Re: Debian unter Windows 2000
UST wrote: > Ich habe einen Dell-Laptop Latitude CPI-A mit Win 2000, auf den ich Debian > installieren möchte. Leider ist das Bios-Passwort nicht auffindbar, so > dass ich die Boot-Reihenfolge nicht auf DVD-einstellen kann. Die > Festplatte (3GB) hat 2 Partitionen. Kann ich unter Windows Debian auf der > 2. Partition installieren und anschließend Win 2000 auf Partition 1 (C) > löschen? Wenn es geht, wie muss ich vorgehen? > Vielen Dank im voraus > > Udo Stapel > > Eberhardstr. 9 > 87439 Kempten > > Postfach 2471 > 87414 Kempten > > I would google for how to reset the bios on your particular notebook. It'll solve the problem easier. The windows bootmanager reads a file in C:\ ... something like boot but I forgot the name. This is something like /boot/grub/menu.lst . Google for the syntax. you can set it up to boot from different partition or image youcopy somewhere regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Debian unter Windows 2000
On Wed,25.Mar.09, 16:20:35, UST wrote: > Ich habe einen Dell-Laptop Latitude CPI-A mit Win 2000, auf den ich > Debian installieren möchte. Leider ist das Bios-Passwort nicht > auffindbar, so dass ich die Boot-Reihenfolge nicht auf DVD-einstellen > kann. Die Festplatte (3GB) hat 2 Partitionen. Kann ich unter Windows > Debian auf der 2. Partition installieren und anschließend Win 2000 auf > Partition 1 (C) löschen? Wenn es geht, wie muss ich vorgehen? > Vielen Dank im voraus http://goodbye-microsoft.com aber dies is eine englische Liste. In deutsch kann man an die debian-user-german Liste schreiben. lG, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Debian unter Windows 2000
Ich habe einen Dell-Laptop Latitude CPI-A mit Win 2000, auf den ich Debian installieren möchte. Leider ist das Bios-Passwort nicht auffindbar, so dass ich die Boot-Reihenfolge nicht auf DVD-einstellen kann. Die Festplatte (3GB) hat 2 Partitionen. Kann ich unter Windows Debian auf der 2. Partition installieren und anschließend Win 2000 auf Partition 1 (C) löschen? Wenn es geht, wie muss ich vorgehen? Vielen Dank im voraus Udo Stapel Eberhardstr. 9 87439 Kempten Postfach 2471 87414 Kempten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Problem installing Windows 2000 in Bochs
Dear all, I am trying to install Win 2000 in Bochs 2.1.1. using image of w2k installation CD and flat HD image of 1 GB. At the point when w2k setup says "Setup starts Windows 2000" Bochs simulation stops (message box: "Bochs simulation has stopped"). Is there some explanations on how to install w2k in Bochs? My .bochsrc file: config_interface: wx display_library: wx romimage: file=/usr/share/bochs/BIOS-bochs-latest, address=0xf megs: 128 vgaromimage: file=/usr/share/vgabios/vgabios.bin floppya: 1_44=/dev/fd0, status=inserted floppyb: 1_44=b.img, status=inserted ata0: enabled=1, ioaddr1=0x1f0, ioaddr2=0x3f0, irq=14 ata1: enabled=0, ioaddr1=0x170, ioaddr2=0x370, irq=15 ata2: enabled=0, ioaddr1=0x1e8, ioaddr2=0x3e0, irq=11 ata3: enabled=0, ioaddr1=0x168, ioaddr2=0x360, irq=9 diskc: file="/var/lib/postgres/win2000/c.img", cyl=2031, heads=16, spt=63 cdromd: dev=/var/lib/postgres/win2000/win2000.iso, status=inserted newharddrivesupport: enabled=1 boot: cdrom ips: 1000 floppy_bootsig_check: disabled=0 log: /dev/stdout panic: action=ask error: action=report info: action=report debug: action=ignore debugger_log: - vga_update_interval: 30 keyboard_serial_delay: 250 keyboard_paste_delay: 10 floppy_command_delay: 500 mouse: enabled=0 private_colormap: enabled=0 usb1: enabled=1, ioaddr=0xFF80, irq=10 Thanks a lot in advance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.bkf files from Windows 2000/XP, and how to read them in Debian
Supposing I had a .bkf file from a Win2000/XP backup, and wanted to be able to extract files from it in Linux, how would I go about this? Just looking at the file, it looks similar to a tar file, but of course it's not. Supposedly it's Veritas Backup Exec that is bundled with W2k. I use smbtar to backup win9x machines over the network, and am able to restore them properly just from the tarball and a copy of fdisk/format, but w2k images won't work that way, so I'm looking at reversing it to W2k putting the image on the server instead. Had to use the smbtar method, because the task scheduler in Win9x depends on the phase of the moon far too much for my liking. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
samba + windows 2000, windows XP
Title: Message Hello. I am using Debian 3.0 (woody), stable with samba 2.2.3a-12 - Debian. I have a problem with setting PDC with my samba server for Windows 2000 or XP. I have used the same configuration (smb.conf, smbpasswd, passwd, shadow) as in other Slackware server I had (running Samba 2.2.4.), but now PDC does not work. For Windows 9x PDC works fine. I have read that PDC for 2000 or XP is supported in samba 2.2.2. already. Any suggestion? Thank you. Matic Koncan
Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro
Kevin Smith wrote: Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? Windows 2000 Pro on powerpc? What's that? Do you mean something like Samba share? Regards -- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Programmer\"" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:51:21AM -, Kevin Smith wrote: > Hi All, Yes, this is crosspost. > > Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian > 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? > > If so, can you give me step-by-step instructions, > or point me in the right direction, on how to do this? Perhaps that http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/explore2fs.htm can help. > > Thanks, > > Kevin > Geert Stappers msg25656/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro
Kevin Smith wrote: Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? Start from http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/explore2fs.htm Regards -- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Programmer\"" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro
Hi All, Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? If so, can you give me step-by-step instructions, or point me in the right direction, on how to do this? Thanks, Kevin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Samba + CUPS + Windows 2000
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:52, Rus Foster wrote: Hi, Does anyone have a working smb.conf for cups printing that I could have a copy of as I just can't get it work here and starting to get annoyed at it all here is a part of it: print command = lpr -P %p -o raw %s -r load printers = yes printing = cups [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = no path = /tmp printable = yes public = no writable = no create mode = 0700 Antoine I am NOT a 'guru" on this subject, but I do have it working here. In addition to what Antoine sent, I found that having a "generic" postscript printer driver on the Windows machine(s) made it work for me. I tried all sorts of config on the Windows side, and the Postscript driver was the key to get it going. I would verify the following steps: 1. Make sure CUPS is set up to work over the network, i.e. hook another Linux computer up and fiddle with the config until you can print from a remote CUPS client. The default CUPS install is not set up for network printing. Dunno if this is absolutely necessary, but it is one of the things I did & had working before I messed with Samba. 2. Make the smb.conf changes Antoine suggested above. This is essentially the same as mine, except I added a line "printcap name = /etc/printcap.cups". 3. I have the cupsys-bsd package installed here 4. Install a postscript driver on the Windows machine. You can get a "generic" driver (what I used) from Adobe at: > http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/main.html under "Printer Drivers". You might be able to just install an existing Postscript Driver for your printer from the Windows disk. Cheers, -Don Spoon- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Samba + CUPS + Windows 2000
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:52, Rus Foster wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have a working smb.conf for cups printing that I could have a > copy of as I just can't get it work here and starting to get annoyed at it > all here is a part of it: print command = lpr -P %p -o raw %s -r load printers = yes printing = cups [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = no path = /tmp printable = yes public = no writable = no create mode = 0700 Antoine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba + CUPS + Windows 2000
Hi, Does anyone have a working smb.conf for cups printing that I could have a copy of as I just can't get it work here and starting to get annoyed at it all Cheers Rus -- http://www.fsck.me.uk - My blog http://www.65535.net - $120 for a lifetime UNIX shell account -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On 09 Nov 2002 02:39:33 -0500, Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote: >> It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the >> Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the >> hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version >> after it had done its check. That relied on having DOS available >> underneath and probably would be much harder in 2k. It's not something >> I would really recommend! > >No, Windows 95/98/ME all do just fine without the MBR. You can have lilo >or grub steal it and windows wont even figure it out. Now Windows >NT/2000/XP all need the MBR and wont boot without it. Under these you >have to use the windows boot loader to load grub or lilo then they >continue to boot linux. Best way is probably to make a grub boot floppy >though. I am not sure Windows NT/2k/XP cares about the MBR, the 'real' bootloader they use is supposed to be at the beginning of the partition they're installed to. I used Grub (Best Bootloader Forever) on many different systems all booting multiple OS's. I always set it up in the MBR (duh) and edit my menu.lst in /boot/grub accordingly to the disks/partition/OS's I have. Then stage1 (in the MBR) looks for its beloved stage2 (sometimes stage1.5) and boots whatever is in menu.lst. If you pick Windows to start with, Grub just gives control to the Windows bootloader. The thing is You'd better install all Win systems before installing Linux so that all Windows systems share one windows bootloader containing only Windows entries, and then put only one entry in Grub to give you access to the Windows bootloader. At least that's how I do it, do not hesitate to ask if I am not clear. -- byeBye... François Le Lay Yet Another Art Project aka YAAP > http://www.yaap.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On 09 Nov 2002 02:39:33 -0500, Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote: >> It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the >> Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the >> hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version >> after it had done its check. That relied on having DOS available >> underneath and probably would be much harder in 2k. It's not something >> I would really recommend! > >No, Windows 95/98/ME all do just fine without the MBR. You can have lilo >or grub steal it and windows wont even figure it out. Now Windows >NT/2000/XP all need the MBR and wont boot without it. Under these you >have to use the windows boot loader to load grub or lilo then they >continue to boot linux. Best way is probably to make a grub boot floppy >though. Dunno about 95/ME. I dual-boot DOS6.22 and Win98SE by having 2 primary DOS partitions and swapping the bootable flag in the partition table; LOADLIN.EXE gets me from either of these to Linux. The code I inserted into my MBR examined the bootable flags and did nothing if 98 was booting. Nevertheless, 98 objected to its being there and responded by running my IDE drives in "MS-DOS compatibility mode". So it looked fine on the surface, but ran slow(er). Maybe there's some way of fooling Windoze on this issue and lilo/grub are smart enough to know about it? Pigeon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
I don't know if you've found a suitable answer for this yet or not, but I have done what you ask about in the subject line. You use dd to make a copy of the boot sector for the linux partition, you drop in the root directory of the C: drive and then edit boot.ini to include that file. Then it works just fine. The only pain about this setup is that anytime you change your linux boot sector (at least with lilo) you have to use dd again to create your boot sector file again and then copy that into the root on the c: drive again so that the changes are reflected. If you would like an example of the boot.ini entry you would need, let me know I might be able to dig one up on one my systems. vec - Original Message - From: "Nathan E Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "debian-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000 > On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 02:39:33AM -0500, Scott Henson wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote: > > > It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the > > > Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the > > > hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version > > > after it had done its check. That relied on having DOS available > > > underneath and probably would be much harder in 2k. It's not something > > > I would really recommend! > > > > No, Windows 95/98/ME all do just fine without the MBR. You can have lilo > > or grub steal it and windows wont even figure it out. Now Windows > > NT/2000/XP all need the MBR and wont boot without it. Under these you > > have to use the windows boot loader to load grub or lilo then they > > continue to boot linux. Best way is probably to make a grub boot floppy > > though. > > Not true. Win2k boots fine from grub, which is installed in the MBR > here. > > -- > Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@;incanus.net > prepBut nI vrbLike adjHungarian! qWhat's artThe adjBig nProblem? > -- alec flett @netscape > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 02:39:33AM -0500, Scott Henson wrote: > On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote: > > It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the > > Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the > > hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version > > after it had done its check. That relied on having DOS available > > underneath and probably would be much harder in 2k. It's not something > > I would really recommend! > > No, Windows 95/98/ME all do just fine without the MBR. You can have lilo > or grub steal it and windows wont even figure it out. Now Windows > NT/2000/XP all need the MBR and wont boot without it. Under these you > have to use the windows boot loader to load grub or lilo then they > continue to boot linux. Best way is probably to make a grub boot floppy > though. Not true. Win2k boots fine from grub, which is installed in the MBR here. -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@;incanus.net prepBut nI vrbLike adjHungarian! qWhat's artThe adjBig nProblem? -- alec flett @netscape -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote: > It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the > Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the > hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version > after it had done its check. That relied on having DOS available > underneath and probably would be much harder in 2k. It's not something > I would really recommend! No, Windows 95/98/ME all do just fine without the MBR. You can have lilo or grub steal it and windows wont even figure it out. Now Windows NT/2000/XP all need the MBR and wont boot without it. Under these you have to use the windows boot loader to