Re: Browser for sparc/linux...
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 08:44:22PM +0100, Cristian Constantin wrote: > hello! > > is netscape available for such a configuration? I mean native linux > binaries... > > or I should emulate some solaris(a.k.a "slowaris") ones?... > > do I have resonable choices instead of netscape? You can use mozilla. Or you can download the netscape sources from slink, which contain the sparc-linux bins. Netscape removed this a long time ago from their ftp (no idea why). apt-get -b source netscape # assuming you have slink deb-src lines in sources.list -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Browser for sparc/linux...
hello! is netscape available for such a configuration? I mean native linux binaries... or I should emulate some solaris(a.k.a "slowaris") ones?... do I have resonable choices instead of netscape? bye! cristian
Re: Want some info on what SparcServer1000 is
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 11:26:59PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I have been building a cluster with lots of machines mixed together, > almost just for fun, and been installing Slink on > SparcStation 5/10/20 SparcIPX SparcClassic via RARP/TFTP/nfs. > > However, I have 3 machines which claim to be SparcServer1000 (and big). > They don't seem to want to boot on SUN4M or SUN4C. > Does anyone have any clue as to what these are and what they want > (for the boot image)? > > I tore it apart, and I think they have SuperSparc. It *seems* as if it is > dual SuperSparc SMP, and has 4 500Mb drive. > It's a shame to trash this machine. >From the hardware guide: SPARCserver 1000 Processor(s): Mbus modules Motherboard:501-2336 (2338?) Bus:XDBus; SBus @ 20MHz, 3 slots/motheboard; Mbus, 2 slots/motherboard Memory: 2G physical, 1M off-chip cache Architecture: sun4d Notes: Single XDBus design with "curious L-shaped motherboards". Three SBus slots, onboard FSBE, 512M, two CPU modules per motherboard. Four motherboards total, or a disk tray with four 535M 1" high 3.5" disks (1G disks supported recently). Code name "Scorpion". 135 MIPS. First supported in Solaris 2.2 (SunOS 5.2). model MHz SPECint92 SPECfp92 SPECint SPECfp - --- - -Rate92--Rate92- 1102 50x2 2730 3681 1104 50x4 5318 7076 1108 50x81011312710 So, try sun4d. -- Elie Rosenblum That is not dead which can eternal lie, http://www.cosanostra.net And with strange aeons even death may die. Admin / Mercenary / System Programmer - _The Necronomicon_
Want some info on what SparcServer1000 is
Hi, I have been building a cluster with lots of machines mixed together, almost just for fun, and been installing Slink on SparcStation 5/10/20 SparcIPX SparcClassic via RARP/TFTP/nfs. However, I have 3 machines which claim to be SparcServer1000 (and big). They don't seem to want to boot on SUN4M or SUN4C. Does anyone have any clue as to what these are and what they want (for the boot image)? I tore it apart, and I think they have SuperSparc. It *seems* as if it is dual SuperSparc SMP, and has 4 500Mb drive. It's a shame to trash this machine. Anyone? --- dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University. ... Long Live Free Software, LIBERTAS OMNI VINCIT.
Automounter logging
Hi! Can someone help me with reducing the imense logging of automount in the logfiles?! It like I have a full debug mode running at the moment and I didn't found anything that would cut that down. -- IVV Geowissenschaften Tel.: +49 (251) 83-30014 Fax.: +49 (251) 83-39763
Re: SS5/170 hanging with 2.2.14 kernel
> I get no opps, but the machine will not respond to anything including > Stop-A. Did anything significant change between .13 & .14 for > sparc32? Is there anything I should enable to help provide kernel > dumps? Not responding to Stop-A is unusual. But there's an easy way on the SS5/170 : the TurboSPARC chip is buggy, and there's a code sequence that lock up the CPU... and gcc _can_ generate thay code sequence ! It happens on Solaris, anyway... try compiling: # int main(int argc, char** argv) { white(1) ; } # use gcc -O1 (or -O2, can't remember), and lockup your SS5/170... :-( _maybe_ that's what you are seeing, if it happens only on the 5/170. HTH -- DOLBEAU Romain | l'histoire est entierement vraie, puisque ENS Cachan / Ker Lann| je l'ai imaginee d'un bout a l'autre [EMAIL PROTECTED]| -- Boris Vian
Re: utility for mapping oopsen to symbols in SPARC?
> I keep hearing about koops (?) on the sparclinux list but can't seem > to find it. Am I delusional, a poor speller, or something else > entirely? You are probably looking for ksymoops. I usually run: ksymoops -VOLK -m System.map < oops Cheers, Anton
IMPORTANT: [boot-floppies] Path name changes
[Crossposted to arch-specific mailing lists FYI. Please followup to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have checked in, and karlheg is working on additional, changes that will change the release directory structure. This is in response to #58655, and problems with kernel version related image naming problems. There are two changes. The first is to change all disks-{1.20,1.44,2.88} paths to images-{1.20,1.44,2.88}. This is for mirroring purposes. See above bug report. The second is to use kernel versions in the path, instead of tagging them to the end of image names. Thus, we will have paths like this: debian/dists/potato/main/disks-${arch}/current/images-${size}/${kernelversion}[/${flavor_or_subarch}]/rescue.bin instead of debian/dists/potato/main/disks-${arch}/current/images-${size}/[${flavor}/]rescue-${kernelversion}[-${flavor}].bin we've discussed this a bit on irc, i realize these are fairly drastic changes, but we think they are necessary for potato boot disks to work right. I've filed a release-critical bug against debian-cd as it will be affect by these changes. If you know of other packages that may be affected, please change/file RC bugs against them. I've crossposted this to all port-related mailing lists because I want to make sure these changes are ok with all non-i386 architectures (what we've tested these on so far). In particular, this needs to deal with subarchs as well. randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.TauSq.org/ pgpLm7lTArJCY.pgp Description: PGP signature
utility for mapping oopsen to symbols in SPARC?
I keep hearing about koops (?) on the sparclinux list but can't seem to find it. Am I delusional, a poor speller, or something else entirely? As I can now comfortably reproduce my hme failure, I'd like to track down what exactly is getting trashed. -- Stephen "If I claimed I was emporer just cause some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away"