[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:41:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within
> > freenet, so taking down github will not stop freenet.
> Yes but does it work? How much work, how many retries, how long, to
> bootstrap the repo off freenet on a fresh node? I guess this'd be an
> interesting performance metric ... IIRC infocalypse is fairly sophisticated
> so there should be relatively few lone keys that if they fail the whole
> repo fails...

On a fresh node I don?t know? I just tried it on my own node, and it took a 
considerable time with multiple tries. But then, just downloading the 60MiB of 
history should take a few hours for well-spread files, and I have 5 other 
downloads running, so I expect half a day at least. And sadly freenet keeps 
crashing on me, while I do the downloads.

Then I also found out, that my reinserting script was broken? fixed now.

I?m thinking about improving that by also regularly inserting a bootstrap 
bundle which can simply be downloaded as file and contains the whole history.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:41:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within
> > freenet, so taking down github will not stop freenet.
> Yes but does it work? How much work, how many retries, how long, to
> bootstrap the repo off freenet on a fresh node? I guess this'd be an
> interesting performance metric ... IIRC infocalypse is fairly sophisticated
> so there should be relatively few lone keys that if they fail the whole
> repo fails...

On a fresh node I don’t know… I just tried it on my own node, and it took a
considerable time with multiple tries. But then, just downloading the 60MiB of
history should take a few hours for well-spread files, and I have 5 other
downloads running, so I expect half a day at least. And sadly freenet keeps
crashing on me, while I do the downloads.

Then I also found out, that my reinserting script was broken… fixed now.

I’m thinking about improving that by also regularly inserting a bootstrap
bundle which can simply be downloaded as file and contains the whole history.

Best wishes,
Arne

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Matthew Toseland]

On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600,
> Robert Hailey wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > 
> > > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
> > 
> > And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before 
> > the FBI comes in our direction. :-)
> 
> I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within freenet, 
> so taking down github will not stop freenet.

Yes but does it work? How much work, how many retries, how long, to bootstrap 
the repo off freenet on a fresh node? I guess this'd be an interesting 
performance metric ... IIRC infocalypse is fairly sophisticated so there should 
be relatively few lone keys that if they fail the whole repo fails...
> 
> Best wishes,
> Arne
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Matthew Toseland]

On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600,
> Robert Hailey wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > 
> > > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
> > 
> > And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before 
> > the FBI comes in our direction. :-)
> 
> I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within freenet, 
> so taking down github will not stop freenet.

Yes but does it work? How much work, how many retries, how long, to bootstrap 
the repo off freenet on a fresh node? I guess this'd be an interesting 
performance metric ... IIRC infocalypse is fairly sophisticated so there should 
be relatively few lone keys that if they fail the whole repo fails...
> 
> Best wishes,
> Arne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 14:34:57 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
> 
> Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> > > ...
> > > Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> > > 
> > > Ian.
> > 
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
> 
> Also the freenet user count in freenet stats increased in the last week, but
> it was mostly the 72 hour stats, so many seem to not be staying. That?s
> what I see as major challenge: How to make the initial usage of freenet so
> attractive that users want to stay.
> 
> I see that actually as much more important than any algorithm fixes, because
> all our algorithms get better with more users.
Some more data:

Mentions on twitter: 

http://topsy.com/s/freenetproject.org?order=date&window=realtime

And Google+:

http://plus.topsy.com/s/freenetproject.org?window=realtime

Mention Graph:

http://analytics.topsy.com/?q=freenetproject.org

And our own freenet stats:

https://theseeker.bounceme.net:/freenet:USK at gjw6StjZOZ4OAG-
pqOxIp5Nk11udQZOrozD4jld42Ac,BYyqgAtc9p0JGbJ~18XU6mtO9ChnBZdf~ttCn48FV7s,AQACAAE/graphs/1710

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
hei?t politisch sein, 
ohne es zu merken. 
- Arne (http://draketo.de)


-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 14:34:57 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
>
> Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> > > ...
> > > Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> > >
> > > Ian.
> >
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
>
> Also the freenet user count in freenet stats increased in the last week, but
> it was mostly the 72 hour stats, so many seem to not be staying. That’s
> what I see as major challenge: How to make the initial usage of freenet so
> attractive that users want to stay.
>
> I see that actually as much more important than any algorithm fixes, because
> all our algorithms get better with more users.
Some more data:

Mentions on twitter:

http://topsy.com/s/freenetproject.org?order�te&window=realtime

And Google+:

http://plus.topsy.com/s/freenetproject.org?window=realtime

Mention Graph:

http://analytics.topsy.com/?q=freenetproject.org

And our own freenet stats:

https://theseeker.bounceme.net:/freenet:USK@gjw6StjZOZ4OAG-
pqOxIp5Nk11udQZOrozD4jld42Ac,BYyqgAtc9p0JGbJ~18XU6mtO9ChnBZdf~ttCn48FV7s,AQACAAE/graphs/1710

Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
- Arne (http://draketo.de)




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

At Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:08 -0500,
Juiceman wrote:
> Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th
> April 2011 please?  If I didn't know better I would think this project was
> abandoned...
> Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other
> Internet blacklist activities?
> Perhaps:
> 
> "Freenet is becoming more necessary every day.  We recommend reading up on
> laws that may affect you, such as
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/Internet-Blacklist-Legislation";

And maybe a link to the mail about the newest release? If we could just add 
that on every release, the project would automatically show its activity again.

Best wishes,
Arne
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600,
Robert Hailey wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> 
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
> 
> And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before the 
> FBI comes in our direction. :-)

I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within freenet, 
so taking down github will not stop freenet.

Best wishes,
Arne
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

At Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:08 -0500,
Juiceman wrote:
> Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th
> April 2011 please?  If I didn't know better I would think this project was
> abandoned...
> Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other
> Internet blacklist activities?
> Perhaps:
> 
> "Freenet is becoming more necessary every day.  We recommend reading up on
> laws that may affect you, such as
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/Internet-Blacklist-Legislation";

And maybe a link to the mail about the newest release? If we could just add 
that on every release, the project would automatically show its activity again.

Best wishes,
Arne

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600,
Robert Hailey wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> 
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
> 
> And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before the 
> FBI comes in our direction. :-)

I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within freenet, 
so taking down github will not stop freenet.

Best wishes,
Arne

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Juiceman]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Michael Grube wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Robert Hailey  > wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
>>
>> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
>> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
>>
>> And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before
>> the FBI comes in our direction. :-)
>>
>
> =/
>
> Development alone will not save us.
>
> With a sufficient set of arguments and PR, we should be able not only to
> keep the FBI at bay, but even portray ourselves as people who are doing
> good(because we are!). This is exactly how WikiLeaks protected themselves
> before they got really big. They were very practiced at answering 
> *all*counterarguments to their activities. I have seen a good deal of
> development and tech support discussion in #freenet, but I have not seen a
> proportionate amount of legal and social defenses.
>
> Maybe it would be possible to make friends with the EFF or ACLU? I'm not
> sure how we'd get the help we may need.
>
>
Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th
April 2011 please?  If I didn't know better I would think this project was
abandoned...
Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other
Internet blacklist activities?
Perhaps:

"Freenet is becoming more necessary every day.  We recommend reading up on
laws that may affect you, such as
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/Internet-Blacklist-Legislation";

-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death,
your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Juiceman]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Michael Grube wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Robert Hailey  > wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
>>
>> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
>> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
>>
>> And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before
>> the FBI comes in our direction. :-)
>>
>
> =/
>
> Development alone will not save us.
>
> With a sufficient set of arguments and PR, we should be able not only to
> keep the FBI at bay, but even portray ourselves as people who are doing
> good(because we are!). This is exactly how WikiLeaks protected themselves
> before they got really big. They were very practiced at answering 
> *all*counterarguments to their activities. I have seen a good deal of
> development and tech support discussion in #freenet, but I have not seen a
> proportionate amount of legal and social defenses.
>
> Maybe it would be possible to make friends with the EFF or ACLU? I'm not
> sure how we'd get the help we may need.
>
>
Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th
April 2011 please?  If I didn't know better I would think this project was
abandoned...
Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other
Internet blacklist activities?
Perhaps:

"Freenet is becoming more necessary every day.  We recommend reading up on
laws that may affect you, such as
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/Internet-Blacklist-Legislation";

-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death,
your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> > ...
> > Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> > 
> > Ian.
> 
> well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)

Also the freenet user count in freenet stats increased in the last week, but it 
was mostly the 72 hour stats, so many seem to not be staying. That?s what I see 
as major challenge: How to make the initial usage of freenet so attractive that 
users want to stay.

I see that actually as much more important than any algorithm fixes, because 
all our algorithms get better with more users.

