Re: Rationale for GRs

2011-03-14 Thread Peter Samuelson 

[Matthew Vernon]
 I would like to propose, therefore, the requirement that anyone
 proposing a GR be required to provide a short (no more than, say, 500
 words) summary of why they believe the GR to be necessary. A similar
 requirement would apply to those proposing an amendment.

If the rationale is a required part of a GR, should it be treated as
normative or informative?  In other words, if I agree with the text of
a GR, but disagree with its posted rationale, am I supposed to vote for
or against it?
-- 
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110314185704.ga30...@p12n.org

Re: DPL elections 2011: Candidates

2011-03-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx 
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project 
Secretary wrote:
 
 The platform will be made available when it's ready at:
 http://www.debian.org/vote/2011/vote_001
 
 I expect it to be there on monday.

It's available now, atleast on the mirror I used.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110314234614.ga13...@roeckx.be