Re: Maven 3 builds take much longer to run in 3.0.3 than in 3.0b1
Vivin Suresh Paliath wrote: > Thanks Jörg! JIRA was the first place I searched to see if anyone else had > noticed this, but I couldn't find anything. Thank you for pointing me to > the issue! Is it possible for me to edit or add to the ticket? Everyone can add comments, but you have to create an account in JIRA if you do not have one yet. Simply follow the login. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven 3 builds take much longer to run in 3.0.3 than in 3.0b1
Thanks Jörg! JIRA was the first place I searched to see if anyone else had noticed this, but I couldn't find anything. Thank you for pointing me to the issue! Is it possible for me to edit or add to the ticket? Vivin On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Vivin, > > Vivin Suresh Paliath wrote: > > > As far as I know, we're not using ranges. However, I don't know if we're > > pulling anything in that does use ranges. What's a good way to find out? > > > > As far as the aether stuff, I noticed as much from looking at the source. > > I'm just trying to figure out if there is a way to make the > > dependency-resolution process faster. > > You're not the first one reporting this: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5125 > > - Jörg > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- Ruin untold; And thine own sadness, Sing in the grass, When eve has forgot, that no more hear common things that gleam and pass; But seek alone to lip, sad Rose of love and ruin untold; And thine own mother Can know it as I know More than another What makes your own sadness, Set in her eyes. $s="01:11:02:11:01:11:02:13:01:11:01:11:01:13:02:12:01:13:01:11: 04:11:06:12:04:11:01:12:01:13:02:12:01:14:01:13:01:11:03:12: 01:11:04:12:02:11:01:11:01:13:02:11:03:11:06:11:01:11:05:12: 02:11:01:11:01:13:02:11:02:12:01:12:04:11:06:12:01:11:04:12: 04:11:01:12:03:12:01:12:01:11:01:12:01:12:02:11:01:11:01:13: 02:11:01:02:11:01:12:02"; @a=split(/:/,$s);$j="";foreach$c(@a) {@n=split(//,$c);$j.=$n[0]x$n[1];} for($i=0;$i<$j=~y///c;$i+=8){print chr(unpack("N",pack("B32",substr("0"x32 .substr($j,$i,8),-32;}
Re: Maven 3 builds take much longer to run in 3.0.3 than in 3.0b1
Hi Vivin, Vivin Suresh Paliath wrote: > As far as I know, we're not using ranges. However, I don't know if we're > pulling anything in that does use ranges. What's a good way to find out? > > As far as the aether stuff, I noticed as much from looking at the source. > I'm just trying to figure out if there is a way to make the > dependency-resolution process faster. You're not the first one reporting this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5125 - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven 3 builds take much longer to run in 3.0.3 than in 3.0b1
As far as I know, we're not using ranges. However, I don't know if we're pulling anything in that does use ranges. What's a good way to find out? As far as the aether stuff, I noticed as much from looking at the source. I'm just trying to figure out if there is a way to make the dependency-resolution process faster. Thanks! Vivin On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you using version ranges ? There seems to be an issue with a > combinatorial explosion of sorts with version ranges, I am not sure if > there has been a jira submitted anywhere for that with a reproducible > test case, though. > > The version range jump (3.0b1 to 3.0.3 include aether), so there's some > pretty substantial changes to the dependency resolution stuff. > > Kristian > > > > ti., 19.07.2011 kl. 09.27 -0700, skrev Vivin Suresh Paliath: > > I'm trying to track down the reason that our builds take much longer to > > build under 3.0.3 rather than 3.0b1. Under 3.0.3, our build takes around > 9 > > minutes, whereas under 3.0b1, it's 3 minutes and 30 seconds. While using > > jconsole, I saw that most of the time (in 3.0.3) is spent inside > > DefaultProjectDependenciesResolver.java. So I downloaded the source to > both > > 3.0b1 and 3.0.3 to see what's happening. I noticed that in 3.0.3 there > are > > two versions of the class. One is in org.apache.maven.project, while the > > other is in org.apache.maven. It also appears that in 3.0.3, the former > is > > being used. While stepping through the code, I saw that bulk of the time > is > > spent when it reaches this statement: > > > > node = repoSystem.collectDependencies( session, collect ).getRoot(); > > > > In 3.0b1, the code does: > > > > ArtifactResolutionResult result = repositorySystem.resolve( request ); > > > > I also noticed that respositorySystem is of type RepositorySystem, and > the > > concrete implementation is LegacyRepositorySystem. I'm assuming that this > > was being used while the Maven 3 was in beta until the new implementation > > was created? Going back to 3.0.3, the collectDependencies method lives in > > DefaultRepositorySystem.java which is part of > > org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal. This eventually calls > > collectDependenciesinside > > DefaultDependencyCollector.java which is also part of > > org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal. I'm assuming that this is how the > > dependency graph is built. My question is if there is a way to make this > > process faster? Could there be something wrong in the way we've set up > our > > dependencies in our project which could cause this process to be so slow? > > > > Or, is this a performance regression? If this is the case, I can open an > > Jira issue. > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- Ruin untold; And thine own sadness, Sing in the grass, When eve has forgot, that no more hear common things that gleam and pass; But seek alone to lip, sad Rose of love and ruin untold; And thine own mother Can know it as I know More than another What makes your own sadness, Set in her eyes. $s="01:11:02:11:01:11:02:13:01:11:01:11:01:13:02:12:01:13:01:11: 04:11:06:12:04:11:01:12:01:13:02:12:01:14:01:13:01:11:03:12: 01:11:04:12:02:11:01:11:01:13:02:11:03:11:06:11:01:11:05:12: 02:11:01:11:01:13:02:11:02:12:01:12:04:11:06:12:01:11:04:12: 04:11:01:12:03:12:01:12:01:11:01:12:01:12:02:11:01:11:01:13: 02:11:01:02:11:01:12:02"; @a=split(/:/,$s);$j="";foreach$c(@a) {@n=split(//,$c);$j.=$n[0]x$n[1];} for($i=0;$i<$j=~y///c;$i+=8){print chr(unpack("N",pack("B32",substr("0"x32 .substr($j,$i,8),-32;}
Re: Maven 3 builds take much longer to run in 3.0.3 than in 3.0b1
Are you using version ranges ? There seems to be an issue with a combinatorial explosion of sorts with version ranges, I am not sure if there has been a jira submitted anywhere for that with a reproducible test case, though. The version range jump (3.0b1 to 3.0.3 include aether), so there's some pretty substantial changes to the dependency resolution stuff. Kristian ti., 19.07.2011 kl. 09.27 -0700, skrev Vivin Suresh Paliath: > I'm trying to track down the reason that our builds take much longer to > build under 3.0.3 rather than 3.0b1. Under 3.0.3, our build takes around 9 > minutes, whereas under 3.0b1, it's 3 minutes and 30 seconds. While using > jconsole, I saw that most of the time (in 3.0.3) is spent inside > DefaultProjectDependenciesResolver.java. So I downloaded the source to both > 3.0b1 and 3.0.3 to see what's happening. I noticed that in 3.0.3 there are > two versions of the class. One is in org.apache.maven.project, while the > other is in org.apache.maven. It also appears that in 3.0.3, the former is > being used. While stepping through the code, I saw that bulk of the time is > spent when it reaches this statement: > > node = repoSystem.collectDependencies( session, collect ).getRoot(); > > In 3.0b1, the code does: > > ArtifactResolutionResult result = repositorySystem.resolve( request ); > > I also noticed that respositorySystem is of type RepositorySystem, and the > concrete implementation is LegacyRepositorySystem. I'm assuming that this > was being used while the Maven 3 was in beta until the new implementation > was created? Going back to 3.0.3, the collectDependencies method lives in > DefaultRepositorySystem.java which is part of > org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal. This eventually calls > collectDependenciesinside > DefaultDependencyCollector.java which is also part of > org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal. I'm assuming that this is how the > dependency graph is built. My question is if there is a way to make this > process faster? Could there be something wrong in the way we've set up our > dependencies in our project which could cause this process to be so slow? > > Or, is this a performance regression? If this is the case, I can open an > Jira issue. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Maven 3 builds take much longer to run in 3.0.3 than in 3.0b1
I'm trying to track down the reason that our builds take much longer to build under 3.0.3 rather than 3.0b1. Under 3.0.3, our build takes around 9 minutes, whereas under 3.0b1, it's 3 minutes and 30 seconds. While using jconsole, I saw that most of the time (in 3.0.3) is spent inside DefaultProjectDependenciesResolver.java. So I downloaded the source to both 3.0b1 and 3.0.3 to see what's happening. I noticed that in 3.0.3 there are two versions of the class. One is in org.apache.maven.project, while the other is in org.apache.maven. It also appears that in 3.0.3, the former is being used. While stepping through the code, I saw that bulk of the time is spent when it reaches this statement: node = repoSystem.collectDependencies( session, collect ).getRoot(); In 3.0b1, the code does: ArtifactResolutionResult result = repositorySystem.resolve( request ); I also noticed that respositorySystem is of type RepositorySystem, and the concrete implementation is LegacyRepositorySystem. I'm assuming that this was being used while the Maven 3 was in beta until the new implementation was created? Going back to 3.0.3, the collectDependencies method lives in DefaultRepositorySystem.java which is part of org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal. This eventually calls collectDependenciesinside DefaultDependencyCollector.java which is also part of org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal. I'm assuming that this is how the dependency graph is built. My question is if there is a way to make this process faster? Could there be something wrong in the way we've set up our dependencies in our project which could cause this process to be so slow? Or, is this a performance regression? If this is the case, I can open an Jira issue. -- Ruin untold; And thine own sadness, Sing in the grass, When eve has forgot, that no more hear common things that gleam and pass; But seek alone to lip, sad Rose of love and ruin untold; And thine own mother Can know it as I know More than another What makes your own sadness, Set in her eyes. $s="01:11:02:11:01:11:02:13:01:11:01:11:01:13:02:12:01:13:01:11: 04:11:06:12:04:11:01:12:01:13:02:12:01:14:01:13:01:11:03:12: 01:11:04:12:02:11:01:11:01:13:02:11:03:11:06:11:01:11:05:12: 02:11:01:11:01:13:02:11:02:12:01:12:04:11:06:12:01:11:04:12: 04:11:01:12:03:12:01:12:01:11:01:12:01:12:02:11:01:11:01:13: 02:11:01:02:11:01:12:02"; @a=split(/:/,$s);$j="";foreach$c(@a) {@n=split(//,$c);$j.=$n[0]x$n[1];} for($i=0;$i<$j=~y///c;$i+=8){print chr(unpack("N",pack("B32",substr("0"x32 .substr($j,$i,8),-32;}