Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-10 Thread Alex Romosan
>I get that same error about java was not found in 
>/usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java.

i've solved the problems on my machines by linking
/usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java to /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java-jdk. don't
know if this is the "approved" solution.

--alex--

-- 
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
|  advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with  |
|  automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion  |
|  and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-08 Thread Lawrence Chim
Paul Serice wrote:
> 
> > > 1)  From my tribulations with JDK, I do believe jdk-common and jdk-static
> > > depend on each other.  Thus, neither can be installed.
> >
> > Try installing them both at the same time:
> > # dpkg -i jdk-common.deb jdk-static.deb
> 
> Wow, that installed them alright!
> 
> Now, I'm still have problems.  I've purged the jdk packages are
> reinstalled them, but I still have the following problem:
> 
> I get that same error about java was not found in
> /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java.  So, I  manually created a symbolic link from
> /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin to /usr/bin.  Now, when I try to run or compile
> a Java program, the terminal just hangs until I press ^c.
> 

should be "ln -s /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java-jdk
/usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java"

lawrence,


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-08 Thread ugs


On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:

> ugs wrote:
> > 
> > 2) When I forced the issue, I got an error similar to the one Joey Hess
> > reported earlier with 1.0.2.2:
> > 
> > Whenever I try to run any of the java stuff, like appletviewer, javac,
> > etc, I get this error:
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/prog/old/java>javac DragItem.java
> > java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java
> 
> easy, as it said it cannot find /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java.
> you can cd to /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin, then type "ln -s java-jdk java".
> it is a bug still in 1.0.2-3, hope it fixes in 1.0.2-4

That does the trick.  Thanks alot!

Paul Serice


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-08 Thread Paul Serice
> > 1)  From my tribulations with JDK, I do believe jdk-common and jdk-static
> > depend on each other.  Thus, neither can be installed. 
> 
> Try installing them both at the same time:
> # dpkg -i jdk-common.deb jdk-static.deb

Wow, that installed them alright!

Now, I'm still have problems.  I've purged the jdk packages are 
reinstalled them, but I still have the following problem:

I get that same error about java was not found in 
/usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java.  So, I  manually created a symbolic link from 
/usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin to /usr/bin.  Now, when I try to run or compile 
a Java program, the terminal just hangs until I press ^c.

Is this a know problem or do I have something misconfigured?  Any 
help would be appreciated.

Thanks
Paul


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-07 Thread Joey Hess
> 1)  From my tribulations with JDK, I do believe jdk-common and jdk-static
> depend on each other.  Thus, neither can be installed. 

Try installing them both at the same time:

# dpkg -i jdk-common.deb jdk-static.deb
 
Or you can use dselect to install them.

-- 
  "How appropriate, you fight like a cow." - - Guybrush Threepwood



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-07 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, ugs wrote:

> 
> 1)  From my tribulations with JDK, I do believe jdk-common and jdk-static
> depend on each other.  Thus, neither can be installed. 

Did you try putting them both on the command line together? Like:

dpkg -i jdk-common_*.deb jdk-static_*.deb

Luck,

Dwarf

  --

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (904) 656-9769
  Flexible Software  11000 McCrackin Road
  e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tallahassee, FL  32308

 If you don't see what you want, just ask --


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Somethings Serious Amiss with JDK?

1997-01-07 Thread Lawrence Chim
ugs wrote:
> 
> 1)  From my tribulations with JDK, I do believe jdk-common and jdk-static
> depend on each other.  Thus, neither can be installed.
> 
> 2) When I forced the issue, I got an error similar to the one Joey Hess
> reported earlier with 1.0.2.2:
> 
> Whenever I try to run any of the java stuff, like appletviewer, javac,
> etc, I get this error:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/prog/old/java>javac DragItem.java
> java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java

easy, as it said it cannot find /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java.
you can cd to /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin, then type "ln -s java-jdk java".
it is a bug still in 1.0.2-3, hope it fixes in 1.0.2-4

lawrence,


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]