Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. For the 0.7 release it has been decided because it is too much work to change it before the 0.7. The wider update is scheduled for 0.8. Images stay put for now. xdocs remains as is for now. raw content (other than images) goes alongside xdocs All that needs doing is the docs get updated for the 0.7 release. Ross
Re: [RT] Directory structure and configuration
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: It was setup like that so you do not need to copy images accross. I think that it was used just for the skin. If we move already the skin out (under /skin) then we should put them within the content directory as they are conten as well. OK so unless anybody objects, we'll do away with a separate folder for images and have them along the transformed content. I will be away till Tuesday, after that I'll try to summarize the current state of our discussion. -- Ferdinand Soethe
Re: [RT] Directory structure and configuration
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Juan Jose Pablos wrote: It was setup like that so you do not need to copy images accross. I think that it was used just for the skin. If we move already the skin out (under /skin) then we should put them within the content directory as they are conten as well. OK so unless anybody objects, we'll do away with a separate folder for images and have them along the transformed content. I'm -1 for this *before* the 0.7 release, but +0 for it after the 0.7 release. Ross
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ross Gardler wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. For the 0.7 release it has been decided because it is too much work to change it before the 0.7. The wider update is scheduled for 0.8. Images stay put for now. xdocs remains as is for now. If this needs to be done. The sooner, the better. raw content (other than images) goes alongside xdocs All that needs doing is the docs get updated for the 0.7 release. Ross
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. For the 0.7 release it has been decided because it is too much work to change it before the 0.7. The wider update is scheduled for 0.8. Images stay put for now. xdocs remains as is for now. If this needs to be done. The sooner, the better. This is only one part of a more wide ranging change. It requires a big clean up of docs, which will take some time. These cahnges are scheduled for 0.8 and have been (http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-187 ). 0.7 is already well overdue and it is important we get it out. I am -1 on delaying it any further. Ross
[JIRA] Closed: (FOR-227) static html site: index.html missing in links
Message: The following issue has been closed. Resolver: Ross Gardler Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 8:42 PM The missing links issue is now in the FAQ: http://forrest.apache.org/0.7/docs/faq.html#defaultStartPage I've not applied the breadcrumbs patch as it assumes that the page referred to is a index.html and we cannot make this assumption. instead I have added a comment to skinconf.xml pointing out the breadcrumb href must point to a file. - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-227 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key: FOR-227 Summary: static html site: index.html missing in links Type: Bug Status: Closed Priority: Minor Resolution: WON'T FIX Project: Forrest Fix Fors: 0.7-dev Versions: 0.6 Assignee: Ross Gardler Reporter: Johannes Schaefer Created: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 5:10 PM Updated: Thu, 12 May 2005 8:42 PM Environment: any Description: When creating a static html site (running command forrest) links in the document that point to a directory (index.html) are broken when using the site without a server (file://) To fix: add the filename to the links, i.e. create a href=../chapter1/index.html instead of a href=../chapter1/ - JIRA INFORMATION: This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.cocoondev.org//secure/Administrators.jspa If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
AW: 0.7 is nearly there
Title: AW: 0.7 is nearly there On May 19th Ant 1.6.4 will be released [1], if you want to include that, maybe one or two weeks later for testing? Jan [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev=111570775312127=2 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 04:04 An: dev@forrest.apache.org Betreff: Re: 0.7 is nearly there Ross Gardler wrote: There are now only 5 issues open on the 0.7 release. 3 of them are documentation issues, so anyone can pitch in here. 2 of them are Cocoon issues and will either be fixed with a cocoon upgrade, or we will not be able to fix them for 0.7 Is it time we planned for a release date? (again) Yes, i believe it is. Let us suggest some dates. --David
