[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-7.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-7.x-Linux/4/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

33 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([5BB00AA1D120CE11:7A8CC359BB1A2E75]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testComman

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk-9) - Build # 488 - Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-MacOSX/488/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

5 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader

Error Message:
Doc with id=4 not found in 
http://127.0.0.1:52397/solr/outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-false due to: 
Path not found: /id; rsp={doc=null}

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Doc with id=4 not found in 
http://127.0.0.1:52397/solr/outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-false due to: 
Path not found: /id; rsp={doc=null}
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3EBBA6FA19AD0E54:405086EADACA016E]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.assertDocExists(TestCloudConsistency.java:250)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.assertDocsExistInAllReplicas(TestCloudConsistency.java:234)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader(TestCloudConsistency.java:127)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader(TestCloudConsistency.java:90)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12060) Sor suggest component failure

2018-03-06 Thread Alexey Ponomarenko (JIRA)
Alexey Ponomarenko created SOLR-12060:
-

 Summary: Sor suggest component failure
 Key: SOLR-12060
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12060
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
  Components: Suggester
Affects Versions: 7.2.1
 Environment: I am using following software:
 * Windows 10 Enterprise (all latest update installed, last check 06.03.2018)
 * Solr 7.2.1 (running in Cloud mode)
Reporter: Alexey Ponomarenko
 Attachments: managed-schema, solrconfig.xml

I am trying to use Solr suggest component but it is crashes. It was working 
initially but suddenly stopped working correctly. I don't know what is the 
problem.

Here is a code:

request: 
{code:java}
http://localhost:8983/solr/numberplate/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.build=true&suggest.dictionary=analyzedSuggestion{code}
response:
{code:java}
{
"responseHeader": {
"zkConnected": true,
"status": 500,
"QTime": 73
},
"command": "build",
"error": {
"trace": "java.lang.NullPointerException\r\n\tat 
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.unmarshalSortValues(QueryComponent.java:1034)\r\n\tat
 
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.mergeIds(QueryComponent.java:885)\r\n\tat
 
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.handleRegularResponses(QueryComponent.java:585)\r\n\tat
 
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.handleResponses(QueryComponent.java:564)\r\n\tat
 
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:423)\r\n\tat
 
org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:177)\r\n\tat
 org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2503)\r\n\tat 
org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:710)\r\n\tat 
org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:516)\r\n\tat 
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:382)\r\n\tat
 
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:326)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1751)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:582)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:548)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:226)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:512)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:185)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:213)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:119)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.rewrite.handler.RewriteHandler.handle(RewriteHandler.java:335)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\r\n\tat
 org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:534)\r\n\tat 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:320)\r\n\tat 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:283)\r\n\tat
 org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:108)\r\n\tat 
org.eclipse.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)\r\n\tat
 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\r\n\tat
 java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)\r\n",
"code": 500
}
}{code}
Here is config (part from solrconfig.xml) file:
{code:java}
// 

analyzedSuggestion
AnalyzingLookupFactory
DocumentDictionaryFactory 
CountryOfRegistration
0
string
false 





  true
  10


   suggest
 

{code}
Here is  part managed-schema file:
{code:java}

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
{

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 21579 - Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/21579/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([376295A79FAE61C5:165E5C5FF59481A1]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCo

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1713 - Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1713/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7FD42956BA04BE42:5EE8E0AED03E5E26]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x - Build # 167 - Still unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/167/

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.test_stored_idx

Error Message:
Some docs had errors -- check logs expected:<0> but was:<1>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some docs had errors -- check logs expected:<0> but 
was:<1>
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D05F9634D306ED1D:C03E3BCDC6A4A833]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.checkField(TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.java:342)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.test_stored_idx(TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.java:241)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apa

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 1473 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/1473/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A9C48F0AC5B4FAC7:88F846F2AF8E1AA3]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Erro

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387646#comment-16387646
 ] 

Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-12057:
-

Thank you [~WebHomer], this is very useful information. I will try to cook a 
tests-patch proving CDCR doesn't work with tlogs.

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387665#comment-16387665
 ] 

Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-12057:
-

More bad news, but it seems CDCR doesn't work with Pull replicas either. I 
didn't tried the combination of 'one type of replicas on source' and 'another 
type of replica on target' but Tlogs and Pull replicas on both clusters doesn't 
end up being replicated via CDCR.

Test attached and following failures are noticed:
{code}
   [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 2F962848ABDB5226]:
   [junit4]   - 
org.apache.solr.cloud.cdcr.CdcrFailWithTlog.testPullWithSingleReplica
   [junit4]   - 
org.apache.solr.cloud.cdcr.CdcrFailWithTlog.testTlogsWithMoreThanOneReplica
   [junit4]   - 
org.apache.solr.cloud.cdcr.CdcrFailWithTlog.testTlogsWithSingleReplica
   [junit4]   - 
org.apache.solr.cloud.cdcr.CdcrFailWithTlog.testPullWithMoreThanOneReplica
{code}

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-7.x - Build # 483 - Still unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-7.x/483/

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([34B160AEAE8568CF:158DA956C4BF88AB]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)




Build Log:
[...truncated 15319 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
   [junit4]   2> NOTE: re

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Sarkar updated SOLR-12057:

Attachment: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch
>
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 474 - Still unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Solaris/474/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

5 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C0BEA19889B90108:E1826860E383E16C]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCo

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 203 - Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-repro/203/

[...truncated 46 lines...]
[repro] Jenkins log URL: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-7.x/482/consoleText

[repro] Revision: e428f0d58d5a6fffe71d25a52a5d58c74e729991

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=MoveReplicaHDFSTest 
-Dtests.method=testFailedMove -Dtests.seed=DEE56711D71C82D8 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=ar-IQ 
-Dtests.timezone=CNT -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=MoveReplicaHDFSTest 
-Dtests.method=testNormalMove -Dtests.seed=DEE56711D71C82D8 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=ar-IQ 
-Dtests.timezone=CNT -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=LegacyFieldFacetCloudTest 
-Dtests.seed=306B9C495D2AE712 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.locale=lt -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
[repro] git rev-parse HEAD
[repro] Initial local git branch/revision: 
122271f28deb739e3d7fe84c86c6a359d367abd8
[repro] git fetch
[repro] git checkout e428f0d58d5a6fffe71d25a52a5d58c74e729991

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] git merge --ff-only

[...truncated 1 lines...]
[repro] ant clean

[...truncated 6 lines...]
[repro] Test suites by module:
[repro]solr/core
[repro]   MoveReplicaHDFSTest
[repro]solr/contrib/analytics
[repro]   LegacyFieldFacetCloudTest
[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 3310 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.MoveReplicaHDFSTest" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  
-Dtests.seed=DEE56711D71C82D8 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.locale=ar-IQ -Dtests.timezone=CNT -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[...truncated 17458 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 576 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.LegacyFieldFacetCloudTest" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  
-Dtests.seed=306B9C495D2AE712 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.locale=lt -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[...truncated 128 lines...]
[repro] Failures:
[repro]   0/5 failed: 
org.apache.solr.analytics.legacy.facet.LegacyFieldFacetCloudTest
[repro]   3/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest
[repro] git checkout 122271f28deb739e3d7fe84c86c6a359d367abd8

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] Exiting with code 256

[...truncated 6 lines...]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12039) NPE when trying to save bean with field not in schema

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387704#comment-16387704
 ] 

Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-12039:
-

Hi Michael,

When I say tests works, means when we map a field-name with object which is not 
present in schema, it throws the typical: 'field not present in schema' 
SolrException rightfully. I wrote a small test-patch on top of master branch 
for demonstration.

test-failures:
{code}
   [junit4]> Throwable #1: 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient$RouteException: Error from 
server at http://127.0.0.1:60981/solr/techproducts_shard1_replica_n1: ERROR: 
[doc=1] unknown field 'daljit'
{code}

> NPE when trying to save bean with field not in schema
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12039
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: 7.2
> Environment: Debian Linux, Sor 7.2
>Reporter: Michal Zubkowicz
>Priority: Minor
>
> I've got bean with mapping :
> ...
> @Field("something")
>  private Float something;
>  
> Field "something" is not in schema.
> When I'm trying to save such bean.
> {code:java}
> //    x:locations] o.a.s.s.HttpSolrCall null:java.lang.NullPointerException
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.mapValueClassesToFieldType(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:509)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:396)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:75)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:92)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:98)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readOuterMostDocIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:188)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:144)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readObject(JavaBinCodec.java:311)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readVal(JavaBinCodec.java:256)
> {code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12039) NPE when trying to save bean with field not in schema

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Sarkar updated SOLR-12039:

Attachment: test-bean.patch

> NPE when trying to save bean with field not in schema
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12039
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: 7.2
> Environment: Debian Linux, Sor 7.2
>Reporter: Michal Zubkowicz
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: test-bean.patch
>
>
> I've got bean with mapping :
> ...
> @Field("something")
>  private Float something;
>  
> Field "something" is not in schema.
> When I'm trying to save such bean.
> {code:java}
> //    x:locations] o.a.s.s.HttpSolrCall null:java.lang.NullPointerException
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.mapValueClassesToFieldType(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:509)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:396)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:75)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:92)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:98)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readOuterMostDocIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:188)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:144)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readObject(JavaBinCodec.java:311)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readVal(JavaBinCodec.java:256)
> {code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12039) NPE when trying to save bean with field not in schema

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387705#comment-16387705
 ] 

Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-12039:
-

Probably if you can write a test in this particular test class and share, or 
entire client code, either will be helpful.

> NPE when trying to save bean with field not in schema
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12039
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: 7.2
> Environment: Debian Linux, Sor 7.2
>Reporter: Michal Zubkowicz
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: test-bean.patch
>
>
> I've got bean with mapping :
> ...
> @Field("something")
>  private Float something;
>  
> Field "something" is not in schema.
> When I'm trying to save such bean.
> {code:java}
> //    x:locations] o.a.s.s.HttpSolrCall null:java.lang.NullPointerException
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.mapValueClassesToFieldType(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:509)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:396)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:75)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:118)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:92)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:98)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readOuterMostDocIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:188)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:144)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readObject(JavaBinCodec.java:311)
>     at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readVal(JavaBinCodec.java:256)
> {code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.6 - Build # 36 - Still Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.6/36/

5 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestCheckJoinIndex.testOrphans

Error Message:
Invalid index

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Invalid index
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F6A8C9D5BA982C0A:993789BFDA55BC27]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestCheckJoinIndex.testOrphans(TestCheckJoinIndex.java:92)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsUnloadDistributedZkTest.test

Error Message:
Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=3186, 
name=testExecutor-1568-thread-5, state=RUNNABLE, 
group=TGRP-HdfsUnloadDistributedZkTest]

Stack Trace:
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.UncaughtExceptionError: Captured an uncaught 
exception in thread: Thread[id=3186, name=testExecutor-1568-thread-5, 
state=RUNNABLE, group=TGRP-HdfsUnloadDistributedZkTest]
Caused by: 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at http://127.0.0.1:40347: Error CREATEing SolrCore 'multiunload4': 
Unable to create core [multiunload4] Caused by: Direct buffer memory
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D4AAAF8E12BF4EE2]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.H

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-10-ea+43) - Build # 21580 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/21580/
Java: 64bit/jdk-10-ea+43 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

13 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([919E0CE18C8A6DFA:3B53DF133B59B82A]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:79)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.testFailedMove(MoveReplicaTest.java:303)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.test

Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:35597/solr: delete the collection time 
out:180s

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at http://127.0.0.1:355

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11795) Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus

2018-03-06 Thread Cassandra Targett (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387754#comment-16387754
 ] 

Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-11795:
--

Can we remove the {{monitoring-solr-with-prometheus-and-grafana.adoc}} changes 
from the patch? When I said I was "reviewing" it as committed, I should have 
said I was actually doing some extensive structural changes to the page. I can 
use the added info in the patch to augment the information within the changes 
I'm making, but if you commit those changes I'll have a big conflict to work 
through.

FYI, among the changes I'm making to 
{{monitoring-solr-with-prometheus-and-grafana.adoc}}:
 * Changing the solr-exporter help output section to a labeled list of properly 
presented parameters
 * Changing parameters in tables to labeled lists
 * Adding more context to the instructions throughout based on a first-time 
experience setting it up and using it
 * Correcting paths to the contrib folder and files within it
 * Adding a tab section for the startup instructions to present Linux & Windows 
 * Adding context to the solr-exporter configuration file to explain its 
overall structure

I'm only about halfway through, but the page will be a much more complete 
section of documentation when I'm done. I could have made these recommendations 
earlier, but I was busy with other things and didn't get a chance.

> Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-11795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: metrics
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Minoru Osuka
>Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-11795-10.patch, SOLR-11795-11.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-2.patch, SOLR-11795-3.patch, SOLR-11795-4.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-5.patch, SOLR-11795-6.patch, SOLR-11795-7.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-8.patch, SOLR-11795-9.patch, SOLR-11795-dev-tools.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-ref-guide.patch, SOLR-11795.patch, solr-dashboard.png, 
> solr-exporter-diagram.png
>
>  Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I 'd like to monitor Solr using Prometheus and Grafana.
> I've already created Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus. I'd like to 
> contribute to contrib directory if you don't mind.
> !solr-exporter-diagram.png|thumbnail!
> !solr-dashboard.png|thumbnail!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_144) - Build # 486 - Still unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows/486/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_144 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

10 tests failed.
FAILED:  
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005

C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001
 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J0\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7761E79233B3FD96]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:329)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:216)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J1\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J1\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005
 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J1\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\codecs\test\J1\temp\lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.TestOrdsBlockTree_7761E79233B3FD96-001\testPostingsFormat-005

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7761E79233B3FD96]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:329)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:216)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11795) Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus

2018-03-06 Thread Cassandra Targett (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387824#comment-16387824
 ] 

Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-11795:
--

Looking at the patch closer, it seems many of the changes I'm making locally 
are done there also. 

And, after catching up with commits overnight my time, it seems it was already 
committed. OK, half a day's work wasted, I'll figure it out.

> Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-11795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: metrics
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Minoru Osuka
>Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-11795-10.patch, SOLR-11795-11.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-2.patch, SOLR-11795-3.patch, SOLR-11795-4.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-5.patch, SOLR-11795-6.patch, SOLR-11795-7.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-8.patch, SOLR-11795-9.patch, SOLR-11795-dev-tools.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-ref-guide.patch, SOLR-11795.patch, solr-dashboard.png, 
> solr-exporter-diagram.png
>
>  Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I 'd like to monitor Solr using Prometheus and Grafana.
> I've already created Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus. I'd like to 
> contribute to contrib directory if you don't mind.
> !solr-exporter-diagram.png|thumbnail!
> !solr-dashboard.png|thumbnail!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x - Build # 166 - Still Failing

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/166/

No tests ran.

Build Log:
[...truncated 30126 lines...]
prepare-release-no-sign:
[mkdir] Created dir: 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist
 [copy] Copying 491 files to 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist/lucene
 [copy] Copying 230 files to 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist/solr
   [smoker] Java 1.8 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.8
   [smoker] Java 9 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9
   [smoker] NOTE: output encoding is UTF-8
   [smoker] 
   [smoker] Load release URL 
"file:/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist/"...
   [smoker] 
   [smoker] Test Lucene...
   [smoker]   test basics...
   [smoker]   get KEYS
   [smoker] 0.2 MB in 0.02 sec (12.5 MB/sec)
   [smoker]   check changes HTML...
   [smoker]   download lucene-7.3.0-src.tgz...
   [smoker] 31.7 MB in 0.04 sec (738.9 MB/sec)
   [smoker] verify md5/sha1 digests
   [smoker]   download lucene-7.3.0.tgz...
   [smoker] 73.4 MB in 0.10 sec (744.7 MB/sec)
   [smoker] verify md5/sha1 digests
   [smoker]   download lucene-7.3.0.zip...
   [smoker] 83.9 MB in 0.12 sec (718.1 MB/sec)
   [smoker] verify md5/sha1 digests
   [smoker]   unpack lucene-7.3.0.tgz...
   [smoker] verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
   [smoker] test demo with 1.8...
   [smoker]   got 6300 hits for query "lucene"
   [smoker] checkindex with 1.8...
   [smoker] test demo with 9...
   [smoker]   got 6300 hits for query "lucene"
   [smoker] checkindex with 9...
   [smoker] check Lucene's javadoc JAR
   [smoker]   unpack lucene-7.3.0.zip...
   [smoker] verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
   [smoker] test demo with 1.8...
   [smoker]   got 6300 hits for query "lucene"
   [smoker] checkindex with 1.8...
   [smoker] test demo with 9...
   [smoker]   got 6300 hits for query "lucene"
   [smoker] checkindex with 9...
   [smoker] check Lucene's javadoc JAR
   [smoker]   unpack lucene-7.3.0-src.tgz...
   [smoker] make sure no JARs/WARs in src dist...
   [smoker] run "ant validate"
   [smoker] run tests w/ Java 8 and testArgs='-Dtests.badapples=false 
-Dtests.slow=false'...
   [smoker] test demo with 1.8...
   [smoker]   got 217 hits for query "lucene"
   [smoker] checkindex with 1.8...
   [smoker] generate javadocs w/ Java 8...
   [smoker] 
   [smoker] Crawl/parse...
   [smoker] 
   [smoker] Verify...
   [smoker] run tests w/ Java 9 and testArgs='-Dtests.badapples=false 
-Dtests.slow=false'...
   [smoker] test demo with 9...
   [smoker]   got 217 hits for query "lucene"
   [smoker] checkindex with 9...
   [smoker]   confirm all releases have coverage in TestBackwardsCompatibility
   [smoker] find all past Lucene releases...
   [smoker] run TestBackwardsCompatibility..
   [smoker] success!
   [smoker] 
   [smoker] Test Solr...
   [smoker]   test basics...
   [smoker]   get KEYS
   [smoker] 0.2 MB in 0.00 sec (78.0 MB/sec)
   [smoker]   check changes HTML...
   [smoker]   download solr-7.3.0-src.tgz...
   [smoker] 54.8 MB in 0.07 sec (801.1 MB/sec)
   [smoker] verify md5/sha1 digests
   [smoker]   download solr-7.3.0.tgz...
   [smoker] 154.6 MB in 0.19 sec (809.7 MB/sec)
   [smoker] verify md5/sha1 digests
   [smoker]   download solr-7.3.0.zip...
   [smoker] 155.6 MB in 0.19 sec (802.7 MB/sec)
   [smoker] verify md5/sha1 digests
   [smoker]   unpack solr-7.3.0.tgz...
   [smoker] verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
   [smoker] unpack lucene-7.3.0.tgz...
   [smoker]   **WARNING**: skipping check of 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/tmp/unpack/solr-7.3.0/contrib/dataimporthandler-extras/lib/javax.mail-1.5.1.jar:
 it has javax.* classes
   [smoker]   **WARNING**: skipping check of 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/tmp/unpack/solr-7.3.0/contrib/dataimporthandler-extras/lib/activation-1.1.1.jar:
 it has javax.* classes
   [smoker] copying unpacked distribution for Java 8 ...
   [smoker] test solr example w/ Java 8...
   [smoker]   start Solr instance 
(log=/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/tmp/unpack/solr-7.3.0-java8/solr-example.log)...
   [smoker] No process found for Solr node running on port 8983
   [smoker]   Running techproducts example on port 8983 from 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/tmp/unpack/solr-7.3.0-java8
   [smoker] ***

[jira] [Moved] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Rowe (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Steve Rowe moved LUCENE-8194 to SOLR-12061:
---

 Security: Public
Lucene Fields:   (was: New)
  Key: SOLR-12061  (was: LUCENE-8194)
  Project: Solr  (was: Lucene - Core)

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Priority: Major
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8194) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Rowe (JIRA)
Steve Rowe created LUCENE-8194:
--

 Summary: TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is 
not valid for name
 Key: LUCENE-8194
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8194
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Steve Rowe


Reproducing master seed from 
[https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] (reproduces 
for me on LInux):

{noformat}
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
   [junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper 
-Dtests.method=testCommands -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.locale=sk-SK -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
   [junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
   [junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
valid for name
   [junit4]>at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
   [junit4]>at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
   [junit4]>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
   [junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
 locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
   [junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
(32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
{noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12059) Unable to rename solr.xml

2018-03-06 Thread Cassandra Targett (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Cassandra Targett updated SOLR-12059:
-
Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)

Changing this issue from a Bug to an Improvement. It's never been promised that 
this is possible, so not being able to do it isn't a bug in the software.

> Unable to rename solr.xml
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12059
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: 6.5.1
> Environment: Renaming of solr,xml in the $SOLR_HOME directory
>Reporter: Edwin Yeo Zheng Lin
>Priority: Major
>
> I am able to rename the flie names like solrconfig.xml and solr.log to custom 
> names like myconfig.xml and my.log quite seamlessly. 
> However, I am not able to rename the same for solr.xml. Understand that the 
> solr.xml is hard-coded at the SolrXmlConfig.java. Meaning it requires a 
> re-compile of the Jar file in order to rename it.
> Since we can rename files like solrconfig.xml from the properties files, so 
> we should do the same for solr.xml?
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Rowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387855#comment-16387855
 ] 

Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-12061:
---

{{git bisect}} says commit {{c1a44251fe}} on SOLR-11960 is where this started 
happening.

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Priority: Major
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11960) Add collection level properties

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Rowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387861#comment-16387861
 ] 

Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-11960:
---

The test failure described at SOLR-12061 started happening at the 
{{c1a44251fe}} commit on this issue.

> Add collection level properties
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Peter Rusko
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, 
> SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch
>
>
> Solr has cluster properties, but no easy and extendable way of defining 
> properties that affect a single collection. Collection properties could be 
> stored in a single zookeeper node per collection, making it possible to 
> trigger zookeeper watchers for only those Solr nodes that have cores of that 
> collection.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 1474 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/1474/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8883850E4B64BE63:A9BF4CF6215E5E07]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Messa

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-12060) Sor suggest component failure

2018-03-06 Thread Erick Erickson (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erick Erickson resolved SOLR-12060.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix

I see you've raised this question on the user's list at 
solr-u...@lucene.apache.org. That's the appropriate venue unless it's 
determined that there is actually a code problem rather than a usage issue. 

If it's determined that this really is a code issue in Solr and not a 
configuration/usage problem, we can raise a new JIRA or reopen this one.

> Sor suggest component failure
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12060
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12060
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: Suggester
>Affects Versions: 7.2.1
> Environment: I am using following software:
>  * Windows 10 Enterprise (all latest update installed, last check 06.03.2018)
>  * Solr 7.2.1 (running in Cloud mode)
>Reporter: Alexey Ponomarenko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: managed-schema, solrconfig.xml
>
>
> I am trying to use Solr suggest component but it is crashes. It was working 
> initially but suddenly stopped working correctly. I don't know what is the 
> problem.
> Here is a code:
> request: 
> {code:java}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/numberplate/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.build=true&suggest.dictionary=analyzedSuggestion{code}
> response:
> {code:java}
> {
> "responseHeader": {
> "zkConnected": true,
> "status": 500,
> "QTime": 73
> },
> "command": "build",
> "error": {
> "trace": "java.lang.NullPointerException\r\n\tat 
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.unmarshalSortValues(QueryComponent.java:1034)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.mergeIds(QueryComponent.java:885)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.handleRegularResponses(QueryComponent.java:585)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.handleResponses(QueryComponent.java:564)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:423)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:177)\r\n\tat
>  org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2503)\r\n\tat 
> org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:710)\r\n\tat 
> org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:516)\r\n\tat 
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:382)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:326)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1751)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:582)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:548)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:226)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:512)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:185)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:213)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:119)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.rewrite.handler.RewriteHandler.handle(RewriteHandler.java:335)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134)\r\n\tat
>  org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:534)\r\n\tat 
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:320)\r\n\tat 
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:283)\r\n\tat
>  org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:108)\r\n\tat 
> org.eclipse.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)\r\n\tat
>  
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)\r\n\ta

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8195) The custom Lucene snowball stemmer is incompatible with current Snowball Stemmer

2018-03-06 Thread Nikolay Georgiev (JIRA)
Nikolay Georgiev created LUCENE-8195:


 Summary: The custom Lucene snowball stemmer is incompatible with 
current Snowball Stemmer
 Key: LUCENE-8195
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8195
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Nikolay Georgiev


If someone is using [the current version of Snowball 
stemmer|[https://github.com/snowballstem/snowball/tree/master/java/org/tartarus/snowball]]
 as (transitive) dependency and adds Lucene Analyzers as separate dependency 
the libraries using the stemmers become incompatible - you either lose Lucene 
or the other libraries.

Here is an example of the case: 
[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49133001/lucene-breaks-snowball-stemmer-dependency]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8195) The custom Lucene snowball stemmer is incompatible with current Snowball Stemmer

2018-03-06 Thread Nikolay Georgiev (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nikolay Georgiev updated LUCENE-8195:
-
Description: 
If someone is using [the current version of Snowball 
stemmer|https://github.com/snowballstem/snowball/tree/master/java/org/tartarus/snowball]
 as (transitive) dependency and adds Lucene Analyzers as separate dependency 
the libraries using the stemmers become incompatible - you either lose Lucene 
or the other libraries.

Here is an example of the case: 
[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49133001/lucene-breaks-snowball-stemmer-dependency]

  was:
If someone is using [the current version of Snowball 
stemmer|[https://github.com/snowballstem/snowball/tree/master/java/org/tartarus/snowball]]
 as (transitive) dependency and adds Lucene Analyzers as separate dependency 
the libraries using the stemmers become incompatible - you either lose Lucene 
or the other libraries.

Here is an example of the case: 
[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49133001/lucene-breaks-snowball-stemmer-dependency]


> The custom Lucene snowball stemmer is incompatible with current Snowball 
> Stemmer
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-8195
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8195
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Nikolay Georgiev
>Priority: Major
>
> If someone is using [the current version of Snowball 
> stemmer|https://github.com/snowballstem/snowball/tree/master/java/org/tartarus/snowball]
>  as (transitive) dependency and adds Lucene Analyzers as separate dependency 
> the libraries using the stemmers become incompatible - you either lose Lucene 
> or the other libraries.
> Here is an example of the case: 
> [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49133001/lucene-breaks-snowball-stemmer-dependency]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk-9) - Build # 4478 - Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/4478/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

7 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream.StreamExpressionTest.testMultiVariateNormalDistribution

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([22D63B1CFFABB297:B82DB26BC882F09C]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream.StreamExpressionTest.testMultiVariateNormalDistribution(StreamExpressionTest.java:8061)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([22D63B1CF

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

2018-03-06 Thread Aroop (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387975#comment-16387975
 ] 

Aroop commented on SOLR-11598:
--

I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
||{color:#33}*Number of Sort Fields*{color}||{color:#33}*QTime Call1* 
{color}||{color:#33}*QTime Call2* {color}||{color:#33}*QTime Call3* 
{color}||*{color:#707070}{color:#33}QTime Call{color} 
{color:#33}4{color}{color}*||
||{color:#14892c}*10*{color}||{color:#707070}9635{color}||{color:#707070}7945{color}||{color:#707070}7042{color}||{color:#707070}6804{color}||
||{color:#14892c}8{color}||{color:#707070}12065{color}||{color:#707070}9017{color}||{color:#707070}6792{color}||{color:#707070}6314{color}||
||{color:#14892c}6{color}||{color:#707070}10733{color}||{color:#707070}7433{color}||{color:#707070}6146{color}||{color:#707070}5508{color}||
||{color:#14892c}4{color}||{color:#707070}9654{color}||{color:#707070}6746{color}||{color:#707070}5224{color}||{color:#707070}4497{color}||

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields. 
 # This was run against the ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 

> Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it 
> should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup 
> capabilities.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: streaming expressions
>Affects Versions: 6.6.1, 7.0
>Reporter: Aroop
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: patch
> Attachments: SOLR-11598-6_6-streamtests, SOLR-11598-6_6.patch, 
> SOLR-11598-master.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch
>
>
> I am a user of Streaming and I am currently trying to use rollups on an 10 
> dimensional document.
> I am unable to get correct results on this query as I am bounded by the 
> limitation of the export handler which supports only 4 sort fields.
> I do not see why this needs to be the case, as it could very well be 10 or 20.
> My current needs would be satisfied with 10, but one would want to ask why 
> can't it be any decent integer n, beyond which we know performance degrades, 
> but even then it should be caveat emptor.
> [~varunthacker] 
> Code Link:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/19db1df81a18e6eb2cce5be973bf2305d606a9f8/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/ExportWriter.java#L455
> Error
> null:java.io.IOException: A max of 4 sorts can be specified
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.getSortDoc(ExportWriter.java:452)
>   at org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.writeDocs(ExportWriter.java:228)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.lambda$null$1(ExportWriter.java:219)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeIterator(JavaBinCodec.java:664)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeKnownType(JavaBinCodec.java:333)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeVal(JavaBinCodec.java:223)
>   at org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec$1.put(JavaBinCodec.java:394)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.lambda$null$2(ExportWriter.java:219)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeMap(JavaBinCodec.java:437)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeKnownType(JavaBinCodec.java:354)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeVal(JavaBinCodec.java:223)
>   at org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec$1.put(JavaBinCodec.java:394)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.lambda$write$3(ExportWriter.java:217)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeMap(JavaBinCodec.java:437)
>   at org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.write(ExportWriter.java:215)
>   at org.apache.solr.core

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

2018-03-06 Thread Aroop (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387975#comment-16387975
 ] 

Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 3/6/18 3:43 PM:
--

I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
| |       *Search Only Streaming Expression - QTime in ms*|
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*1st Call*|*2nd Call*|*3rd Call*|*4th Call*|
|                *{color:#14892c}10{color}*|9635|7945|7042|6804|
|                  *{color:#14892c}8{color}*|12065|9017|6792|6314|
|                  *{color:#14892c}6{color}*|10733|7433|6146|5508|
|                  *{color:#14892c}4{color}*|9654|6746|5224|4497|

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields. 
 # This was run against the ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 


was (Author: aroopganguly):
I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
||{color:#33}*Number of Sort Fields*{color}||{color:#33}*QTime Call1* 
{color}||{color:#33}*QTime Call2* {color}||{color:#33}*QTime Call3* 
{color}||*{color:#707070}{color:#33}QTime Call{color} 
{color:#33}4{color}{color}*||
||{color:#14892c}*10*{color}||{color:#707070}9635{color}||{color:#707070}7945{color}||{color:#707070}7042{color}||{color:#707070}6804{color}||
||{color:#14892c}8{color}||{color:#707070}12065{color}||{color:#707070}9017{color}||{color:#707070}6792{color}||{color:#707070}6314{color}||
||{color:#14892c}6{color}||{color:#707070}10733{color}||{color:#707070}7433{color}||{color:#707070}6146{color}||{color:#707070}5508{color}||
||{color:#14892c}4{color}||{color:#707070}9654{color}||{color:#707070}6746{color}||{color:#707070}5224{color}||{color:#707070}4497{color}||

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields. 
 # This was run against the ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 

> Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it 
> should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup 
> capabilities.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: streaming expressions
>Affects Versions: 6.6.1, 7.0
>Reporter: Aroop
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: patch
> Attachments: SOLR-11598-6_6-streamtests, SOLR-11598-6_6.patch, 
> SOLR-11598-master.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch
>
>
> I am a user of Streaming and I am currently trying to use rollups on an 10 
> dimensional document.
> I am unable to get correct results on this query as I am bounded by the 
> limitation of the export handler which supports only 4 sort fields.
> I do not see why this needs to be the case, as it could very well be 10 or 20.
> My current needs would be satisfied with 10, but one would want to ask why 
> can't it be any decent integer n, beyond which we know performance degrades, 
> but even then it should be caveat emptor.
> [~varunthacker] 
> Code Link:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/19db1df81a18e6eb2cce5be973bf2305d606a9f8/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/ExportWriter.java#L455
> Err

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

2018-03-06 Thread Aroop (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387975#comment-16387975
 ] 

Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 3/6/18 3:44 PM:
--

I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*1st Call*|*2nd Call*|*3rd Call*|*4th Call*|
|                *{color:#14892c}10{color}*|9635|7945|7042|6804|
|                  *{color:#14892c}8{color}*|12065|9017|6792|6314|
|                  *{color:#14892c}6{color}*|10733|7433|6146|5508|
|                  *{color:#14892c}4{color}*|9654|6746|5224|4497|

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields. 
 # This was run against the ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 


was (Author: aroopganguly):
I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
| |       *Search Only Streaming Expression - QTime in ms*|
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*1st Call*|*2nd Call*|*3rd Call*|*4th Call*|
|                *{color:#14892c}10{color}*|9635|7945|7042|6804|
|                  *{color:#14892c}8{color}*|12065|9017|6792|6314|
|                  *{color:#14892c}6{color}*|10733|7433|6146|5508|
|                  *{color:#14892c}4{color}*|9654|6746|5224|4497|

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields. 
 # This was run against the ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 

> Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it 
> should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup 
> capabilities.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: streaming expressions
>Affects Versions: 6.6.1, 7.0
>Reporter: Aroop
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: patch
> Attachments: SOLR-11598-6_6-streamtests, SOLR-11598-6_6.patch, 
> SOLR-11598-master.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch
>
>
> I am a user of Streaming and I am currently trying to use rollups on an 10 
> dimensional document.
> I am unable to get correct results on this query as I am bounded by the 
> limitation of the export handler which supports only 4 sort fields.
> I do not see why this needs to be the case, as it could very well be 10 or 20.
> My current needs would be satisfied with 10, but one would want to ask why 
> can't it be any decent integer n, beyond which we know performance degrades, 
> but even then it should be caveat emptor.
> [~varunthacker] 
> Code Link:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/19db1df81a18e6eb2cce5be973bf2305d606a9f8/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/ExportWriter.java#L455
> Error
> null:java.io.IOException: A max of 4 sorts can be specified
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.getSortDoc(ExportWriter.java:452)
>   at org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.writeDocs(ExportWriter.java:228)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.lambda$null$1(ExportWriter.java:219)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeIterator(JavaBinCodec.java:664)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeKnownTyp

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

2018-03-06 Thread Aroop (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387975#comment-16387975
 ] 

Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 3/6/18 3:45 PM:
--

I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*1st Call*|*2nd Call*|*3rd Call*|*4th Call*|
|                *{color:#14892c}10{color}*|9635|7945|7042|6804|
|                  *{color:#14892c}8{color}*|12065|9017|6792|6314|
|                  *{color:#14892c}6{color}*|10733|7433|6146|5508|
|                  *{color:#14892c}4{color}*|9654|6746|5224|4497|

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields in each call. 
 # This was run against an ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 


was (Author: aroopganguly):
I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs:

Query Times in ms for Search Streaming Expressions with different number of 
fields in the sort expressions:
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*1st Call*|*2nd Call*|*3rd Call*|*4th Call*|
|                *{color:#14892c}10{color}*|9635|7945|7042|6804|
|                  *{color:#14892c}8{color}*|12065|9017|6792|6314|
|                  *{color:#14892c}6{color}*|10733|7433|6146|5508|
|                  *{color:#14892c}4{color}*|9654|6746|5224|4497|

 

Similarly for a much more complicated streaming expression of the form 
[select(rollup(search())) ]
|*Number of Sort Fields*|*Qtime (ms)  (1st call)*|*Qtime (ms) (2nd call)*|
|*{color:#14892c}10{color}*| 33,303|2389|
|{color:#14892c}*8*{color}| 31,453|1150|
|*{color:#14892c}6{color}*| 26,403|990|
|*{color:#14892c}4{color}*| 16,346|705|

 

Test Setup details:
 # These tests were done with the same fields. 
 # This was run against the ailas which points to about 34 collections each of 
size ~ 20 GB.  (total size: 640 GB, total documents: 5,808,140,268.00 [5.8 
Billion] )
 # The queries used in this set would have actually fetched data from 2 
collections (due to filters ), so 40 GB size and 456,903,090 documents  [456 
Million]

 

> Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it 
> should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup 
> capabilities.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: streaming expressions
>Affects Versions: 6.6.1, 7.0
>Reporter: Aroop
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: patch
> Attachments: SOLR-11598-6_6-streamtests, SOLR-11598-6_6.patch, 
> SOLR-11598-master.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch, SOLR-11598.patch
>
>
> I am a user of Streaming and I am currently trying to use rollups on an 10 
> dimensional document.
> I am unable to get correct results on this query as I am bounded by the 
> limitation of the export handler which supports only 4 sort fields.
> I do not see why this needs to be the case, as it could very well be 10 or 20.
> My current needs would be satisfied with 10, but one would want to ask why 
> can't it be any decent integer n, beyond which we know performance degrades, 
> but even then it should be caveat emptor.
> [~varunthacker] 
> Code Link:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/19db1df81a18e6eb2cce5be973bf2305d606a9f8/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/ExportWriter.java#L455
> Error
> null:java.io.IOException: A max of 4 sorts can be specified
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.getSortDoc(ExportWriter.java:452)
>   at org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.writeDocs(ExportWriter.java:228)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.handler.ExportWriter.lambda$null$1(ExportWriter.java:219)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeIterator(JavaBinCodec.java:664)
>   at 
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeKnownType(JavaBinCodec.java:333)
>   at 
> org.apach

Re: [1/2] lucene-solr:master: SOLR-12020: Remove unused import

2018-03-06 Thread Yonik Seeley
Whoops, thanks Tomas!

-Yonik


On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:01 PM,   wrote:
> Repository: lucene-solr
> Updated Branches:
>   refs/heads/master fc2fd1dc2 -> c1a44251f
>
>
> SOLR-12020: Remove unused import

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11795) Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus

2018-03-06 Thread Cassandra Targett (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387997#comment-16387997
 ] 

Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-11795:
--

Sorry, one more bit of feedback - I didn't realize until the new doc updates 
that the default port for Prometheus to listen on is 9983. That's the default 
port that Solr uses for the embedded ZooKeeper. If someone is in SolrCloud mode 
with the embedded ZK, that would cause a port conflict. IMO, it would be best 
for us to simply reserve port 9983 in Solr for ZK always, and a different 
default port should be selected here.

> Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-11795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: metrics
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Minoru Osuka
>Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-11795-10.patch, SOLR-11795-11.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-2.patch, SOLR-11795-3.patch, SOLR-11795-4.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-5.patch, SOLR-11795-6.patch, SOLR-11795-7.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-8.patch, SOLR-11795-9.patch, SOLR-11795-dev-tools.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-ref-guide.patch, SOLR-11795.patch, solr-dashboard.png, 
> solr-exporter-diagram.png
>
>  Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I 'd like to monitor Solr using Prometheus and Grafana.
> I've already created Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus. I'd like to 
> contribute to contrib directory if you don't mind.
> !solr-exporter-diagram.png|thumbnail!
> !solr-dashboard.png|thumbnail!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11960) Add collection level properties

2018-03-06 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388024#comment-16388024
 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-11960:
--

It looks like there is no consumer to this API (yet) but watchers are being 
created anyway? We should avoid that until we have an actual user for this API.

> Add collection level properties
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Peter Rusko
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, 
> SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch
>
>
> Solr has cluster properties, but no easy and extendable way of defining 
> properties that affect a single collection. Collection properties could be 
> stored in a single zookeeper node per collection, making it possible to 
> trigger zookeeper watchers for only those Solr nodes that have cores of that 
> collection.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11066) Implement a scheduled trigger

2018-03-06 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388029#comment-16388029
 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-11066:
--

Jirabot missed a commit I made:

{code}
SOLR-11066: Added examples of startTime in ref guide. Added null check for 
processor and code comments to explain skipped events and lastRunAt 
initialization. Moved default preferredOp value to ComputePlanAction. Extracted 
a constant.

master: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/commit/9cec2221
branch_7x: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/commit/29060a7b
{code}

> Implement a scheduled trigger
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-11066
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11066
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: AutoScaling, SolrCloud
>Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-11066-test-fix.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, 
> SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, 
> SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch
>
>
> Implement a trigger that runs on a fixed interval say every 1 hour or every 
> 24 hours starting at midnight etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Webster Homer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388058#comment-16388058
 ] 

Webster Homer commented on SOLR-12057:
--

Our setup would likely have either Tlog or NRT replicas. Any setup would have 
at least one of those, I wouldn't expect that you'd want to send to a PULL 
replica since they cannot be masters.

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch
>
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Webster Homer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388058#comment-16388058
 ] 

Webster Homer edited comment on SOLR-12057 at 3/6/18 4:35 PM:
--

Our setup would likely have either Tlog or NRT replicas. Any setup would have 
at least one of those, I wouldn't expect that you'd want to send to a PULL 
replica since they cannot be masters.

 

We would like to favor TLOG replicas since they always give consistent search 
results while NRT do not


was (Author: webhomer):
Our setup would likely have either Tlog or NRT replicas. Any setup would have 
at least one of those, I wouldn't expect that you'd want to send to a PULL 
replica since they cannot be masters.

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch
>
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.3 RC1

2018-03-06 Thread David Smiley
+1 (belated; vote is done)

SUCCESS! [0:56:33.040401]

Note LeaderElectionContextKeyTest failed on the first go-round.  I beasted
it and didn't get it to re-occur.  This is not a test impacted by the
BadApple'ing or AwaitsFix activity lately.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:37 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:

> This vote has passed, thanks all for voting,
>
> I’ll go start on next steps now.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Mar 5, 2018, at 4:59 AM, Koji Sekiguchi 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:20:25.158491]
> >
> > Koji
> >
> > On 2018/03/05 16:36, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> >> +1
> >> SUCCESS! [1:08:00.711198]
> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Steve Rowe  sar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.3.
> >>The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.3-RC1-revd1e9bbd333ea55cfa0c75d324424606e857a775b
> >><
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.3-RC1-revd1e9bbd333ea55cfa0c75d324424606e857a775b
> >
> >>You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.3-RC1-revd1e9bbd333ea55cfa0c75d324424606e857a775b
> >><
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.3-RC1-revd1e9bbd333ea55cfa0c75d324424606e857a775b
> >
> >>Here's my +1, smoke tester says SUCCESS! [0:34:...] (from memory -
> terminal scrollback is
> >>uncooperative...)
> >>--
> >>Steve
> >>www.lucidworks.com 
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org  dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org  dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com


[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 21581 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/21581/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

10 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms.testMaxByteNorms

Error Message:
expected:<198> but was:<594>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<198> but was:<594>
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4806A0E522A87B9B:FCF935DB08E40F4D]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
at org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms.testMaxByteNorms(TestNorms.java:61)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms.testMaxByteNorms

Error Message:
expected:<198> but was:<594>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<198> but was:<594>
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4806A0E522A87B9B:FCF935DB08E40F4D]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at org.junit.Ass

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388100#comment-16388100
 ] 

Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-12057:
-

[~WebHomer], yeah, pull replicas cannot be leaders. Improved the patch, 
failures are consistent. I will try to understand why this is happening since 
TLog replica behave as NRT when leader, and CDCR only concerns with leader 
nodes of both collection-clusters. 

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch
>
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe reassigned SOLR-12061:


Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12057) CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas

2018-03-06 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Sarkar updated SOLR-12057:

Attachment: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch

> CDCR does not replicate to Collections with TLOG Replicas
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: CDCR
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Webster Homer
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch, 
> cdcr-fail-with-tlog-pull.patch
>
>
> We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds.
> We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 nodes, all our collections have 2 
> shards. We use CDCR to replicate the collections from this environment to 2 
> data centers hosted in Google cloud. This seems to work fairly well for our 
> collections with NRT replicas. However the new TLOG collection has problems.
>  
> The google cloud solrclusters have 4 nodes each (3 separate Zookeepers). 2 
> shards per collection with 2 replicas per shard.
>  
> We never see data show up in the cloud collections, but we do see tlog files 
> show up on the cloud servers. I can see that all of the servers have cdcr 
> started, buffers are disabled.
> The cdcr source configuration is:
>  
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{
>       "name":"/cdcr",
>       "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler",
>       "replica":[
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://xxx-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://xxx-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"},
>         {
>           
> "zkHost":"[-mzk01.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk01.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk02.sial.com:2181|http://-mzk02.sial.com:2181/],[-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr|http://-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr]";,
>           "source":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T",
>           "target":"b2b-catalog-material-180124T"}],
>       "replicator":{
>         "threadPoolSize":4,
>         "schedule":500,
>         "batchSize":250},
>       "updateLogSynchronizer":\{"schedule":6
>  
> The target configurations in the 2 clouds are the same:
> "requestHandler":{"/cdcr":{ "name":"/cdcr", 
> "class":"solr.CdcrRequestHandler", "buffer":{"defaultState":"disabled"}}} 
>  
> All of our collections have a timestamp field, index_date. In the source 
> collection all the records have a date of 2/28/2018 but the target 
> collections have a latest date of 1/26/2018
>  
> I don't see cdcr errors in the logs, but we use logstash to search them, and 
> we're still perfecting that. 
>  
> We have a number of similar collections that behave correctly. This is the 
> only collection that is a TLOG collection. It appears that CDCR doesn't 
> support TLOG collections.
>  
> It looks like the data is getting to the target servers. I see tlog files 
> with the right timestamps. Looking at the timestamps on the documents in the 
> collection none of the data appears to have been loaded.In the solr.log I see 
> lots of /cdcr messages  action=LASTPROCESSEDVERSION,  
> action=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and  action=SHARDCHECKPOINT 
>  
> no errors
>  
> Target collections autoCommit is set to  6 I tried sending a commit 
> explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in 
> the collection.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12045) Move Analytics Component from contrib to core

2018-03-06 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388111#comment-16388111
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-12045:
-

+1 (haven't reviewed patch yet)

The implicit "useParams" is explained here: SOLR-9557

> Move Analytics Component from contrib to core
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12045
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: master (8.0)
>Reporter: Houston Putman
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (8.0)
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The Analytics Component currently lives in contrib. Since it includes no 
> external dependencies, there is no harm in moving it into core solr.
> The analytics component would be included as a default search component and 
> the analytics handler (currently only used for analytics shard requests, 
> might be transitioned to handle user requests in the future) would be 
> included as an implicit handler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk-9) - Build # 489 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-MacOSX/489/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

5 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DF0FC81C238B17A1:FE3301E449B1F7C5]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11960) Add collection level properties

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388148#comment-16388148
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-11960:
--

bq. The test failure described at SOLR-12061 started happening at the 
c1a44251fe commit on this issue.
Thanks Steve, I'll take a look
bq. It looks like there is no consumer to this API (yet) but watchers are being 
created anyway? We should avoid that until we have an actual user for this API.
I think you are right, there is no need to register the watch on 
{{registerCore}}. Users of this feature can add a watch themselves by calling 
{{registerCollectionPropsWatcher}}. That's what you mean, right?

> Add collection level properties
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Peter Rusko
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, 
> SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch
>
>
> Solr has cluster properties, but no easy and extendable way of defining 
> properties that affect a single collection. Collection properties could be 
> stored in a single zookeeper node per collection, making it possible to 
> trigger zookeeper watchers for only those Solr nodes that have cores of that 
> collection.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11960) Add collection level properties

2018-03-06 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388178#comment-16388178
 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-11960:
--

bq. I think you are right, there is no need to register the watch on 
registerCore. Users of this feature can add a watch themselves by calling 
registerCollectionPropsWatcher. That's what you mean, right?

Yes, but that is not sufficient. We need to take care of ZK reconnects as well. 
So we should re-create the collection prop watchers in 
createClusterStateWatchersAndUpdate method.

> Add collection level properties
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11960
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Peter Rusko
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch, 
> SOLR-11960.patch, SOLR-11960.patch
>
>
> Solr has cluster properties, but no easy and extendable way of defining 
> properties that affect a single collection. Collection properties could be 
> stored in a single zookeeper node per collection, making it possible to 
> trigger zookeeper watchers for only those Solr nodes that have cores of that 
> collection.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-10-ea+43) - Build # 1475 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/1475/
Java: 64bit/jdk-10-ea+43 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

6 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestLeaderInitiatedRecoveryThread.testPublishDownState

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected: but was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([CC8BDC0876D44B04:92F67EF6D2C902F9]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestLeaderInitiatedRecoveryThread.testPublishDownState(TestLeaderInitiatedRecoveryThread.java:188)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:993)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:968)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadL

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12045) Move Analytics Component from contrib to core

2018-03-06 Thread Houston Putman (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388233#comment-16388233
 ] 

Houston Putman commented on SOLR-12045:
---

Thanks for the link.

I think everything should be fine then, since:
 # the {{/analytics}} handler isn't user facing yet. (It is called for shard 
requests from the AnalyticsComponent)
 # There are no implicit params that it needs.

> Move Analytics Component from contrib to core
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-12045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12045
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: master (8.0)
>Reporter: Houston Putman
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (8.0)
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The Analytics Component currently lives in contrib. Since it includes no 
> external dependencies, there is no harm in moving it into core solr.
> The analytics component would be included as a default search component and 
> the analytics handler (currently only used for analytics shard requests, 
> might be transitioned to handle user requests in the future) would be 
> included as an implicit handler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388240#comment-16388240
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-12061:
--

It looks like I broke this test with the latest change I did in SOLR-11960. 
I'll comment our the failing part until I have a definitive fix

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

2018-03-06 Thread Shawn Heisey


> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs
> 
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which 
> means we can (and do) still use log4j calls in the code.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Not entierly sure. We **don't** do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?

```
Not entierly sure. We don't do log4j calls in the code in general, we have that 
explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does something with 
log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j APIs. I don't 
believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
```

Solr only uses log4j code in one place -- our log watcher for the admin UI.  
This probably has a notation to disable the forbidden API check.  Lucene 
doesn't use any logging at all as far as I know.

The reason that we need the 1.2 compatibility shim is not for Solr or Lucene.  
It's for dependencies.  One dependency that I know for sure uses it is 
zookeeper.  There might be others, but I haven't done an exhaustive check to 
find out.


- Shawn


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/#review198580
---


On March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m., Varun Thacker wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/
> ---
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lucene.
> 
> 
> Repository: lucene-solr
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   lucene/CHANGES.txt e3799bc9d5 
>   lucene/common-build.xml 4fa59ac936 
>   lucene/ivy-versions.properties 5ab36ddfa2 
>   solr/CHANGES.txt 05f4f560bd 
>   solr/bin/install_solr_service.sh b82957144d 
>   solr/bin/solr 4e178de945 
>   solr/bin/solr.cmd dcff0c6af7 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.cmd bfb33e0e9d 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.sh e7478cdf5c 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j.properties b5216db8b2 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j.properties d3ea4deafc 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j.properties d86c6988d5 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/ivy.xml ff4fa48679 
>   
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/embedded/JettySolrRunner.java 
> 23a8dc1eb3 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandler.java 
> 122d2cbf8b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/LogWatcher.java c510590282 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/EventAppender.java 
> ff2876fb2f 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jInfo.java dfd3dde74a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jWatcher.java 
> 04fa5fb1d8 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/package-info.java 
> f78953385c 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2Watcher.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/SolrDispatchFilter.java 
> 4d944d239b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrCLI.java 266ef3a28a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrLogLayout.java a60ada828b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/StartupLoggingUtils.java c582eff4c0 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j.properties 969439a228 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/RequestLoggingTest.java 
> 4c780ccda4 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandlerTest.java 
> 555c1376a5 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2WatcherTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/util/TestSolrCLIRunExample.java 
> 89008517f8 
>   solr/example/README.txt 562c256377 
>   solr/example/example-DIH/solr/db/conf/solrconfig.xml 1ffbbe817f 
>   solr/example/example-DIH/solr/mail/conf/solrconfig.xml 770b0fd870 
>   solr/example/example-DIH/solr/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml 3f00141340 
>   solr/example/resources/log4j.properties 02f91c5dae 
>   solr/example/resources/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/licenses/audience-annotations-0.7.0.jar.sha1 PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/licenses/audience-annotations-LICENSE-ASL.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/licenses/audience-annotations-NOTICE.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/licenses/disruptor-3.4.0.jar.sha1 PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/lic

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

2018-03-06 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe


> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs
> 
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which 
> means we can (and do) still use log4j calls in the code.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Not entierly sure. We **don't** do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> 
> Shawn Heisey wrote:
> ```
> Not entierly sure. We don't do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> ```
> 
> Solr only uses log4j code in one place -- our log watcher for the admin 
> UI.  This probably has a notation to disable the forbidden API check.  Lucene 
> doesn't use any logging at all as far as I know.
> 
> The reason that we need the 1.2 compatibility shim is not for Solr or 
> Lucene.  It's for dependencies.  One dependency that I know for sure uses it 
> is zookeeper.  There might be others, but I haven't done an exhaustive check 
> to find out.

That is exactly my point. Solr doesn't use log4j in the code and it's 
forbidden. We need to include the log4j2 packages in the list of forbidden so 
that developers don't try to use it (unless they know what they are doing and 
explicitly remove the forbidden check)


- Tomás


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/#review198580
---


On March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m., Varun Thacker wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/
> ---
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lucene.
> 
> 
> Repository: lucene-solr
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   lucene/CHANGES.txt e3799bc9d5 
>   lucene/common-build.xml 4fa59ac936 
>   lucene/ivy-versions.properties 5ab36ddfa2 
>   solr/CHANGES.txt 05f4f560bd 
>   solr/bin/install_solr_service.sh b82957144d 
>   solr/bin/solr 4e178de945 
>   solr/bin/solr.cmd dcff0c6af7 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.cmd bfb33e0e9d 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.sh e7478cdf5c 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j.properties b5216db8b2 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j.properties d3ea4deafc 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j.properties d86c6988d5 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/ivy.xml ff4fa48679 
>   
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/embedded/JettySolrRunner.java 
> 23a8dc1eb3 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandler.java 
> 122d2cbf8b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/LogWatcher.java c510590282 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/EventAppender.java 
> ff2876fb2f 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jInfo.java dfd3dde74a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jWatcher.java 
> 04fa5fb1d8 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/package-info.java 
> f78953385c 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2Watcher.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/SolrDispatchFilter.java 
> 4d944d239b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrCLI.java 266ef3a28a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrLogLayout.java a60ada828b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/StartupLoggingUtils.java c582eff4c0 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j.properties 969439a228 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/RequestLoggingTest.java 
> 4c780ccda4 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandlerTest.java 
> 555c1376a5 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2WatcherTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/util/TestSolrCLIRunExample.java 
> 89008517f8 
>   solr/example/README.txt 562c256377 
>   solr/example/example-DIH/solr/db/conf/solrconfig.xml 1ffbbe817f 
>   solr/example/example-DIH/solr/mail/conf/solrconfig.xml 770b0fd870 
>   solr/example/example-DIH/solr/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml 3f00141340 
>   solr/example/resources/

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

2018-03-06 Thread Shawn Heisey


> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs
> 
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which 
> means we can (and do) still use log4j calls in the code.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Not entierly sure. We **don't** do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> 
> Shawn Heisey wrote:
> ```
> Not entierly sure. We don't do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> ```
> 
> Solr only uses log4j code in one place -- our log watcher for the admin 
> UI.  This probably has a notation to disable the forbidden API check.  Lucene 
> doesn't use any logging at all as far as I know.
> 
> The reason that we need the 1.2 compatibility shim is not for Solr or 
> Lucene.  It's for dependencies.  One dependency that I know for sure uses it 
> is zookeeper.  There might be others, but I haven't done an exhaustive check 
> to find out.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> That is exactly my point. Solr doesn't use log4j in the code and it's 
> forbidden. We need to include the log4j2 packages in the list of forbidden so 
> that developers don't try to use it (unless they know what they are doing and 
> explicitly remove the forbidden check)

Sounds like we are in violent agreement, then. :)  Yes, we should make a 
general rule of forbidding log4j usage, both 1.2 and 2.x, and provide an 
exception for the one place where we use it intentionally.  Am I correct in 
thinking that forbidden APIs won't complain about usage in dependencies, just 
the class files that our code builds?


- Shawn


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/#review198580
---


On March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m., Varun Thacker wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/
> ---
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lucene.
> 
> 
> Repository: lucene-solr
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   lucene/CHANGES.txt e3799bc9d5 
>   lucene/common-build.xml 4fa59ac936 
>   lucene/ivy-versions.properties 5ab36ddfa2 
>   solr/CHANGES.txt 05f4f560bd 
>   solr/bin/install_solr_service.sh b82957144d 
>   solr/bin/solr 4e178de945 
>   solr/bin/solr.cmd dcff0c6af7 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.cmd bfb33e0e9d 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.sh e7478cdf5c 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j.properties b5216db8b2 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j.properties d3ea4deafc 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j.properties d86c6988d5 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/ivy.xml ff4fa48679 
>   
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/embedded/JettySolrRunner.java 
> 23a8dc1eb3 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandler.java 
> 122d2cbf8b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/LogWatcher.java c510590282 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/EventAppender.java 
> ff2876fb2f 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jInfo.java dfd3dde74a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jWatcher.java 
> 04fa5fb1d8 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/package-info.java 
> f78953385c 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2Watcher.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/SolrDispatchFilter.java 
> 4d944d239b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrCLI.java 266ef3a28a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrLogLayout.java a60ada828b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/StartupLoggingUtils.java c582eff4c0 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j.properties 969439a228 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/RequestLoggingTest.java 
> 4c780ccda4 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandlerTest.java 
> 555c1376a5 
>   solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2WatcherTes

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

2018-03-06 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe


> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs
> 
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which 
> means we can (and do) still use log4j calls in the code.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Not entierly sure. We **don't** do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> 
> Shawn Heisey wrote:
> ```
> Not entierly sure. We don't do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> ```
> 
> Solr only uses log4j code in one place -- our log watcher for the admin 
> UI.  This probably has a notation to disable the forbidden API check.  Lucene 
> doesn't use any logging at all as far as I know.
> 
> The reason that we need the 1.2 compatibility shim is not for Solr or 
> Lucene.  It's for dependencies.  One dependency that I know for sure uses it 
> is zookeeper.  There might be others, but I haven't done an exhaustive check 
> to find out.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> That is exactly my point. Solr doesn't use log4j in the code and it's 
> forbidden. We need to include the log4j2 packages in the list of forbidden so 
> that developers don't try to use it (unless they know what they are doing and 
> explicitly remove the forbidden check)
> 
> Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Sounds like we are in violent agreement, then. :)  Yes, we should make a 
> general rule of forbidding log4j usage, both 1.2 and 2.x, and provide an 
> exception for the one place where we use it intentionally.  Am I correct in 
> thinking that forbidden APIs won't complain about usage in dependencies, just 
> the class files that our code builds?

Right. And we already have lines for forbidding 1.2 jog4j and JUL. My point is 
that we need to add the new packages there. See file "solr.txt" under 
lucene/tools/forbiddenApis
```
@defaultMessage Use slf4j classes instead
org.apache.log4j.**
java.util.logging.**
```


- Tomás


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/#review198580
---


On March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m., Varun Thacker wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/
> ---
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lucene.
> 
> 
> Repository: lucene-solr
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   lucene/CHANGES.txt e3799bc9d5 
>   lucene/common-build.xml 4fa59ac936 
>   lucene/ivy-versions.properties 5ab36ddfa2 
>   solr/CHANGES.txt 05f4f560bd 
>   solr/bin/install_solr_service.sh b82957144d 
>   solr/bin/solr 4e178de945 
>   solr/bin/solr.cmd dcff0c6af7 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.cmd bfb33e0e9d 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.sh e7478cdf5c 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j.properties b5216db8b2 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j.properties d3ea4deafc 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j.properties d86c6988d5 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/ivy.xml ff4fa48679 
>   
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/embedded/JettySolrRunner.java 
> 23a8dc1eb3 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandler.java 
> 122d2cbf8b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/LogWatcher.java c510590282 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/EventAppender.java 
> ff2876fb2f 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jInfo.java dfd3dde74a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jWatcher.java 
> 04fa5fb1d8 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/package-info.java 
> f78953385c 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2Watcher.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/SolrDispatchFilter.java 
> 4d944d239b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrCLI.java 266ef3a28a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrLogLayout.java a60ada828b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/StartupLoggingUtils.java c582eff4c0 
>   solr/core/src/test-files/log4j.properties 969439

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11066) Implement a scheduled trigger

2018-03-06 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388320#comment-16388320
 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-11066:
--

Another commit missed by jira bot:
{code}
SOLR-11066: Renamed the internal ScheduledTriggers.ScheduledTrigger inner class 
to TriggerWrapper to avoid confusion with the ScheduledTrigger added in this 
issue

Master: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/commit/8b9a1adb
branch_7x: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/commit/05297278
{code}

> Implement a scheduled trigger
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-11066
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11066
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: AutoScaling, SolrCloud
>Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-11066-test-fix.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, 
> SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, 
> SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch, SOLR-11066.patch
>
>
> Implement a trigger that runs on a fixed interval say every 1 hour or every 
> 24 hours starting at midnight etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1714 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1714/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

8 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([283A79CF729861AF:82F7AA3DC54BB47F]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:79)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.testFailedMove(MoveReplicaTest.java:303)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.test

Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:38131/solr: delete the collection time 
out:180s

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server 

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11670) Implement a periodic house-keeping task

2018-03-06 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388379#comment-16388379
 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-11670:
--

Thanks Andrzej! A few comments:

* Autoscaling.java -- the constant AUTO_ADD_REPLICAS_LISTENER_NAME is not used 
anywhere
* ExecutePlanAction -- the counter appended to the asyncId has been removed. It 
is not useful today I agree but it will be needed again when SOLR-11605 is 
implemented
* InactiveShardCleanupAction -- It is not safe to compare nanotime if the 
overseer leader changed between the shard split and the cleanup task. Perhaps 
we stick to currentTimeMillis() here?
* Perhaps we should let InactiveShardCleanupAction only produce operations that 
are later executed by ExecutePlanAction? The advantage is that those operations 
(and others created by clean up tasks in future) can be performed in parallel 
once SOLR-11605 comes in. But more importantly, an exception thrown in one 
clean up action will not cause the action processing to be aborted. This point 
is moot however if you envision each future clean up action to have its own 
scheduled trigger (in which case we should increase the schedule interval for 
this one to something very large e.g. once a day). It is also possible that 
future clean up tasks do not produce solrj requests at all. I'm curious to know 
what you think about this.
* Exceptions thrown from the delete shard API should also be added to context 
properties so that they can be sent to listeners
* SimSolrCloudTestCase -- many unused imports

> Implement a periodic house-keeping task
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11670
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11670
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: AutoScaling
>Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
>Assignee: Andrzej Bialecki 
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-11670.patch, SOLR-11670.patch
>
>
> Some high-impact cluster changes (such as split shard) leave the original 
> data and original state that is no longer actively used. This makes sense due 
> to safety reasons and to make it easier to roll-back the changes.
> However, this unused data will accumulate over time, especially when actions 
> like split shard are invoked automatically by the autoscaling framework. We 
> need a periodic task that would clean up this kind of data after a certain 
> period.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9.0.4) - Build # 21582 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/21582/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9.0.4 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

6 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testNormalMove

Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:38265/solr: delete the collection time 
out:180s

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at http://127.0.0.1:38265/solr: delete the collection time out:180s
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3EFD2A778406E7D8:98259DD001E725C2]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:643)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:255)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:244)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient.doRequest(LBHttpSolrClient.java:483)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient.request(LBHttpSolrClient.java:413)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.sendRequest(CloudSolrClient.java:1104)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:884)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.request(CloudSolrClient.java:817)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:194)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:211)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MiniSolrCloudCluster.deleteAllCollections(MiniSolrCloudCluster.java:451)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.beforeTest(MoveReplicaTest.java:97)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:968)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-master - Build # 2404 - Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-master/2404/

8 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([B1E2E963661DDCF9:1B2F3A91D1CE0929]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:79)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.testFailedMove(MoveReplicaTest.java:303)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.test

Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:33711/solr: delete the collection time 
out:180s

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at http://127.0.0.1:33711/solr: delete the collection time ou

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388441#comment-16388441
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-12061:
--

I think this is actually a bug in the API Mapping code that was there before. I 
believe we need this change in {{V1toV2ApiMapper.serializeToV2Format}}:

{code:java}
   Object substitute = meta.getReverseParamSubstitute(key);
   int idx = template.variables.indexOf(substitute);
   if (idx > -1) {
-String val = params.get(String.valueOf(substitute));
+String val = params.get(key);
 if (val == null) throw new RuntimeException("null value is not 
valid for " + key);
 list[idx] = val;
 continue;
{code}

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8185) HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter returns terms shorter than minSubwordSize

2018-03-06 Thread Matthias Krueger (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Matthias Krueger updated LUCENE-8185:
-
Affects Version/s: 6.6.1
   7.2.1

> HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter returns terms shorter than minSubwordSize
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-8185
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8185
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 6.6.1, 7.2.1
>Reporter: Matthias Krueger
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-8185.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> To account for languages which use binding characters ("fogemorphemes") for 
> composing words the {{HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter}} re-checks the 
> dictionary for a candidate with the last character removed when the original 
> candidate was not found. It currently does not re-check against 
> {{minSubWordSize}} in this case. Terms that are one character shorter than 
> {{minSubWordSize}} can be returned.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated SOLR-12061:
-
Attachment: SOLR-12061.patch

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12061.patch
>
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



SOLR-11954 issue

2018-03-06 Thread Александр Шестак

Hi,
Some time ago I have created isuue which related with unpredictable behaviour 
of different kinds of synonyms mapping.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11954  
Can you please look at this issue and say if community will try to solve this 
issue.
Or may be you can give me some advices and I will try to solve it by myself.

Thanks,
Alexandr

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 475 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Solaris/475/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader

Error Message:
Doc with id=4 not found in 
https://127.0.0.1:61329/solr/outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-false due to: 
Path not found: /id; rsp={doc=null}

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Doc with id=4 not found in 
https://127.0.0.1:61329/solr/outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-false due to: 
Path not found: /id; rsp={doc=null}
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([EE438B7495B5BA49:90A8AB6456D2B573]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.assertDocExists(TestCloudConsistency.java:250)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.assertDocsExistInAllReplicas(TestCloudConsistency.java:234)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader(TestCloudConsistency.java:127)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader(TestCloudConsistency.java:90)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestS

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8192) Remove offsetsAreCorrect from BaseTokenStreamTestCase

2018-03-06 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388500#comment-16388500
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-8192:


+1 to latest patch, yay!

> Remove offsetsAreCorrect from BaseTokenStreamTestCase
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-8192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8192
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Robert Muir
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8192.patch, LUCENE-8192_prototype.patch, 
> LUCENE-8192_take_two.patch
>
>
> Similar to LUCENE-8191, now that indexwriter checks the offsets, this boolean 
> is useless: if offsets are broken it will still fail.
> We should just remove the boolean.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master - Build # 1496 - Still Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/1496/

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexSorting.testRandom3

Error Message:
Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.

Stack Trace:
java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([2AB9BAC360DC26AE]:0)


FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexSorting

Error Message:
Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec).

Stack Trace:
java.lang.Exception: Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec).
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([2AB9BAC360DC26AE]:0)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands

Error Message:
null value is not valid for name

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not valid for name
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([669571DD12ACC28E:47A9B825789622EA]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
at org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailu

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11752) add gzip to jetty

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388539#comment-16388539
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-11752:


[~elyograg] That's ok, practically same solution, please consider listing my 
name in CHANGES as well when marking SOLR-10999 as duplicate :)

> add gzip to jetty
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-11752
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11752
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: Server
>Affects Versions: master (8.0)
>Reporter: Matthew Sporleder
>Priority: Trivial
>  Labels: jetty
> Attachments: SOLR-11752.patch, SOLR-11752.patch
>
>
> with a little bit of typing I am able to add gzip to my solr's jetty, which 
> is a big help for SAN access and completely out-of-band to solr, *and* only 
> happens if the client requests it so I think it is is a good default.
> I will just inline my code to this ticket:
> {code}
> #server/etc/jetty-gzip.xml
> #just download it from here: 
> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-server/9.3.0.v20150612/etc/jetty-gzip.xml?av=f
> {code}
> {code}
> #server/modules/gzip.mod
> [depend]
> server
> [xml]
> etc/jetty-gzip.xml
> {code}
> This is where you might want to add an option, but the result should look 
> like this:
> {code}
> #bin/solr
> else
>   SOLR_JETTY_CONFIG+=("--module=http,gzip")
> fi
> {code}
> I can now do this:
> {code}
> curl -vvv --compressed localhost:8983/solr/ > /dev/null
> {code}
> With:
> {code}
> < Content-Encoding: gzip
> < Content-Length: 2890
> {code}
> Without:
> {code}
> < Content-Length: 13349
> {code}
> ---
> A regular query:
> With:
> {code}
> < Content-Encoding: gzip
> < Content-Length: 2876
> {code}
> Without:
> {code}
> < Content-Length: 17761
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10999) Support "Accept-Encoding" header to enable response gzip compression

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-10999.

Resolution: Duplicate

> Support "Accept-Encoding" header to enable response gzip compression
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10999
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: Server
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: compression, http-headers, standards
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-10999.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from 
> [email|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b4ec90b01bc075a98947e77b0a683308f760221dccb11be5819d1601@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E]
> Accept-Encoding:
> Advertises which content encoding, usually a compression algorithm, the 
> client is able to understand
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Accept-Encoding
> Could enable compression of large search results. SOLR-856 suggests that this 
> is implemented,
> but it does not work. Seems it is only implemented for replication. I’d 
> expect this to be useful for
> large /export or /stream requests. Example:
> Accept-Encoding: gzip
> Could be configured with the [Jetty Gzip 
> Handler|http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.4.x/gzip-filter.html]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 1476 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/1476/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC

20 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.testAllVersionsTested

Error Message:
Missing backcompat test files:   6.6.3-cfs   7.2.1-cfs 

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Missing backcompat test files:
  6.6.3-cfs
  7.2.1-cfs

at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([993855BDDAD34382:89E7BAFD6E4455AE]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.testAllVersionsTested(TestBackwardsCompatibility.java:634)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  
org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.testAllVersionsTested

Error Message:
Missing backcompat test files:   6.6.3-cfs   7.2.1-cfs 

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Missing backcompat test files:
  6.6.3-cfs
  7.2.1-cfs

at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([993855BDDAD34382:89E7BAFD6E4455AE]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.testAllVersionsTested(TestBackwardsCompatibility.java:634)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeM

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_144) - Build # 7205 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7205/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_144 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

5 tests failed.
FAILED:  
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001\bar-005:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001\bar-005

C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001
 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001\bar-005:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001\bar-005
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J1\temp\lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory_2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6-001

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([2D3C5A5B0EEAF5F6]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:329)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:216)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest.testBasic

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2\index:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2\index

C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2
 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2\index:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2\index
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-master-Windows\lucene\build\replicator\test\J0\temp\lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest_E725F21B37EF101D-001\httpReplicatorTest-001\2

at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12062) V1toV2ApiMapper.convert only works for POST request

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA
Tomás Fernández Löbbe created SOLR-12062:


 Summary: V1toV2ApiMapper.convert only works for POST request
 Key: SOLR-12062
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12062
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe


DELETE requests won't work. I believe this only affects someone using SolrJ and 
setting {{usev2}} to {{true}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 205 - Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-repro/205/

[...truncated 28 lines...]
[repro] Jenkins log URL: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-7.x/6/consoleText

[repro] Revision: e428f0d58d5a6fffe71d25a52a5d58c74e729991

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestJmxIntegration 
-Dtests.method=testJmxOnCoreReload -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=hu 
-Dtests.timezone=Africa/Monrovia -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=AtomicUpdateProcessorFactoryTest 
-Dtests.method=testMultipleThreads -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=ar-IQ -Dtests.timezone=JST -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestTriggerIntegration 
-Dtests.method=testSearchRate -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=es-ES -Dtests.timezone=America/Argentina/ComodRivadavia 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest 
-Dtests.method=testHistory -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=mt-MT 
-Dtests.timezone=Navajo -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestReplicationHandler 
-Dtests.method=doTestIndexFetchOnMasterRestart -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=ms-MY -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Omsk -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=ZkControllerTest 
-Dtests.method=testPublishAndWaitForDownStates -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=ar-MA -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT-12 -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestLargeCluster 
-Dtests.method=testBasic -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=es-PA 
-Dtests.timezone=Asia/Krasnoyarsk -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestLTRReRankingPipeline 
-Dtests.method=testDifferentTopN -Dtests.seed=C865C85D2D0B1E 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=et 
-Dtests.timezone=America/Grand_Turk -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
[repro] git rev-parse HEAD
[repro] Initial local git branch/revision: 
28de8218fee732077d91d52fb04e6abe427efdc7
[repro] git fetch
[repro] git checkout e428f0d58d5a6fffe71d25a52a5d58c74e729991

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] git merge --ff-only

[...truncated 1 lines...]
[repro] ant clean

[...truncated 6 lines...]
[repro] Test suites by module:
[repro]solr/contrib/ltr
[repro]   TestLTRReRankingPipeline
[repro]solr/core
[repro]   AtomicUpdateProcessorFactoryTest
[repro]   TestLargeCluster
[repro]   ZkControllerTest
[repro]   TestTriggerIntegration
[repro]   AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest
[repro]   TestJmxIntegration
[repro]   TestReplicationHandler
[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 2579 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.TestLTRReRankingPipeline" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  
-Dtests.seed=C865C85D2D0B1E -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=et -Dtests.timezone=America/Grand_Turk 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[...truncated 135 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 1331 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=35 
-Dtests.class="*.AtomicUpdateProcessorFactoryTest|*.TestLargeCluster|*.ZkControllerTest|*.TestTriggerIntegration|*.AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest|*.TestJmxIntegration|*.TestReplicationHandler"
 -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  -Dtests.seed=23AAAD1FABF0CFDC -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=ar-IQ 
-Dtests.timezone=JST -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[...truncated 72682 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] Failures:
[repro]   0/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.sim.TestLargeCluster
[repro]   1/5 failed: 
org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.sim.TestTriggerIntegration
[repro]   2/5 failed: 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AtomicUpdateProcessorFactoryTest
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkControllerTest
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler
[repro]   5/5 failed: 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest
[repro]   5/5 fai

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 206 - Still Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-repro/206/

[...truncated 28 lines...]
[repro] Jenkins log URL: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master/971/consoleText

[repro] Revision: c1a44251fefabb0ed743f1bdaf287ac89ac38758

[repro] Ant options: -DsmokeTestRelease.java9=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9
[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=LIRRollingUpdatesTest 
-Dtests.method=testNewReplicaOldLeader -Dtests.seed=4D418759779FE164 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=zh-TW -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Victoria 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=LIRRollingUpdatesTest 
-Dtests.method=testNewLeaderOldReplica -Dtests.seed=4D418759779FE164 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=zh-TW -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Victoria 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=LIRRollingUpdatesTest 
-Dtests.method=testNewLeaderAndMixedReplicas -Dtests.seed=4D418759779FE164 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=zh-TW -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Victoria 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=LIRRollingUpdatesTest 
-Dtests.method=testOldLeaderAndMixedReplicas -Dtests.seed=4D418759779FE164 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=zh-TW -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Victoria 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
[repro] git rev-parse HEAD
[repro] Initial local git branch/revision: 
28de8218fee732077d91d52fb04e6abe427efdc7
[repro] git fetch
[repro] git checkout c1a44251fefabb0ed743f1bdaf287ac89ac38758

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] git merge --ff-only

[...truncated 1 lines...]
[repro] ant clean

[...truncated 6 lines...]
[repro] Test suites by module:
[repro]solr/core
[repro]   LIRRollingUpdatesTest
[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 3292 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.LIRRollingUpdatesTest" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror 
-DsmokeTestRelease.java9=/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest1.9 
-Dtests.seed=4D418759779FE164 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=zh-TW 
-Dtests.timezone=Australia/Victoria -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[...truncated 8795 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] Failures:
[repro]   1/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.LIRRollingUpdatesTest
[repro] git checkout 28de8218fee732077d91d52fb04e6abe427efdc7

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] Exiting with code 256

[...truncated 5 lines...]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12062) V1toV2ApiMapper.convert only works for POST request

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388661#comment-16388661
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-12062:
--

Attached test case that reproduces the failure

> V1toV2ApiMapper.convert only works for POST request
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-12062
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12062
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-12062.patch
>
>
> DELETE requests won't work. I believe this only affects someone using SolrJ 
> and setting {{usev2}} to {{true}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12062) V1toV2ApiMapper.convert only works for POST request

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated SOLR-12062:
-
Attachment: SOLR-12062.patch

> V1toV2ApiMapper.convert only works for POST request
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-12062
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12062
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-12062.patch
>
>
> DELETE requests won't work. I believe this only affects someone using SolrJ 
> and setting {{usev2}} to {{true}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 21583 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/21583/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeaderAfterRestart

Error Message:
Timeout waiting for active collection null Live Nodes: [127.0.0.1:34685_solr, 
127.0.0.1:38627_solr, 127.0.0.1:39247_solr, 127.0.0.1:41583_solr] Last 
available state: 
DocCollection(outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true//collections/outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true/state.json/23)={
   "pullReplicas":"0",   "replicationFactor":"3",   "shards":{"shard1":{   
"range":"8000-7fff",   "state":"active",   "replicas":{ 
"core_node62":{   
"core":"outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true_shard1_replica_n61",   
"base_url":"https://127.0.0.1:41583/solr";,   
"node_name":"127.0.0.1:41583_solr",   "state":"active",   
"type":"NRT",   "leader":"true"}, "core_node64":{   
"core":"outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true_shard1_replica_n63",   
"base_url":"https://127.0.0.1:38627/solr";,   
"node_name":"127.0.0.1:38627_solr",   "state":"down",   
"type":"NRT"}, "core_node66":{   
"core":"outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true_shard1_replica_n65",   
"base_url":"https://127.0.0.1:39247/solr";,   
"node_name":"127.0.0.1:39247_solr",   "state":"down",   
"type":"NRT",   "router":{"name":"compositeId"},   "maxShardsPerNode":"1",  
 "autoAddReplicas":"false",   "nrtReplicas":"3",   "tlogReplicas":"0"}

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Timeout waiting for active collection
null
Live Nodes: [127.0.0.1:34685_solr, 127.0.0.1:38627_solr, 127.0.0.1:39247_solr, 
127.0.0.1:41583_solr]
Last available state: 
DocCollection(outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true//collections/outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true/state.json/23)={
  "pullReplicas":"0",
  "replicationFactor":"3",
  "shards":{"shard1":{
  "range":"8000-7fff",
  "state":"active",
  "replicas":{
"core_node62":{
  "core":"outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true_shard1_replica_n61",
  "base_url":"https://127.0.0.1:41583/solr";,
  "node_name":"127.0.0.1:41583_solr",
  "state":"active",
  "type":"NRT",
  "leader":"true"},
"core_node64":{
  "core":"outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true_shard1_replica_n63",
  "base_url":"https://127.0.0.1:38627/solr";,
  "node_name":"127.0.0.1:38627_solr",
  "state":"down",
  "type":"NRT"},
"core_node66":{
  "core":"outOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader-true_shard1_replica_n65",
  "base_url":"https://127.0.0.1:39247/solr";,
  "node_name":"127.0.0.1:39247_solr",
  "state":"down",
  "type":"NRT",
  "router":{"name":"compositeId"},
  "maxShardsPerNode":"1",
  "autoAddReplicas":"false",
  "nrtReplicas":"3",
  "tlogReplicas":"0"}
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([319162A814CA065F:1904F0FDC747D704]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudTestCase.waitForState(SolrCloudTestCase.java:269)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.addDocToWhenOtherReplicasAreDown(TestCloudConsistency.java:164)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader(TestCloudConsistency.java:122)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeaderAfterRestart(TestCloudConsistency.java:95)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11749) regression-test-like functionality for bin/solr*

2018-03-06 Thread Jason Gerlowski (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jason Gerlowski updated SOLR-11749:
---
Attachment: SOLR-11749.patch

> regression-test-like functionality for bin/solr*
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-11749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11749
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: scripts and tools
>Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-11749.patch, SOLR-11749.patch, SOLR-11749.patch, 
> SOLR-11749.patch, test-output.txt
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

2018-03-06 Thread Erick Erickson


> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs
> 
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which 
> means we can (and do) still use log4j calls in the code.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Not entierly sure. We **don't** do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> 
> Shawn Heisey wrote:
> ```
> Not entierly sure. We don't do log4j calls in the code in general, we 
> have that explicitly forbidden in forbidden APIS today, and code that does 
> something with log4j has to supress that. Developers must instead use slf4j 
> APIs. I don't believe that's changing now with log4j2, or does it?
> ```
> 
> Solr only uses log4j code in one place -- our log watcher for the admin 
> UI.  This probably has a notation to disable the forbidden API check.  Lucene 
> doesn't use any logging at all as far as I know.
> 
> The reason that we need the 1.2 compatibility shim is not for Solr or 
> Lucene.  It's for dependencies.  One dependency that I know for sure uses it 
> is zookeeper.  There might be others, but I haven't done an exhaustive check 
> to find out.
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> That is exactly my point. Solr doesn't use log4j in the code and it's 
> forbidden. We need to include the log4j2 packages in the list of forbidden so 
> that developers don't try to use it (unless they know what they are doing and 
> explicitly remove the forbidden check)
> 
> Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Sounds like we are in violent agreement, then. :)  Yes, we should make a 
> general rule of forbidding log4j usage, both 1.2 and 2.x, and provide an 
> exception for the one place where we use it intentionally.  Am I correct in 
> thinking that forbidden APIs won't complain about usage in dependencies, just 
> the class files that our code builds?
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Right. And we already have lines for forbidding 1.2 jog4j and JUL. My 
> point is that we need to add the new packages there. See file "solr.txt" 
> under lucene/tools/forbiddenApis
> ```
> @defaultMessage Use slf4j classes instead
> org.apache.log4j.**
> java.util.logging.**
> ```

Maybe raise a separate JIRA? IIRC I tried this and it failed precommit 
miserably, didn't pursue as this JIRA is big enough as it is..


- Erick


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/#review198580
---


On March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m., Varun Thacker wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/
> ---
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lucene.
> 
> 
> Repository: lucene-solr
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   lucene/CHANGES.txt e3799bc9d5 
>   lucene/common-build.xml 4fa59ac936 
>   lucene/ivy-versions.properties 5ab36ddfa2 
>   solr/CHANGES.txt 05f4f560bd 
>   solr/bin/install_solr_service.sh b82957144d 
>   solr/bin/solr 4e178de945 
>   solr/bin/solr.cmd dcff0c6af7 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.cmd bfb33e0e9d 
>   solr/bin/solr.in.sh e7478cdf5c 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j.properties b5216db8b2 
>   solr/contrib/clustering/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j.properties d3ea4deafc 
>   solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j.properties d86c6988d5 
>   solr/contrib/ltr/src/test-files/log4j2.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/ivy.xml ff4fa48679 
>   
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/embedded/JettySolrRunner.java 
> 23a8dc1eb3 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/LoggingHandler.java 
> 122d2cbf8b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/LogWatcher.java c510590282 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/EventAppender.java 
> ff2876fb2f 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jInfo.java dfd3dde74a 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/Log4jWatcher.java 
> 04fa5fb1d8 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j/package-info.java 
> f78953385c 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2Watcher.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/SolrDispatchFilter.java 
> 4d944d239b 
>   solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrCLI.java 266ef3a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11749) regression-test-like functionality for bin/solr*

2018-03-06 Thread Jason Gerlowski (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388679#comment-16388679
 ] 

Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-11749:


Just noticed that my previous patch was broken.  Due to some .gitignore rules I 
didn't know about, some bash functions I'd pulled into a {{lib}} directory 
under {{bin-test}} didn't get picked up when I wrote the patch.  Fixed that and 
reuploaded.

In other minor news, I'm making creeping progress on a batch version of this 
functionality, but it's slow going.

> regression-test-like functionality for bin/solr*
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-11749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11749
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: scripts and tools
>Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-11749.patch, SOLR-11749.patch, SOLR-11749.patch, 
> SOLR-11749.patch, test-output.txt
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11646) Ref Guide: Update API examples to include v2 style examples

2018-03-06 Thread Jason Gerlowski (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388693#comment-16388693
 ] 

Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-11646:


If we wanted to start giving people nudges to switch over to the v2 API, a 
decent way of doing so would be by making V2 the "default" tab.  Was there a 
particular reason you chose to keep v1 as the default?

I can see arguments either way, and don't care strongly.  (e.g. Maybe the V2 
API's not ready to be "default" in the docs yet, or we want to avoid confusing 
users.)  Just wanted to mention it in case you hadn't thought of it but liked 
the idea.

> Ref Guide: Update API examples to include v2 style examples
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11646
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: documentation, v2 API
>Reporter: Cassandra Targett
>Assignee: Cassandra Targett
>Priority: Major
>
> The Ref Guide currently only has a single page with what might be generously 
> called an overview of the v2 API added in 6.5 
> (https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/v2-api.html) but most of the actual 
> APIs that support the v2 approach do not show an example of using it with the 
> v2 style. A few v2-style APIs are already used as examples, but there's 
> nothing consistent.
> With this issue I'll add API input/output examples throughout the Guide. Just 
> in terms of process, my intention is to have a series of commits to the pages 
> as I work through them so we make incremental progress. I'll start by adding 
> a list of pages/APIs to this issue so the scope of the work is clear.
> Once this is done we can figure out what to do with the V2 API page itself - 
> perhaps it gets archived and replaced with another page that describes Solr's 
> APIs overall; perhaps by then we figure out something else to do with it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11646) Ref Guide: Update API examples to include v2 style examples

2018-03-06 Thread Jason Gerlowski (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388693#comment-16388693
 ] 

Jason Gerlowski edited comment on SOLR-11646 at 3/6/18 11:30 PM:
-

If we wanted to start giving people nudges to switch over to the v2 API, a 
decent way of doing so would be by making V2 the "default" tab.  Was there a 
particular reason you chose to keep v1 as the default?

I can see arguments either way, and don't care strongly.  (e.g. Maybe the V2 
API's not ready to be "default" in the docs yet, or we want to avoid confusing 
users.)  Just wondering.


was (Author: gerlowskija):
If we wanted to start giving people nudges to switch over to the v2 API, a 
decent way of doing so would be by making V2 the "default" tab.  Was there a 
particular reason you chose to keep v1 as the default?

I can see arguments either way, and don't care strongly.  (e.g. Maybe the V2 
API's not ready to be "default" in the docs yet, or we want to avoid confusing 
users.)  Just wanted to mention it in case you hadn't thought of it but liked 
the idea.

> Ref Guide: Update API examples to include v2 style examples
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11646
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: documentation, v2 API
>Reporter: Cassandra Targett
>Assignee: Cassandra Targett
>Priority: Major
>
> The Ref Guide currently only has a single page with what might be generously 
> called an overview of the v2 API added in 6.5 
> (https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/v2-api.html) but most of the actual 
> APIs that support the v2 approach do not show an example of using it with the 
> v2 style. A few v2-style APIs are already used as examples, but there's 
> nothing consistent.
> With this issue I'll add API input/output examples throughout the Guide. Just 
> in terms of process, my intention is to have a series of commits to the pages 
> as I work through them so we make incremental progress. I'll start by adding 
> a list of pages/APIs to this issue so the scope of the work is clear.
> Once this is done we can figure out what to do with the V2 API page itself - 
> perhaps it gets archived and replaced with another page that describes Solr's 
> APIs overall; perhaps by then we figure out something else to do with it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12061) TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388745#comment-16388745
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-12061:
--

Does my change make sense to you [~noble.paul]? You know this code better than 
I do

> TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands() failure: null value is not valid for name
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12061
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Steve Rowe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12061.patch
>
>
> Reproducing master seed from 
> [https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7204/] 
> (reproduces for me on LInux):
> {noformat}
>[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper -Dtests.method=testCommands 
> -Dtests.seed=8BD251EC0EE042E0 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk-SK 
> -Dtests.timezone=America/Araguaina -Dtests.asserts=true 
> -Dtests.file.encoding=Cp1252
>[junit4] ERROR   0.03s J0 | TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands <<<
>[junit4]> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: null value is not 
> valid for name
>[junit4]>  at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8BD251EC0EE042E0:AAEE981464DAA284]:0)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$null$2(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:108)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter$1.put(MapWriter.java:45)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.lambda$serializeToV2Format$3(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:98)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.common.MapWriter.toMap(MapWriter.java:42)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper$ActionInfo.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:87)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.V1toV2ApiMapper.convert(V1toV2ApiMapper.java:137)
>[junit4]>  at 
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper.testCommands(TestV1toV2ApiMapper.java:55)
>[junit4]>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene70): {}, 
> docValues:{}, maxPointsInLeafNode=1930, maxMBSortInHeap=5.753934837955, 
> sim=Asserting(org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.AssertingSimilarity@1313219),
>  locale=sk-SK, timezone=America/Araguaina
>[junit4]   2> NOTE: Windows 10 10.0 x86/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_144 
> (32-bit)/cpus=3,threads=1,free=103812072,total=282828800
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows (64bit/jdk-9.0.1) - Build # 487 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows/487/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9.0.1 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

11 tests failed.
FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001

C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001
 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7A21AE67ABC2EA21]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:329)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:216)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)


FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001

C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001
 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001:
 java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001\testfieldswriterexceptions-001
   
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001:
 java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-7.x-Windows\lucene\build\core\test\J0\temp\lucene.index.TestFieldsReader_7A21AE67ABC2EA21-001

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7A21AE67ABC2EA21]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:329)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:216)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.Te

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 207 - Still Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-repro/207/

[...truncated 28 lines...]
[repro] Jenkins log URL: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-master/6/consoleText

[repro] Revision: 4bdc99a465f830c5fe71abc2833327b9c27b221c

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestReplicationHandler 
-Dtests.method=doTestIndexFetchOnMasterRestart -Dtests.seed=2BA7C7AEF14E474F 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=mt 
-Dtests.timezone=America/Dawson -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=ConcurrentCreateRoutedAliasTest 
-Dtests.method=testConcurrentCreateRoutedAliasComplex 
-Dtests.seed=2BA7C7AEF14E474F -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=es-DO -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT-12 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=ZkControllerTest 
-Dtests.method=testPublishAndWaitForDownStates -Dtests.seed=2BA7C7AEF14E474F 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=be-BY -Dtests.timezone=America/Menominee -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestJmxIntegration 
-Dtests.method=testJmxOnCoreReload -Dtests.seed=2BA7C7AEF14E474F 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=fr-CH -Dtests.timezone=Poland -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=MoveReplicaHDFSTest 
-Dtests.method=testFailedMove -Dtests.seed=2BA7C7AEF14E474F 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true 
-Dtests.locale=en-MT -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Irkutsk -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper 
-Dtests.method=testCommands -Dtests.seed=1F12AC59F109861F -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=de-CH 
-Dtests.timezone=MST7MDT -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestLTRReRankingPipeline 
-Dtests.method=testDifferentTopN -Dtests.seed=5B92C4E830354075 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=pt 
-Dtests.timezone=Asia/Urumqi -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[repro] git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
[repro] git rev-parse HEAD
[repro] Initial local git branch/revision: 
28de8218fee732077d91d52fb04e6abe427efdc7
[repro] git fetch
[repro] git checkout 4bdc99a465f830c5fe71abc2833327b9c27b221c

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] git merge --ff-only

[...truncated 1 lines...]
[repro] ant clean

[...truncated 6 lines...]
[repro] Test suites by module:
[repro]solr/solrj
[repro]   TestV1toV2ApiMapper
[repro]solr/core
[repro]   ConcurrentCreateRoutedAliasTest
[repro]   TestReplicationHandler
[repro]   ZkControllerTest
[repro]   TestJmxIntegration
[repro]   MoveReplicaHDFSTest
[repro]solr/contrib/ltr
[repro]   TestLTRReRankingPipeline
[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 2444 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.TestV1toV2ApiMapper" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  
-Dtests.seed=1F12AC59F109861F -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=de-CH -Dtests.timezone=MST7MDT 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[...truncated 147 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 1329 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=25 
-Dtests.class="*.ConcurrentCreateRoutedAliasTest|*.TestReplicationHandler|*.ZkControllerTest|*.TestJmxIntegration|*.MoveReplicaHDFSTest"
 -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  -Dtests.seed=2BA7C7AEF14E474F -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=es-DO 
-Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT-12 -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[...truncated 49900 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 566 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.TestLTRReRankingPipeline" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror  
-Dtests.seed=5B92C4E830354075 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=pt -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Urumqi 
-Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

[...truncated 135 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] Failures:
[repro]   0/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.ConcurrentCreateRoutedAliasTest
[repro]   0/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkControllerTest
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.ltr.Te

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 1477 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/1477/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E511605995DACC95:4FDCB3AB22091945]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:79)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.testFailedMove(MoveReplicaTest.java:301)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E511605995DACC95:4FDCB3AB22091945]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at 

BeastIt! (Test)

2018-03-06 Thread BeastIt BeastIt
BeastIt Unit Test Beasting Summary Report for Apache Solr Master

BeastIt gives unit tests a chance to duke it out in a fair but difficult
environement. Each test is beasted and then judged. See a link to the full
reports below.

Number of Tests: 1098
Number Passed: 1053
% Passed: 95.9%

Ran 30 iterations, 5 at a time


 *** Worst Test - Not Marked (It's your Moby Dick!)

 - TestReplicationHandler 100% mission-failed ' '

  If you catch that whale, next try
   - TestJmxIntegration 100% mission-failed ' '


 *** New Failures in Test(s)?! Everything looked so good!

 - HdfsBasicDistributedZkTest 3% flakey was 0,0,0
 - HdfsAutoAddReplicasIntegrationTest 3% flakey was 0,0,0
 - CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest 3% flakey was 0,0,0
 - TestV1toV2ApiMapper 100% mission-failed was 0,0,0

 *** Slowest Test

 - CdcrReplicationDistributedZkTest 1746.69 screwy '@BadApple @Nightly  '
Can you speed me up?


 *** Non Running Tests - Coverage Holes?!

 - ChaosMonkeyShardSplitTest '@Ignore '
 - TestRankQueryPlugin '@Ignore '
 - TestMailEntityProcessor '@Ignore '


Full Reports http://apache-solr.bitballoon.com

(Report maintained by Mark Miller)


[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11954) Search behavior depends on kind of synonym mappings

2018-03-06 Thread Shawn Heisey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388838#comment-16388838
 ] 

Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-11954:
-

There is a very subtle difference in how the analysis works with the different 
synonym definition.

Either way, the query terms produced are b2, b, boron, ii, and 2.  But with the 
second definition, the "b" and "2" terms have the type "word" whereas "boron" 
and "ii" are tagged as SYNONYM.  With the first definition, all of the terms 
other than b2 are tagged as SYNONYM.  I think this is expected, because of how 
the => definition in synonyms works.

What's not expected is what the query parser does with it -- for the first 
definition two of the five terms that analysis produces are lost. Something 
like this is probably what the first definition SHOULD have produced:

{noformat}
my_field:b2 my_field:b my_field:2 Synonym(my_field:boron my_field:ii)
{noformat}

Or maybe:

{noformat}
my_field:b2 my_field:b Synonym(my_field:boron) my_field:2 Synonym(my_field:ii)
{noformat}

I don't think it can possibly produce an identical parsedQuery, but what it IS 
doing does look wrong.


