Fedora Packages Search

2012-03-30 Thread Johannes Lips 

Hi all,

I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just 
wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I use 
the current URL to promote some packages or is it likely that the URL 
could change in the near future.
Is there some place where I could find information about the things 
which are planned in the future.


Thanks a lot

Johannes




[1] https://community.dev.fedoraproject.org/packages/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

package with binaries only in /usr/sbin: rpmlint no binaries error, empty debuginfo

2012-03-30 Thread Eric Smith 
I'm working on packaging HP's LTFS filesystem (which uses fuse), and it 
has binaries only in /usr/sbin.  rpmlint complains that there are no 
binaries, and the debuginfo package is empty.


[eric@p1 SPECS]$ rpm -qlvp ../RPMS/x86_64/hpltfs-1.2.2-1.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1217 Mar 30 00:11 
/etc/ltfs.conf
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  400 Mar 30 00:11 
/etc/ltfs.conf.local
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 3698 Mar 30 00:11 
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ltfs
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5895 Mar 30 00:11 
/usr/sbin/ltfs
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5929 Mar 30 00:11 
/usr/sbin/ltfsck
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5929 Mar 30 00:11 
/usr/sbin/mkltfs
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5929 Mar 30 00:11 
/usr/sbin/unltfs
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Mar 30 00:11 
/usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26536 Mar 30 00:11 
/usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/COPYING.LIB
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3144 Aug 23  2011 
/usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/INSTALLING.linux
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot11268 Aug 31  2011 
/usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/README.txt
[eric@p1 SPECS]$ rpmlint hpltfs.spec  ../RPMS/x86_64/hpltfs-*.rpm 
../SRPMS/hpltfs-1.2.2-1.src.rpm

hpltfs.x86_64: E: no-binary
hpltfs.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address 
/usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/COPYING.LIB

hpltfs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 12 warnings.
[warnings edited out for brevity]

How do I placate rpmlint and get a proper debuginfo, short of moving the 
binaries into /usr/bin?


Thanks!
Eric

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: package with binaries only in /usr/sbin: rpmlint no binaries error, empty debuginfo

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Schwendt 
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:28:23 -0700, ES (Eric) wrote:

 I'm working on packaging HP's LTFS filesystem (which uses fuse), and it 
 has binaries only in /usr/sbin.  rpmlint complains that there are no 
 binaries, and the debuginfo package is empty.
 
 [eric@p1 SPECS]$ rpm -qlvp ../RPMS/x86_64/hpltfs-1.2.2-1.x86_64.rpm
 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1217 Mar 30 00:11 
 /etc/ltfs.conf
 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot  400 Mar 30 00:11 
 /etc/ltfs.conf.local
 -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 3698 Mar 30 00:11 
 /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltfs
 -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5895 Mar 30 00:11 
 /usr/sbin/ltfs
 -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5929 Mar 30 00:11 
 /usr/sbin/ltfsck
 -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5929 Mar 30 00:11 
 /usr/sbin/mkltfs
 -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 5929 Mar 30 00:11 
 /usr/sbin/unltfs

Rather short files = suspicious! Read on. ;)

 drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Mar 30 00:11 
 /usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2
 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot26536 Mar 30 00:11 
 /usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/COPYING.LIB
 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3144 Aug 23  2011 
 /usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/INSTALLING.linux
 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot11268 Aug 31  2011 
 /usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/README.txt
 [eric@p1 SPECS]$ rpmlint hpltfs.spec  ../RPMS/x86_64/hpltfs-*.rpm 
 ../SRPMS/hpltfs-1.2.2-1.src.rpm
 hpltfs.x86_64: E: no-binary
 hpltfs.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address 
 /usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/COPYING.LIB
 hpltfs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 12 warnings.
 [warnings edited out for brevity]

 How do I placate rpmlint and get a proper debuginfo, short of moving the 
 binaries into /usr/bin?

Run the more helpful rpmlint -i as not to misunderstand what no-binary
refers to.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora Packages Search

2012-03-30 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 

On 03/30/2012 07:06 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:

Hi all,

I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just 
wanted to know what the current state of it is



There are two things I feel need improvements one is the bug section of 
it, with my QA hat on I would rather like to see monthly/weekly/daily 
line or bar graph activity on bugstats instead of what's currently there.


In the source section I would like to see a git links and link to the 
upstream source.


Other then the above mentioned items it's becoming very useful and part 
of my workflow within the project.


JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: package with binaries only in /usr/sbin: rpmlint no binaries error, empty debuginfo

2012-03-30 Thread Alec Leamas 

On 03/30/2012 09:28 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
I'm working on packaging HP's LTFS filesystem (which uses fuse), and 
it has binaries only in /usr/sbin.  rpmlint complains that there are 
no binaries, and the debuginfo package is empty.



[cut]

hpltfs.x86_64: E: no-binary
hpltfs.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address 
/usr/share/doc/hpltfs-1.2.2/COPYING.LIB

hpltfs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 12 warnings.
[warnings edited out for brevity]

How do I placate rpmlint and get a proper debuginfo, short of moving 
the binaries into /usr/bin?


Thanks!
Eric


See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora Packages Search

2012-03-30 Thread Pádraig Brady 
On 03/30/2012 08:43 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
 On 03/30/2012 07:06 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
 Hi all,

 I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just wanted to 
 know what the current state of it is
 
 
 There are two things I feel need improvements one is the bug section of it, 
 with my QA hat on I would rather like to see monthly/weekly/daily line or bar 
 graph activity on bugstats instead of what's currently there.
 
