Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 Dear all, I have now created a side tag for f37 as well: f37-build-side-60483. asio is getting built. I will keep the tag open for a week and push the update afterwards. Best regards, Julian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 asio-1.24.0-1.fc38 has now been built and is available in the side tag. Best regards, Julian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Julian Sikorski wrote on 2022/08/14 19:06: Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 asio-1.24.0-1.fc38 has now been built and is available in the side tag. Well, asio{-devel} seems header (template) collection, no library, so actually even without any rebuild, no dependency breakage will happen. Nevertheless is it better that we rebuild all depending src.rpm? ( src.rpms with BuildRequires: asio-devel are only 7, so rebuilding them is not hard anyway.) 1 OpenSceneGraph-0:3.6.5-10.fc37.src 2 abiword-1:3.0.5-4.fc37.src 3 freefem++-0:4.11-2.fc37.src 4 galera-0:26.4.11-3.fc37.src 5 hidviz-0:0.1.5-19.fc37.src 6 hpx-0:1.8.1-1.fc37.src 7 vdrift-0:20141020-27.git5ae309f.fc37.src Best regards, Julian Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Am 14.08.22 um 13:08 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: Julian Sikorski wrote on 2022/08/14 19:06: Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 asio-1.24.0-1.fc38 has now been built and is available in the side tag. Well, asio{-devel} seems header (template) collection, no library, so actually even without any rebuild, no dependency breakage will happen. Nevertheless is it better that we rebuild all depending src.rpm? ( src.rpms with BuildRequires: asio-devel are only 7, so rebuilding them is not hard anyway.) 1 OpenSceneGraph-0:3.6.5-10.fc37.src 2 abiword-1:3.0.5-4.fc37.src 3 freefem++-0:4.11-2.fc37.src 4 galera-0:26.4.11-3.fc37.src 5 hidviz-0:0.1.5-19.fc37.src 6 hpx-0:1.8.1-1.fc37.src 7 vdrift-0:20141020-27.git5ae309f.fc37.src Best regards, Julian Regards, Mamoru Since nobody except Ralf (freefem++ maintainer) responded, may I ask for assistance from provenpackagers? Thank you in advance. Best regards, Julian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Am 20.08.22 um 18:00 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Am 14.08.22 um 13:08 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: Julian Sikorski wrote on 2022/08/14 19:06: Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 asio-1.24.0-1.fc38 has now been built and is available in the side tag. Well, asio{-devel} seems header (template) collection, no library, so actually even without any rebuild, no dependency breakage will happen. Nevertheless is it better that we rebuild all depending src.rpm? ( src.rpms with BuildRequires: asio-devel are only 7, so rebuilding them is not hard anyway.) 1 OpenSceneGraph-0:3.6.5-10.fc37.src 2 abiword-1:3.0.5-4.fc37.src 3 freefem++-0:4.11-2.fc37.srco 4 galera-0:26.4.11-3.fc37.src 5 hidviz-0:0.1.5-19.fc37.src 6 hpx-0:1.8.1-1.fc37.src 7 vdrift-0:20141020-27.git5ae309f.fc37.src Best regards, Julian Regards, Mamoru Since nobody except Ralf (freefem++ maintainer) responded, may I ask for assistance from provenpackagers? Thank you in advance. Best regards, Julian Given the lack of response, I tried to push the update anyway given the low risk of breakage due to it being header-only. Unfortunately, it turns out that my side-tag is gone. Documentation states: Side tags are cleaned up 30 days after creation, or 14 days if they have not been used at all. Make sure and use your side tag before then. Since I used my side tag, I have expected it to still be there. Could someone clarify? Does 14 days apply for any consecutive 14 days? The wording implies that building something for the side tag at any time would make it stay for 30 days. Best regards, Julian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 08:51:13AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Given the lack of response, I tried to push the update anyway given the low > risk of breakage due to it being header-only. Unfortunately, it turns out > that my side-tag is gone. Documentation states: > > Side tags are cleaned up 30 days after creation, or 14 days if they have not > been used at all. Make sure and use your side tag before then. > > Since I used my side tag, I have expected it to still be there. Could > someone clarify? Does 14 days apply for any consecutive 14 days? The wording > implies that building something for the side tag at any time would make it > stay for 30 days. Yes, thats what the intent is... Odd. I am not sure what happened here. We cleanup side tags with: /usr/sbin/koji-sidetag-cleanup --empty-delay=14 --old-delay=30 So, it should have left this one alone for 30days, but it didn't. ;( Perhaps it's a koji bug... :( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue