigemo (20110227-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fix upgrade/transition from 'migemo'. 
+   - Change install destination for smooth upgrade,
+ Thanks to Andreas Beckmann. (Closes: #679756)
+
+ -- Youhei SASAKI   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:48:43 +0100
+
 cmigemo (20110227-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Transitional package for smooth upgrade from migemo
diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-install 
cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-install
--- cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-install   2012-06-16 
18:05:35.0 +0100
+++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-install   2012-07-02 
14:11:15.0 +0100
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #  and octave by Dirk Eddelbuettel .
 
 FLAVOR=$1
-PACKAGE=migemo
+PACKAGE=migemo-el
 
 if [ ${FLAVOR} = emacs ]; then exit 0; fi
 
@@ -23,13 +23,6 @@
 ELDIR=/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/${PACKAGE}
 ELCDIR=/usr/share/${FLAVOR}/site-lisp/${PACKAGE}
 
-# Install-info-altdir does not actually exist. 
-# Maybe somebody will write it.
-# if test -x /usr/sbin/install-info-altdir; then
-# echo install/${PACKAGE}: install Info links for ${FLAVOR}
-# install-info-altdir --quiet --section "" "" --dirname=${FLAVOR} 
/usr/info/${PACKAGE}.info.gz
-# fi
-
 install -m 755 -d ${ELCDIR}
 cd ${ELDIR}
 FILES=`echo *.el`
diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-remove 
cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-remove
--- cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-remove2012-06-16 
18:05:35.0 +0100
+++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-remove2012-07-02 
14:11:07.0 +0100
@@ -1,14 +1,10 @@
 #!/bin/sh -e
-# /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/remove/migemo
+# /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/remove/migemo-el
 
 FLAVOR=$1
-PACKAGE=migemo
+PACKAGE=migemo-el
 
 if [ ${FLAVOR} != emacs ]; then
-# if test -x /usr/sbin/install-info-altdir; then
-#echo remove/${PACKAGE}: removing Info links for ${FLAVOR}
-#install-info-altdir --quiet --remove --dirname=${FLAVOR} 
/usr/info/migemo.info.gz
-# fi
 
 echo remove/${PACKAGE}: purging byte-compiled files for ${FLAVOR}
 rm -rf /usr/share/${FLAVOR}/site-lisp/${PACKAGE}
diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup 
cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup
--- cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup   2012-06-16 
18:05:35.0 +0100
+++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup   2012-07-02 
14:11:27.0 +0100
@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@
 ;; We have to add this to the load-path:
 (setq load-path (cons (concat "/usr/share/"
   (symbol-name flavor)
- "/site-lisp/migemo") load-path))
+ "/site-lisp/migemo-el") load-path))
 
diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.install 
cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.install
--- cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.install   2012-06-16 18:05:35.0 
+0100
+++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.install   2012-07-02 14:11:38.0 
+0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-debian/contrib/migemo.el usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/migemo/
+debian/contrib/migemo.el usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/migemo-el/

Bug#669348: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#675773: Bug#675773: libopenjpeg2: Please make libopenjpeg2 multi-arch: same

[Michael Gilbert]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Said approval will not come before wheezy is released.

Based on the release team's decision about the 1.5 (non)transition,
I've refreshed the nmu for 1.3 and uploaded again to delayed/5.
Please see attached patch.

Best wishes,
Mike


openjpeg.patch
Description: Binary data

Please let electric-fence 2.2.3 into testing

[Matthew Vernon]

Hi,

I've just uploaded electric-fence 2.2.3. This version just tweaks the 
build system a little, which undoes a reversion such that we again pass 
-fno-builtin-malloc to gcc, which fixes a FTBFS on many architectures 
(gcc mis-optimises without it). I've tested it works on i386 amd64 and 
armel, so the buildds should build the whole lot soon.


Thanks,

Matthew


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff1fc69.1040...@debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#679633: pu: package xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.13.0-7

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 679633 + pending
Bug #679633 [release.debian.org] pu: package xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.13.0-7
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679633: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679633
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13412595374319.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#679633: pu: package xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.13.0-7

[Adam D. Barratt]

tags 679633 + pending
thanks

On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 13:03 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:57:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Simon McVittie reported a crash in the intel driver, and tracked down
> > the fix in the upstream tree.  The patch is simple and applies cleanly.
> > debdiff follows, modulo dch -r.
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded, and flagged for acceptance; thanks.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1341259454.8481.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Processed: Re: Bug#668780: pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 668780 + pending
Bug #668780 [release.debian.org] pu: package 
nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
668780: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668780
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13412595604700.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#668780: pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze1

[Adam D. Barratt]

tag 668780 + pending
thanks

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 17:06 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-06-16 16:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:00 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=178460
> 
> > I see that the package has now appeared in p-u-NEW.  Does this mean that
> > the above issue was resolved, or that you decided it wasn't an issue
> > after all?
> 
> There hasn't been conclusive information on this issue by Nvidia and no
> updates have appeared for the security patches.
> 
> But there have been regressions found and fixed in 295.49 that affected
> the older GeForce 6, 7, etc. cards, but that were unrelated to the
> security fix.
> 
> So I assume the security fix is OK for the older cards as well (causing
> no regressions) and uploaded the package.

Okay; thanks.  I've just flagged the package for acceptance in to
p-u-NEW; sorry for the delay.

> Now I'm also preparing an update for nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx.

How's that going?

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1341259478.8481.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:11 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff
> > > (only changed changelog entry to reflect NMU) for powertop.
> > > 
> > > (I have added win...@debian.org to recipient lists)
> > > 
> > > Can I upload this?
> > 
> > Please go ahead; thanks.
> 
> Thanks, just uploaded some minutes ago.

Flagged for acceptance; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1341259483.8481.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#679979: Report wasn't quite complete

[Scott Kitterman]

I also wanted to get an SE Linux fix in if I could (#679852), but I was using 
the wrong diff in the initial report.   Please see the attached diff instead.diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/configure opendkim-2.6.2/configure
--- opendkim-2.6.1/configure	2012-06-24 23:34:56.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/configure	2012-07-02 13:59:41.0 -0400
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 #! /bin/sh
 # Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles.
-# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68 for OpenDKIM 2.6.1.
+# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68 for OpenDKIM 2.6.2.
 #
 # Report bugs to .
 #
@@ -570,8 +570,8 @@
 # Identity of this package.
 PACKAGE_NAME='OpenDKIM'
 PACKAGE_TARNAME='opendkim'
-PACKAGE_VERSION='2.6.1'
-PACKAGE_STRING='OpenDKIM 2.6.1'
+PACKAGE_VERSION='2.6.2'
+PACKAGE_STRING='OpenDKIM 2.6.2'
 PACKAGE_BUGREPORT='b...@opendkim.org'
 PACKAGE_URL=''
 
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
   # Omit some internal or obsolete options to make the list less imposing.
   # This message is too long to be a string in the A/UX 3.1 sh.
   cat <<_ACEOF
-\`configure' configures OpenDKIM 2.6.1 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
+\`configure' configures OpenDKIM 2.6.2 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
 
 Usage: $0 [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
 
@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@
 
 if test -n "$ac_init_help"; then
   case $ac_init_help in
- short | recursive ) echo "Configuration of OpenDKIM 2.6.1:";;
+ short | recursive ) echo "Configuration of OpenDKIM 2.6.2:";;
esac
   cat <<\_ACEOF
 
@@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@
 test -n "$ac_init_help" && exit $ac_status
 if $ac_init_version; then
   cat <<\_ACEOF
-OpenDKIM configure 2.6.1
+OpenDKIM configure 2.6.2
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68
 
 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@
 This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
 running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
 
-It was created by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.1, which was
+It was created by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.2, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.  Invocation command line was
 
   $ $0 $@
@@ -3222,7 +3222,7 @@
 
 # Define the identity of the package.
  PACKAGE='opendkim'
- VERSION='2.6.1'
+ VERSION='2.6.2'
 
 
 cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
@@ -3271,7 +3271,7 @@
 #
 # Hexadecimal version, for use in generating dkim.h
 #
-HEX_VERSION=$(printf %08x $(( ((2 << 8 | 6) << 8 | 1) << 8| 0 )))
+HEX_VERSION=$(printf %08x $(( ((2 << 8 | 6) << 8 | 2) << 8| 0 )))
 
 
 #
@@ -20528,7 +20528,7 @@
 # report actual input values of CONFIG_FILES etc. instead of their
 # values after options handling.
 ac_log="
-This file was extended by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.1, which was
+This file was extended by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.2, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.  Invocation command line was
 
   CONFIG_FILES= $CONFIG_FILES
@@ -20594,7 +20594,7 @@
 cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF || ac_write_fail=1
 ac_cs_config="`$as_echo "$ac_configure_args" | sed 's/^ //; s/[\\""\`\$]/&/g'`"
 ac_cs_version="\\
-OpenDKIM config.status 2.6.1
+OpenDKIM config.status 2.6.2
 configured by $0, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68,
   with options \\"\$ac_cs_config\\"
 
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/configure.ac opendkim-2.6.2/configure.ac
--- opendkim-2.6.1/configure.ac	2012-06-24 23:33:43.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/configure.ac	2012-07-02 13:58:53.0 -0400
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 #
 m4_define([VERSION_RELEASE], 2)
 m4_define([VERSION_MAJOR_REV], 6)
-m4_define([VERSION_MINOR_REV], 1)
+m4_define([VERSION_MINOR_REV], 2)
 m4_define([VERSION_PATCH], 0)
 
 #
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec opendkim-2.6.2/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec
--- opendkim-2.6.1/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec	2012-06-24 23:35:13.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec	2012-07-02 14:00:30.0 -0400
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Summary: An open source library and milter for providing DKIM service
 Name: opendkim
-Version: 2.6.1
+Version: 2.6.2
 Release: 1
 License: BSD
 Group: System Environment/Daemons
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/debian/changelog opendkim-2.6.2/debian/changelog
--- opendkim-2.6.1/debian/changelog	2012-07-02 15:38:45.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/debian/changelog	2012-07-02 15:38:45.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+opendkim (2.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release (addresses three bugs that affect the Debian package)
+- Fix bug #SF3539449: Clarify legal "Socket" values.  Requested by Scott
+  Kitterman.
+- Fix bug #SF3539493: Handle certain cases of data set names that appear
+  to be comma-separated lists which include IPv6 addresses.  Reported by
+  Scott Kitterman. (Closes: #679548)
+  * Use restorecon to apply a SE Linux label after creating a run dir
+(Closes: #679852)
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:44:38 -0400
+
 opendkim (2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/debian/opendkim.init opendkim-2.6.2/debian/opendkim.init
--- opendkim-2.6.1/debian/opendkim.init	2012-07-02 15:38:45.0 -0400
+++ open

Bug#679979: unblock: opendkim/2.6.2-1

[Scott Kitterman]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package opendkim

The opendkim upstream just did a new release primarily to fix #679548 through
a combination of improved documentation and a small code fix.

The release also addresses a few other minor issues.  The FFR_RESIGN fix
doesn't affect Debian since neither of the options affected by the fix are
enabled.  The opendkim-genrates fix doesn't affect Debian since that script is
not included in any of the binaries.  The only change that affects Debian that
isn't in the scope of #679548 is a hyphen/minus sign fix in a man page.

Upstream has been very cooperative on #679548, putting out a release
specifically because of it.  I think it's both technically and socially better
at this point in the freeze process to update to the new version than to
extract most of the update into a patch.

I have the package ready to upload if this is approved.  This problem exists
in both Squeeze and Wheezy and came to light due to increased IPv6 usage.
This is not a case of fixing a regression.

The full diff (upstream and packaging) is attached.

unblock opendkim/2.6.2-1
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/configure opendkim-2.6.2/configure
--- opendkim-2.6.1/configure	2012-06-24 23:34:56.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/configure	2012-07-02 13:59:41.0 -0400
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 #! /bin/sh
 # Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles.
-# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68 for OpenDKIM 2.6.1.
+# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68 for OpenDKIM 2.6.2.
 #
 # Report bugs to .
 #
@@ -570,8 +570,8 @@
 # Identity of this package.
 PACKAGE_NAME='OpenDKIM'
 PACKAGE_TARNAME='opendkim'
-PACKAGE_VERSION='2.6.1'
-PACKAGE_STRING='OpenDKIM 2.6.1'
+PACKAGE_VERSION='2.6.2'
+PACKAGE_STRING='OpenDKIM 2.6.2'
 PACKAGE_BUGREPORT='b...@opendkim.org'
 PACKAGE_URL=''
 
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
   # Omit some internal or obsolete options to make the list less imposing.
   # This message is too long to be a string in the A/UX 3.1 sh.
   cat <<_ACEOF
-\`configure' configures OpenDKIM 2.6.1 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
+\`configure' configures OpenDKIM 2.6.2 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
 
 Usage: $0 [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
 
@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@
 
 if test -n "$ac_init_help"; then
   case $ac_init_help in
- short | recursive ) echo "Configuration of OpenDKIM 2.6.1:";;
+ short | recursive ) echo "Configuration of OpenDKIM 2.6.2:";;
esac
   cat <<\_ACEOF
 
@@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@
 test -n "$ac_init_help" && exit $ac_status
 if $ac_init_version; then
   cat <<\_ACEOF
-OpenDKIM configure 2.6.1
+OpenDKIM configure 2.6.2
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68
 
 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@
 This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
 running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
 
-It was created by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.1, which was
+It was created by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.2, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.  Invocation command line was
 
   $ $0 $@
@@ -3222,7 +3222,7 @@
 
 # Define the identity of the package.
  PACKAGE='opendkim'
- VERSION='2.6.1'
+ VERSION='2.6.2'
 
 
 cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
@@ -3271,7 +3271,7 @@
 #
 # Hexadecimal version, for use in generating dkim.h
 #
-HEX_VERSION=$(printf %08x $(( ((2 << 8 | 6) << 8 | 1) << 8| 0 )))
+HEX_VERSION=$(printf %08x $(( ((2 << 8 | 6) << 8 | 2) << 8| 0 )))
 
 
 #
@@ -20528,7 +20528,7 @@
 # report actual input values of CONFIG_FILES etc. instead of their
 # values after options handling.
 ac_log="
-This file was extended by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.1, which was
+This file was extended by OpenDKIM $as_me 2.6.2, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.  Invocation command line was
 
   CONFIG_FILES= $CONFIG_FILES
@@ -20594,7 +20594,7 @@
 cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<_ACEOF || ac_write_fail=1
 ac_cs_config="`$as_echo "$ac_configure_args" | sed 's/^ //; s/[\\""\`\$]/&/g'`"
 ac_cs_version="\\
-OpenDKIM config.status 2.6.1
+OpenDKIM config.status 2.6.2
 configured by $0, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68,
   with options \\"\$ac_cs_config\\"
 
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/configure.ac opendkim-2.6.2/configure.ac
--- opendkim-2.6.1/configure.ac	2012-06-24 23:33:43.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/configure.ac	2012-07-02 13:58:53.0 -0400
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 #
 m4_define([VERSION_RELEASE], 2)
 m4_define([VERSION_MAJOR_REV], 6)
-m4_define([VERSION_MINOR_REV], 1)
+m4_define([VERSION_MINOR_REV], 2)
 m4_define([VERSION_PATCH], 0)
 
 #
diff -Nru opendkim-2.6.1/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec opendkim-2.6.2/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec
--- opendkim-2.6.1/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec	2012-06-24 23:35:13.0 -0400
+++ opendkim-2.6.2/contrib/spec/opendkim.spec	2012-07-02 14:00:30.0 -0400
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Summary: An open source library and milter for providing DKIM service
 Name: opendkim
-Version: 2.6.1
+Version: 2.6.2
 Release: 1
 License: BSD
 Group: System Environment

nbd freeze exception?

[Wouter Verhelst]

Hi,

No, this isn't a request for a freeze exception, yet. I'd just like to
test the waters before I start working on this:

I have a number of crash-fix patches waiting upstream for nbd, which I
had hoped to make a new upstream release for and upload into Debian
before hopping on a plane to debconf. Alas, that didn't happen, mainly
because several customers broke their network and I had to do some
last-minute frantic fixes.

Since this new upstream release would consist mainly of bugfixes[1], I
would really (really) like to get them into the next stable release.
Would the release team approve such an update, in principle? Of course I
realize that this would depend on the actual changes in question, but I
don't have a full list yet right now; I'd like to get a feel of your
policy before I start doing the necessary work to have that.

Thanks,

[1] "mainly" as in, "I believe it's actually only bugfixes, but I'm not
100% sure on that".

-- 
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:

pi zz a


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702190345.ga...@grep.be

Bug#679965: marked as done (unblock: nagios-plugins-contrib/4.20120702)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:01:58 +0100
with message-id <1341252118.8481.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#679965: unblock: nagios-plugins-contrib/4.20120702
has caused the Debian Bug report #679965,
regarding unblock: nagios-plugins-contrib/4.20120702
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679965: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679965
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hi Release-Team,

please unblock package nagios-plugins-contrib. The recent upload fixes a
rather annoying bug where backuppc was installed together with
nagios-plugins due to being recommended by nagios-plugins-contrib. Diff
is attached.

Thanks,

Bernd


unblock nagios-plugins-contrib/4.20120702


-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
diff --git a/check_backuppc/control b/check_backuppc/control
index ab9660a..fb3af99 100644
--- a/check_backuppc/control
+++ b/check_backuppc/control
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 Uploaders: Jan Wagner 
-Recommends: backuppc, libnagios-plugin-perl
+Recommends: libnagios-plugin-perl
+Suggests: backuppc
 Version: 1.1.0
 Homepage: http://n-backuppc.sourceforge.net/
 Watch: http://sourceforge.net/projects/n-backuppc/files/ check_backuppc-([0-9.]+)\.tar\.gz
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 32777ac..c63d134 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+nagios-plugins-contrib (4.20120702) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * [bf291c63] check_backuppc: move backuppc to Suggests.
+Thanks to Werner Detter (Closes: #679871)
+  * [0997dfd3] Auto update of debian/control
+
+ -- Bernd Zeimetz   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:28:52 +0200
+
 nagios-plugins-contrib (3.20120614) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * [30fd20be] check_packages should return CRITICAL for outstanding security updates.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 836cf8c..5cd4d86 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-nagios/pkg-nagios-plugins-contrib;a=su
 Package: nagios-plugins-contrib
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}
-Recommends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, backuppc, libnagios-plugin-perl, libnagios-plugin-perl (>= 0.31), libio-socket-ssl-perl, libmail-imapclient-perl, libnet-smtp-tls-perl, libnet-ssleay-perl, liblocale-gettext-perl, liblwp-useragent-determined-perl, snmp, freeipmi-tools, libipc-run-perl, lsof, libyaml-syck-perl, libreadonly-perl, libnet-dns-perl, libnet-snmp-perl, openssl, libdate-manip-perl, ruby | ruby-interpreter
-Suggests: perl-doc, cciss-vol-status, mpt-status, expect
+Recommends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, libnagios-plugin-perl, libnagios-plugin-perl (>= 0.31), libio-socket-ssl-perl, libmail-imapclient-perl, libnet-smtp-tls-perl, libnet-ssleay-perl, liblocale-gettext-perl, liblwp-useragent-determined-perl, snmp, freeipmi-tools, libipc-run-perl, lsof, libyaml-syck-perl, libreadonly-perl, libnet-dns-perl, libnet-snmp-perl, openssl, libdate-manip-perl, ruby | ruby-interpreter
+Suggests: backuppc, perl-doc, cciss-vol-status, mpt-status, expect
 Enhances: nagios-plugins, nagios-plugins-basic, nagios-plugins-standard
 Description: Plugins for nagios compatible monitoring systems
  This package provides various plugins for Nagios compatible monitoring
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 19:47 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> please unblock package nagios-plugins-contrib. The recent upload fixes a
> rather annoying bug where backuppc was installed together with
> nagios-plugins due to being recommended by nagios-plugins-contrib. Diff
> is attached.

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


--- End Message ---

Bug#679965: unblock: nagios-plugins-contrib/4.20120702

[Bernd Zeimetz]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hi Release-Team,

please unblock package nagios-plugins-contrib. The recent upload fixes a
rather annoying bug where backuppc was installed together with
nagios-plugins due to being recommended by nagios-plugins-contrib. Diff
is attached.

Thanks,

Bernd


unblock nagios-plugins-contrib/4.20120702


-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
diff --git a/check_backuppc/control b/check_backuppc/control
index ab9660a..fb3af99 100644
--- a/check_backuppc/control
+++ b/check_backuppc/control
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 Uploaders: Jan Wagner 
-Recommends: backuppc, libnagios-plugin-perl
+Recommends: libnagios-plugin-perl
+Suggests: backuppc
 Version: 1.1.0
 Homepage: http://n-backuppc.sourceforge.net/
 Watch: http://sourceforge.net/projects/n-backuppc/files/ check_backuppc-([0-9.]+)\.tar\.gz
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 32777ac..c63d134 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+nagios-plugins-contrib (4.20120702) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * [bf291c63] check_backuppc: move backuppc to Suggests.
+Thanks to Werner Detter (Closes: #679871)
+  * [0997dfd3] Auto update of debian/control
+
+ -- Bernd Zeimetz   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:28:52 +0200
+
 nagios-plugins-contrib (3.20120614) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * [30fd20be] check_packages should return CRITICAL for outstanding security updates.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 836cf8c..5cd4d86 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-nagios/pkg-nagios-plugins-contrib;a=su
 Package: nagios-plugins-contrib
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}
-Recommends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, backuppc, libnagios-plugin-perl, libnagios-plugin-perl (>= 0.31), libio-socket-ssl-perl, libmail-imapclient-perl, libnet-smtp-tls-perl, libnet-ssleay-perl, liblocale-gettext-perl, liblwp-useragent-determined-perl, snmp, freeipmi-tools, libipc-run-perl, lsof, libyaml-syck-perl, libreadonly-perl, libnet-dns-perl, libnet-snmp-perl, openssl, libdate-manip-perl, ruby | ruby-interpreter
-Suggests: perl-doc, cciss-vol-status, mpt-status, expect
+Recommends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, libnagios-plugin-perl, libnagios-plugin-perl (>= 0.31), libio-socket-ssl-perl, libmail-imapclient-perl, libnet-smtp-tls-perl, libnet-ssleay-perl, liblocale-gettext-perl, liblwp-useragent-determined-perl, snmp, freeipmi-tools, libipc-run-perl, lsof, libyaml-syck-perl, libreadonly-perl, libnet-dns-perl, libnet-snmp-perl, openssl, libdate-manip-perl, ruby | ruby-interpreter
+Suggests: backuppc, perl-doc, cciss-vol-status, mpt-status, expect
 Enhances: nagios-plugins, nagios-plugins-basic, nagios-plugins-standard
 Description: Plugins for nagios compatible monitoring systems
  This package provides various plugins for Nagios compatible monitoring

Processed: reassign 679727 to ftp.debian.org

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 679727 ftp.debian.org
Bug #679727 [release.debian.org] RM: netapplet/1.0.8 -- ROM
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #679727 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #679727 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134125073125101.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#679952: for reference: diff for #679797

[Kamal Mostafa]

>From e94e2f2c17e81fa4bc114c31110916dfe02540f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Freese 
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:57:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] HAMQTH Session ID

  * Retry session ID after session time out
  * Correct error string extraction
---
 src/logbook/lookupcall.cxx |   23 +--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/logbook/lookupcall.cxx b/src/logbook/lookupcall.cxx
index 6a3aa2c..2f35dc0 100644
--- a/src/logbook/lookupcall.cxx
+++ b/src/logbook/lookupcall.cxx
@@ -751,20 +751,22 @@ bool HAMQTH_get_session_id()
if (!fetch_http(url, retstr, 5.0)) {
return false;
}
-   if ((p1 = retstr.find("")) != string::npos) {
+   p1 = retstr.find("");
+   if (p1 != string::npos) {
p2 = retstr.find("");
-   lookup_notes = retstr.substr(p1 + 7, p2 - p1 - 7);
+   if (p2 != string::npos) {
+   p1 += 7;
+   lookup_notes = retstr.substr(p1, p2 - p1);
+   }
return false;
}
-   if ((p1 = retstr.find("")) == string::npos) {
+   p1 = retstr.find("");
+   if (p1 == string::npos) {
lookup_notes = "HamQTH not available";
return false;
}
p2 = retstr.find("");
HAMQTH_session_id = retstr.substr(p1 + 12, p2 - p1 - 12);
-//#ifdef HAMQTH_DEBUG
-// printf("session id = %s\n", HAMQTH_session_id.c_str());
-//#endif
return true;
 }
 
@@ -885,12 +887,13 @@ bool HAMQTHget(string& htmlpage)
url.append("&prg=FLDIGI");
 
ret = fetch_http(url, htmlpage, 5.0);
-   if (htmlpage.find("") != string::npos ) {
-   size_t p = htmlpage.find("") + 7;
-   size_t p1 = htmlpage.find("");
+   size_t p = htmlpage.find("");
+   if (p != string::npos ) {
+   size_t p1 = htmlpage.find("", p);
if (p1 != string::npos) {
string tempstr;
-   tempstr.assign(htmlpage.substr(p1, p1 - p));
+   p += 7;
+   tempstr.assign(htmlpage.substr(p, p1 - p));
LOG_WARN("HAMQTH error: %s", tempstr.c_str());
}
htmlpage.clear();
-- 
1.7.9.5




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Sljlu-0003ev-U8@fourier

Bug#679952: unblock: fldigi/3.21.48-1

[Kamal Mostafa]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package fldigi

I request a freeze exception for fldigi/3.21.48-1 which I have uploaded to
unstable.  The delta for this version includes only the two bug fixes noted in
the changelog entry here:

fldigi (3.21.48-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release, includes these changes only:
 - Tango Icon Library updated public domain version (Closes: #679792)
 - Retry session ID after session time out (Closes: #679797)

The Tango Icons issue is a DFSG-non-compliance problem (more details in the bug
report #679792).  The fix involves no functional change, just a replacement of
the icon pixmaps.  But as this results in a 1-line diff of just C-language
xpm pixmap data, I shall omit the diff from this report.

The Retry session ID (#679797) fix is a small functional change which corrects
a moderately serious malfunction of the application; that diff is attached for
reference.

Thanks!


unblock fldigi/3.21.48-1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120702164251.13398.28220.reportbug@localhost6.localdomain6

Re: No WPA support in wheezy?

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 02.07.2012 17:25, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I've just noticed that wpasupplicant was removed from testing on  
Sat,

09 Jun 2012:


http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wpasupplicant/news/20120609T163917Z.html


The source was removed, the binaries are still there:

wpasupplicant |  1.0-2 |   testing | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, 
sparc
wpasupplicant |  1.0-2 |  unstable | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, 
sparc


They're built from the "wpa" source package now, as packages.d.o (or 
sources.gz) will show.



However, I do not really understand why, as no hint was mentioned.


That generally means that the source package has become obsolete (i.e. 
all of its binary packages have been taken over by other source 
packages), so britney has automatically removed it.  Indeed, that's 
exactly the reason that shows up in ftp-master's removal log for 
unstable:


Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:10:08 +
Ftpmaster: Luca Falavigna
Suite: unstable
Sources:
 wpasupplicant_0.7.3-6
Reason: [auto-cruft] obsolete source package

Now with the freeze in place, what options are available to still 
have WPA

support in wheezy?


Exactly the same options as before?

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/5a666cd7fb7b402a43a4072d78f8e...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Re: Freeze exception for ruby-fast-xs 0.8.0-3

[Cyril Brulebois]

Antonio Terceiro  (02/07/2012):
> +Breaks: ruby-hpricot (< 0.8.6-3~)

In addition to Adam's mail, < has been deprecated for a long while now,
please don't use it.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

No WPA support in wheezy?

[Reinhard Tartler]

Hi,

I've just noticed that wpasupplicant was removed from testing on  Sat,
09 Jun 2012:

http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wpasupplicant/news/20120609T163917Z.html

However, I do not really understand why, as no hint was mentioned. Now
with the freeze in place, what options are available to still have WPA
support in wheezy?

-- 
regards,
Reinhard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAJ0cceZRKvsq3LkU6XU-2H-OAt5MBMpy36z9hT33u+x4J=f...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#679937: RM: haskell-cryptocipher and reverse dependencies [powerpc] -- ROM; Broken on powerpc, no fix in sight

[Joachim Breitner]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear ftp-masters,

haskell-cryptocipher has stopped building on powerpc. The problem is a
a compiler issue, but we have no fix available
(http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/6156). This prevents the
following list of packages from (re-)entering wheezy. As we’d rather
release with them on all arches but powerpc than on no arches at all,
I’m requestion removal of all powerpc binaries of the following packages from 
unstable:

haskell-cryptocipher/0.2.14-1
haskell-clientsession/0.7.3.1-1
haskell-cprng-aes/0.2.1-1
haskell-tls/0.8.1-1
haskell-tls-extra/0.4.0-1
haskell-authenticate/0.10.3.1-1
haskell-hledger-web/0.18-1
haskell-http-enumerator/0.7.1.8-1
haskell-yesod-core/0.9.3.4-1
haskell-yesod/0.9.3.4-1
haskell-yesod-auth/0.7.7-1
haskell-yesod-form/0.3.4-1
haskell-yesod-json/0.2.2.1-1
haskell-yesod-persistent/0.2.2-1
haskell-yesod-static/0.3.2-1

Thanks,
Joachim

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/xv9cACgkQ9ijrk0dDIGx7NQCg1C4JlxpD5s9+AzVLJ5jhVFL5
UMkAn0w5+pi+e3zaczKh+TtmeALguCTB
=j0Gq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702153551.1343.24618.reportbug@kirk

Bug#679913: unblock: frog/0.12.15-3

[Joost van Baal-Ilić]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hi,

Please unblock package frog.

Wheezy currently has frog/0.12.9-3.  Since frog/0.12.15-3 has new upstream
code, with lots of bugfixes, and depends upon the new frogdata package, both me
and upstream (Ko van der Sloot) consider this new version much more suitable
for inclusion in Debian wheezy.

Upstream writes about 0.12.15:
 
 Frog can be considered beta software, and, as of 2012-06, is being stabilized.
 All planned functionality (including a dependency parser, the multi-word
 chunker, Named Entity Recognition, Chunking and error handling and reporting)
 has been implemented and tested.

The new frogdata package is "architecture: all", it installs about 100 MB of
data.  Package frog in wheezy (arch: any) installs 70 MB, frog in sid installs 
500 kB.

The only other change in frog 0.12.9-3 vs 0.12.15-3 is: more strict build
dependencies.

unblock frog/0.12.15-3

Thanks for your time!

Bye,

Joost

-- 
Ho Mitakuye Oyasin ※ joostvb@{牛在田里,ad1810}.com ※ http://mdcc.cx/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702123512.gb16...@beskar.mdcc.cx

Re: Bug#618314 closed by Debian FTP Masters (Bug#659309: Removed package(s) from unstable)

[Neil McGovern]

Hi Toni,

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:43:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
[snip lots]
> This will at least prevent practical scim usage in Wheezy for any new
> installs. I therefore request that you re-think that course of action,
> and allow swift re-introduction of possibly stripped-down packages
[snip lots]

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking.


If you wish to update scim, the freeze policy is at
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html

If you feel scim wouldn't be useful in it's current shape for wheezy,
and don't think you can update it given the above, then please file a
removal bug against release.debian.org, preferably with the right
usertags. Reportbug can help with this.

Neil
-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: citadel/webcit/libcitadel 8.12

[Jonathan Wiltshire]

On 2012-07-02 11:39, Michael Meskes wrote:

Hi,

I just uploaded 8.12 which is a pure bugfix release over 8.11. Is it 
possible
to get this unblocked (provided of course I didn't add serious bugs)? 
If so,

what do you need? A debdiff? Upstream's changelog?


See the announcement [1] and linked from that, #3 on the freeze policy.

1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg9.html

--
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/0d3708b1a0f86ab3f7f493eeeddb0...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net

Re: Freeze exception for ruby-fast-xs 0.8.0-3

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

On 02.07.2012 12:02, Antonio Terceiro wrote:

Please unblock ruby-fast-xs 0.8.0-3, which fixes RC bug #679847
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679847

The attached patch just declares a Breaks: agains the last version of
ruby-hpricot that contained a file that is now provided by 
ruby-fast-xs.


Hmmm, it looks like ruby-fast-xs is a new package, i.e. it's not in 
wheezy yet?  This provides a slight complication, as it effectively 
makes a request for unblocking -3 in to a request for allowing a 
completely new source package in to the release (I realise that -1 got 
an automatic exception, but if we'd been asked for a manual one I don't 
know whether it would have).


Looking through the BTS, it looks like both #679606 (in ruby-hpricot) 
and #679847 (in ruby-xs-fast) only affect unstable currently; is that 
correct?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/69862e79470f65dbc35289088bb17...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Re: Freeze Exception for taglib-sharp 2.0.5.0

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 02.07.2012 09:47, Chow Loong Jin wrote:

I would like to get a freeze exception for taglib-sharp 2.0.5.0
before I upload it into unstable.

It is a mostly bugfix release, with a relatively small number of 
commits (25)
since 2.0.4.0, which is already in testing. The NEWS file is at [1], 
and the

upstream VCS is at [2].


As requested in the freeze policy linked from the last d-d-a mail (rule 
#3, specifically), please provide a diff for the package you're 
proposing to upload. We won't ack things based on pointers to VCSen.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/d0733b9c3303ec44ccba04d16718c...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Freeze exception for ruby-fast-xs 0.8.0-3

[Antonio Terceiro]

Hi,

Please unblock ruby-fast-xs 0.8.0-3, which fixes RC bug #679847
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679847

The attached patch just declares a Breaks: agains the last version of
ruby-hpricot that contained a file that is now provided by ruby-fast-xs.

-- 
Antonio Terceiro 
From 02276845735f93f71a1554a347902a013df5deaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Terceiro 
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 01:03:59 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fix #679847

---
 debian/changelog |8 
 debian/control   |1 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f954f38..c9e03ed 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ruby-fast-xs (0.8.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Team upload.
+  * Breaks: ruby-hpricot < 0.8.6-3~ since this package now provides a file
+that used to be provided by that package (Closes: #679847).
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro   Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:02:38 -0300
+
 ruby-fast-xs (0.8.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add full name to uploaders
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f82a3b0..1288e2f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Architecture: any
 XB-Ruby-Versions: ${ruby:Versions}
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ruby | ruby-interpreter
 # hoe (>= 2.8.0, development)
+Breaks: ruby-hpricot (< 0.8.6-3~)
 Description: ruby extension for escaping text
  fast_xs escapes text so it can be embedded more directly into XML and
  HTML without having to deal with character set issues.
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
1.7.10



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

citadel/webcit/libcitadel 8.12

[Michael Meskes]

Hi,

I just uploaded 8.12 which is a pure bugfix release over 8.11. Is it possible
to get this unblocked (provided of course I didn't add serious bugs)? If so,
what do you need? A debdiff? Upstream's changelog?

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702103944.ga17...@feivel.credativ.lan

Re: Bug#618314 closed by Debian FTP Masters (Bug#659309: Removed package(s) from unstable)

[Toni Mueller]

Dear Release Team, dear FTP Masters,

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:57:35PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:42:13PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > which was filed against the scim-tables-zh package:
> > 
> > #618314: scim-tables-zh: description of WuBi is a little unclear
> > 
> > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters .
> 
> > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> > better one in a separate message then please contact Debian FTP Masters 
> >  by
> > replying to this email.
> 
> I'll try to investigate the details of the package ASAP (today, if possible),
> but in case I can verify that the whole support for middle-east and Indian
> languages is also in scim-tables, removing it was probably a gross mistake, 
> and
> kindly ask that the packages may possibly be re-instated.

in roughly the last few weeks, I have seen a number of removal bugs
filed against various packages out of the group of packages surrounding
the 'scim' input method package. I claim that the statements made in
those removal bugs are in part simply false statements, and primarily
designed to remove the only reasonable competition from ibus, which so
far still sees only half the adoption of scim, according to popcon.
Please see below.

As a recent discussion on -devel has indicated, there are significant
uses for scim that are not covered by ibus, thus imho invalidating the
claim that scim is not useful anymore, anyway. Not everything works for
everyone, and users should have the choice and find something that
works.

Before deciding to commit to scim, I tried ibus, too, falling for their
advertising, but even with very little usage (1 day or so) found a bug
that was important to me, although maybe not to many, plus a number of
things that may simply be me. Today, one of the ibus folks told me to
report the bug upstream instead of in the BTS, giving an unconvincing
reason (which I've countered in the BTS already).

Incidentically, those removal bugs have been filed by the people
supporting ibus, while sometimes claiming maintainership for
scim-related packages. I've discussed with Tz-Huang and Rolf, who were
until recently alone in working on this package, that we want to
establish a group, for obvious reasons outside of the current pkg-ime
group, that contains Tz-Huang, Rolf, and me, that will claim
maintainership for all scim-related packages. Also, at least the most
important problems (no "im-bridge") are now resolved in the scim 1.4.14
package, which is in unstable.

But to my great chagrin, the removals filed and executed so far, have
left scim in a barely usable state, as the two most important input
methods, scim-pinyin and scim-tables, which, together with the packages
hanging below them, cover the vast majority of input methods, have been
killed already. This will at least prevent practical scim usage in
Wheezy for any new installs. I therefore request that you re-think that
course of action, and allow swift re-introduction of possibly
stripped-down packages - one of the pet peeves of the ibus folks seems
to be the python interfaces to scim libraries, as far as I can see, and
the other pet peeve, no im-bridge, has been resolved in the meantime.

As a follow-up to my earlier email that this is a reply to, I have in
the meantime verified that scim-tables covers several CJK input methods,
along with at least several Indian languages, Tamil, Kannada, Amharic,
Arabic, Russian, and a few other languages as well. scim-pinyin covers
the pinyin based IMEs, and eg. the scim-sunpinyin, if it is really a
problem, should be simple to disable in the control file.

As a position statement, I can only re-iterate what I have so far said
to both the ibus and the other two scim folks, that my primary concern
is to have a fully functional IME package in Debian, but so far, I see
that while there is some overlap between ibus and scim, both have at
least their distinct use cases as of now, and can't fully replace each
other, so it's imho important to keep a working set of scim packages in
Debian for Wheezy, otherwise, people would simply be forced to use ibus
(and fcitx, also sometimes suggested as an alternative, seems to be none
for all those who have a requirement for support of non-CJK languages).


Please advise.


Kind regards,
--Toni++


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702104350.ga14...@spruce.wiehl.oeko.net

Freeze Exception for taglib-sharp 2.0.5.0

[Chow Loong Jin]

Hi,

I would like to get a freeze exception for taglib-sharp 2.0.5.0 before I upload
it into unstable.

It is a mostly bugfix release, with a relatively small number of commits (25)
since 2.0.4.0, which is already in testing. The NEWS file is at [1], and the
upstream VCS is at [2].

The relevant NEWS entry is quoted below:
| Version 2.0.5.0
| July 1, 2012
|
| Fixes and Features in this release include:
|   * Fix a freeze on some mp3 files where header was at the end of file
|   * Properly implement partial matching for File.Find and File.RFind
|   * [Mpeg4] Fix parsing of some apple tags (bgo#658920)
|   * Add partial support for IPTC-IIM
|   * Fix nested UDTA boxes
|   * [Mpeg4] Attempt to handle corrupt tags a little better (bgo#676934)
|   * Mark the file as corrupt instead of throwing exception (bgo#643477)
|   * StartTag.ReadTag should not silence exceptions
|   * Check for short popularimeter tags
|   * On corrupt Id3v2 frame, skip just that frame (bgo#650674)
|   * Use O(N) rather than O(N^2) deunsynchronization algorithm
|
| Contributors to this release:
|   Alan McGovern, Alexander Kojevnikov, Anton Drachev, Chow Loong Jin,
|   Eamon Nerbonne, Eberhard Beilharz, Jakub 'Fiołek' Fijałkowski,
|   Samuel D. Jack, Stephen Shaw, Tim Howard

[1] http://download.banshee.fm/taglib-sharp/2.0.5.0/taglib-sharp-2.0.5.0.news
[2] http://github.com/mono/taglib-sharp

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#679778: unblock: spandsp/0.0.6~pre20-2

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 02.07.2012 07:22, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Please unblock package spandsp

[...]

On that basis, the changes from both -1 and -2 are relevant to the
unblock.  While the changes between the current testing package and 
-1
aren't huge, the changelog isn't really very helpful in terms of 
helping

me decide whether they're appropriate for an unblock as it just says
"new upstream version".

Would it be possible to expand (briefly should be fine) on what the
changes in the new upstream version are?


As of now there are two separate issues:


Apologies if my question wasn't clear.  I was asking for more detail on 
why 0.0.6~pre20 is a better candidate for release than the version 
that's currently in wheezy, other than by sheer virtue of being "newer".


Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/74089e442e795dc76687de5f68d87...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org