Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3
On 2015-02-25 07:53, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on >>> all >>> release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and >>> gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures. >>> >>> >> >> Hi Matthias, >> >> I am afraid that there are reports of regressions, namely #772958. Ivo >> reported that the example works in Jessie but fails in unstable. > > #772958 reports an issue in testing, with a binutils version number found in > unstable. I asked the submitter to clarify. Also "Ivo reported" doesn't help > much. Please be more specific. > Hi Matthias, The message I wanted to convey was that Ivo (ivodd) informed me that he had tested the example mentioned in #772958 provided by the submitter and found it working as intended in testing. However, trying the same example in unstable reproduce the error reported in the bug. > I'll prepare an upload anyway. > > Matthias > Thank you, it will be much appreciated. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ed724b.1040...@thykier.net
Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3
On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: >> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on >> all >> release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and >> gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures. >> >> > > Hi Matthias, > > I am afraid that there are reports of regressions, namely #772958. Ivo > reported that the example works in Jessie but fails in unstable. #772958 reports an issue in testing, with a binutils version number found in unstable. I asked the submitter to clarify. Also "Ivo reported" doesn't help much. Please be more specific. I'll prepare an upload anyway. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ed715a.7070...@debian.org
Processed: severity of 779013 is normal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 779013 normal Bug #779013 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org] unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 779013 to the same value. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142484625731584.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 779013 normal Bug #779013 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org] unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142484616631246.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 779013 grave Bug #779013 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org] unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142484596229780.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#779172: unblock: sweethome3d/4.5+dfsg-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, Please consider an unblock of the package sweethome3d. sweethome3d/4.5+dfsg-3 addresses an RC bug #778947 by disabling the automatic version check "phone home" feature by default by changing the default for setting. The debdiff against the version of testing is attached. Thank you, tony unblock sweethome3d/4.5+dfsg-3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) diff -Nru sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/changelog sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/changelog --- sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/changelog 2014-10-23 18:41:04.0 -0700 +++ sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/changelog 2015-02-24 20:49:06.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +sweethome3d (4.5+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Set checkForUpdates=false as the default. (Closes: #778947). + + -- tony mancill Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:40:22 -0800 + sweethome3d (4.5+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * 4.5 replaces Loader3DS with a library inspired from lib3ds. diff -Nru sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/05disable_checkForUpdates sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/05disable_checkForUpdates --- sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/05disable_checkForUpdates 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800 +++ sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/05disable_checkForUpdates 2015-02-24 20:49:06.0 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +diff --git a/src/com/eteks/sweethome3d/io/DefaultUserPreferences.properties b/src/com/eteks/sweethome3d/io/DefaultUserPreferences.properties +index bd52fdb..a2d5fc2 100644 +--- a/src/com/eteks/sweethome3d/io/DefaultUserPreferences.properties b/src/com/eteks/sweethome3d/io/DefaultUserPreferences.properties +@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ wallPattern=hatchUp + newWallThickness=7.5 + newHomeWallHeight=250 + newFloorThickness=12 +-checkUpdatesEnabled=true ++checkUpdatesEnabled=false + autoSaveDelayForRecovery=60 + + # Uncomment default currency line to use prices in application diff -Nru sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/series sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/series --- sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/series 2014-10-23 18:41:04.0 -0700 +++ sweethome3d-4.5+dfsg/debian/patches/series 2015-02-24 20:49:06.0 -0800 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ 02noadditionalprovisions 03novideo 04manifest +05disable_checkForUpdates File lists identical (after any substitutions) Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) Version: [-4.5+dfsg-2-] {+4.5+dfsg-3+} signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Uploading linux (3.16.7-ckt7-1)
I intend to upload linux version 3.16.7-ckt7-1 to unstable later this week. This will include: - Many fixes from stable release 3.16.7-ckt{5,6,7} - New hardware support: Olimex A20-OLinuXino-LIME2, GPIO backlight driver (for BeagleBone Black LCD7 cape) - Security fixes: CVE-2015-1465, CVE-2015-1420, CVE-2015-1593 and some others TBD - Clock stability fix for some Atom systems including Soekris net6501 - in linux-libc-dev to support kdbus userland Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#778985: marked as done (unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:15:21 +0100 with message-id <20150224221521.gd17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#778985: unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #778985, regarding unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 778985: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778985 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking package orafce. The new version fixes the autopkgtest regression tests. (No change in the binaries.) http://ci.debian.net/packages/o/orafce/unstable/amd64/ unblock orafce/3.0.7-4 Thanks! diff -Nru orafce-3.0.7/debian/changelog orafce-3.0.7/debian/changelog --- orafce-3.0.7/debian/changelog 2014-08-26 19:07:29.0 +0200 +++ orafce-3.0.7/debian/changelog 2015-02-22 15:25:29.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +orafce (3.0.7-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix test failures with PostgreSQL 9.4.1: "\set ECHO all;" was always +silently interpreted as "\set ECHO none"; now psql will print a warning. +Fix by using "none" explicitly. The test output was already expecting the +"none" output variant. + + -- Christoph Berg Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:21:54 +0100 + orafce (3.0.7-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix invocation of orafce_sql_yyerror. Patch taken from upstream git. diff -Nru orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/regress-echo orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/regress-echo --- orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/regress-echo1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/regress-echo2015-02-22 15:21:51.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +--- a/sql/dbms_pipe_session_A.sql b/sql/dbms_pipe_session_A.sql +@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ BEGIN + PERFORM dbms_pipe.send_message(pipename); + END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; + +-\set ECHO all; ++\set ECHO none + + SELECT createImplicitPipe(); + +--- a/sql/dbms_pipe_session_B.sql b/sql/dbms_pipe_session_B.sql +@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ BEGIN + RETURN result; + END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; + +-\set ECHO all; ++\set ECHO none + + -- Receives messages sent via an implicit pipe + SELECT receiveFrom('named_pipe'); diff -Nru orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/series orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/series --- orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/series 2014-08-26 19:02:53.0 +0200 +++ orafce-3.0.7/debian/patches/series 2015-02-22 15:19:56.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ git-to_date-conversion git-sqy_yyerror.patch regress-no-alert +regress-echo Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:10:06PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:25:16PM +0100, Christoph Berg > wrote: > > Re: Mehdi Dogguy 2015-02-22 <20150222174611.gb14...@dogguy.org> > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Christoph Berg > > > wrote: > > > > + > > > > +-\set ECHO all; > > > > ++\set ECHO none > > > > + > > > > > > Is it missing a semi-colon? > > > > No, to the contrary: The parser didn't understand "all;" and > > substituted it by "none" internally. The current test failure is > > because the previously silent substitution is now accompanied by a > > warning: > > > > Alright. Unblocked. > ... and closing. -- Mehdi Dogguy--- End Message ---
Bug#778985: unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:25:16PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Mehdi Dogguy 2015-02-22 <20150222174611.gb14...@dogguy.org> > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Christoph Berg > > wrote: > > > + > > > +-\set ECHO all; > > > ++\set ECHO none > > > + > > > > Is it missing a semi-colon? > > No, to the contrary: The parser didn't understand "all;" and > substituted it by "none" internally. The current test failure is > because the previously silent substitution is now accompanied by a > warning: > Alright. Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150224221006.gc17...@dogguy.org
Bug#776839: marked as done (unblock: libgit2/0.21.3-1.1)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:01:18 +0100 with message-id <20150224220117.gb17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#776839: unblock: libgit2/0.21.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #776839, regarding unblock: libgit2/0.21.3-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 776839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776839 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libgit2 The newer version of the libgit2 package fixes a security hole [0]. Sorry I realise that this is the second unblock request for this package. But at the time of the previous request I did not think that the vulnerability met the requirements for an unblock request. I have since been contacted by the Debian security team and asked to submit an unblock request. I haven't split out the fix into a separate patch on the existing package in jessie as it's probably not super easy. But i can do it if it's required. I have not inculded a debdiff since it's 182K but I can attach it if needed. 0. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-9390 unblock libgit2/0.21.3-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:00:49PM +1100, Russell Sim wrote: > On 17 February 2015 at 09:26, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > > Thanks for your work and sorry for not getting back to you sooner. The > > patch > > looks okay. Please go ahead and upload 0.21.1-3 to Jessie and notify us as > > soon as it gets accepted. > > > > Ok, it has been uploaded and accepted > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgit2/news/20150222T113335Z.html > Upload approved. Thanks for your work! -- Mehdi Dogguy--- End Message ---
Bug#778673: marked as done (unblock: suricata/2.0.6-2)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:55:28 +0100 with message-id <20150224215528.ga17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#778759: unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #778673, regarding unblock: suricata/2.0.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 778673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778673 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package suricata We just uploaded to unstable a new suricata version (2.0.6-2) which would require another unblock to enter jessie. This is the debdiff, which was generated with (unfiltered): % debdiff suricata_2.0.6-1.dsc suricata_2.0.6-2.dsc diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog 2015-02-18 11:42:51.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog 2015-02-18 11:33:51.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +suricata (2.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ] + * d/patches: drop 10-fix-missing-script-autoreconf.patch (Closes: #778670) + * d/rules: prevent not .so libhtp files from entering binary suricata package + + [ Pierre Chifflier ] + * Add conflicts/replaces fields for transition from libhtp (Closes: #778668) + + -- Pierre Chifflier Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:19:31 +0100 + suricata (2.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Pierre Chifflier ] diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/control suricata-2.0.6/debian/control --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/control 2015-02-18 11:42:51.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/control 2015-02-18 11:33:51.0 +0100 @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends} +Conflicts: libhtp1 (<< 0.5.16), libhtp-dev (<< 0.5.16) +Replaces: libhtp1 (<< 0.5.16), libhtp-dev (<< 0.5.16) Recommends: oinkmaster, snort-rules-default, python Description: Next Generation Intrusion Detection and Prevention Tool Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System (IDS). It is based on diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/10-fix-missing-script-autoreconf.patch suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/10-fix-missing-script-autoreconf.patch --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/10-fix-missing-script-autoreconf.patch 2015-02-18 11:42:51.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/10-fix-missing-script-autoreconf.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -Index: suricata/libhtp/configure.ac -=== suricata.orig/libhtp/configure.ac 2014-04-01 08:25:37.604832456 +0200 -+++ suricata/libhtp/configure.ac 2014-04-02 20:11:01.504628889 +0200 -@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ - dnl Initialization macros - dnl -- - --AC_INIT([LibHTP], m4_esyscmd([./get-version.sh VERSION])) -+AC_INIT([LibHTP], 0.5.10) - AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE() - - AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h]) diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/series suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/series --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/series2015-02-18 11:42:51.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/patches/series1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -10-fix-missing-script-autoreconf.patch diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules 2015-02-18 11:42:51.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules 2015-02-18 10:57:35.0 +0100 @@ -35,7 +35,11 @@ rm -rf $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/lib/python*;\ (cd scripts/suricatasc &&\ python -B setup.py install --install-layout=deb --prefix $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr) + # we don't want to deploy any of the libhtp files, only the .so rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/*.la + rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/*.a + rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/pkgconfig + rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/include override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- $(CONFIGURE_ARGS) unblock suricata/2.0.6-2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:46:53PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > Please unblock package suricata > > We fixed a couple of tiny things on it. > > % debdiff suricata_2.0.6-2 suricata_2.0.6-3 > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy--- End Message ---
Bug#778759: marked as done (unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:55:28 +0100 with message-id <20150224215528.ga17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#778759: unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #778759, regarding unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 778759: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778759 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package suricata We fixed a couple of tiny things on it. % debdiff suricata_2.0.6-2 suricata_2.0.6-3 diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog 2015-02-19 12:15:56.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/changelog 2015-02-19 11:57:19.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +suricata (2.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ] + * suricata: don't deploy .so links + + [ Pierre Chifflier ] + * Add missing installation files (Closes: #778724) + * Fix .so symlinks removal + * Update default-rules-path + + -- Pierre Chifflier Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:55:05 +0100 + suricata (2.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ] diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/control suricata-2.0.6/debian/control --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/control 2015-02-19 12:15:56.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/control 2015-02-19 11:11:47.0 +0100 @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends} -Conflicts: libhtp1 (<< 0.5.16), libhtp-dev (<< 0.5.16) -Replaces: libhtp1 (<< 0.5.16), libhtp-dev (<< 0.5.16) +Conflicts: libhtp1 (<< 0.5.16) +Replaces: libhtp1 (<< 0.5.16) Recommends: oinkmaster, snort-rules-default, python Description: Next Generation Intrusion Detection and Prevention Tool Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System (IDS). It is based on diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules 2015-02-19 12:15:56.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/rules 2015-02-19 11:56:59.0 +0100 @@ -38,13 +38,14 @@ # we don't want to deploy any of the libhtp files, only the .so rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/*.la rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/*.a + rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/*.so rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/lib/*/pkgconfig rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/suricata/usr/include override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- $(CONFIGURE_ARGS) sed \ - -e 's|^default-rule-path: .*$$|default-rule-path: /etc/snort/rules|' \ + -e 's|^default-rule-path: .*$$|default-rule-path: /etc/suricata/rules|' \ suricata.yaml > suricata-debian.yaml override_dh_clean: diff -Nru suricata-2.0.6/debian/suricata.install suricata-2.0.6/debian/suricata.install --- suricata-2.0.6/debian/suricata.install 2015-02-19 12:15:56.0 +0100 +++ suricata-2.0.6/debian/suricata.install 2015-02-19 11:54:49.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ suricata-debian.yaml /etc/suricata classification.config /etc/suricata reference.config /etc/suricata +threshold.config /etc/suricata +rules/*.rules /etc/suricata/rules unblock suricata/2.0.6-3 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:46:53PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > Please unblock package suricata > > We fixed a couple of tiny things on it. > > % debdiff suricata_2.0.6-2 suricata_2.0.6-3 > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy--- End Message ---
Processed: jessie-pu is not useful until jessie is released
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 778858 unblock: openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1 Bug #778858 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1' from 'jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1' > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org. > usertag 778858 -pu Usertags were: pu. Usertags are now: . > usertag 778858 unblock There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: unblock. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778858 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142481080322583.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: retitle 779013 to unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 779013 unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Bug #779013 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1' from 'jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142480693429858.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#779013: marked as done (unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:42:54 +0100 with message-id <54ecd43e.30...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779013, regarding unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 779013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: jessie Severity: normal Hello phppgadmin is a web application that supports apache2.2 When upgrading to Jessie that contains apache 2.4, the application doesn't work anymore. See #669837. The proposed update fixes that important issue. It is unclear whether it is ok to bump the severity of #669837 to RC: In a way, you can move and fix the apache conf file around yourself so it may not be RC, but another point of view is that if you had the package working on wheezy, upgrading to jessie just always breaks it. I'd like to have your opinion on that. If you agree the severity can be bumped to RC, then we could just unblock phppgadmin/5.1-1.1 Attached is the full debdiff, that will be for Jessie 8.1 I suppose. Please double check the first line of the changelog, I'm a bit lost about how to proceed with versionning, and I assumed testing-proposed-update will become proposed-update when jessie is released. Regarding the patch itself, using dh_apache2 is not a trivial change, but I believe it is less complex that trying to fix things by doing things manually in maintainer scripts. The only unnecessary thing I see there is that we stop creating obsolete /etc/apache2/conf.d/ directory, which is a good thing imho. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog --- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog 2013-04-18 12:37:03.0 +0200 +++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog 2015-02-20 18:21:14.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ +phppgadmin (5.1-1+deb8u1) testing; urgency=low + + * Non maintainer upload. + * Changes for apache2.4 settings (Closes: #669837) +. Upgrade phppgadmin.conf restriction to localhost to 2.4 format. +. Update rules: +Use "--with apache2" in rules. +No longer copying apache.conf, dh_apache2 does that. +. Rename apache.conf into phppgadmin.conf. +. Drop /etc/apache2/conf.d from dirs. +. Remove manual reload of apache in maintainer scripts, dh_apache2 does it + automatically. +. Build-depends on dh-apache2. +. Use {$misc:Suggests} so apache2 is no longer a direct Depends. + + -- Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:01:15 + + phppgadmin (5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control --- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control 2013-04-18 11:39:06.0 +0200 +++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control 2015-02-20 18:04:29.0 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Uploaders: Peter Eisentraut Section: web Priority: extra -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dh-apache2 Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Homepage: http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/ Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-postgresql/phppgadmin.git @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ Package: phppgadmin Architecture: all -Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi, php5-pgsql, apache2 | httpd, +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi, php5-pgsql, libjs-jquery -Recommends: postgresql-doc +Recommends: ${misc:Recommends}, postgresql-doc Suggests: postgresql, slony1-bin Description: web-based administration tool for PostgreSQL phpPgAdmin is a web-based administration tool for PostgreSQL. It is perfect diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs --- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs 2013-04-18 11:39:06.0 +0200 +++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs 2015-02-20 10:28:52.0 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ usr/share/phppgadmin usr/share/phppgadmin/conf etc/phppgadmin -etc/apache2/conf.d diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2 phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2 --- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppga
Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags -1 -pu usertags -1 unblock tags -1 jessie severity 669837 grave thanks On 2015-02-23 10:47, Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Tags: jessie > Severity: normal > > Hello > Hi, > phppgadmin is a web application that supports apache2.2 > > When upgrading to Jessie that contains apache 2.4, the application > doesn't work anymore. See #669837. > > [...] > > [...] if you had the package working on wheezy, upgrading to jessie just > always breaks it. [...] > If it upgrading breaks it, then it is generally RC. > Attached is the full debdiff, that will be for Jessie 8.1 I suppose. > Please double check the first line of the changelog, I'm a bit lost > about how to proceed with versionning, and I assumed > testing-proposed-update will become proposed-update when jessie is released. > Given we have not released yet, we can still pull packages from unstable. Therefore this can be solved with a regular unblock. > Regarding the patch itself, using dh_apache2 is not a trivial change, > but I believe it is less complex that trying to fix things by doing > things manually in maintainer scripts. > The only unnecessary thing I see there is that we stop creating obsolete > /etc/apache2/conf.d/ directory, which is a good thing imho. > > [...] Indeed - it is a bit more than I liked. But unblocked anyway... Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ecd29a.5020...@thykier.net
Bug#778858: jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-02-20 19:31, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: jessie > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > The latest kernel (security) update included a KPI change, moving > d_alias to the d_u union in struct dentry. This KPI change caused > the openafs kernel module to FTBFS (#778196 for FTBFS report and > #778254 where I asked if unblocking the version in sid is reasonable). > > While reviewing the patches present in sid but not jessie, I reported > #778851 (data corruption writing to large mmaped files). > > This proposed update includes upstream's patches for both the issues > listed above, and no other changes. > > Debdiff (to an unsigned local build on sid) attached. > > [...] Approved, *but* please fix #778196 in unstable before uploading this change-set to testing-proposed-updates. If the bug is already fixed in unstable, please ensure the BTS is aware of it by adding the necessary information (e.g. fixed versions). Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eccb5a.8030...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#778858: jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #778858 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 778858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778858 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b778858.142480470914108.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#775566: marked as done (unblock: plptools/1.0.9)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:55:42 +0100 with message-id <54ecc92e.8080...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#775566: unblock: plptools/1.0.9 has caused the Debian Bug report #775566, regarding unblock: plptools/1.0.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 775566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package plptools Very small patch to fix build on kfreebsd (#766248) unblock plptools/1.0.9 -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) diff -u plptools-1.0.9/debian/changelog plptools-1.0.9/debian/changelog --- plptools-1.0.9/debian/changelog +++ plptools-1.0.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +plptools (1.0.9-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Fix "plptools-dev: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: 'ENOMEDIUM' undeclared" +using patch from Steven Chamberlain (Closes: #766248) + * Acknowldge previous NMUs + + -- John Lines Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:55:52 + + plptools (1.0.9-2.4) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. only in patch2: unchanged: --- plptools-1.0.9.orig/plpfuse/fuse.c +++ plptools-1.0.9/plpfuse/fuse.c @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ /* Maximum length of a generated psion xattr string */ #define XATTR_MAXLEN 3 +#ifndef ENOMEDIUM +#define ENOMEDIUM ENODEV +#endif + int debug; int --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2015-01-17 14:54, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On 2015-01-17 13:37, John Lines wrote: >> Please unblock package plptools >> >> Very small patch to fix build on kfreebsd (#766248) > > It's a very small fix against 1.0.13-0.1, yes. However, jessie currently > has 1.0.9-2.4 from 2012, as the NMU from last July failed to migrate due > to the kfreebsd build failure. > > None of the changes in 1.0.13 appear to be release-critical and they > include a debhelper compat bump, which isn't really acceptable at this > point in the freeze, so I'm afraid we'd need some convincing as to why > this needs unblocking. > > Regards, > > Adam > > Given the above and no follow ups, I have decided to close this request now. Thanks, ~Niels--- End Message ---
Bug#773865: marked as done (unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security])
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:46:20 +0100 with message-id <54ecc6fc.9010...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#773865: unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security] has caused the Debian Bug report #773865, regarding unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 773865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773865 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package imagemagick This fix a few security bug. Bugs are well isolated. Debdiff joined unblock imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) debdiff.xz Description: application/xz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2014-12-24 12:01, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Severity: normal > > Please unblock package imagemagick > > This fix a few security bug. Bugs are well isolated. Debdiff joined > > unblock imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 > > [...] This request appears to be obsolete now, given that imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5 is now in testing - closing accordingly. Thanks, ~Niels--- End Message ---
Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8
Control: tags -1 d-i On 2015-02-11 00:02, Christian Seiler wrote: > Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8 > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Dear release team, > > please consider unblocking open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8. The > upload fixes two bugs: #735773, where open-iscsi now makes sure that > the file the CHAP credentials (if any) are stored in (iscsid.conf) is > now not world-readable. It also fixes #775778 and repairs boot and > shutdown ordering on systemd systems, removing a 1.5min delay at boot > and a potential race that might cause data loss (although I have not > been able to trigger the latter so far) at shutdown. > Ok with me, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack (and quoting the rest of your mail for his convenience). Thanks, ~Niels > The package has successfully been built on all release archs in > unstable. > > Notes for #775778: > > - Ritesh and I now follow Michael Biebl's suggestion for how to handle >this (which is much simpler than what we originally had, so thanks >there!) > > - but we do keep Should-Start: mountnfs-bootclean, because we don't >think it's a good idea to break potential users' configurations, >in this case using iSCSI when /usr is on NFS and sysvinit is used, >even if we don't know (of) any such users ourselves > - if you disagree and think this type of configuration should not > be supported, please tell us, we could then provide -9 without > that init dep and add a note to the docs about that > > - however: /usr on NFS under sysvinit is currently broken irrespective >of iSCSI, I reported #777547; might be of interest to you > - working around that problem, I could successfully test the new > open-iscsi package and confirm it does in fact work with /usr > on NFS under sysvinit > > Notes for #735773: > > - this change affects the udeb in a trivial way: permissions of >iscsid.conf are also changed in the udeb (everything else stays the >same). I've checked by manually changing the permissions on a >running RC1 installer that this is indeed harmless (but also >required unless you want #735773 to occur if / is on iSCSI). > > Source debdiff against the version in testing (-4) is attached. > > It would be great if you could accept both changes into Jessie. > Thanks for considering! > > unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8 > > Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ecc41b.4030...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8
Processing control commands: > tags -1 d-i Bug #776276 [release.debian.org] unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 776276: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776276 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b776276.14248028532046.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 776144, tagging 778734
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Waiting for d-i ack > tags 776144 - confirmed Bug #776144 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbus/1.8.16-1 Removed tag(s) confirmed. > tags 778734 - confirmed Bug #778734 [release.debian.org] unblock: bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9 Removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 776144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776144 778734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778734 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142480229830459.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#779134: nmu: testdisk_6.14-3, partclone_0.2.73-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Seems that there was yet another ntfs-3g library transition, now from libntfs-3g852 to libntfs-3g853 (source:ntfs-3g) making testdisk and partclone again uninstallable in sid. Please trigger a binary NMU. Thanks in advance nmu testdisk_6.14-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ntfs-3g 1:2014.2.15AR.3-1 (Closes: #764284)" nmu partclone_0.2.73-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against ntfs-3g 1:2014.2.15AR.3-1 (Closes: #777249)" -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150224173803.ga23...@agmartin.aq.upm.es
Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2015, 13:17 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > Please use 3.99.5+repack1-3+deb7u1 as the version number and feel free > to upload. The current distribution of "stable-proposed-updates" will > work, but "wheezy" is more self-documenting. Done, thank you! - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1424792076.7599.0.ca...@greffrath.com
Bug#779067: marked as done (unblock: wine/1.6.2-20)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:51:22 +0100 with message-id <20150224135122.gd19...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#779067: unblock: wine/1.6.2-20 has caused the Debian Bug report #779067, regarding unblock: wine/1.6.2-20 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 779067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- package: release.debian.org user: release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags: unblock severity: normal Please consider unblocking wine. I know its rather late for fixing important bugs, but this one was just filed. There is currently a missing relationship to libasound2-plugins, which can leave users without working audio by default (bug #779002). This change has been present in wine-development for almost a year. unblock wine/1.6.2-20 diff -Nru wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog --- wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2015-01-18 13:01:44.0 -0500 +++ wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2015-02-23 01:08:22.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +wine (1.6.2-20) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Recommend libasound2-plugins (closes: #779002). + + -- Michael Gilbert Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:07:16 + + wine (1.6.2-19) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix typo in libwine-alsa.maintscript (closes: #774861). diff -Nru wine-1.6.2/debian/control wine-1.6.2/debian/control --- wine-1.6.2/debian/control 2015-01-18 13:02:52.0 -0500 +++ wine-1.6.2/debian/control 2015-02-23 01:08:55.0 -0500 @@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ libfreetype6, libgl1-mesa-dri, libwine-gecko-2.21 +Recommends: + libasound2-plugins, Breaks: wine (<< 1.6.1-9), wine-bin (<< 1.5.31-1), @@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ Replaces: wine (<< 1.6.1-9), Recommends: + libasound2-plugins, wine32 (>= ${source:Version}), Description: Windows API implementation - 64-bit binary loader Wine is a free MS-Windows API implementation. diff -Nru wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in --- wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in 2015-01-10 14:21:31.0 -0500 +++ wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in 2015-02-23 01:06:52.0 -0500 @@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ libfreetype6, libgl1-mesa-dri, libwine-gecko-2.21 +Recommends: + libasound2-plugins, Breaks: wine (<< 1.6.1-9), wine-bin (<< 1.5.31-1), @@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ Replaces: wine (<< 1.6.1-9), Recommends: + libasound2-plugins, wine32 (>= ${source:Version}), Description: Windows API implementation - 64-bit binary loader Wine is a free MS-Windows API implementation. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:45:16PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > unblock wine/1.6.2-20 Unblocked. Cheers, Ivo--- End Message ---
Bug#776748: (pre-approval) unblock: libxml2/2.9.1+dfsg1-5 (via t-p-u)
Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:48:59PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On PTS it says: > > * Unblock request by ivodd ignored due to version mismatch: 2.9.1+dfsg1-5 > > > > Anything wrong? > > Not on our side. > > The PTS is only checking the excuses for unstable, which is obviously > not unblocked. Compare the output of "grep-excuses libxml2" and > "grep-excuses libxml2_tpu". The t-p-u build on arm64 was missing, but it got built and uploaded earlier today, and libxml2 migrated to testing during the last britney run. Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150224134828.gb19...@ugent.be
Bug#779059: marked as done (unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:58 +0100 with message-id <20150224134957.gc19...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#779059: unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779059, regarding unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 779059: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779059 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package qmail-run It moves a file needed during postinst from /usr/share/doc/qmail-run to /usr/share/qmail-run. #775052 Andreas unblock qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:29:25AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Please unblock package qmail-run Unblocked. Cheers, Ivo--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #779083 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 779083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b779083.142478384032040.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2015-02-24 10:59, Fabian Greffrath wrote: please grant permission to upload an updated package for lame in wheezy. The package will contain three patches that have been created to cope with a couple of crashes that were detected by feeding fuzzed wav file samples into the library. At least two of them appear to be security-relevant, to say the least, and the third one fixes a nasty crash in the frontend. [...] PS: I have set the distribution to wheezy-p-u. Is this correct or should I rather set it to stable, or wheezy? Please use 3.99.5+repack1-3+deb7u1 as the version number and feel free to upload. The current distribution of "stable-proposed-updates" will work, but "wheezy" is more self-documenting. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/abd09eeb243e9f17cdd03a8593dfb...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#779075: unblock: partman-target/94
Niels Thykier (2015-02-24): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi, > > This package already got unblocked by the RT; we just need waiting for > a d-i ack. It fixes two RC bugs (according to Britney): #757413, > #761815 > > The changelog is: > > """ > Changes: > partman-target (94) unstable; urgency=medium > . >[ Steve McIntyre ] >* Don't add entries for random USB media to /etc/fstab, they're not > useful. Closes: #761815 > > """ > > NB: AFAICT #757413 is a duplicate of #761815 that was closed manually > after upload. Well, it's maintained by debian-boot@, and it appears on http://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html so I'm not sure you want to go through an unblock bug for such a package… Letting me request unblock && unblock-udeb as usual should work. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi there, please grant permission to upload an updated package for lame in wheezy. The package will contain three patches that have been created to cope with a couple of crashes that were detected by feeding fuzzed wav file samples into the library. At least two of them appear to be security-relevant, to say the least, and the third one fixes a nasty crash in the frontend. All three patches have been forwarded upstream by private mail to one of the upstream developers. Please find a debdiff between the original and the updated package attached. Cheers, Fabian PS: I have set the distribution to wheezy-p-u. Is this correct or should I rather set it to stable, or wheezy? -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) diff -Nru lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/changelog lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/changelog --- lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/changelog 2012-03-17 18:41:48.0 +0100 +++ lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/changelog 2015-02-24 09:50:06.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ +lame (3.99.5+repack1-3wheezy1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=medium + + * Add check for invalid input sample rate, thanks Maks Naumov +(Closes: #775959, #777160, #777161). Thanks Jakub Wilk and +Brian Carpenter for the bug reports and test cases. + * Extend Maks Naumov's patch to also include a sanity check for +a valid amount of input channels (Closes: #778703). + * Avoid malformed wav causing floating point exception in the +frontend (Closes: #777159). + * Fix decision if sample rate ratio is an integer value or not +(Closes: #778529). Thanks to Henri Salo for the bug reports +and the fuzzed samples! + + -- Fabian Greffrath Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:46:48 +0100 + lame (3.99.5+repack1-3) unstable; urgency=low * Handle case on setting CFLAGS for systems where dpkg-dev (<< 1.15.7) diff -Nru lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/0001-Add-check-for-invalid-input-sample-rate.patch lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/0001-Add-check-for-invalid-input-sample-rate.patch --- lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/0001-Add-check-for-invalid-input-sample-rate.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/0001-Add-check-for-invalid-input-sample-rate.patch 2015-02-24 09:38:55.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +From 1ea4eac3e7d57dbad42fb067a32ac1600a0397a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Maks Naumov +Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:20:40 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] Add check for invalid input sample rate + +Signed-off-by: Maks Naumov +--- + libmp3lame/lame.c | 6 ++ + 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) + +--- a/libmp3lame/lame.c b/libmp3lame/lame.c +@@ -822,6 +822,12 @@ lame_init_params(lame_global_flags * gfp + } + #endif + ++if (gfp->samplerate_in < 0 || gfp->num_channels < 0) { ++freegfc(gfc); ++gfp->internal_flags = NULL; ++return -1; ++} ++ + cfg->disable_reservoir = gfp->disable_reservoir; + cfg->lowpassfreq = gfp->lowpassfreq; + cfg->highpassfreq = gfp->highpassfreq; diff -Nru lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/bits_per_sample.patch lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/bits_per_sample.patch --- lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/bits_per_sample.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/bits_per_sample.patch 2015-02-24 09:39:00.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +Description: Avoid malformed wav causing floating point exception (integer divide by zero) +Author: Fabian Greffrath +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/777159 + +--- a/frontend/get_audio.c b/frontend/get_audio.c +@@ -1448,6 +1448,10 @@ parse_wave_header(lame_global_flags * gf + else { + (void) lame_set_in_samplerate(gfp, global_reader.input_samplerate); + } ++/* avoid division by zero */ ++if (bits_per_sample < 1) ++return -1; ++ + global. pcmbitwidth = bits_per_sample; + global. pcm_is_unsigned_8bit = 1; + global. pcm_is_ieee_float = (format_tag == WAVE_FORMAT_IEEE_FLOAT ? 1 : 0); diff -Nru lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/int_resample_ratio.patch lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/int_resample_ratio.patch --- lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/int_resample_ratio.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lame-3.99.5+repack1/debian/patches/int_resample_ratio.patch 2015-02-24 09:39:05.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Subject: Fix decision if sample rate ratio is an integer value or not + If the sample rate of the input file is sufficiently close to an + integer multiple of the output sample rate, the value of the int
Bug#779080: unblock (pre-approval): gtk+2.0/2.24.25-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking planned upload of package gtk+2.0. + * debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch: +Cherry-pick patch from upstream stable branch to protect +gdk_event_apply_filters_safe from changes in the filter list (Closes: +#777142) The MATE packaging team has discovered an issue in GTK-2 that is affecting several GTK2 based applications inside Debian. """ from #777142 A serious flaw in gdk_event_apply_filters function is causing weird crashes in various software. For example, mate-display-properties crashes when the screen resolution is changed or a new monitor is plugged in [1]. Some other older bugs like [2] and [3] also might be caused by this one. """ In the upstream bug description (for GTK-3, please note this) [4], we find: """ If an event filter function calls gdk_window_add_filter or gdk_window_remove_filter the list that gdk_event_apply_filters walks will become inconsistent. This may result in very obscure bugs and/or crashes. An example of this problem may be found in gnome-desktop where a filter is added to detect xrandr events and the callback calls a function that adds and/or removes a filter in another class to monitor _NET_WORKSPACE changes. This results in a crash when adding a monitor. """ """ An event filter may add or remove filters itself. This patch does two things to address this case. The first is to take a temporary reference to the filter while it is being used. The second is to wait until after the filter function is run before determining the next node in the list to process. This guards against changes to the next node. It also does not run functions that have been marked as removed. Though I'm not sure if this case can arise. """ One of the MATE upstream devs sat down to backport that patch from GTK3 to GTK2 (which is already part of GTK2 2.24.26). light+love, Mike [1] https://bugs.debian.org/760445 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/708559 [3] https://bugs.debian.org/718269 [4] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635380 unblock gtk+2.0/2.24.25-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) diff -Nru gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/changelog gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/changelog --- gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/changelog 2014-10-10 18:33:16.0 +0100 +++ gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/changelog 2015-02-23 17:51:40.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +gtk+2.0 (2.24.25-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch: +Cherry-pick patch from upstream stable branch to protect +gdk_event_apply_filters_safe from changes in the filter list (Closes: +#777142) + + -- Iain Lane Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:46:25 + + gtk+2.0 (2.24.25-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload diff -Nru gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/control gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/control --- gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/control 2014-10-10 18:34:04.0 +0100 +++ gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/control 2015-02-23 17:51:45.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers -Uploaders: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort , Iain Lane , Michael Biebl +Uploaders: Iain Lane , Michael Biebl Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.1.3), gettext, gtk-doc-tools (>= 1.11), diff -Nru gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch --- gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ gtk+2.0-2.24.25/debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch 2015-02-23 17:45:41.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,351 @@ +From ee95f3d7259c0859ce41189b781b4339b4cd64aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Matthias Clasen +Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:12:39 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH] Make gdk_event_apply_filters safe against changes in filter + list + +An event filter may add or remove filters itself. This patch does +two things to address this case. The first is to take a temporary +reference to the filter while it is being used. The second is +to wait until after the filter function is run before determining +the next node in the list to process. This guards against +changes to the next node. It also does not run functions +that have been marked as removed. Though I'm not sure if this +case can arise. + +https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635380 +