Re: Error activating XKB configuration. Probably internal X server problem

2004-07-17 Thread Andreas Girardet
Hello
Ignore my message ... 2 nights without sleep made me not see the obvious! 
Found the fix and it is gnome related and not XFree related.

Andreas
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: DMX has broken binary compatibility

2004-07-17 Thread Kevin E Martin
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 12:59:04PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>DMX unconditionally changed MAXFORMATS in misc.h which modified
> the ScreenRec and broke binary compatiblity.

This can be very easily changed back, which I have now done.  In the
future, if you find other areas where the code has caused ABI problems,
please let me know and I will fix the problems.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


DMX has broken binary compatibility

2004-07-17 Thread Mark Vojkovich
   DMX unconditionally changed MAXFORMATS in misc.h which modified
the ScreenRec and broke binary compatiblity.  No third party drivers
will work with XFree86 after the DMX integration.  I think it was
a mistake to unconditionally break binary compatibility in this way.
DMX should be a build option and off by default so that third
party drivers will still work.

Mark.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: xf86Io.c, libos.a && GetTimeInMillis() change.

2004-07-17 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
Just want to confirm something,
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Io.c,v 3.58 has had
GetTimeInMillis() removed from it, the commit message doesn't
say anything specific about it but is the copy of GetTimeInMillis()
from libos.a the one that linked into the XFree86 server from now on?
I can't speak in place of David, but I think it's a good thing to 
finally get rid of this duplicate definition, which has mostly caused 
problems when building oher X servers in addition to the XFree86 one.

There are probably a few more cleanings that could be done now that 
XFree86 uses the libos version (and builds it).
--
	Matthieu
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Error activating XKB configuration. Probably internal X server problem

2004-07-17 Thread Andreas Girardet
Hello XFree devel list
I am the maintainer of the Yoper distro and we are loyal to XFree.
Our Gnome 2.6.1 setup (all latest libraries across the board) is 
currently producing an error upon login that says

Error activating XKB configuration. Probably internal X server problem
then it suggests to run
xprop -root | grep XKB
and
gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/xkb
The output of is
which returns: _XKB_RULES_NAMES(STRING)="xfree86","pc104","us","", ""
and respective
gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/xkb
After spending nights (literally) hunting down the bug within Gnome I have 
found the only relevant postings regarding a similar bug in Xorg with the 
hint that it was fixed by upgrading libxklavier. After doing that I and 
the brave users who use Gnome in Yoper still had the same error.

My programming skills are low compared to my sysadmin skills, so all I 
could do is try out Xorg in form of SuSE's src rpm and here you go .. the 
error message is gone.

Now all I can think at this point is that xorg has the bug and XFree 
hasn't but I might be very much wrong.

I assume it has something to do with loading the keymap's correctly.
Since I am no programmer I can only offer practical help here to fix it as 
I really intend to stay loyal to XFree, I hope that one of you XFree 
guru's could lend me 10 fingers :)  and find the possible Bug in XFree or 
at least exclude once in for all that it is XFree.

Thanks in advance
Regards
Andreas Girardet
Yoper principal maintainer
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel