Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-19 Thread Amadan Korvin
hi

OK i'm not a package maintainer or anything.  but i've been watching
the status of etch and sid for a couple weeks now because i've had the
same problems as you - each time i try for an aptitude upgrade i get
depencency hell.  as far as i understand, what is happening is that
several critical and co-dependent packages are getting some bugs
hammered out, and are slightly out of sync with each other in terms of
the next source upload, with the result that a lot of dependencies are
broken right now.  every couple days, _some_ of the problems are
resolved.  (although sadly more crop up).  I'm almost at the point now
where my aptitude upgrade goes through without errors.  seems they're
clearing things up.
cheers
adam



Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-19 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:53:23PM -0500, Amadan Korvin wrote:
 hi
 
 OK i'm not a package maintainer or anything.  but i've been watching
 the status of etch and sid for a couple weeks now because i've had the
 same problems as you - each time i try for an aptitude upgrade i get
 depencency hell.  as far as i understand, what is happening is that
 several critical and co-dependent packages are getting some bugs
 hammered out, and are slightly out of sync with each other in terms of
 the next source upload, with the result that a lot of dependencies are
 broken right now.  every couple days, _some_ of the problems are
 resolved.  (although sadly more crop up).  I'm almost at the point now
 where my aptitude upgrade goes through without errors.  seems they're
 clearing things up.
 cheers
 adam
Hi Adam,
this is the process of creating a relatively bug-free distribution! It
takes a LOT of this to finally produce 'stable' where all these issue
are resolved. As this process proceeds, testing becomes more stable and
less things are pulled out and put in. It takes between 12 and 24 months
for Debian. There are ways to speed up this process, because you do not
have to be a Debian Developer to fix problems. Not every package is
maintained by Debian Developers. Most of the applications are not done
by Debian Developers. The hard part is finding out what needs to be done
SPECIFICALLY beyond locating orphaned packages or looking in the BTS
(bugs.debian.org, our bug tracking system) but the main thrust is to fix
things you are interested it and submit them as bug reports or patches.
Cheers,
Kev
-- 
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |   my web site:   |
| : :' :  The  Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'  Operating System| go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-http://www.debian.org/ |be counted! #238656   |
| my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   | my NPO: cfsg.org |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-19 Thread Amadan Korvin
Hi

sorry, i guess i came off sounding complaining.  actually i knew that
this is a normal process.  i was just hoping that the info might be
useful to the other dude on the thread.

and i've been doing bug reports for the packages, to help ;)
adam



Etch dependency failures

2006-02-18 Thread David Jarvie
I'm running Etch. For a few weeks now, whenever I do my regular (more than 
once a week) 'aptitude dist-upgrade', I get messages about unmet 
dependencies. The original ones were about libpaper1 and libpaper-utils, but 
in the last week or so more have started appearing each time. I'm surprised 
that these haven't been fixed quickly. Does anybody know what is the reason 
for these errors?

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be installed.
 Depends: libpaper-utils (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be 
installed.
  python2.3-glade2: Depends: python2.3-gtk2 (= 2.6.3-2) but 2.8.2-3 is 
installed.
  dbus-glib-1: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
  libhal0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
  libhal-storage0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
  dbus-qt-1-dev: Depends: dbus-qt-1c2 (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable
 Depends: dbus-1-dev (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable

-- 
David Jarvie.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-18 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 2/18/06, David Jarvie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Etch. For a few weeks now, whenever I do my regular (more thanonce a week) 'aptitude dist-upgrade', I get messages about unmetdependencies. The original ones were about libpaper1 and libpaper-utils, but
in the last week or so more have started appearing each time. I'm surprisedthat these haven't been fixed quickly. Does anybody know what is the reasonfor these errors?The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be installed.
Depends: libpaper-utils (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to beinstalled.python2.3-glade2: Depends: python2.3-gtk2 (= 2.6.3-2) but 2.8.2-3 isinstalled.dbus-glib-1: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
libhal0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installablelibhal-storage0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installabledbus-qt-1-dev: Depends: dbus-qt-1c2 (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable

Depends: dbus-1-dev (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable
I had a similar experience 3 or 4 weeks ago (I do weekly updates with
aptitude). Aptitude reported that several packages - a list
similar to that above - were broken. I followed the broken
dependencies and fixed them one by one (using 'b' in aptitude to find
each broken package, and then examining each one for what was missing
and installing it). As I recall, it took a couple of passes to
get everything back in order, but I haven't had the problem
since. Of course, all that should not be necessary - but at least
it worked, for me at least.

Patrick



Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-18 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:23:18AM +, David Jarvie wrote:
 I'm running Etch. For a few weeks now, whenever I do my regular (more than 
 once a week) 'aptitude dist-upgrade', I get messages about unmet 
 dependencies. The original ones were about libpaper1 and libpaper-utils, but 
 in the last week or so more have started appearing each time. I'm surprised 
 that these haven't been fixed quickly. Does anybody know what is the reason 
 for these errors?
 
 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be installed.
  Depends: libpaper-utils (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be 
 installed.
   python2.3-glade2: Depends: python2.3-gtk2 (= 2.6.3-2) but 2.8.2-3 is 
 installed.
   dbus-glib-1: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
   libhal0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
   libhal-storage0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
   dbus-qt-1-dev: Depends: dbus-qt-1c2 (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable
  Depends: dbus-1-dev (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable
 
Hi David,
the developent cycle begins with bug reports with bug fixes or new upstream 
versions.
When those happen, a new version is created and its upload to
unstable/sid. If this version is not found to be buddy, after about 10
days, it will get moved to testing/etch by 'britney'. So, things do not
get fixed 'quickly'. The thing about testing is that things can be added
and removed depending upon available depenpencies which leads to the
situation above. The name 'testing' is actaully the workshop of 'Debian'
as its where the next stable is born. -Kev

-- 
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |   my web site:   |
| : :' :  The  Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'  Operating System| go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-http://www.debian.org/ |be counted! #238656   |
| my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   | my NPO: cfsg.org |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-18 Thread David Jarvie
On Saturday 18 February 2006 15:08, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
 On 2/18/06, David Jarvie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm running Etch. For a few weeks now, whenever I do my regular (more
  than once a week) 'aptitude dist-upgrade', I get messages about unmet
  dependencies. The original ones were about libpaper1 and libpaper-utils,
  but
  in the last week or so more have started appearing each time. I'm
  surprised
  that these haven't been fixed quickly. Does anybody know what is the
  reason
  for these errors?
 
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be
  installed.
   Depends: libpaper-utils (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be
  installed.
python2.3-glade2: Depends: python2.3-gtk2 (= 2.6.3-2) but 2.8.2-3 is
  installed.
dbus-glib-1: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
libhal0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
libhal-storage0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
dbus-qt-1-dev: Depends: dbus-qt-1c2 (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not
  installable
   Depends: dbus-1-dev (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not
  installable

 I had a similar experience 3 or 4 weeks ago (I do weekly updates with
 aptitude).  Aptitude reported that several packages - a list similar to
 that above - were broken.  I followed the broken dependencies and fixed
 them one by one (using 'b' in aptitude to find each broken package, and
 then examining each one for what was missing and installing it).  As I
 recall, it took a couple of passes to get everything back in order, but I
 haven't had the problem since.  Of course, all that should not be necessary
 - but at least it worked, for me at least.

Aptitude didn't show any broken packages for me. But I tried marking one of 
two of the packages as automatically installed, and that allowed aptitude to 
resolve the errors. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

-- 
David Jarvie.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Etch dependency failures

2006-02-18 Thread David Jarvie
On Saturday 18 February 2006 16:21, Kevin Mark wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:23:18AM +, David Jarvie wrote:
  I'm running Etch. For a few weeks now, whenever I do my regular (more
  than once a week) 'aptitude dist-upgrade', I get messages about unmet
  dependencies. The original ones were about libpaper1 and libpaper-utils,
  but in the last week or so more have started appearing each time. I'm
  surprised that these haven't been fixed quickly. Does anybody know what
  is the reason for these errors?
 
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be
  installed. Depends: libpaper-utils (= 1.1.14-3) but 1.1.14-5 is to be
  installed.
python2.3-glade2: Depends: python2.3-gtk2 (= 2.6.3-2) but 2.8.2-3 is
  installed.
dbus-glib-1: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
libhal0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
libhal-storage0: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
dbus-qt-1-dev: Depends: dbus-qt-1c2 (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not
  installable Depends: dbus-1-dev (= 0.23.4-8) but it is not installable

 Hi David,
 the developent cycle begins with bug reports with bug fixes or new upstream
 versions. When those happen, a new version is created and its upload to
 unstable/sid. If this version is not found to be buddy, after about 10
 days, it will get moved to testing/etch by 'britney'. So, things do not
 get fixed 'quickly'. The thing about testing is that things can be added
 and removed depending upon available depenpencies which leads to the
 situation above. The name 'testing' is actaully the workshop of 'Debian'
 as its where the next stable is born. -Kev

I know that 'testing' isn't guaranteed to be as bug-free as stable. I was just 
under the impression that dependencies were things that you never have to 
worry about at all using Debian, whether you're using stable, testing or 
unstable. These are the first such errors I can remember in over a year using 
Debian testing, so I was a bit surprised when they didn't go away. Anyway, 
thanks to Patrick's suggestion, I've managed to resolve them now.

Regardless of these small problems, I'm still a big fan of Debian's dependency 
handling and of how upgrades are handled (particularly the fact that it 
doesn't overwrite manually edited config files without asking first).
-- 
David Jarvie.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]