Re: Release Notes pages
I like this, the whole thing. +1 from me. On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Agreed, I was about to post something on reddit for ds and noticed there > was no release page. > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Pete Muir wrote: > > > +1 this is something I’ve heard a lot of people ask for, and will make > > getting the word out about DS much easier. > > > > On 7 Sep 2014, at 16:06, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > > include > > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about > > what > > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps > > even > > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > > > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Re: Release Notes pages
Agreed, I was about to post something on reddit for ds and noticed there was no release page. On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Pete Muir wrote: > +1 this is something I’ve heard a lot of people ask for, and will make > getting the word out about DS much easier. > > On 7 Sep 2014, at 16:06, John D. Ament wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > include > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about > what > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps > even > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > >
Re: Release Notes pages
If no one has any objections, I'd like to move foward with using openhub for the contributors list. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > @john: > i'm not sure if romain finished all his plans with this site. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2014-09-07 21:38 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > > > Hi > > > > Seems like maintaining the csv file is a PITA. It's missing some newer > > committers. It also looks clearer to me who is actually active in the > > project, vs the csv file, especially at [1]. > > > > [1]: > https://www.openhub.net/p/DeltaSpike/contributors?query=&sort=commits > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > @openhub - fyi: > > > we have a contributors page already (see [1]). > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/contributors.html > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-09-07 17:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > > > > > > > What a great page! I did not know about Double-Submit prevention > > feature > > > > and I was actually investigating how to solve it just now :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 September 2014 17:06, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > > > > include > > > > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information > about > > > > what > > > > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I > was > > > > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and > perhaps > > > > even > > > > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > > > > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Release Notes pages
+1 this is something I’ve heard a lot of people ask for, and will make getting the word out about DS much easier. On 7 Sep 2014, at 16:06, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi all > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them include > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about what > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps even > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html
Re: Release Notes pages
@john: i'm not sure if romain finished all his plans with this site. regards, gerhard 2014-09-07 21:38 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > Hi > > Seems like maintaining the csv file is a PITA. It's missing some newer > committers. It also looks clearer to me who is actually active in the > project, vs the csv file, especially at [1]. > > [1]: https://www.openhub.net/p/DeltaSpike/contributors?query=&sort=commits > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi john, > > > > @openhub - fyi: > > we have a contributors page already (see [1]). > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/contributors.html > > > > > > > > 2014-09-07 17:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > > > > > What a great page! I did not know about Double-Submit prevention > feature > > > and I was actually investigating how to solve it just now :-) > > > > > > > > > On 7 September 2014 17:06, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > > > include > > > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about > > > what > > > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > > > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps > > > even > > > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Release Notes pages
Hi Seems like maintaining the csv file is a PITA. It's missing some newer committers. It also looks clearer to me who is actually active in the project, vs the csv file, especially at [1]. [1]: https://www.openhub.net/p/DeltaSpike/contributors?query=&sort=commits On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Gerhard Petracek < gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi john, > > @openhub - fyi: > we have a contributors page already (see [1]). > > regards, > gerhard > > [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/contributors.html > > > > 2014-09-07 17:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > > > What a great page! I did not know about Double-Submit prevention feature > > and I was actually investigating how to solve it just now :-) > > > > > > On 7 September 2014 17:06, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > > include > > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about > > what > > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps > > even > > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > > > > > >
Re: Release Notes pages
hi john, @openhub - fyi: we have a contributors page already (see [1]). regards, gerhard [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/contributors.html 2014-09-07 17:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > What a great page! I did not know about Double-Submit prevention feature > and I was actually investigating how to solve it just now :-) > > > On 7 September 2014 17:06, John D. Ament wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > include > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about > what > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps > even > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > > >
Re: Release Notes pages
What a great page! I did not know about Double-Submit prevention feature and I was actually investigating how to solve it just now :-) On 7 September 2014 17:06, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi all > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them include > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about what > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps even > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html >
Release Notes pages
Hi all I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them include dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information about what went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I was wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and perhaps even merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. Here's a prototype page: [1]. http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html