 In the source section I would like to see a git links and link to the 
 upstream source.

Right. That's in the plan:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Packager

 Other then the above mentioned items it's becoming very useful and part of my 
 workflow within the project.

+1 to that. I especially like the search feature which
I can use to summarize the openstack projects for example:
https://community.dev.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/openstack
Though being able to tag and search on tags would be more general.

cheers,
Pádraig.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Dropping libusb1-static package ?!

2012-03-30 Thread Hans de Goede 

Hi,

While working on updating the libusb1 package I noticed it still
provides a libusb1-static package. I would very much like to drop
this, so 2 questions:

1) Any objections?
2) I'm afraid my repoquery-foo is too weak to figure out if anything
   BuildRequires libusb1-static, can someone give me a hand with this?

Thanks  Regards,

Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Dropping libusb1-static package ?!

2012-03-30 Thread Dan Horák 
Hans de Goede píše v Pá 30. 03. 2012 v 10:37 +0200: 
 Hi,
 
 While working on updating the libusb1 package I noticed it still
 provides a libusb1-static package. I would very much like to drop
 this, so 2 questions:
 
 1) Any objections?
 2) I'm afraid my repoquery-foo is too weak to figure out if anything
 BuildRequires libusb1-static, can someone give me a hand with this?

repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
libusb1-static
returns an empty list for me


Dan


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: package with binaries only in /usr/sbin: rpmlint no binaries error, empty debuginfo

2012-03-30 Thread Eric Smith 

Michael Schwendt wrote:
Rather short files = suspicious! Read on. ;) 

Thanks, I should have spotted that!

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Delay in pushing to update-testing with critical security updates

2012-03-30 Thread Jan Horak 
Why it takes 12-20 hours to submit critical security update to 
updates-testing repository? Do we have such long queue or is the push 
done regularly in long period?


I think we should prioritize 0day security updates a little more if 
possible. We're struggling with getting enough positive feedback and 
this is another 12-20 hours delay and we can't start the build nor make 
and update the day before Mozilla officially releases it.


See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1606/thunderbird-10.0.1-1.fc15,xulrunner-10.0.1-1.fc15,firefox-10.0.1-1.fc15?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1650/thunderbird-10.0.1-1.fc16,xulrunner-10.0.1-1.fc16,firefox-10.0.1-1.fc16?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1845/xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc15?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-17408/xulrunner-9.0.1-1.fc16,firefox-9.0.1-1.fc16?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
for pushing schedule.
--
jh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

F-17 Branched report: 20120330 changes

2012-03-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report 
Compose started at Fri Mar 30 08:15:04 UTC 2012

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.1-5.fc17.noarch requires ruby-nokogiri
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.8-2.fc17.1.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[catfish]
catfish-engines-0.3.2-4.fc17.1.noarch requires pinot
[comoonics-cdsl-py]
comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-19.noarch requires comoonics-base-py
[comoonics-cluster-py]
comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-25.noarch requires comoonics-base-py
[contextkit]
contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1
contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit)
[converseen]
converseen-0.4.9-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libMagickWand.so.5()(64bit)
converseen-0.4.9-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit)
converseen-0.4.9-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libMagick++.so.5()(64bit)
[dh-make]
dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper
[eruby]
eruby-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit)
eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.i686 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.i686 requires libruby.so.1.8
eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit)
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
gcc-python3-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
[gearmand]
gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libtcmalloc.so.0()(64bit)
gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libmemcached.so.8()(64bit)
gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
[genius]
genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
gnome-genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
[gnome-phone-manager]
gnome-phone-manager-0.66-9.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-bluetooth.so.9()(64bit)
[gnome-user-share]
gnome-user-share-3.0.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-bluetooth.so.9()(64bit)
[gorm]
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libobjc.so.3
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.20
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.23
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libobjc.so.3()(64bit)
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnustep-gui.so.0.20()(64bit)
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnustep-base.so.1.23()(64bit)
[gscribble]
gscribble-0.1.2-2.fc17.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2
[i3]
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-property.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-keysyms.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-icccm.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-event.so.1()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-aux.so.0()(64bit)
i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-atom.so.1()(64bit)
[ibus-fep]
ibus-fep-1.4.3-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
[ibus-gucharmap]
ibus-gucharmap-1.4.0-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
[ibus-panel-extensions]
ibus-panel-extensions-1.4.99.20111207-1.fc17.i686 requires 
libibus-1.0.so.0
ibus-panel-extensions-1.4.99.20111207-1.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
[ibus-unikey]
ibus-unikey-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
[jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api]
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120309gita3c227.fc17.noarch requires 
jboss-servlet-3.0-api
[kazehakase]
kazehakase-ruby-0.5.8-11.svn3873_trunk.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 
0:1.8
kazehakase-ruby-0.5.8-11.svn3873_trunk.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libruby.so.1.8()(64bit)
[libprelude]
1:libprelude-ruby-1.0.0-11.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
1:libprelude-ruby-1.0.0-11.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit)
[libteam]
libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-route-3.so.199
libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-nf-3.so.199
libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-genl-3.so.199
libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-cli-3.so.199
libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-3.so.199
libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.x86_64

Delay in pushing to update-testing with critical security updates

2012-03-30 Thread Jan Horak 
Why it takes 12-20 hours to submit critical security update to 
updates-testing repository? Do we have such long queue or is the push 
done regularly in long period?


I think we should prioritize 0day security updates a little more if 
possible. We're struggling with getting enough positive feedback and 
this is another 12-20 hours delay and we can't start the build nor make 
and update the day before Mozilla officially releases it.


See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1606/thunderbird-10.0.1-1.fc15,xulrunner-10.0.1-1.fc15,firefox-10.0.1-1.fc15?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1650/thunderbird-10.0.1-1.fc16,xulrunner-10.0.1-1.fc16,firefox-10.0.1-1.fc16?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1845/xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc15?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-17408/xulrunner-9.0.1-1.fc16,firefox-9.0.1-1.fc16?_csrf_token=2687aa88f9c75370a673f0b53ca2cbb1fcda5f68
for pushing schedule.
--
jh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Meeting minutes FESCo (2012-03-26)

2012-03-30 Thread David Tardon 
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
 
 Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
 week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
 kind of thing is done consistently?
 
 Just in the last two weeks we've had a FESCo meeting announcement with
 an empty topic, and now a minutes post with a different subject from all
 the previous minutes posts (the 'standard' appears to be Summary 
 minutes for today's FESCo meeting (-XX-XX)) and with no text but an
 *attachment* of the meetbot summary.

Sorry, but I really do not understand your problem. I have never had a
problem recognizing the meeting notes email. The same for parsing its
content. (Actually, I haven't even noticed that the subject is not
always the same...)

If it is really so important that the structure of that email is always
the same, without a sligthest variation, it should be sent directly by
the bot, without any human intervention. Period.

Or do we really need a policy/process/guideline for _everything_?

D.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

libnet update to 1.1.6 coming to rawhide, soname bump

2012-03-30 Thread Jon Ciesla 
This affects the following:

libnids
suricata
syslog-ng

Whose owners are CCd and which I'll handle rebuilding unless the
owners would rather.

Thanks,

-J

-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2

2012-03-30 Thread Peter Jones 

On 03/29/2012 10:15 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com
mailto:clum...@redhat.com wrote:

  How is that possible to implement with a:
  1. Show GUI, write kickstart.
  2. Process kickstart.
  design?

We're not literally going to have one program that you use to construct
a kickstart file, write the file out, and then spawn a separate program
do to the processing of.  We are using kickstart as the data store
internally (via pykickstart) and having one program operate on it.  The
only writing will be towards the end of installation, where we spit out
/root/anaconda-ks.cfg.

A lot of these tasks like figuring out authentication information and
adding extra users can be prompted for while filesystems are being
created, then actually take effect and augment the ksdata after packages
are laid down.  They will be reflected in the final anaconda-ks.cfg.
Some other tasks may not map to existing kickstart at all (yet).

- Chris
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


If we go for doing something like that, is there any reason to keep firstboot
around? Couldn't we stuff the actions done in firstboot into anaconda with this
newer asynch design?


Well, there are some reasons on each side there, and it certainly merits further
discussion.

Personally, I've got some skepticism about running firstboot-style plugins in
the installer. For those that need that (and they are out there), it's a whole
lot easier to put things like that in the packageset and have them run at 
firstboot than to get them into the running install image. But if we decide it's

worth it, that's probably a problem we could engineer around, too.

--
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Meeting minutes FESCo (2012-03-26)

2012-03-30 Thread Peter Jones 

On 03/30/2012 08:29 AM, David Tardon wrote:

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:

Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
kind of thing is done consistently?

Just in the last two weeks we've had a FESCo meeting announcement with
an empty topic, and now a minutes post with a different subject from all
the previous minutes posts (the 'standard' appears to be Summary
minutes for today's FESCo meeting (-XX-XX)) and with no text but an
*attachment* of the meetbot summary.


Sorry, but I really do not understand your problem. I have never had a
problem recognizing the meeting notes email. The same for parsing its
content. (Actually, I haven't even noticed that the subject is not
always the same...)


Presumably the problem is not identifying it when he sees it, but rather
searching for it as a reference.  The former is easy; the latter isn't
necessarily, and consistency would go quite far to change that.

--
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 696680] [abrt] claws-mail-3.7.9-2.fc14: _int_malloc: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Schwendt 
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:08:47 -0400, bugzilla wrote:

 Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
 comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
 
 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696680
 
 abrt-bot@… changed:
 
What|Removed |Added
 
  Status|NEW |CLOSED
  Resolution||DUPLICATE
 Last Closed||2012-03-30 09:08:45
 
 --- Comment #4 from abrt-bot@… 2012-03-30 09:08:45 EDT ---
 Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #759143, closing as
 duplicate.
 
 Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: 
   DeviceKit-disks: bug #579968
   claws-mail: bug #749177, bug #789636
   evince: bug #615380
   evolution: bug #744469
   evolution-data-server: bug #607960, bug #799718
   evolution-exchange: bug #669649
   gnome-shell: bug #759143, bug #781780
   gvfs: bug #571349
   pcmanfm: bug #789628
   rhythmbox: bug #681163, bug #709834, bug #748661
   xfce4-sensors-plugin: bug #772409
 
 This comment is automatically generated.
 
 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***


Dubious. Bug 696680 is about F-14, bug 759143 about F-16 gnome-shell.
Reassignment is needed as F-14 didn't have gnome-shell.

And why isn't the target bug for the dupes the one with the lowest ticket id?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 789636] [abrt] claws-mail-3.8.0-1.fc16: IMAP - offline mode -_int_memalign: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Schwendt 
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:09:51 -0400, bugzilla wrote:

 Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
 comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
 
 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789636
 
 abrt-bot@… changed:
 
What|Removed |Added
 
  Status|NEW |CLOSED
  Resolution||DUPLICATE
 Last Closed||2012-03-30 09:09:49
 
 --- Comment #8 from abrt-bot@… 2012-03-30 09:09:49 EDT ---
 Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #759143, closing as
 duplicate.
 
 Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: 
   DeviceKit-disks: bug #579968
   claws-mail: bug #696680, bug #749177
   evince: bug #615380
   evolution: bug #744469
   evolution-data-server: bug #607960, bug #799718
   evolution-exchange: bug #669649
   gnome-shell: bug #759143, bug #781780
   gvfs: bug #571349
   pcmanfm: bug #789628
   rhythmbox: bug #681163, bug #709834, bug #748661
   xfce4-sensors-plugin: bug #772409
 
 This comment is automatically generated.
 
 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***

This one is highly suspicious. It would be better to not close it
as duplicate so brutally. Interrupting network connection in Claws Mail
causes problems somewhere in Claws Mail and/or libetpan IMAP access and
crashes the app. It isn't related to the other bugs, IMO. Just the
symptoms are similar due to memory management discovering the problem.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora Packages Search

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi 
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:11 +0100
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just 
 wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I
 use the current URL to promote some packages or is it likely that the
 URL could change in the near future.
 Is there some place where I could find information about the things 
 which are planned in the future.

The best place would be the infrastructure list, or #fedora-admin on
irc, but here works fine too. ;) 

We are working on deploying this into production... 

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ is the initial instance. 
We still are working on deploying tagger and cleaning some things up
before we officially announce it and start supporting it in production. 

packages and tagger are part of the 2.0 version of fedora-community. 

See: https://fedorahosted.org/fedoracommunity for how to contact them
and add your ideas/patches/etc. 

Hope that helps, 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 789636] [abrt] claws-mail-3.8.0-1.fc16: IMAP - offline mode -_int_memalign: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Karel Klíč 
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
 On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:09:51 -0400, bugzilla wrote:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789636
 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***

 This one is highly suspicious. It would be better to not close it
 as duplicate so brutally. Interrupting network connection in Claws Mail
 causes problems somewhere in Claws Mail and/or libetpan IMAP access and
 crashes the app. It isn't related to the other bugs, IMO. Just the
 symptoms are similar due to memory management discovering the problem.

Agreed, this one looks like a false positive.  We are going to fix the
scripts to ignore glib memory management functions.

If you reopen the bug, it will not be touched by the scripts again.
Please let us know if you see other suspicious actions.

Thanks for the feedback!

Karel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 696680] [abrt] claws-mail-3.7.9-2.fc14: _int_malloc: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Karel Klíč 
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
 On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:08:47 -0400, bugzilla wrote:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696680
 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***


 Dubious. Bug 696680 is about F-14, bug 759143 about F-16 gnome-shell.
 Reassignment is needed as F-14 didn't have gnome-shell.

 And why isn't the target bug for the dupes the one with the lowest ticket id?

The target bug is determined by the number of people in CC and last
modification time.

Karel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 789636] [abrt] claws-mail-3.8.0-1.fc16: IMAP - offline mode -_int_memalign: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius 

On 03/30/2012 05:00 PM, Karel Klíč wrote:

Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com  writes:

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:09:51 -0400, bugzilla wrote:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789636
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***


This one is highly suspicious. It would be better to not close it
as duplicate so brutally. Interrupting network connection in Claws Mail
causes problems somewhere in Claws Mail and/or libetpan IMAP access and
crashes the app. It isn't related to the other bugs, IMO. Just the
symptoms are similar due to memory management discovering the problem.


Agreed, this one looks like a false positive.  We are going to fix the
scripts to ignore glib memory management functions.

If you reopen the bug, it will not be touched by the scripts again.
Please let us know if you see other suspicious actions.


I am suspecting this also to be a false positive:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806419
which was closed as duplicate of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707963)

Different OSes (F15, vs, F16), entirely different sets of packages 
involved, 10 months of Fedora history inbetween.


Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 789636] [abrt] claws-mail-3.8.0-1.fc16: IMAP - offline mode -_int_memalign: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Karel Klíč 
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
 I am suspecting this also to be a false positive:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806419
 which was closed as duplicate of
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707963)

 Different OSes (F15, vs, F16), entirely different sets of packages
 involved, 10 months of Fedora history inbetween.

The bugs seem to be duplicates to me, although I do not know gstreamer
internals.  The crashing threads are identical in the backtraces, and
it's the same application.

Do you think that the differencea in non-crashing threads are relevant
in this case?

Karel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Delay in pushing to update-testing with critical security updates

2012-03-30 Thread Jon Ciesla 
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
 On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:15:12 +0200
 Jan Horak jho...@redhat.com wrote:

 Why it takes 12-20 hours to submit critical security update to
 updates-testing repository? Do we have such long queue or is the push
 done regularly in long period?

 f15/f16 updates pushes take a long time. ;(

 There's some things on the horizon that will hopefully make it better:

 * Currently updates mashes are done on the rhel6 rel-eng machines.
 When/if we can do them in a mock chroot, they should use the much
 faster Fedora createrepo.

 * Currently 1 fedora push can happen at a time. If we can split that
  out we can push f15 and f16 in parallel and cut way down on time.

 I think we should prioritize 0day security updates a little more if
 possible. We're struggling with getting enough positive feedback and
 this is another 12-20 hours delay and we can't start the build nor
 make and update the day before Mozilla officially releases it.

 If you have a specific update thats critical to push out sooner, ask
 rel-eng? (in ticket or #fedora-releng on irc).

Slightly OT, will it be much longer before the next f17 push, or are
we waiting on Beta?

-J

 kevin

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Delay in pushing to update-testing with critical security updates

2012-03-30 Thread Jon Ciesla 
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
 On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:58:58 -0500
 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Slightly OT, will it be much longer before the next f17 push, or are
 we waiting on Beta?

 Stable f17 push? yes, thats waiting until after we have a beta.

 I am doing a testing push in a bit here.

10-4, thanks.

-J

 kevin


 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: urandom vs haveged

2012-03-30 Thread David Sommerseth 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 26/03/12 21:56, Chris Murphy wrote:
 
 Performance:
 
 dd if=/dev/zero   ~56MB/s CPU  10% dd if=/dev/urandom
 ~12MB/s
 CPU 99% haveged   ~54MB/s CPU  25%
 
 
 The dd relative values are consistent with kernels in Fedora 16. 
 However these tests were done with 3.3.0-1. The questions are:
 
 Is the urandom performance expected?

That sounds reasonable.  Unless I mix /dev/random and /dev/urandom,
the latter blocks until it has filled up the entropy pool again.

 What is the quality of pseudo-random data produced by urandom vs 
 haveged?

PolarSSL used havege in v1.0 and below.  It used RDTSC as a source for
seeding the randomisation.  However, it turned out that in some
virtualised environment, the RDTSC values was quite easy to predict.
I'm not sure if I mix it with another issue, but I believe I remember
some reporting it to constantly be seeded with 0.

Havege is in otherwords something to play carefully with.  If used
together with other randomisation sources or on bare metal, it's okay.

Kind of interesting, as LWN had an article pointing at this blog post
today http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=265 ... and yesterday the havege
implementation in OpenVPN when using PolarSSL was discussed in the
developers meeting.  As a side note, OpenVPN decided to deprecate
PolarSSL versions below v1.1, thus enforcing DRBG as a replacement for
havege, due to the mentioned reasons.  (Using OpenSSL, nothing changes
btw.)

 If the qualities are similar, or haveged's is better, is there 
 anything that can be done to improve urandom's performance? It
 really takes quite a bit longer to prepare a disk/volume for
 encryption.

The reason /dev/urandom is experienced as slow is because it tries to
ensure a certain level of randomness.  That's also a device provided
by the kernel.

While havege and other rngd's are probably faster as they can use more
sources for entropy generation and prepare bigger entropy pools than
what's default in the kernel space.

But as mentioned, be careful with havege.  It might not be as random
as you'd expect.


kind regards,

David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk915wcACgkQIIWEatLf4HerZQCglA4QOSgRoIR8FwSMBBfR52Su
PNgAoKzFupvU2MwuFHty+3cDiUJJPGnv
=JN6G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Queries regarding python packages using setuptools

2012-03-30 Thread Ankur Sinha 
Hello,

I have two queries that I'd like clarified please:

1. Is the setup.py file to be included in the rpm? I was under the
impression that this file is only required for building that package and
therefore should not be part of the rpm. Is this correct?

2. Are python eggs to be generated for *all* python packages, or only
python modules (ie, files in python_sitelib/sitearch)? For example, the
sugar package that I'm reviewing[1] goes into sugaractivitydir and
does not create an egg-info file. Do I need to request the submitter to
force it to create them?

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
-- 
Thanks, 
Regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [389-devel] Please review: schema def must have DESC '' - close paren must be preceded by space

2012-03-30 Thread Noriko Hosoi 

Rich Megginson wrote:




--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Queries regarding python packages using setuptools

2012-03-30 Thread Peter Robinson 
On Mar 30, 2012 6:34 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I have two queries that I'd like clarified please:

 1. Is the setup.py file to be included in the rpm? I was under the
 impression that this file is only required for building that package and
 therefore should not be part of the rpm. Is this correct?

No it should not be shipped.

 2. Are python eggs to be generated for *all* python packages, or only
 python modules (ie, files in python_sitelib/sitearch)? For example, the
 sugar package that I'm reviewing[1] goes into sugaractivitydir and
 does not create an egg-info file. Do I need to request the submitter to
 force it to create them?

No, they not used by sugar activities

Peter

 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
 --
 Thanks,
 Regards,
 Ankur: FranciscoD

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
 http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/


 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-Perl-Destruct-Level] Created tag perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el5

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Howarth 
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el5' was created pointing 
to:

 1b0870e... Initial import (perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Destruct-Level] Created tag perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el6

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Howarth 
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el6' was created pointing 
to:

 1b0870e... Initial import (perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Destruct-Level] Created tag perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc15

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Howarth 
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc15' was created pointing 
to:

 1b0870e... Initial import (perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Destruct-Level] Created tag perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc16

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Howarth 
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc16' was created pointing 
to:

 1b0870e... Initial import (perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Destruct-Level] Created tag perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc17

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Howarth 
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc17' was created pointing 
to:

 1b0870e... Initial import (perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Destruct-Level] Created tag perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc18

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Howarth 
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc18' was created pointing 
to:

 1b0870e... Initial import (perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla 
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-30 14:06:22 EDT ---
perl-Test-Script-1.06-1.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: urandom vs haveged

2012-03-30 Thread Przemek Klosowski 

On 03/30/2012 01:02 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:


That sounds reasonable.  Unless I mix /dev/random and /dev/urandom,
the latter blocks until it has filled up the entropy pool again.

Eh, the FORMER (/dev/random) blocks until it has filled up the entropy 
pool again. I seem to remember that urandom is a PRNG seeded with data 
from /dev/random; it never blocks.


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Introduction.

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel E. Wilson 
Hi, my name is Dan and I have submitted the version 5.2.1 of the racket 
scheme interpreter for review.


I use Lisp type languages for my own projects and needed a more recent 
version than the plt-scheme package for my Fedora box.  When I found out 
that plt-scheme was orphaned that I would become a package maintainer 
since I can not possibly be the only person that needs this software.


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Introduction.

2012-03-30 Thread 夜神　岩男 
--- On Sat, 2012/3/31, Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org wrote:

 Hi, my name is Dan and I have submitted the version 5.2.1 of the racket 
 scheme interpreter for review.
 
 I use Lisp type languages for my own projects and needed a more recent 
 version than the plt-scheme package for my Fedora box.  When I found out that 
 plt-scheme was orphaned that I would become a package maintainer since I can 
 not possibly be the only person that needs this software.
 

Hi Dan,

I've never used Racket before personally, but you may also be interested to 
know that Guile 2.0 is out (Fedora currently ships 2.0.3, and I think moving to 
2.0.5 soon). The more solid Scheme environments the better, IMO. :-) Have fun.

-IY
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: urandom vs haveged

2012-03-30 Thread David Sommerseth 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 30/03/12 21:01, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
 On 03/30/2012 01:02 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
 
 That sounds reasonable.  Unless I mix /dev/random and
 /dev/urandom, the latter blocks until it has filled up the
 entropy pool again.
 
 Eh, the FORMER (/dev/random) blocks until it has filled up the
 entropy pool again. I seem to remember that urandom is a PRNG
 seeded with data from /dev/random; it never blocks.

Right!  I too often mix those two.  Thanks for the correction.


kind regards,

David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk92GqEACgkQIIWEatLf4Hc1ewCgxoOLNEvXjKvIw9zr2/UjsrYL
UecAn3Ssyfvmo1JTfBA3nVv9cDjv67M5
=qVJL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora Packages Search

2012-03-30 Thread Johannes Lips 

On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:11 +0100
Johannes Lipsjohannes.l...@googlemail.com  wrote:


Hi all,

I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just
wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I
use the current URL to promote some packages or is it likely that the
URL could change in the near future.
Is there some place where I could find information about the things
which are planned in the future.


The best place would be the infrastructure list, or #fedora-admin on
irc, but here works fine too. ;)

We are working on deploying this into production...

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ is the initial instance.
We still are working on deploying tagger and cleaning some things up
before we officially announce it and start supporting it in production.

packages and tagger are part of the 2.0 version of fedora-community.

See: https://fedorahosted.org/fedoracommunity for how to contact them
and add your ideas/patches/etc.

Hope that helps,

kevin




Yes this helps a lot and answered all my questions!
Thanks a lot Kevin!

Johannes

P.S.: Sorry for posting this to -devel, I just don't want to subscribe 
to all fedora-mls ;-)

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: creating dynamic access control lists for a device: systemd and udev

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Kofler 
Ian Malone wrote:
 Interesting, not sure how you'd tell that. I've now noticed the header
 #This file is part of systemd.
 And rpm -qf confirms that, but why don't systemd and udev get into
 conflict over it?

Because udev dropped their equivalent 70-acl.rules in favor of systemd's 
implementation.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: urandom vs haveged

2012-03-30 Thread Paul Wouters 

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Steve Grubb wrote:


Something else I'd like to mention is that during system installation there is
very little system entropy. There is no saved seed to prime the generators with.
(LiveCD's have the same problem.) I have a feeling that the randomness of the
numbers is not what you would expect.


Exactly. This is why daemons generating keys (opensshd, sendmail, openswan)
generate their keys on first start and not on install.


entropy. But if you don't have a mouse and are doing a text or kickstart
install, you need to find a way to get keystrokes involved. If you can think of 
a
key that has no effect on any questions in the install, hit it a bunch of times.
If you have a kickstart, put something in the script requiring typing a bunch of
keystrokes and throw them away.


Or if it is a net install, you can try and ping (-f) the machine for a
little while and see if the network card or interrupts gives you
entropy. Though that does not seem to be the case for virtual network adaptors.

It's sad that even old cheap VIA CPUs have such a strong random device,
that's fully supported with Linux, but that Intel and AMD still haven't
caught up yet. My 3 week old intel cpu still seems to be lacking support
for anything (like intel-rng.ko). A few years ago, I had a server that
supported the intel-rng driver, and rngd kept dropping zeroes and
logging warnings. I've never ever gotten a single warning from a VIA
CPU.

Paul

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Bug 789636] [abrt] claws-mail-3.8.0-1.fc16: IMAP - offline mode -_int_memalign: Process /usr/bin/claws-mail was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Kofler 
Karel Klíč wrote:
 Please let us know if you see other suspicious actions.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805736

I reopened the false duplicates.

The backtrace here looks the same in all apps: __GI_raise triggered from the 
Qt event loop, but that's because the Qt event loop catches all exceptions 
and rethrows them after doing some cleanups. Without the terminal output 
(which ABRT is unable to capture), there's usually no way to know what the 
actual exception was (though in the Rosegarden4 case, it seems to originate 
from a different thread, which shows an interesting backtrace), but it's 
likely different in each of the apps.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 808197] FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla 
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
External Bug ID||CPAN 71112

--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-03-30 04:51:10 EDT ---
The t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t:55 test checks serialization of

my $message = $genlsock-new_message(
   nlmsg_type = 30,
   cmd = 1,
   version = 2
);

netlink(7) defines netlink header as:

struct nlmsghdr {
  __u32 nlmsg_len;/* Length of message including header. */
  __u16 nlmsg_type;   /* Type of message content. */
  __u16 nlmsg_flags;  /* Additional flags. */
  __u32 nlmsg_seq;/* Sequence number. */
  __u32 nlmsg_pid;/* PID of the sending process. */
};

So I think the expected

00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

is wrong since the type (30 = 0x1e) should occupy two bytes only. Here it spans
to nlmsg_flags field.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi

2012-03-30 Thread buildsys 


perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the F-17 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.19-1.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libswipl.so.5.10.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.19-1.fc17.i686 requires libswipl.so.5.10.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Debug-Client-0.18.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-03-30 Thread Petr Pisar 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Debug-Client:

a4391fb6e3a837fc6441d819e67a7ac5  Debug-Client-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 802986] perl-Debug-Client-0.18 is available

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla 
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802986

--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-03-30 08:31:35 EDT ---
Some tests fail because of incompatibility with Term::ReadLine::Perl = 1.0303.
The module is not needed indeed. I will exclude it and ask upstream for a help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 802986] perl-Debug-Client-0.18 is available

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla 
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802986

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Debug-Client-0.18-1.fc
   ||18
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-03-30 08:45:42

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File CPAN-Uploader-0.103001.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Uploader:

7698046a5b1d779734568da987b5928b  CPAN-Uploader-0.103001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-CPAN-Uploader] update to 0.103001

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit 68bbd73c5862adc68d7123dd7dc1c196e8cd3891
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 06:55:04 2012 -0600

update to 0.103001

 .gitignore  |1 +
 perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec |   10 ++
 sources |2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 583242e..6a5a73d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 CPAN-Uploader-0.101670.tar.gz
 CPAN-Uploader-0.102150.tar.gz
 /CPAN-Uploader-0.103000.tar.gz
+/CPAN-Uploader-0.103001.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec b/perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec
index 1cd7e00..57f4b58 100644
--- a/perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec
+++ b/perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-CPAN-Uploader
-Version:0.103000
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:0.103001
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Upload things to the CPAN
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -51,14 +51,16 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 RELEASE_TESTING=1 make test
 
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc Changes dist.ini LICENSE META.json README
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_bindir}/*
 %{_mandir}/man1/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.103001-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.103000-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7474177..b6f9454 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7bd63780e1ebb7ff806ba95b4f60c3ba  CPAN-Uploader-0.103000.tar.gz
+7698046a5b1d779734568da987b5928b  CPAN-Uploader-0.103001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.33.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session:

bb0561b8c3030f9c24f34617759960ff  Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session] update to 0.33

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit b4c19d1e7ead958aa1d669bbd747115ca537da51
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 07:01:58 2012 -0600

update to 0.33

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec |7 +--
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 24133e4..c3c814d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.29.tar.gz
 /Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.31.tar.gz
 /Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.32.tar.gz
+/Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.33.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec 
b/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec
index 2284065..6067163 100644
--- a/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec
+++ b/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session
 Summary:Catalyst generic session plugin
-Version:0.32
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.33
+Release:1%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/B/BO/BOBTFISH/Catalyst-Plugin-Session-%{version}.tar.gz
 
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.33-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Sun Jan 22 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.32-2
 - drop tests subpackage; move tests to main package documentation
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 14019e1..d051d4b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-978ee69b592aa7b384e118ae2900e251  Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.32.tar.gz
+bb0561b8c3030f9c24f34617759960ff  Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07019.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader:

a09b96cf9c165ec106baf70938d4bf96  DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07019.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader] update to 0.07019

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit 64a2796730b27eb9a20040f78cb9878f52e263ef
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 08:01:06 2012 -0600

update to 0.07019

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec |7 +--
 sources|2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c4b6511..6207503 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.05003.tar.gz
 /DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07010.tar.gz
 /DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07015.tar.gz
 /DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07017.tar.gz
+/DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07019.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec 
b/perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec
index e36290c..6757ca8 100644
--- a/perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec
+++ b/perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader
 Summary:Dynamic definition of a DBIx::Class::Schema
-Version:0.07017
+Version:0.07019
 Release:1%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 README.iconv README
 touch -r README.iconv README
 rm -f README.iconv
 
-sed -i '1s,#!.*perl,#!%{__perl},' t/*.t
+find t -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '1s,#!.*perl,#!%{__perl},'
 
 %build
 %{__perl} Makefile.PL --skipdeps INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ make test
 %{_bindir}/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.07019-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Wed Feb 08 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.07017-1
 - update to latest upstream version
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1cb855d..7892118 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b2bc5056ce57508b7a3a887d5230ac00  DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07017.tar.gz
+a09b96cf9c165ec106baf70938d4bf96  DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07019.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader/f17] update to 0.07019

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
Summary of changes:

  64a2796... update to 0.07019 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-RPM2

2012-03-30 Thread buildsys 


perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpm.so.2
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class:

8b98dcc6ef5d056781162c9e14a8e94d  MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class] update to 0.06

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit c794736b04635e0e7add7458ba493c14ae8c289d
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 08:33:01 2012 -0600

update to 0.06

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec |9 ++---
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4c4d7cf..bfdf67c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05.tar.gz
+/MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.06.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
index 7d2224f..c913fc3 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class 
 Summary:A Path::Class type library for Moose 
-Version:0.05
-Release:12%{?dist}
+Version:0.06
+Release:1%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TH/THEPLER/MooseX-Types-Path-Class-%{version}.tar.gz
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Moose) = 0.39
 BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Getopt) = 0.05
 BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Types) = 0.04
 BuildRequires:  perl(Path::Class) = 0.16
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.62
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.88
 
 Requires:   perl(Class::MOP)
 Requires:   perl(Moose) = 0.39
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.06-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.05-12
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ff8e41d..7c8013a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-79a0d19fe8b4547b232605645c75aaad  MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05.tar.gz
+8b98dcc6ef5d056781162c9e14a8e94d  MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class] clean up spec for modern rpmbuild

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit 983016efbc335d1f0238e914f2302f3861611ba9
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 08:33:36 2012 -0600

clean up spec for modern rpmbuild

 perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec |8 +---
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
index c913fc3..0954bb8 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TH/THEPLER/MooseX-Types-Path-Class-%{version}.tar.gz
 
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-Path-Class
-BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 BuildArch:  noarch
 
@@ -44,8 +43,6 @@ for both Path::Class::Dir and Path::Class::File.
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
 find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
@@ -55,11 +52,7 @@ find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null 
';'
 %check
 make test
 
-%clean
-rm -rf %{buildroot} 
-
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes README 
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
@@ -67,6 +60,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %changelog
 * Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.06-1
 - update to latest upstream version
+- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
 
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.05-12
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class] drop tests subpackage

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit 1d4a4e21383150c1d9fbf2f5f64076b37cf55f85
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 08:35:13 2012 -0600

drop tests subpackage

 perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec |7 +--
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
index 0954bb8..788e28f 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
@@ -22,9 +22,11 @@ Requires:   perl(Moose) = 0.39
 Requires:   perl(MooseX::Types) = 0.04
 Requires:   perl(Path::Class) = 0.16
 
+# obsolete/provide old tests subpackage
+Obsoletes:  %{name}-tests  0.06-1
+Provides:   %{name}-tests = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %{?perl_default_filter}
-%{?perl_default_subpackage_tests}
 
 %description
 MooseX::Types::Path::Class creates common Moose types, coercions and option
@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null 
';'
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc Changes README 
+%doc Changes README t/
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ make test
 * Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.06-1
 - update to latest upstream version
 - clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
+- drop tests subpackage; move tests to main package documentation
 
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.05-12
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class] silence rpmlint wrong-script-interpreter error

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit 5f02f770261782460559f950ec17492763471ff7
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 08:51:07 2012 -0600

silence rpmlint wrong-script-interpreter error

 perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec |3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
index 788e28f..c5d67a1 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ for both Path::Class::Dir and Path::Class::File.
 %prep
 %setup -q -n MooseX-Types-Path-Class-%{version}
 
+sed -i '1s:^#!.*perl:#!%{__perl}:' t/*.t
+
 %build
 %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ make test
 - update to latest upstream version
 - clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
 - drop tests subpackage; move tests to main package documentation
+- silence rpmlint wrong-script-interpreter error
 
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.05-12
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File String-Flogger-1.101242.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-String-Flogger:

909502184dda0b5833ef752cc0380301  String-Flogger-1.101242.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-String-Flogger] update to 1.101242

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit e73ce058350322086825a27f1633132b3828b640
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 09:00:46 2012 -0600

update to 1.101242

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-String-Flogger.spec |8 +---
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a1e16eb..d00cb87 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 String-Flogger-1.101240.tar.gz
 /String-Flogger-1.101241.tar.gz
+/String-Flogger-1.101242.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-String-Flogger.spec b/perl-String-Flogger.spec
index 455b46c..07be044 100644
--- a/perl-String-Flogger.spec
+++ b/perl-String-Flogger.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-String-Flogger
-Version:1.101241
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:1.101242
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:String munging for loggers
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -39,12 +39,14 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 make test
 
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes LICENSE README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 1.101242-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.101241-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 4df5551..ad3907d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-42668540d4720f1b78efae39c255c33e  String-Flogger-1.101241.tar.gz
+909502184dda0b5833ef752cc0380301  String-Flogger-1.101242.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 806884] RPM2 can't be built with new rpm-4.10

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla 
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806884

--- Comment #1 from Anton Guda a...@dmeti.dp.ua 2012-03-30 15:55:55 EDT ---
Created attachment 574087
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=574087
Patch to hide unpulished names

Some actions will now work, but core ctill works.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File CPAN-Meta-2.120900.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Meta:

47a33638f7d9d449626d896aaddcecd4  CPAN-Meta-2.120900.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-CPAN-Meta] update to 2.120900

2012-03-30 Thread Iain Arnell 
commit 6d728e588955f0c802e69bd148742a43577e6735
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Fri Mar 30 15:17:26 2012 -0600

update to 2.120900

 .gitignore  |1 +
 perl-CPAN-Meta.spec |5 -
 sources |2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 89cbb9b..1ea3534 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ CPAN-Meta-2.102160.tar.gz
 /CPAN-Meta-2.120351.tar.gz
 /CPAN-Meta-2.120530.tar.gz
 /CPAN-Meta-2.120630.tar.gz
+/CPAN-Meta-2.120900.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Meta.spec b/perl-CPAN-Meta.spec
index a66d769..19fd6d5 100644
--- a/perl-CPAN-Meta.spec
+++ b/perl-CPAN-Meta.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-CPAN-Meta
 Summary:Distribution metadata for a CPAN dist
-Version:2.120630
+Version:2.120900
 Release:1%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Mar 30 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2.120900-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Sun Mar 04 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2.120630-1
 - update to latest upstream version
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0d9c941..a8dabd2 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-f8336fb484414c7935581ce03dacf6ea  CPAN-Meta-2.120630.tar.gz
+47a33638f7d9d449626d896aaddcecd4  CPAN-Meta-2.120900.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 803000] perl-Socket-2.000 is available

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla 
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803000

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Socket-2.000-2.fc17|perl-Socket-2.000-1.fc16

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-30 
23:06:11 EDT ---
perl-Socket-2.000-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel