Re: df and ext3
This was a rather lengthy thread on the ext3-users mailing list (more than once, one thread started by me). The issue is indeed with the 'auto' fstype, and setting the fstype to 'ext3' in your /etc/fstab will fix the problem. One of the main reasons for using type 'auto' was so that if you booted from a non-ext3 kernel you'd still have access to your partition, just mounted as ext2. After botching my linux system up, I discovered that as long as fsck checks your partition and marks it clean, it doesn't matter if your fstype is ext3 or auto, it'll get mounted ok. HTH -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- WHERE CAN THE MATTER BE Oh, dear, where can the matter be When it's converted to energy? There is a slight loss of parity. Johnny's so long at the fair. -- WWW - http://hoshino-ruri.myip.org ICQ - 1738575 [Authorization Required] On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Greg Madden wrote: > On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:51 pm, Shaya Potter wrote: > > du doesn't seem to provide any statistics for my ext3 partition. any > > praticular reason for this? > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount > > /dev/hda2 on / type auto (rw,errors=remount-ro,errors=remount-ro) > > proc on /proc type proc (rw) > > /dev/hda1 on /dosc type vfat (rw) > > usbdevfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw) > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > /dev/hda1 13375640 3668672 9706968 28% /dosc > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > I am not positive but using 'auto' may be the problem, try using > type>ext3. 'df' doesn't have any issues with ext3 fs's , afaik. (works > here) >
Console Blanking
Is there a way to disable the console blanking? If so, how do you go about doing that? -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I came, I saw, I deleted all your files. -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit]
Re: Console Blanking
cherry-chan:~# xset s noblank xset: unable to open display "" i want to disable the text console blanking... i don't run X on the machine in question... -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I came, I saw, I deleted all your files. -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, ktb wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:40:03PM -0700, Curtis Hogg wrote: > > Is there a way to disable the console blanking? If so, how do you go > > about doing that? > > > > It looks like "xset s noblank" Type "xset" at the command line and it > will spit out options. I have also seen "xset s 0" on the list. You > can also take a look at the man page for further details. A good place > to search for answers is - > http://lists.debian.org/search.html > hth, > kent > > -- > I'd really love ta wana help ya Flanders but... Homer Simpson > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: debian init.d scripts
rc.S is for system-required scripts iirc... networking is started up there
instead of at the rc.[123456] level, so it ensures you have network
connnectivity in all runlevel modes... well except for singleuser of
course. course i'm probably wrong about that. 's been some time since i
mucked with my init scripts...
-- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
What's done to children, they will do to society.
--
Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW - [in transit]
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, MaD dUCK wrote:
> hey,
> i am new to debian - done redhat and suse and am now finally with what
> truly seems to be the best distro. honestly, it was a pleasure to
> install debian and using it is fabulous too for i *hate* that
> redhat/suse automatic config crap.
>
> anyway, been looking around through /etc/init.d and i actually
> installed file-rc to control runlevels through /etc/runlevel.conf.
> however, i am noticing a couple of peculiar things and i am not sure
> if i am interpreting them correctly...
>
> for instance, all these *.sh scripts, are they for single user mode
> only?
>
> and what is the difference between runlevel S and runlevel 1?
>
> furthermore, it seems as if mounting and bringing the network up (for
> instance) happen somewhere else but through
> /etc/init.d{mountall,networking} - at least my default
> /etc/runlevel.conf lists only runlevel S as start (and - for stop) for
> both, but obviously networking starts in runlevels 2 and 3 as well.
> why then are they there?
>
> where can i find an indepth rundown of what the concept behind
> /etc/init.d for potato is?
>
> thanks,
> martin
>
> [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]@@@.net
> --
> "mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images."
>-- jean cocteau
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Kinda Off Topic, Re: debian init.d scripts
In the init.d/networking script, for the rp_filter init section... is there a way to make it only set up filtering for certian ipv4 devices? I'm running FreeS/WAN IPsec and it doesn't work if rp_filter is set to 1 for ipsec0 (which it seems to get set to by default)... or can someone point me to a better solution for making rp filtering not enabled on that device? -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- One fine day, the bus driver went to the bus garage, started his bus, and drove off along the route. No problems for the first few stops -- a few people got on, a few got off, and things went generally well. At the next stop, however, a big hulk of a guy got on. Six feet eight, built like a wrestler, arms hanging down to the ground. He glared at the driver and said, "Big John doesn't pay!" and sat down at the back. Did I mention that the driver was five feet three, thin, and basically meek? Well, he was. Naturally, he didn't argue with Big John, but he wasn't happy about it. Well, the next day the same thing happened -- Big John got on again, made a show of refusing to pay, and sat down. And the next day, and the one after that, and so forth. This grated on the bus driver, who started losing sleep over the way Big John was taking advantage of him. Finally he could stand it no longer. He signed up for bodybuilding courses, karate, judo, and all that good stuff. By the end of the summer, he had become quite strong; what's more, he felt really good about himself. So on the next Monday, when Big John once again got on the bus and said "Big John doesn't pay!," the driver stood up, glared back at the passenger, and screamed, "And why not?" With a surprised look on his face, Big John replied, "Big John has a bus pass." -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit]
SSH connection problem.
Whenever I try to connect to any of my machines running the latest updates from testing, i get -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh tomoe-hotaru ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host -- my SSH was working just fine until i moved to the testing set... the SSH in question is 2.3.0p1-1.11. Has anyone else been having this problem, and more importantly, does anyone have an idea how to fix it? -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nearly every complex solution to a programming problem that I have looked at carefully has turned out to be wrong. -- Brent Welch -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit]
Squelching messages from the via82cxxx_audio driver.
I'm running kernel 2.2.18, and the via82cxxx_audio driver prints out about 150 messages from the driver stating via82cxxx: unknown AFMT These messages are driving me nuts... can somebody please tell me a way to make these messages go away? Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Support your right to bare arms! -- A message from the National Short-Sleeved Shirt Association -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit]
Re: tulip and kernel 2.4.2
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, MaD dUCK wrote: > also sprach Jacob Stowell (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 11:52:25PM -0500): > > I checked ifconfig and it told me that my ethernet card has a base > > address: > > 0x7000 and an interrupt of 10. > > ifconfig tells you what? i/o addresses? that's news to me... It's done that for about as long as I can remember. At least a couple years. > > > When I type modprobe tulip io=0x7000 irq=10 it says that this is an > > invalid io_parm. > > besides 0x7000 is clearly out of range. i would argue that your > network card is at one of > > 0x200 0x240 0x260 0x280 0x300 0x340 > Your statement would arguably be correct if the card in question weren't PCI. the addresses you listed are correct for ISA cards. however, my Tulip based card is at IO 0x6000, and one of my rtl8139 cards at home is at 0xb400... PCI cards have a higher IO address range. > the easiest way: try them all. the card will only be found at the > right i/o. > > martin What I'm interested to know, is what does the module say in dmesg when you try to load it, under 2.2.18 and under 2.4.2 when you just do a 'modprobe tulip'? What error does it give when you don't give anything, in 2.4.2? -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rpc.statd hacking but firewalled
i don't recall what port rpc.statd binds to, but what it is is a part of the NFS system, so disabling rpc.statd, i think, will also break NFS mounting on your side. you can still mount remote systems i think. And, yes, it is a hack attempt.. by some scriptkiddie trying to use a common buffer overflow in rpc.statd... only problem is that the's using the Solaris overflow, not the I386 one... see all those \220s? those are Solaris NOOP codes used to overflow the buffer. x86 NOOPs are \90 iirc... at any rate, turn off NFS and you turn off rpc.statd. You could use a program like snort to alert you to other attacks like the one directed at your machine you might want to check your /etc/services to see if it says where rpc.statd usually sticks itself. hope this helps any -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The White Rabbit put on his spectacles. "Where shall I begin, please your Majesty ?" he asked. "Begin at the beginning,", the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." -- Lewis Carroll -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, hanasaki wrote: > The following showed up in my syslog the other day Is this possbile > hacking? > > What port is rpc.statd on? > What does it do? > What will break if it is turned off? and how to turn it off? > Only a few, selected ports, are listened on. The last rule in my > firewall script is ipchains -l -A input -i eth0 -j DENY. > > thank you. > > > > Mar 11 17:55:25 hostname /sbin/rpc.statd[156]: gethostbyname error for > ^X > ^X^Y^Y^Z^Z^[ > > ^[%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%236x%n%137x%n%10x%n%192x%n\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > > \220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220 > Mar 11 17:55:25 hostname > ^F/binF^D/shA0\210F^G\211v^L\215V^P\215N^L\21 > 1^K\200^A\200\177 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
telnet problems with Debian woody
A friend of mine (as am I) is running Debian 2.1 that has been dist-upgraded to woody, and while he can telnet into my machine just fine, I cannot telnet into his, the error received states- telnetd: getpty: permission denied the permissions on his ptys and ttys and so on are the same as mine. What do I need to do to fix this problem? TIA -- Curtis Hogg Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - http://www.cyberhighway.net/~buckmins -- UNIX Trix For those of you in the reseller business, here is a helpful tip that will save your support staff a few hours of precious time. Before you send your next machine out to an untrained client, change the permissions on /etc/passwd to 666 and make sure there is a copy somewhere on the disk. Now when they forget the root password, you can easily login as an ordinary user and correct the damage. Having a bootable tape (for larger machines) is not a bad idea either. If you need some help, give us a call. -- CommUNIXque 1:1, ASCAR Business Systems --
RE: Semi-frequent lock-ups (unrealated)
The # after 2.2.14 indicates what build of the kernel you're running...
namely, if you recompile your kernel, this number will increase.
Mine's at #17 =)
-- Curtis Hogg
Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW - http://www.cyberhighway.net/~buckmins
--
UNIX Trix
For those of you in the reseller business, here is a helpful tip that will
save your support staff a few hours of precious time. Before you send your
next machine out to an untrained client, change the permissions on /etc/passwd
to 666 and make sure there is a copy somewhere on the disk. Now when they
forget the root password, you can easily login as an ordinary user and correct
the damage. Having a bootable tape (for larger machines) is not a bad idea
either. If you need some help, give us a call.
-- CommUNIXque 1:1, ASCAR Business Systems
--
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of chris horn.
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 2:42 PM
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Semi-frequent lock-ups
> >
> >
> > Hi. I'm running wiht packages from the newest update of Slink off the
> ftp.cs.unm.edu/mirrors/debian
> > Debian2.1r5 site, with kernel "2.2.14 #4 SMP ...
>
> I've always wondered: What does the "#4" ("#1" on my box) mean?
>
> Christian
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
problem with sendmail.
I am getting the following error whenever i try to use fetchmail to get my pop3 mail. this wasn't a problem before... Apr 27 21:43:44 ayanami-rei sendmail[1969]: e3S3hiv01969: SYSERR(root): Can't create transcript file ./xfe3S3hiv01969: Permission denied I know that it's a permissions problem (obviously) but i'm not sure where i need to change permissions to fix this problem. Any help would be appreciated Your recently-posting newbie, =) -- Curtis Hogg Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - http://www.cyberhighway.net/~buckmins -- Q: Why haven't you graduated yet? A: Well, Dad, I could have finished years ago, but I wanted my dissertation to rhyme. --
Re: PCI Modem
My roommate has a PCI modem as well, though it's made by ESS not Wisecom..
supposedly it's not a Winmodem, but who can really tell.
> assigned to a serial device. Do the following:
>
> 1. make sure you have pciutils installed.
Check
>
> 2. run lspci -v and look for a reference to the "serial controller"
> device. Note its IRQ and i/o port address, say, for example:
>
> "00:13.0 Serial controller: US Robotics: Unknown device 1008 (rev 01)
> (prog-if 02)
> Subsystem: Unknown device 12b9:00ad
> Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 19
> I/O ports at efe0"
Check, found it on IRQ 4 (?) IO Port b400
>
> 3. open /etc/rc.boot/0setserial, scrool down to MANUAL CONFIGURATION,
> look at the lines for COM1 to COM4, and uncomment the line for, say,
> ttyS2 and edit it to read, say, for example:
>
> "${SETSERIAL} -b /dev/ttyS2 uart 16550A port 0xefe0 irq 19
> ${STD_FLAGS}"
>
Check, Windows had it on COM1, so i changed /dev/ttyS0
>
> 4. reboot.
Done, but modem still doesn't respond to anything.
Any other ideas?
-- Curtis Hogg
Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW - http://www.cyberhighway.net/~buckmins
--
Q: Why haven't you graduated yet?
A: Well, Dad, I could have finished years ago, but I wanted
my dissertation to rhyme.
--
Re: PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at ...
I had problems with my Linksys tulip card, having a similar error, only in my case the tulip driver told me that my card was on irq 0... do you run windows on your system as well? if so, were you in windows prior to booting into linux? and did you do a soft reset to get there? Windows screws with PCI cards, especially network cards, and linux doesn't like that very much... my problem went away after i started resetting by poweroff to clear ram and my system configuration... if i just went into linux after being in windows i didn't get my card. cold booting allowed it to find my card just fine. maybe that could be your problem. hth. -- Curtis Hogg Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - http://www.cyberhighway.net/~buckmins -- "Irrationality is the square root of all evil" -- Douglas Hofstadter -- On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Jordan Howarth wrote: > > Suddenly I am not able to get network access through my ethernet card and this > error ( PCI BIOS has not enabled ... ) in dmesg seems to point to the problem > as > it comes just prior to the ethernet card being identified. > > --\-- > > ... > > PPP line discipline registered. > The PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at 0/48! Updating PCI command > 0013->0017. > tulip.c:v0.91 4/14/99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > eth0: Digital DS21143 Tulip rev 65 at 0xfc00, 00:00)4C:ED:C0:DE, IRQ 10 > eth0: EEPROM default media type Autosense. > eth0: Index #0 - Media 10BaseT (#0) described by a 21142 Serial PHY (2) > block. > eth0: Index #1 - Media 10BaseT-FD (#4) described by a 21142 Serial PHY (2) > block. > eth0: Index #2 - Media 100BaseTx (#3) described by a 21143 SYM PHY (4) > block. > eth0: Index #3 - Media 100BaseTx-FD (#5) described by a 21142 SYM PHY (4) > block. > > ... > > --\-- > > Does anybody know what this might mean ? > > > I have been playing with bits and pieces so I may have changed something I > was not > supposed to, ie. the ethernet card was working before. I am using the new > tulip > driver not the one packed with the Debian - running potato with 2.2.12 on an > NEC > Versa Note > > Thanks, > > J. > > > >
Re: Win2000 , Debian Dual Boot
What kind of hardware are you running? What order did you install the two operating systems? What versino of Lilo/GRUB? I'm running a Debian Testing/Win2k SP2 dualboot and it's working just fine. -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Due to a shortage of devoted followers, the production of great leaders has been discontinued. -- WWW - http://hoshino-ruri.myip.org ICQ - 1738575 [Authorization Required] On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Albert Heijn wrote: > Hi ! > > I have some problems . I have installed Win2000 and > Debian on a Dual boot system on my hd . But now iam > getting inaccessible_boot_device errors from Win2000 > nearly every time i try to start it up . it doesnt > seem to be regularly but it happens quite often . > The change from lilo to Grub didnt help . The " > phenomenon " dissapeared for a couple of days but is > back now . I tried a virus scanner under Win2000 - > nothing found . Win2000 has installed all the > important updates . And Debian is in the version > testing not so old either . > What can i do ? > Any help is very apreciated ! > > David > > > > __ > > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > Ihre E-Mail noch individueller? - http://domains.yahoo.de > > >
Re: folder highlightning in Pine ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What you do, is in your folders page, you hit the ; key... then select [P]roperties (P key), then hit [N]ew (N key). this will check all of your folders for new messages, and put an X next to each one that contains new messages. - -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Rule of Life #1 -- Never get separated from your luggage. - -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Allan Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a new user with pine email (Have allways used a graphical program), > but was impressed to see the program 'simplicity' and speed, so I desided > to try it out my self. > > I've set up some filters in Pine to control the incoming mails into the > right folders. But as soon as I got more than a couple of these folders > it gets a bit confuseble. So I was wondering if it was possible to get > the folder highlighted when a new mail arrived to it ? > > It's a bit irritating to go though each folder when a new mail arrives. > > Hope anyone could assists, best regards > Allan Andersen > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOtUXjLHXK8DxaQMZEQJbBQCffd7pax5MwmBdn66XNFgJRB+b+jEAn2/D ZJfTruiKt5/DhHul3ZCn320+ =P4jl -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: folder highlightning in Pine ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm using Pine 4.32. In my settings, i have 'enable-aggregate-command-set' under Advanced Command Preferences turned on, that might be what turns it on, i know you have to hit ; before you can use p/n since they are bound to the previous/next folder commands otherwise... you must do the ; from the menu that lists all of your folders... i also have enable-dot-folders on, but i don't know if that helps any. - -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Rule of Life #1 -- Never get separated from your luggage. - -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Allan Andersen wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, but which version of Pine are you using ? > > The one I'm using is 4.33 ... it's be couse the ';' command doesn't exists > and 'P'/'N' is in my Pine previous/new folder. > > Allan Andersen > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOtWUM7HXK8DxaQMZEQINNwCghmY4H3gnQ44Yfj8zndI0EJMLEhQAn3sz bShxBFVKD3Bfsdn9+CQWmQGj =Mejv -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Does anyone know what this is ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 daytime, i'm not sure on. chargen, as it's name suggests, generates characters echo, echos any characters it receives. there have been some really fun denial of service attacks back in the olden-days, caused by spoofing a tcp session and linking the echo and chargen ports together =) my whole builtin services section is commented out, so i don't worry about it. hope this helps. - -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Quality control, n.: Assuring that the quality of a product does not get out of hand and add to the cost of its manufacture or design. - -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, will trillich wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:58:26PM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Benj wrote: > > > > > I run top, and see this process: > > > 7705 0.0 % -discard [164.138.*.*] > > > > > > What is this process -discard ?? The IP (from which i've hidden the last > > > two > > > numbers) is totally unknown, its not my servers's or mine. > > > > discard is a TCP service provided by inetd itself which just ignores any > > input fed to it. That IP is connecting to your machine and spewing data > > into inetd. It's not harming your machine, but it will be wasting > > bandwidth. > > > > > Do you think I should kill it ? > > > > More than that, I'd disable discard, and it's friends daytime, echo, and > > chargen in /etc/inetd.conf. then '/etc/init.d/inetd restart' > > okay, now for the Big Question -- "why"? i.e. is there a danger > in "offering" the 'daytime','echo', etc services from xinetd? > > -- > DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP: > Looking to use your Debian machine as a FIREWALL? No problem! > Try "apt-get install ipmasq"... After you've got your > /etc/network/interfaces file set up properly, ipmasq will > save you lots of work, setting up firewall and routing > tables automatically. > > ...from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOuaPH7HXK8DxaQMZEQLdXgCcDDaFW7OYn1wyjsq7PpLvMd7IeSAAoIBk YCex6J8OgLXYGoBYrl+W1w17 =3Ax9 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
libpcap0 question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've noticed that the Debian libpcap0 package comes with a shared object. tomoe-hotaru:# dpkg -L libpcap0 (...) /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.6.2 (...) My question then, is this? How/where did the .so file come from? When I compiled libpcap 0.6.2 from source from www.tcpdump.org, all i got was a libpcap.a file. Since the program I'm working on is using the shared object, this made it slightly annoying when I moved the files over to my laptop (which is not using Debian, or really any existing distribution), as it only had the .a. Now, I can statically compile libpcap in, but i didn't want to do this. What I'm wondering, is how did Debian get the .so file, since there was no switches or rules in the makefile for creating it out-of-the-tarball? Any help would be appreciated. - -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- The real reason psychology is hard is that psychologists are trying to do the impossible. - -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOxYI1LHXK8DxaQMZEQJYaACdGdbsCqY4AKlTMK0L4cz/4czXNUMAn3VF tJmO4lPFxpCFnU+/2Vrmawln =ZNBW -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: middle mouse button
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What do you have your repeater type set to for your gpm configuration? You may have a problem there. What's the actual type of your mouse. - -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- The real reason psychology is hard is that psychologists are trying to do the impossible. - -- Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW - [in transit] On Thu, 31 May 2001, Frank Zimmermann wrote: > Hi there, > > since my mouse refused to work under X with gpm running I changed > the entry in my XF86Config file from /dev/ttyS0 to /dev/gpmdata. Now > I do have my mouse under X and on the console but under X the middle > mouse buton is not working. Does anyone know a solution to this > problem? > > Here is the pointer section: > > Section "Pointer" > Device "/dev/gpmdata" > Protocol "microsoft" > # Device "/dev/ttyS0" > #Emulate3Buttons > EndSection > > > Thank you, > > Frank > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOxYOM7HXK8DxaQMZEQKedwCg4DQCpjwkhEEmDTzkhMVN8AQWIa4Ani7b n8N+sY2fPRh5d+JzL65Uk1gF =cM/b -END PGP SIGNATURE-
(RESOLVED) Re: libpcap0 question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I finally found out how to do it (RTFMing really does work). In my
/usr/src/libpcap-0.6.2/ dir, i did
ld -o libpcap.so -shared *.o
and that produced what appears to be a working .so libpcap (as in, my
program didn't horribly complain when i started it and it appears to be
working perfectly)
I wrote a patch against the configure script and Makefile.in for
libpcap-0.6.2, which is attached to this message if anyone wants it.
- -- Curtis Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- --
Cheit's Lament:
If you help a friend in need, he is sure to remember you--
the next time he's in need.
- --
Email 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email 2 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW - [in transit]
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Aaron Brashears wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:03:08AM -0600, Curtis Hogg wrote:
> > My question then, is this? How/where did the .so file come from? When I
> > compiled libpcap 0.6.2 from source from www.tcpdump.org, all i got was a
> > libpcap.a file.
>
>
> I'm also working on a project using libpcap and libpcap dev, and I
> noticed this little issue. However, I don't have to redistribute, so I
> wasn't worried. Try looking at the source, the diffs, and contact the
> maintainer if you're still wondering.
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBOxmKSrHXK8DxaQMZEQKmogCg3ol+h1o62OHnHe7ZcpTjdYn1Ne8An31o
r0+pkpGdNBw69vHHDpx91l1V
=e37l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
*** configure.old Sat Jun 2 18:15:47 2001
--- configure Sat Jun 2 18:16:13 2001
***
*** 2255,2258
--- 2255,2259
test -z "$INSTALL_DATA" && INSTALL_DATA='${INSTALL} -m 644'
+ test -z "$INSTALL_SO" && INSTALL_SO='${INSTALL} -m 755'
***
*** 2419,2422
--- 2420,2424
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%$INSTALL_SCRIPT%g
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%$INSTALL_DATA%g
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@%$INSTALL_SO%g
CEOF
*** Makefile.in.old Wed Jan 17 21:06:24 2001
--- Makefile.in Sat Jun 2 18:10:06 2001
***
*** 53,56
--- 53,57
INSTALL_PROGRAM = @INSTALL_PROGRAM@
INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA@
+ INSTALL_SO = @INSTALL_SO@
RANLIB = @RANLIB@
***
*** 92,98
$(SRC) $(HDR) $(TAGHDR)
! CLEANFILES = $(OBJ) libpcap.a $(GENSRC) $(GENHDR) lex.yy.c
! all: libpcap.a
libpcap.a: $(OBJ)
--- 93,99
$(SRC) $(HDR) $(TAGHDR)
! CLEANFILES = $(OBJ) libpcap.a libpcap.so $(GENSRC) $(GENHDR) lex.yy.c
! all: libpcap.a libpcap.so
libpcap.a: $(OBJ)
***
*** 101,104
--- 102,109
$(RANLIB) $@
+ libpcap.so: $(OBJ)
+ @rm -f $@
+ ld -o libpcap.so -shared $(OBJ)
+
scanner.c: $(srcdir)/scanner.l
@rm -f $@
***
*** 141,144
--- 146,154
$(INSTALL_DATA) libpcap.a $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.a
$(RANLIB) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.a
+ $(INSTALL_SO) libpcap.so $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0.6.2
+ @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0
+ ln -s $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0.6.2
$(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0
+ @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so
+ ln -s $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0 $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so
[ -d $(DESTDIR)$(includedir) ] || \
(mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(includedir); chmod 755
$(DESTDIR)$(includedir))
***
*** 157,160
--- 167,173
uninstall:
rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.a
+ rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0.6.2
+ rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so.0
+ rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libpcap.so
rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(includedir)/pcap.h
rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(includedir)/pcap-namedb.h
Problems restarting Sendmail after upgrade.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running Debian unstable (yes, i know that's a bad idea), and get this
message after apt-get update/apt-get upgrading today:
Start sendmail now? (Y/n)
Starting Mail Transport Agent: sendmail/usr/sbin/sendmail: /lib/libc.so.6:
version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by /usr/sbin/sendmail)
/usr/sbin/sendmail: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found
(required by /usr/sbin/sendmail)
invoke-rc.d: initscript sendmail, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing sendmail (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I have 2 questions:
1) GLIBC_2.3?
2) How can I fix this problem? I do run a mailing list from this server,
and while it's very low-traffic, it will be a problem if sendmail
doesn't work.
- --
Curtis Hogg [buckminst at inconnu dot isu dot edu]
- --
Brahma said: Well, after hearing ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
wiser. But an intelligent man needs only two thousand five hundred.
-- The Mahabharata
- --
WWW - http://www.furuba.net
ICQ - 1738575 [Authorization Required]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9uGfMrn6Ei15FGb8RAqVXAJ42GuBA+J4UIP1BjOC6cKtp3DcDfQCeOiEE
7ToOgIHFbHsKXL9NXku6yjg=
=aNXj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