load grub or lilo then they continue to boot linux. Best way is probably to make a grub boot floppy though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:45:40 -0500, Gleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: >> >> I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I >> do not know where to ask it anywhere else :-( >> >> I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under >> Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because >> of protected mode. > >loadlin and syslinux both work from DOS, and won't work on >Windows 2000 (Windows NT/2000/XP are not DOS-based). > > >> I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly >> cloned by Ghost and that default boot options must stay Windows. > >Lilo can be set up to boot Windows 2000 by default, just be sure to >install Linux *after* you install Windows. Grub can also be set up to >boot Windows 2000 for you. Either can be set up so that they look >innocuous to a person who might be afraid of a boot menu. > >Alternately, if you are not permitted to touch the MBR, you can make a >very flexible boot floppy with grub. After installing the Debian grub >package, you can make a grub boot floppy as simply as "grub-floppy >/dev/fd0". > >Best of Luck, >-Gleef For people who may be afraid of boot menus, maybe you could have the PC set up just to boot 2k, and make up a DOS boot floppy with LOADLIN.EXE on it run from AUTOEXEC.BAT; remove the write-protect tab and stick a big picture of Tux on it. Then you can tell people "put the penguin in to use Linux, take it out for Windoze." I guess you could make a grub floppy to do the same. It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version after it had done its check. That relied on having DOS available underneath and probably would be much harder in 2k. It's not something I would really recommend! Pigeon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: > > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I > do not know where to ask it anywhere else :-( > > I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under > Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because > of protected mode. loadlin and syslinux both work from DOS, and won't work on Windows 2000 (Windows NT/2000/XP are not DOS-based). > I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly > cloned by Ghost and that default boot options must stay Windows. Lilo can be set up to boot Windows 2000 by default, just be sure to install Linux *after* you install Windows. Grub can also be set up to boot Windows 2000 for you. Either can be set up so that they look innocuous to a person who might be afraid of a boot menu. Alternately, if you are not permitted to touch the MBR, you can make a very flexible boot floppy with grub. After installing the Debian grub package, you can make a grub boot floppy as simply as "grub-floppy /dev/fd0". Best of Luck, -Gleef -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've heard that win2k won't stand for LILO replacing its own MBR. My laptop dual-boots Win2K and Debian unstable with GRUB in the MBR, and both sides work fine. -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
Hi debian-user-digest-request! On Thu, 07 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:02:56 -0500 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On November 7, 2002 11:49 am, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: > > > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do > > > not know where to ask it anywhere else :-( > > > > > > I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under > > > Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because of > > > protected mode. > > > > > > I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly cloned by > > > Ghost > > I've heard that win2k won't stand for LILO replacing its own MBR. The > alternatives I know of are: Sure it does. I have installed Windows 2000 Server alongside on my Debian Box and it works without any problems using LILO. Could be that it is working because I use install-mbr on the mbr and have placed the LILO boot stuff into the boot partition of Linux. bye, Klaus -- | | | | | Klaus Bodo Valentin Lichti | Tel. +31-45-5670421 | | |_|_| | Nullanderstraat 72 | Mobil +49-700-99LICHTI | | | | | Fax +49-170-13-2834088 | | --^-- | 6461 GD Kerkrade / Nederland | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On Thursday 07 November 2002 10:02 am, Levi Waldron wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On November 7, 2002 11:49 am, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: > > > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do > > > not know where to ask it anywhere else :-( > > > > > > I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under > > > Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because of > > > protected mode. > > > > > > I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly cloned > > > by Ghost > > I've heard that win2k won't stand for LILO replacing its own MBR. The > alternatives I know of are: > LILO dual-booting W2K and Linux works fine for me. I have LILO on the MBR, /boot as the first partition, / as the second and Windows as the third. - Derek > 1) Put a boot floppy in when you want to boot Linux > 2) Use XOSL http://www.xosl.org - a GPL universal bootloader that's > compatible with linux and all wins. > 3) I don't know if wintoes will stand for not being on the primary hard > drive, but if it will then you could hook it up as secondary (something > other than /dev/hdb) and let linux have your MBR. > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE9yqrQTJSEdOdSWd4RAh1tAJ9SrXSl5A5xWRb9gnYZQFOHe5KB3wCfXh5k > hHZvRTmOiZ+YwRURtzGNOx4= > =+FFp > -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On November 7, 2002 11:49 am, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: > > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do > > not know where to ask it anywhere else :-( > > > > I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under > > Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because of > > protected mode. > > > > I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly cloned by > > Ghost I've heard that win2k won't stand for LILO replacing its own MBR. The alternatives I know of are: 1) Put a boot floppy in when you want to boot Linux 2) Use XOSL http://www.xosl.org - a GPL universal bootloader that's compatible with linux and all wins. 3) I don't know if wintoes will stand for not being on the primary hard drive, but if it will then you could hook it up as secondary (something other than /dev/hdb) and let linux have your MBR. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9yqrQTJSEdOdSWd4RAh1tAJ9SrXSl5A5xWRb9gnYZQFOHe5KB3wCfXh5k hHZvRTmOiZ+YwRURtzGNOx4= =+FFp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: > > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do not > know where to ask it anywhere else :-( > > I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under Windows > 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because of protected > mode. > > I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly cloned by Ghost can't? > and that default boot options must stay Windows. Surely Ghost can clone an entire hard drive, MBR and all? Even cat could handle that. Just build a machine with LILO setup to boot win2k by default, and image it... -rob msg11554/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Booting Linux from windows 2000
I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do not know where to ask it anywhere else :-( I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadlin but it does not work because of protected mode. I can modify lilo boot loader since those stations are oftenly cloned by Ghost and that default boot options must stay Windows. Anybody with an idea ? -- -- Bruno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone tried out the plex86 Debian packages to install Windows 2000?
As per the subject I'd be interesting to know whether anyone has been sucessful in installing Windows 2000 as a guest OS and whether there are any specific limitations (like only being able to run in 16 colour VGA mode). Thanks, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet sharing with linux and windows 2000
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Iv=E1n_Filpo?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My brother has windows 2000 pro on his computer and i have linux on mine. I > dont have a linux modem. > > So I want to be able to use the internet from my brothers. > > Using his computer as gateway to the internet. > > > is this possible ?. If it is tell me what to do please because i have tried > route add default gw ip eth0 and ifconfig eth0 ip and i have the ip fine. > > Please reply as soon as possible , thanks If Win2k has Internet Connection Sharing (ICS), then yes it is possible. You might consider reading the help information on your brothers win2k machine about ICS, but here's a brief explanation of how to do it: Make sure your brother has ICS installed and running (in Win98, you do: Settings->Control Panel->Network->Ethernet Card Bind the ethernet card to TCP/IP (home) to Internet Connection Sharing. This should cause the windows machine to impliment it's dhcp server, so provided you have a dhcp client on your machine (such as pump, dhcpcd, or dchp-client), your networking should be configured automally. Further, to do it on boot: # /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for ifup(8), ifdown(8) # The loopback interface iface lo inet loopback # Ethernet0 iface eth0 inet dhcp but if you want a static ip on your machine in your home then find out what your brother's ethernet card's ip address is (e.g. 192.168.1.1). Turn on ICS (also see Settings->Control Panel->Internet Options->Connections [Tabular]->Sharing [Button]), then set your ip address to something within the 192.168.1.X network, e.g. ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up (or something like that) route add default gw 192.168.1.1 and fix your /etc/resolv.conf cat > /etc/resolv.conv nameserver 192.168.1.1 Elizabeth
Internet sharing with linux and windows 2000
My brother has windows 2000 pro on his computer and i have linux on mine. I dont have a linux modem. So I want to be able to use the internet from my brothers. Using his computer as gateway to the internet. is this possible ?. If it is tell me what to do please because i have tried route add default gw ip eth0 and ifconfig eth0 ip and i have the ip fine. Please reply as soon as possible , thanks Ivan Filpo
Re: How to get networking working for windows 2000 within vmware??
Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am unclear what settings within windows 2000 i should be inputting. This isn't on topic in d-u, since vmware is a commercial product and is not packaged for debian. Try contacting vmware's tech support instead. -- Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
How to get networking working for windows 2000 within vmware??
I am unclear what settings within windows 2000 i should be inputting. I had a look at the smb.conf file vmware manages and it has entries like: lsof -i: vmware-nm 1486 root7u IPv4 1710 UDP 172.16.61.1:netbios-ns vmware-nm 1486 root8u IPv4 1715 UDP 172.16.61.1:netbios-dgm vmware-sm 1488 root5u IPv4 1722 TCP 172.16.61.1:netbios-ssn (LISTEN) Is this suppose the IP I put in during the windows networking option under LAN? I include the smb.conf file from vmware: It looks like I have to enable the hosts allow line? Since it seems to be commented out? -walter ps. Anyone who has windows 2000 network working within vmware with a host-only configuration please enlighten me. I keep getting an error message from the windows configuration tool about an incorrect mask. ; ; Configuration file for Samba 2.0.6 vmware-[sn]mbd operating on vmnet1. ; ; This file was automatically generated by the VMware configuration program. ; If you modify it, it will be backed up the next time you run the ; configuration program. ; ; Global settings [global] ; ; Identity ; ; Allow several Samba servers on different subnet without conflicts socket address = 172.16.61.1 interfaces = 172.16.61.0/255.255.255.0 bind interfaces only = yes ; Workgroup the host belongs to workgroup = WORKGROUP ; SMB name of the host (the hostname by default) ; netbios name = ; Description of the host server string = VMware host ; ; Access ; ; Allow connections from ; Beware: if we use this directive, smbd will try to do a reverse resolution ; of the guest IP. If the host is disconnected from the network and uses ; named, that reverse resolution will take a long time, and the smb client ; (the guest) will give up waiting for a smb reply before the reverse ; resolution timeout occurs :( ; Because it doesn't add any real security, we don't use this --hpreg ; hosts allow = 172.16.61.0/255.255.255.0 ; Authentication scheme security = user encrypt passwords = yes ; ; Options ; ; Automatically load the printer list (from /etc/printcap by default) load printers = yes ; Gives better performance socket options = TCP_NODELAY ; VMware extension to use a different shared memory access key on each ; Samba server running on this host sysv shm key = /dev/vmnet1 ; ; Files and directories ; ; Debug log for _both_ daemons ; log file = /etc/vmware/vmnet1/smb/var/log.smb ; log level = 1 ; Max log size in KB ; max log size = 50 ; Locks lock directory = /etc/vmware/vmnet1/smb/var/locks ; SMB passwords smb passwd file = /etc/vmware/vmnet1/smb/private/smbpasswd ; VMware extension to use codepages in a different directory codepage dir = /usr/local/lib/vmware/smb/codepages ; ; Name browsing ; ; Allow the host to participate in master browser elections local master = yes ; Force a local browser election upon startup ; We need that otherwise it takes a long time before the windows network is ; browsable preferred master = yes ; Do not try to resolve SMB names via DNS dns proxy = no ; ; Shared resources ; ; Home directories [homes] comment = Home directories browseable = no writable = yes ; Printers [printers] comment = All printers path = /var/lpd browseable = no guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes [HostFS] comment = VMware host filesystem path = / public = no writeable = yes printable = no
Re: windows 2000 DHCP servers
On Thu, 2001-09-13 at 16:57, David L. Nicol wrote: > > we have windows 2000 DHCP servers, and the potato installation > disks will not obtain configuration information from them. > > The redhat install disks do, though. > Are the redhat disks using pump? I'm not sure what dhcp client is on the disks you are using, is it also pump? --mike
windows 2000 DHCP servers
we have windows 2000 DHCP servers, and the potato installation disks will not obtain configuration information from them. The redhat install disks do, though. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 .sig file closed by executive order
Windows 2000
Hi, I need to set up one windows 2000 machine inside our Debian only network. Of course I don't want to set up a complete 2000 domain etc., but I also do not like to have two different authetifications. Before I start digging through the possibilites (sambe as domain controller, ldap, kerberos, etc.) I wonder if anyone else had the same problem and could tell me how he solved it. Thanks for any idea. Michael P.S.: Please CC me on replies since I'm not subscribed to -user. -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:25:01PM +, Darryl Röthering wrote: | But I want to get the bootsector from linux to copy into Windoze. | | Now, as I sit here looking at the /boot I see two possibilities: | | boot.b | boot.0301 | | Which is the one I want to capture & is the syntax just: | | dd boot.b > floppy | | ?? Which boot loader are you using? If you use lilo , make sure your /etc/lilo.conf file is correct (or else you will end up with an unbootable system) and run 'lilo' (you might need some CL options, try man lilo to find out). If you use grub, just enter the command mode of it (during bootup) and type setup (hd0) to put grub on the MBR of hd0. If you mess up with grub, you can just enter command mode and try again :-). (You can even boot by entering the commands manually). Then set /boot/grub/menu.lst to the proper configuration. Some other notes re grub : o make sure stage2 and menu.lst are in the same directory o make sure they are on the hard drive, and you specified the hard drive in the 'setup' command (the first time I put it on MBR was from booting with a floppy -- I specified to get the other stuff from the floppy and as a result the MBR needed the floppy for booting. I then (haveing already put stage2 and menu.lst on the harddrive) specified the hd to install from and it was fine) o you can put stage2 and menu.lst on any partition -- all partitions are labeled '/' by grub because it doesn't know how any os's mount the partitions. (/boot/grub can be on your windows partition if you want it to be) The main restriction here is the filesystem must be of a supported type (ext2 vfat minix and others -- see grub documentation for more details) HTH, -D
coexistence with Windows 2000
Apologies in advance. Through delete-itis, I inadvertently lost the good advice I receive for my Debian coexistence with windows. I got everything set up ok & I can now boot Linux by using a boot floppy. My default MBR is still Windows 2000, so without the boot floppy in I get Windoze. But I want to get the bootsector from linux to copy into Windoze. Now, as I sit here looking at the /boot I see two possibilities: boot.b boot.0301 Which is the one I want to capture & is the syntax just: dd boot.b > floppy ?? TIA, Regards, Darryl _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
> There is no particular order for installing any windows / linux config. BUT > ... (taratatata) > If you install Linux first and have installed LILO into the MBR (i believe > any) windows installation later on will simply clear the MBR so you'll be > unable to boot into Linux but you system will default boot into Windows. > > ---> Keep a Boot diskette handy (AND working) at all time to resolve this : > remove LiLo and reinstall LiLo > > With windows 2000 (NT is friendlier) things get more complicated since these > versions use their own bootloader and it's a pest. I had to install windows > 2000 and configure a third-party bootmanager to be able to still boot into > Linux (powerquest to the rescue). Lilo and the win2k bootloader decided to > bit each others tails and there was no easy way to solve this (i mean a 30 > second solution). I KNOW there are ways to multi-boot win2k and linux easily > but it's a mess to set this up since win2k is a bootloader fascist by nature > and yes this evolution (hint win98 was quite 'natural'). I guess that if you > use the win2k bootloader to boot the linux /boot or / partition (depends on > your setup) you'll be happy ever after but i'm not very confident it will be > an easy thing to do. Actually, I got Windows 2000 and Lilo working together without problems, much to my surprise. I had win2k installed first and then added Debian afterwards. My install went like this: 1. Windows 2000 installed on /dev/hda 2. Installed Debian on a free partition. 3. Set up Lilo to allow boot from Debian or chain boot from /dev/hda. Told Lilo to install itself on the master boot record. If you are running Woody, you can select your windows 2000 partition to be booted from as another OS. Here's my lilo.conf: - boot=/dev/hda root=/dev/hda6# This is my linux root partition install=/boot/boot-menu.b map=/boot/map menu-title="Lapdog" prompt timeout=50 vga=EXT compact lba32 read-only image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2# This is my default boot: Linux label=2.4.2 other=/dev/hda1# This is my Windows 2000 partition label="Windows 2000" table=/dev/hda - So now I can select in Lilo where I want to go, or not, today... Have fun, Chris
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
Just to throw a spanner clean into the works on this issue, I have Windows 2000 pro and linux dual booting here on my machine. I had debian set up, did the 2000 install, and it never even touched the bootloader. Even to the point of when the install was finished, I even had lilo still intact and functioning. Don't ask me why, and a lot of people seem to have problems dual booting these 2, but, for me, it was a very basic process, as I didn't even need a boot disk to get lilo back. Peter Good. Joris Lambrecht wrote: > > There is no particular order for installing any windows / linux config. BUT > ... (taratatata) > If you install Linux first and have installed LILO into the MBR (i believe > any) windows installation later on will simply clear the MBR so you'll be > unable to boot into Linux but you system will default boot into Windows. > > ---> Keep a Boot diskette handy (AND working) at all time to resolve this : > remove LiLo and reinstall LiLo > > With windows 2000 (NT is friendlier) things get more complicated since these > versions use their own bootloader and it's a pest. I had to install windows > 2000 and configure a third-party bootmanager to be able to still boot into > Linux (powerquest to the rescue). Lilo and the win2k bootloader decided to > bit each others tails and there was no easy way to solve this (i mean a 30 > second solution). I KNOW there are ways to multi-boot win2k and linux easily > but it's a mess to set this up since win2k is a bootloader fascist by nature > and yes this evolution (hint win98 was quite 'natural'). I guess that if you > use the win2k bootloader to boot the linux /boot or / partition (depends on > your setup) you'll be happy ever after but i'm not very confident it will be > an easy thing to do.
RE: coexistence with Windows 2000
There is no particular order for installing any windows / linux config. BUT ... (taratatata) If you install Linux first and have installed LILO into the MBR (i believe any) windows installation later on will simply clear the MBR so you'll be unable to boot into Linux but you system will default boot into Windows. ---> Keep a Boot diskette handy (AND working) at all time to resolve this : remove LiLo and reinstall LiLo With windows 2000 (NT is friendlier) things get more complicated since these versions use their own bootloader and it's a pest. I had to install windows 2000 and configure a third-party bootmanager to be able to still boot into Linux (powerquest to the rescue). Lilo and the win2k bootloader decided to bit each others tails and there was no easy way to solve this (i mean a 30 second solution). I KNOW there are ways to multi-boot win2k and linux easily but it's a mess to set this up since win2k is a bootloader fascist by nature and yes this evolution (hint win98 was quite 'natural'). I guess that if you use the win2k bootloader to boot the linux /boot or / partition (depends on your setup) you'll be happy ever after but i'm not very confident it will be an easy thing to do. To put it mildly, if you don't need win2k don't use it, it's rather *cough,cough* good and _seemed_ well built but it's not needed if just in need for some windows specific gizmo's like games and or :-( a canon d660u scanner. Greetings, Joris -Original Message- From: Darryl Rthering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 22 maart 2001 14:18 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: coexistence with Windows 2000 Casper, et. al.: Sorry I got distracted from this thread. If I am understanding this lilo.conf properly, I have a question and would appreciate comments on my rough plan to install, to see if I am missing something or if it should work. TIA for the help. (1) When the lilo.conf points to /dev/hda1 , and when I select this Windows boot from the set of boot choices, does it then invoke automatically the boot.ini found in my c root drive? Does it know what to invoke in order to bring up the Windows software? Do I still get the choices to bring it up in safe mode, etc.? (2) My tentative plan for adding in Debian. current partitioning of Windows 2000 a. harddisk C: 2G NTFS w Windows 2000 installed here D: 2G FAT32 b. use FIPS to get windows 2000 out of the end of the C drive c. repartition C: drive I want to get C: ~ 1G w/ windows 2000 swap: 500 Meg linux root: remainder ~ 1G d. install Debian e. edit lilo.conf to make sure it points an option to my windows partition. f. run lilo. g. reboot. The only thing that gives me pause on this plan is Dieter's comment that he is running both Potato & Windows, but that he "had" to install Debian first and doesnt know how to alter the installation sequence. If there is no way to do this, then I will have to reinstall windows 2000, I guess. Any comments? Regards, Darryl _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
Casper, et. al.: Sorry I got distracted from this thread. If I am understanding this lilo.conf properly, I have a question and would appreciate comments on my rough plan to install, to see if I am missing something or if it should work. TIA for the help. (1) When the lilo.conf points to /dev/hda1 , and when I select this Windows boot from the set of boot choices, does it then invoke automatically the boot.ini found in my c root drive? Does it know what to invoke in order to bring up the Windows software? Do I still get the choices to bring it up in safe mode, etc.? (2) My tentative plan for adding in Debian. current partitioning of Windows 2000 a. harddisk C: 2G NTFS w Windows 2000 installed here D: 2G FAT32 b. use FIPS to get windows 2000 out of the end of the C drive c. repartition C: drive I want to get C: ~ 1G w/ windows 2000 swap: 500 Meg linux root: remainder ~ 1G d. install Debian e. edit lilo.conf to make sure it points an option to my windows partition. f. run lilo. g. reboot. The only thing that gives me pause on this plan is Dieter's comment that he is running both Potato & Windows, but that he "had" to install Debian first and doesnt know how to alter the installation sequence. If there is no way to do this, then I will have to reinstall windows 2000, I guess. Any comments? Regards, Darryl _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
Hello, I'm running Debian (Potato) and Windoze2000 on one machine. Here are my experiences: First of all, they coexist peacefully! :-) 1) Install Debian 2) Edit lilo.conf: (--> attachment: my lilo.conf) 3) Don't forget to run lilo! 4) Install Windows 2000 (first make sure to apply the right boot sequence in your bios setup [e.g. "CDROM, A, C" when installing Windows from a CD]) 5) Reboot: You should now see an option menu like: Boot: 1) Linux 2) Windows 6) Have fun running two OSs on your machine. Cheers Dieter PS: Since I assume that you are already running Win2000, I have to confess that I don't know how to alter this installation sequence. I _had_to_ install Debian first. > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Darryl Röthering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. März 2001 21:37 > An: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Betreff: coexistence with Windows 2000 > > > Dear all: > > As much as I would like to just wipe out Windows, I have to have > it for some > support purposes (work). However, I would like to repartition and > get Debian > up. > > I have been reading and re-reading "tfm," but wonder if anyone has any > experience on this. > > I put up slink with just the floppies on an old throwaway system > a year ago, > but I don't see how I can use lilo to switch between Windows and > debian. I > can use the lilo.conf file to point to other kernels, but what > entries do I > put there to boot up a Windows session? > > Could someone with experience explain how this is done? I need a > little more > comfort level on this before I get started. > > TIA. > > Darryl > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > lilo.conf Description: Binary data
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:37:29PM +, Darryl R?thering wrote: > I put up slink with just the floppies on an old throwaway system a year ago, > but I don't see how I can use lilo to switch between Windows and debian. I > can use the lilo.conf file to point to other kernels, but what entries do I > put there to boot up a Windows session? > Quick guide: -create some unpartioned space on your disk to install linux to -use bootfloppies and install linux -write /etc/lilo.conf (I've attached mine) -run lilo -be happy -- Casper Gielen -- People just generally like to disagree. Bill Joy boot=/dev/hda root=/dev/hda3 # my linux root partition, yours is probably different delay=200 map=/boot/map compact read-only default=l image=/vmlinuz # linux label=l image=/vmlinuz.old # linux backup label=o other=/dev/hda1 # windows label=w table=/dev/hda
Re: coexistence with Windows 2000
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 21:37:29 +, Darryl Röthering wrote: > I can use the lilo.conf file to point to other kernels, but what entries > do I put there to boot up a Windows session? You need an entry with other=[partition] and table=[drive]. HTH, Ray -- RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may not be a better one than the one the blocks live in but it'll be a sight more vivid. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
coexistence with Windows 2000
Dear all: As much as I would like to just wipe out Windows, I have to have it for some support purposes (work). However, I would like to repartition and get Debian up. I have been reading and re-reading "tfm," but wonder if anyone has any experience on this. I put up slink with just the floppies on an old throwaway system a year ago, but I don't see how I can use lilo to switch between Windows and debian. I can use the lilo.conf file to point to other kernels, but what entries do I put there to boot up a Windows session? Could someone with experience explain how this is done? I need a little more comfort level on this before I get started. TIA. Darryl _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Upgraded to Windows 2000 - now all files saved are corrupt
I installed Win2k on two workstations now all the files I open and save back to my Debian 2.2 file server are corrupt, filled with nonesense (probably nulls). I downloaded and upgraded samba to 2.0.7 but the problem still persists. Can anyone help me with this problem? Chris MasonBox 340, The Valley, Anguilla, British West IndiesTel: 264 497 5670 Fax: 264 497 8463USA Fax (561) 382-7771Take a virtual tour of the islandhttp://net.ai/ The Anguilla GuideFind out more about NetConceptswww.netconcepts.aiTalk to me in real time with Instant Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]SignatureF331 8AD1 36FB B3B0 DF9F D95B 8024 D1EA 7450 D50C ..
RE: Windows 2000 and Telnet
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Guettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 10:50 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Windows 2000 and Telnet > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:02:01AM -0500, Brooks R. Robinson wrote: > > Greetings, > > I use mostly Microsoft products at work (I can't help it, > they make me), > > and I recently went to Windows 2000. Fortunately, instead having to go > > through an MS proxy server, I negotiated a direct connection to the > > internet. So, I have a system with dual NIC's (one to the > internal network, > > and one to the internet via DSL) running Windows 2000. > > Most everything is okay except my connection to the > internet seems to have > > problems. I can browse without problems, my e-mail works just > fine, and I > > can ping to my heart's content. > > I cannot, however, FTP or telnet out! I do have a few > linux boxen that I > > take care of, not being able to connect is a severe problem. > Anyone have > > similar problems? Anyone with a resolution? I don't have a > choice to go > > "down" in version, so I am thoroughly stuck. Help, help, help! > > Do you use masquerading or does your internal network have offical IPs? > I think w2k does some filtering check the configuration. I have a direct/public IP address, no masquerading. I am going through every possible configuration screen, including their deranged version of security, trying to shut down as much as possible (scary huh), but once I find what is preventing my connection I will go back and turn things back on one at a time. > > -- > Thomas Guettler > Office: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.interface-business.de > Private:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://yi.org/guettli > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe > [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >
Re: Windows 2000 and Telnet
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:02:01AM -0500, Brooks R. Robinson wrote: > Greetings, > I use mostly Microsoft products at work (I can't help it, they make me), > and I recently went to Windows 2000. Fortunately, instead having to go > through an MS proxy server, I negotiated a direct connection to the > internet. So, I have a system with dual NIC's (one to the internal network, > and one to the internet via DSL) running Windows 2000. > Most everything is okay except my connection to the internet seems to > have > problems. I can browse without problems, my e-mail works just fine, and I > can ping to my heart's content. > I cannot, however, FTP or telnet out! I do have a few linux boxen that > I > take care of, not being able to connect is a severe problem. Anyone have > similar problems? Anyone with a resolution? I don't have a choice to go > "down" in version, so I am thoroughly stuck. Help, help, help! Do you use masquerading or does your internal network have offical IPs? I think w2k does some filtering check the configuration. -- Thomas Guettler Office: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.interface-business.de Private:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://yi.org/guettli
Windows 2000 and Telnet
Greetings, I use mostly Microsoft products at work (I can't help it, they make me), and I recently went to Windows 2000. Fortunately, instead having to go through an MS proxy server, I negotiated a direct connection to the internet. So, I have a system with dual NIC's (one to the internal network, and one to the internet via DSL) running Windows 2000. Most everything is okay except my connection to the internet seems to have problems. I can browse without problems, my e-mail works just fine, and I can ping to my heart's content. I cannot, however, FTP or telnet out! I do have a few linux boxen that I take care of, not being able to connect is a severe problem. Anyone have similar problems? Anyone with a resolution? I don't have a choice to go "down" in version, so I am thoroughly stuck. Help, help, help! Thanks, Brooks
Re: Windows 2000 boot loader
I've installed without problem win2k and Deb 2.2 (using lilo as boot loader). There's a mini how to linux+NT just follows it. pch To: debian-user@lists.debian.org cc: (bcc: Patrick Charbonnier) Date: 15/10/2000 22:48 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Windows 2000 boot loader Has anyone succesfully replaced the Windows 2000 boot loader with LILO ? I have a Win2000/DOS boot machine, but I'm afraid to attempt installing LILO on hda in case Win2000 needs to be there. It's my work computer and if I stuff it up I'll be in big trouble. Matthew Sherborne winmail.dat Description: Binary data ***Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
Re: Windows 2000 boot loader
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Matthew Sherborne wrote:
> Has anyone succesfully replaced the Windows 2000 boot loader with LILO ?
>
> I have a Win2000/DOS boot machine, but I'm afraid to attempt installing LILO
> on hda in case Win2000 needs to be there. It's my work computer and if I
> stuff it up I'll be in big trouble.
Yes. It works.
My partition layout is:
NameFlags Part Type FS Type [Label]Size (MB)
--
hda1Primary Unknown (DE)16.46
hda2Primary Linux ext2 32.91
hda3BootPrimary NTFS 5996.23
hda5Logical Linux swap 131.61
hda6Logical Linux 131.61
hda7Logical Linux ext25996.23
NameFlags Part Type FS Type [Label]Size (MB)
--
hdb1Primary FAT12[NO NAME] 16.46
hdb2Primary Linux ext2 32.91
hdb3Primary NTFS 5996.23
hdb5Logical Linux swap 131.61
hdb6Logical Linux ext2 131.61
hdb7Logical Linux 5996.23
Win2000 has:
/dev/hda3 on c:
/dev/hdb3 on d: or e: (I don't remember which)
Debian has:
/dev/hda7 on /
/dev/hda2 on /boot
/dev/hdb6 on /tmp
The pertinent part of my /etc/lilo.conf follows my signature.
I've also done the reverse, although with NT, not Win2000. That is, I used
the NT boot loader. That works, too.
Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Technology Services
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 319-335-, fax: 319-335-5505
# Support LBA for large hard disks.
#
lba32
# Specifies the boot device. This is where Lilo installs its boot
# block. It can be either a partition, or the raw device, in which
# case it installs in the MBR, and will overwrite the current MBR.
#
boot=/dev/hda
# Specifies the device that should be mounted as root. (`/')
#
root=/dev/hda7
# Installs the specified file as the new boot sector
#
install=/boot/boot.b
# Specifies the location of the map file
#
map=/boot/map
# Specifies the number of deciseconds (0.1 seconds) LILO should
# wait before booting the first image.
#
# delay=100
# You can put a customized boot message up if you like. If you use
# `prompt', and this computer may need to reboot unattended, you
# must specify a `timeout', or it will sit there forever waiting
# for a keypress. `single-key' goes with the `alias' lines in the
# `image' configurations below. eg: You can press `1' to boot
# `Linux', `2' to boot `LinuxOLD', if you uncomment the `alias'.
#
message=/boot/bootmess.txt
prompt
timeout=100
single-key
# Specifies the VGA text mode at boot time. (normal, extended, ask, )
vga=normal
# Boot up Windows by default.
#
default=Win2000
# enable frame buffers for consoles via matroxfb
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
append="video=matrox:vesa:447 video=scrollback:64k video=vc:1-5"
alias=2
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux.nofb
read-only
alias=3
# Windows 2000
other=/dev/hda3
label=Win2000
alias=1
RE: Windows 2000 boot loader
i wouldn't replace it, but simply add linux to the menu so each os can safely coexist. here is a little utility that will do that for you, provided you install LILO at the beginning of your root partition, and NOT the mbr. http://www.winimage.com/bootpart.htm Jason > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Sherborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 3:49 PM > To: debian user > Subject: Windows 2000 boot loader > > Has anyone succesfully replaced the Windows 2000 boot loader with LILO ? > > I have a Win2000/DOS boot machine, but I'm afraid to attempt installing > LILO on hda in case Win2000 needs to be there. It's my work computer and > if I stuff it up I'll be in big trouble. > > Matthew Sherborne <>
Windows 2000 boot loader
Has anyone succesfully replaced the Windows 2000 boot loader with LILO ? I have a Win2000/DOS boot machine, but I'm afraid to attempt installing LILO on hda in case Win2000 needs to be there. It's my work computer and if I stuff it up I'll be in big trouble. Matthew Sherborne <>
Re: WINE and Windows 2000?
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 09:35:02AM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote: > Does anyone know if WINE can run Windows apps if Windows 2000 is > installed rather than Windows 98? A guy at the office successfully (?) loaded Win2K with WMWare on his Linux box and things generally work in that. No info for WINE for you, sorry. The installation was painfully slow and so is running the OS in a window, but if you badly need some particular software, it might be an option. -- Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2 Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others. pgp7r9FIP51e7.pgp Description: PGP signature
WINE and Windows 2000?
Does anyone know if WINE can run Windows apps if Windows 2000 is installed rather than Windows 98? Cheers. -- Phillip Deackes Using Storm Linux 2000
