Re: [VFS] Code Review Tool?

[Mark Fortner]

Bernd,
That looks interesting, but I don't see any way to publish the review.  The
nice thing about Crucible is that it's web-based and integrated with JIRA.

Cheers,

Mark



On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> Am 08.08.2013, 20:03 Uhr, schrieb Mark Fortner :
>
>
>  Recently Bernd posted a code review of a few of the RAM provider classes.
>> That kind of feedback is very useful, and it made me wonder if there was a
>> standard way within commons to do code reviews?  I know that apache makes
>> a
>> lot of use of Atlassian software, and I've used their Crucible code review
>> tool before.  Is Crucible available for use?  Or is there some other
>> approach that should be used?
>>
>
> I cant speak for Apache Commons, but if you want me to use a tool in the
> future, I could use Jupiter(Eclipse) it kind of works without the need for
> any server project infrastructure.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/**jupiter-eclipse-plugin/wiki/**UserGuide
>
> Greetings
> Bernd
> --
> http://www.zusammenkunft.net
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VFS] Code Review Tool?

[Gary Gregory]

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> Am 08.08.2013, 20:03 Uhr, schrieb Mark Fortner :
>
>
>  Recently Bernd posted a code review of a few of the RAM provider classes.
>> That kind of feedback is very useful, and it made me wonder if there was a
>> standard way within commons to do code reviews?  I know that apache makes
>> a
>> lot of use of Atlassian software, and I've used their Crucible code review
>> tool before.  Is Crucible available for use?  Or is there some other
>> approach that should be used?
>>
>
> I cant speak for Apache Commons, but if you want me to use a tool in the
> future, I could use Jupiter(Eclipse) it kind of works without the need for
> any server project infrastructure.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/**jupiter-eclipse-plugin/wiki/**UserGuide
>

I'm not sure I want yet another tool to fiddle with, does it work with
Eclipse 4.3?

Between the ML and JIRA, we do reach the right audience. I love Eclipse,
but I know other people love other IDEs too.

Gary

>
> Greetings
> Bernd
> --
> http://www.zusammenkunft.net
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
JUnit in Action, Second Edition 
Spring Batch in Action 
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Re: [VFS] Code Review Tool?

[Bernd Eckenfels]

Am 08.08.2013, 20:03 Uhr, schrieb Mark Fortner :


Recently Bernd posted a code review of a few of the RAM provider classes.
That kind of feedback is very useful, and it made me wonder if there was  
a
standard way within commons to do code reviews?  I know that apache  
makes a
lot of use of Atlassian software, and I've used their Crucible code  
review

tool before.  Is Crucible available for use?  Or is there some other
approach that should be used?


I cant speak for Apache Commons, but if you want me to use a tool in the  
future, I could use Jupiter(Eclipse) it kind of works without the need for  
any server project infrastructure.


http://code.google.com/p/jupiter-eclipse-plugin/wiki/UserGuide

Greetings
Bernd
--
http://www.zusammenkunft.net

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[VFS] Code Review Tool?

[Mark Fortner]

Recently Bernd posted a code review of a few of the RAM provider classes.
That kind of feedback is very useful, and it made me wonder if there was a
standard way within commons to do code reviews?  I know that apache makes a
lot of use of Atlassian software, and I've used their Crucible code review
tool before.  Is Crucible available for use?  Or is there some other
approach that should be used?

Cheers,

Mark