DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18400] - add failonerror to target
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400 add failonerror to target [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-23 21:15 --- jhuang: have you looked at the trycatch stuff in ant-contrib.sf.net? These would seem to meet your needs in a cleaner, more structured manner. I dont see any likelihood that targets will add failonerror; try/catch is a better model as you can detect and act on failure, rather than just ignore it,
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18400] - add failonerror to target
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400 add failonerror to target --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-10 12:47 --- Maybe the try-Task of Ant-Contrib would help you.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18400] - add failonerror to target
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400 add failonerror to target --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-27 17:05 --- What you are describing somewhat breaks the notion of dependancies as things that the target depends on for proper functioning. Perhaps adding a failonerror to antcall would make more sense. it might look something like this... target name=report antcall target=t1 failonerror=false/ antcall target=t2 failonerror=false/ !-- do report type stuff here -- /target Personally I think dependancies should be dependancies, though being able to call a target such that it's failure is not fatal to the build might be useful to support in some form. I havn't used it, but I think the ant-contrib trycatch task might solve your problem until some action is taken on this. Try this link: http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/ant-contrib/manual/tasks/index.html