> Search behavior depends on kind of synonym mappings
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-11954
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11954
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Affects Versions: 7.2.1
>Reporter: Alexandr
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: synonyms
>
> For field with such type
> {noformat}
>  autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true">
>    
>       
>        generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" splitOnNumerics="1"
> catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" preserveOriginal="1" 
> protected="protwords_en.txt"/>
>       
>    
>    
>       
>        generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" splitOnNumerics="1"
> catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="0" preserveOriginal="1" 
> protected="protwords_en.txt"/>
>       
>        synonyms="synonyms_en.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>    
> {noformat}
>  If synonyms configured in next way
> {noformat}
> b=>b,boron
> 2=>ii,2{noformat}
> Then for query "my_field:b2" parsedQuery looks so "my_field:b2 
> Synonym(my_field:2 my_field:ii)"
> But when synonyms configured in such way
> {noformat}
> b,boron
> ii,2{noformat}
> Then for query "my_field:b2" parsedQuery looks so "my_field:b2 my_field:\"b 
> 2\" my_field:\"b ii\" my_field:\"boron 2\" my_field:\"boron ii\")"
> The second query is correct (it uses synonyms for two parts after word 
> split). 
> Search behavior should not depends on kind of synonym mappings.
> This issue also has been discussed in solr user mailing list
>  
> [http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SynonymGraphFilterFactory-with-WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory-usage-td4373974.html]
> It reproduced for me for Solr 7.1.0, but it also can be reproduced for 7.2.1 
> version



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

2018-03-06 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/
---

Review request for lucene.


Repository: lucene-solr


Description
---

Creating this Review request on Ere Maijala's patch. See SOLR-11982 for 
previous discussion.
It would be nice to have the possibility to easily sort the shards in the 
preferred order e.g. by replica type. The attached patch adds support for 
shards.sort parameter that allows one to sort e.g. PULL and TLOG replicas first 
with ``shards.sor=replicaType:PULL|TLOG``(which would mean that NRT replicas 
wouldn't be hit with queries unless they're the only ones available) and/or to 
sort by replica location (like preferLocalShards=true but more versatile).


Diffs
-

  solr/CHANGES.txt 99e61f1d16 
  
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
 6bfd36af94 
  solr/solr-ref-guide/src/distributed-requests.adoc f5aaff469e 
  solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/params/ShardParams.java cbc33f41f4 
  
solr/solrj/src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/CloudSolrClientTest.java 
9539846f88 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/diff/1/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Tomás Fernández Löbbe



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11982) Add support for shards.sort parameter

2018-03-06 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388907#comment-16388907
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-11982:
--

I created a review request with your latest patch. I'll add some comments 
there: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/

> Add support for shards.sort parameter
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-11982
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11982
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: SolrCloud
>Affects Versions: master (8.0), 7.3
>Reporter: Ere Maijala
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: patch-available, patch-with-test
> Attachments: SOLR-11982.patch, SOLR-11982.patch, SOLR-11982.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to have the possibility to easily sort the shards in the 
> preferred order e.g. by replica type. The attached patch adds support for 
> {{shards.sort}} parameter that allows one to sort e.g. PULL and TLOG replicas 
> first with {{shards.sor=replicaType:PULL|TLOG }}(which would mean that NRT 
> replicas wouldn't be hit with queries unless they're the only ones available) 
> and/or to sort by replica location (like preferLocalShards=true but more 
> versatile).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11795) Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus

2018-03-06 Thread Minoru Osuka (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388911#comment-16388911
 ] 

Minoru Osuka commented on SOLR-11795:
-

Hi [~ctargett],

Thank you for your feedback and the corrections. Your corrections are pretty 
clear!
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/be11f56bbcf3085829f09eb9d30eede4bba62705


> Add Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-11795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11795
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: metrics
>Affects Versions: 7.2
>Reporter: Minoru Osuka
>Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-11795-10.patch, SOLR-11795-11.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-2.patch, SOLR-11795-3.patch, SOLR-11795-4.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-5.patch, SOLR-11795-6.patch, SOLR-11795-7.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-8.patch, SOLR-11795-9.patch, SOLR-11795-dev-tools.patch, 
> SOLR-11795-ref-guide.patch, SOLR-11795.patch, solr-dashboard.png, 
> solr-exporter-diagram.png
>
>  Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I 'd like to monitor Solr using Prometheus and Grafana.
> I've already created Solr metrics exporter for Prometheus. I'd like to 
> contribute to contrib directory if you don't mind.
> !solr-exporter-diagram.png|thumbnail!
> !solr-dashboard.png|thumbnail!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

2018-03-06 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/#review198758
---




solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Line 308 (original), 311 (patched)


We could make this class package private and do better unit tests, should 
be easier to test all the possible branches, specially failure scenarios.



solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Line 309 (original), 312 (patched)


This class can be made static



solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Lines 310-311 (original), 313-314 (patched)


These two could be made final, right?



solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Lines 327 (patched)


You could set the size of the array to ``sortRules.size()``, right?



solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Lines 331 (patched)


I think in this case we should throw an IllegalArgumentException that 
becomes a BAD_REQUEST instead of logging



solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Line 323 (original)


I think we should throw an exception if the rule.name is unknown (not one 
of the expected values)



solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
Lines 404-406 (patched)


I don't think this can really happen (someone comparing with the replica 
type directly) or am I missing something?



solr/solr-ref-guide/src/distributed-requests.adoc
Lines 149 (patched)


``[...]replicas in the given order of precedence``. Maybe add "within each 
shard"? Not sure if that's clear enough. WDYT?


- Tomás Fernández Löbbe


On March 7, 2018, 2:17 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/
> ---
> 
> (Updated March 7, 2018, 2:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lucene.
> 
> 
> Repository: lucene-solr
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Creating this Review request on Ere Maijala's patch. See SOLR-11982 for 
> previous discussion.
> It would be nice to have the possibility to easily sort the shards in the 
> preferred order e.g. by replica type. The attached patch adds support for 
> shards.sort parameter that allows one to sort e.g. PULL and TLOG replicas 
> first with ``shards.sor=replicaType:PULL|TLOG``(which would mean that NRT 
> replicas wouldn't be hit with queries unless they're the only ones available) 
> and/or to sort by replica location (like preferLocalShards=true but more 
> versatile).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   solr/CHANGES.txt 99e61f1d16 
>   
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactory.java
>  6bfd36af94 
>   solr/solr-ref-guide/src/distributed-requests.adoc f5aaff469e 
>   solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/params/ShardParams.java 
> cbc33f41f4 
>   
> solr/solrj/src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/CloudSolrClientTest.java
>  9539846f88 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> 
>



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 490 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-MacOSX/490/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.LIRRollingUpdatesTest.testNewLeaderOldReplica

Error Message:
Replica core_node44 is not put as DOWN null Live Nodes: [127.0.0.1:55790_solr, 
127.0.0.1:55795_solr, 127.0.0.1:55800_solr] Last available state: 
DocCollection(testNewLeaderOldReplica//collections/testNewLeaderOldReplica/state.json/6)={
   "pullReplicas":"0",   "replicationFactor":"2",   "shards":{"shard1":{   
"range":"8000-7fff",   "state":"active",   "replicas":{ 
"core_node42":{   "core":"testNewLeaderOldReplica_shard1_replica_n41",  
 "base_url":"http://127.0.0.1:55790/solr";,   
"node_name":"127.0.0.1:55790_solr",   "state":"active",   
"type":"NRT",   "leader":"true"}, "core_node44":{   
"core":"testNewLeaderOldReplica_shard1_replica_n43",   
"base_url":"http://127.0.0.1:55795/solr";,   
"node_name":"127.0.0.1:55795_solr",   "state":"recovering",   
"type":"NRT",   "router":{"name":"compositeId"},   "maxShardsPerNode":"1",  
 "autoAddReplicas":"false",   "nrtReplicas":"2",   "tlogReplicas":"0"}

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Replica core_node44 is not put as DOWN
null
Live Nodes: [127.0.0.1:55790_solr, 127.0.0.1:55795_solr, 127.0.0.1:55800_solr]
Last available state: 
DocCollection(testNewLeaderOldReplica//collections/testNewLeaderOldReplica/state.json/6)={
  "pullReplicas":"0",
  "replicationFactor":"2",
  "shards":{"shard1":{
  "range":"8000-7fff",
  "state":"active",
  "replicas":{
"core_node42":{
  "core":"testNewLeaderOldReplica_shard1_replica_n41",
  "base_url":"http://127.0.0.1:55790/solr";,
  "node_name":"127.0.0.1:55790_solr",
  "state":"active",
  "type":"NRT",
  "leader":"true"},
"core_node44":{
  "core":"testNewLeaderOldReplica_shard1_replica_n43",
  "base_url":"http://127.0.0.1:55795/solr";,
  "node_name":"127.0.0.1:55795_solr",
  "state":"recovering",
  "type":"NRT",
  "router":{"name":"compositeId"},
  "maxShardsPerNode":"1",
  "autoAddReplicas":"false",
  "nrtReplicas":"2",
  "tlogReplicas":"0"}
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([2C7A9B08081EF686:62613C0FA914E149]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudTestCase.waitForState(SolrCloudTestCase.java:269)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.LIRRollingUpdatesTest.testNewLeaderOldReplica(LIRRollingUpdatesTest.java:201)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAda

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_162) - Build # 21584 - Still Unstable!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/21584/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_162 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([BD473B766A761C8B:178AE884DDA5C95B]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:79)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.testFailedMove(MoveReplicaTest.java:303)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.test

Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:35277/solr: delete the collection time 
out:180s

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at htt

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-7.x - Build # 7 - Still unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-7.x/7/

8 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testFailedMove

Error Message:
No live SolrServers available to handle this 
request:[https://127.0.0.1:46663/solr/MoveReplicaHDFSTest_failed_coll_true, 
https://127.0.0.1:53133/solr/MoveReplicaHDFSTest_failed_coll_true]

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live SolrServers available 
to handle this 
request:[https://127.0.0.1:46663/solr/MoveReplicaHDFSTest_failed_coll_true, 
https://127.0.0.1:53133/solr/MoveReplicaHDFSTest_failed_coll_true]
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([65857C840D67A728:CF48AF76BAB472F8]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient.request(LBHttpSolrClient.java:462)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.sendRequest(CloudSolrClient.java:1104)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:884)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:991)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.request(CloudSolrClient.java:817)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:194)
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrClient.query(SolrClient.java:942)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.testFailedMove(MoveReplicaTest.java:307)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.luc

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 208 - Still Unstable

2018-03-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-repro/208/

[...truncated 28 lines...]
[repro] Jenkins log URL: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/167/consoleText

[repro] Revision: d72c369fb2f5d4f7904d0821037fcee924516258

[repro] Ant options: -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates 
-Dtests.method=test_stored_idx -Dtests.seed=D05F9634D306ED1D 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.locale=id -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Accra -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=StressHdfsTest -Dtests.method=test 
-Dtests.seed=D05F9634D306ED1D -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.nightly=true 
-Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.locale=lv-LV -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Accra -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[repro] Repro line:  ant test  -Dtestcase=TestV1toV2ApiMapper 
-Dtests.method=testCommands -Dtests.seed=10318A17A9D0D8C9 -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.locale=es-DO -Dtests.timezone=Iran -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[repro] git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
[repro] git rev-parse HEAD
[repro] Initial local git branch/revision: 
3c153ccd0e649cec361846a41cd518c7fc64d902
[repro] git fetch
[repro] git checkout d72c369fb2f5d4f7904d0821037fcee924516258

[...truncated 2 lines...]
[repro] git merge --ff-only

[...truncated 1 lines...]
[repro] ant clean

[...truncated 6 lines...]
[repro] Test suites by module:
[repro]solr/solrj
[repro]   TestV1toV2ApiMapper
[repro]solr/core
[repro]   StressHdfsTest
[repro]   TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates
[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 2460 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.TestV1toV2ApiMapper" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.seed=10318A17A9D0D8C9 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.nightly=true 
-Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.locale=es-DO -Dtests.timezone=Iran -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[...truncated 152 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 1331 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=10 
-Dtests.class="*.StressHdfsTest|*.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates" 
-Dtests.showOutput=onerror -Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.seed=D05F9634D306ED1D -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.nightly=true 
-Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.locale=lv-LV -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Accra -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1

[...truncated 2672 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] Failures:
[repro]   0/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.StressHdfsTest
[repro]   2/5 failed: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper

[repro] Re-testing 100% failures at the tip of branch_7x
[repro] ant clean

[...truncated 8 lines...]
[repro] Test suites by module:
[repro]solr/solrj
[repro]   TestV1toV2ApiMapper
[repro] ant compile-test

[...truncated 2460 lines...]
[repro] ant test-nocompile -Dtests.dups=5 -Dtests.maxfailures=5 
-Dtests.class="*.TestV1toV2ApiMapper" -Dtests.showOutput=onerror 
-Dtests.multiplier=2 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.seed=10318A17A9D0D8C9 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.nightly=true 
-Dtests.slow=true 
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/test-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
 -Dtests.locale=es-DO -Dtests.timezone=Iran -Dtests.asserts=true 
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII

[...truncated 151 lines...]
[repro] Setting last failure code to 256

[repro] Failures at the tip of branch_7x:
[repro]   5/5 failed: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.TestV1toV2ApiMapper

[repro] Re-testing 100% failures at the tip of branch_7x without a seed
[repr

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1715 - Failure!

2018-03-06 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1715/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaHDFSTest.testNormalMove

Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:47815/solr: delete the collection time 
out:180s

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at http://127.0.0.1:47815/solr: delete the collection time out:180s
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([39BF131140344BF0:9F67A4B6C5D589EA]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:643)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:255)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:244)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient.doRequest(LBHttpSolrClient.java:483)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient.request(LBHttpSolrClient.java:413)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.sendRequest(CloudSolrClient.java:1104)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:884)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.request(CloudSolrClient.java:817)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:194)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:211)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MiniSolrCloudCluster.deleteAllCollections(MiniSolrCloudCluster.java:451)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.MoveReplicaTest.beforeTest(MoveReplicaTest.java:97)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:968)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAd

  1   2   >