Best wishes,
Arne

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Well, my take is that with SOPA/PIPA coming today and Megaupload busted and 
Wikipedia taking a stand for the open web and against censorship, our 
relentless promotion of freenet over the last few months seems to have taken 
hold. People are realizing that freenet still exists and has already created 
solutions to many hard problems. 

Especially the Mesh-People were quite interested in seeing that Freenet 
actually works over restricted routes, which is a perfect fit for mesh 
networking technology, where these restricted routes are enforced by the 
hardware.

And maybe people now realize, that those nutcracks who said ?we need freenet to 
provide the basic necessarities for free speech? were actually right?

I reworked the english Wikipedia page a while back to show the current 
capabilities of freenet. Maybe people did the same for the french site.
And about Facebook: That?s all about momentum. 
In Sone we also get more new users per day.

So, how to improve the first impression people get? Do the installers work 
everywhere? Are there enough people in the chatroom to help newcomers?

In IRC someone dropped by and said that he is gathering all the old time 
freenetters fro his computer club again. And they are building a darknet. 
Sparky the name was, I think.

And damn, the SOPA vote is today. So people should actually get freenet wie 
they can still reach the site.

Best wishes,
Arne

PS: @toad: This would be the perfect time to get done with the exams :). But I 
think it woould be the worst time to deploy NLM. Never break the wave while it 
runs. Ride it and smooth out every disbalance as fast as possible to keep the 
momentum.

At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:15:07 -0600,
Ian Clarke wrote:
> 
> [1  ]
> [1.1  ]
> Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> 
> https://img.skitch.com/20120123-nhxbcfmkwnjriwrr3bga7aamq3.png
> 
> Anyone know what is going on?  Since the beginning of January referrals
> from Facebook have increased by 2,500%, referrals from Wikipedia have
> doubled, and referrals from fr.wikipedia.org have increased 10X.
> 
> We're also getting some traffic from:
> 
> http://www.linuxzone.es/2012/01/20/the-freenet-project-una-red-anti-sopa-y-sinde/
> 
> Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> 
> Ian.
> 
> -- 
> Ian Clarke
> Founder, The Freenet Project
> Email: ian at freenetproject.org
> [1.2  ]
> 
> [2  ]
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Michael Grube]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Robert Hailey
wrote:

>
> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
>
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
>
> And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before
> the FBI comes in our direction. :-)
>

=/

Development alone will not save us.

With a sufficient set of arguments and PR, we should be able not only to
keep the FBI at bay, but even portray ourselves as people who are doing
good(because we are!). This is exactly how WikiLeaks protected themselves
before they got really big. They were very practiced at answering
*all*counterarguments to their activities. I have seen a good deal of
development and tech support discussion in #freenet, but I have not seen a
proportionate amount of legal and social defenses.

Maybe it would be possible to make friends with the EFF or ACLU? I'm not
sure how we'd get the help we may need.



>
> --
> Robert Hailey
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Robert Hailey]

On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:

> well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)

And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before the 
FBI comes in our direction. :-)

--
Robert Hailey

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Michael Grube]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Robert Hailey
wrote:

>
> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
>
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
>
> And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before
> the FBI comes in our direction. :-)
>

=/

Development alone will not save us.

With a sufficient set of arguments and PR, we should be able not only to
keep the FBI at bay, but even portray ourselves as people who are doing
good(because we are!). This is exactly how WikiLeaks protected themselves
before they got really big. They were very practiced at answering
*all*counterarguments to their activities. I have seen a good deal of
development and tech support discussion in #freenet, but I have not seen a
proportionate amount of legal and social defenses.

Maybe it would be possible to make friends with the EFF or ACLU? I'm not
sure how we'd get the help we may need.



>
> --
> Robert Hailey
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl@freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> > ...
> > Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> > 
> > Ian.
> 
> well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)

Also the freenet user count in freenet stats increased in the last week, but it 
was mostly the 72 hour stats, so many seem to not be staying. That’s what I see 
as major challenge: How to make the initial usage of freenet so attractive that 
users want to stay.

I see that actually as much more important than any algorithm fixes, because 
all our algorithms get better with more users.

Best wishes,
Arne
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Well, my take is that with SOPA/PIPA coming today and Megaupload busted and 
Wikipedia taking a stand for the open web and against censorship, our 
relentless promotion of freenet over the last few months seems to have taken 
hold. People are realizing that freenet still exists and has already created 
solutions to many hard problems. 

Especially the Mesh-People were quite interested in seeing that Freenet 
actually works over restricted routes, which is a perfect fit for mesh 
networking technology, where these restricted routes are enforced by the 
hardware.

And maybe people now realize, that those nutcracks who said “we need freenet to 
provide the basic necessarities for free speech” were actually right…

I reworked the english Wikipedia page a while back to show the current 
capabilities of freenet. Maybe people did the same for the french site.
And about Facebook: That’s all about momentum. 
In Sone we also get more new users per day.

So, how to improve the first impression people get? Do the installers work 
everywhere? Are there enough people in the chatroom to help newcomers?

In IRC someone dropped by and said that he is gathering all the old time 
freenetters fro his computer club again. And they are building a darknet. 
Sparky the name was, I think.

And damn, the SOPA vote is today. So people should actually get freenet wie 
they can still reach the site.

Best wishes,
Arne

PS: @toad: This would be the perfect time to get done with the exams :). But I 
think it woould be the worst time to deploy NLM. Never break the wave while it 
runs. Ride it and smooth out every disbalance as fast as possible to keep the 
momentum.

At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:15:07 -0600,
Ian Clarke wrote:
> 
> [1  ]
> [1.1  ]
> Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> 
> https://img.skitch.com/20120123-nhxbcfmkwnjriwrr3bga7aamq3.png
> 
> Anyone know what is going on?  Since the beginning of January referrals
> from Facebook have increased by 2,500%, referrals from Wikipedia have
> doubled, and referrals from fr.wikipedia.org have increased 10X.
> 
> We're also getting some traffic from:
> 
> http://www.linuxzone.es/2012/01/20/the-freenet-project-una-red-anti-sopa-y-sinde/
> 
> Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> 
> Ian.
> 
> -- 
> Ian Clarke
> Founder, The Freenet Project
> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
> [1.2  ]
> 
> [2  ]
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl@freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Robert Hailey]

On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:

> well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)

And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before the 
FBI comes in our direction. :-)

--
Robert Hailey

___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler]

On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> ...
> Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> 
> Ian.

well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)

good byte
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Sich]

Le 23/01/2012 14:15, Ian Clarke a ?crit :
> Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
>
> https://img.skitch.com/20120123-nhxbcfmkwnjriwrr3bga7aamq3.png
>
> Anyone know what is going on?  Since the beginning of January 
> referrals from Facebook have increased by 2,500%, referrals from 
> Wikipedia have doubled, and referrals from fr.wikipedia.org 
>  have increased 10X.
>
> We're also getting some traffic from:
>
> http://www.linuxzone.es/2012/01/20/the-freenet-project-una-red-anti-sopa-y-sinde/
>
> Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
>
> Ian.

Perhaps with the end of MegaUpload...
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Ian Clarke]

Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:

https://img.skitch.com/20120123-nhxbcfmkwnjriwrr3bga7aamq3.png

Anyone know what is going on?  Since the beginning of January referrals
from Facebook have increased by 2,500%, referrals from Wikipedia have
doubled, and referrals from fr.wikipedia.org have increased 10X.

We're also getting some traffic from:

http://www.linuxzone.es/2012/01/20/the-freenet-project-una-red-anti-sopa-y-sinde/

Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: ian at freenetproject.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler]

On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> ...
> Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> 
> Ian.

well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)

good byte


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Sich]

Le 23/01/2012 14:15, Ian Clarke a écrit :

Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:

https://img.skitch.com/20120123-nhxbcfmkwnjriwrr3bga7aamq3.png

Anyone know what is going on?  Since the beginning of January 
referrals from Facebook have increased by 2,500%, referrals from 
Wikipedia have doubled, and referrals from fr.wikipedia.org 
 have increased 10X.


We're also getting some traffic from:

http://www.linuxzone.es/2012/01/20/the-freenet-project-una-red-anti-sopa-y-sinde/

Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?

Ian.


Perhaps with the end of MegaUpload...
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

[Ian Clarke]

Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:

https://img.skitch.com/20120123-nhxbcfmkwnjriwrr3bga7aamq3.png

Anyone know what is going on?  Since the beginning of January referrals
from Facebook have increased by 2,500%, referrals from Wikipedia have
doubled, and referrals from fr.wikipedia.org have increased 10X.

We're also getting some traffic from:

http://www.linuxzone.es/2012/01/20/the-freenet-project-una-red-anti-sopa-y-sinde/

Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: i...@freenetproject.org
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl