Re: DDeps 1.1.1
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 at 16:16:02 UTC, lempiji wrote: Recently, I created a tool to create a module dependency graph for the D language. The tool can compare two versions and visualize the differences. I think it's useful for source reviews. Try it if you are interested. Some screenshots are included in the README. - DUB: http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddeps - GitHub: https://github.com/lempiji/ddeps Very nice! I’ll have to bookmark this. Bastiaan.
Re: DDeps 1.1.1
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 at 16:16:02 UTC, lempiji wrote: Recently, I created a tool to create a module dependency graph for the D language. The tool can compare two versions and visualize the differences. I think it's useful for source reviews. Try it if you are interested. Some screenshots are included in the README. - DUB: http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddeps - GitHub: https://github.com/lempiji/ddeps Very nice! Does this respect versions? E.g. to separate unit tests importing everything else, from library code being relatively modular. This will be useful for modularising DMD.
DDeps 1.1.1
Recently, I created a tool to create a module dependency graph for the D language. The tool can compare two versions and visualize the differences. I think it's useful for source reviews. Try it if you are interested. Some screenshots are included in the README. - DUB: http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddeps - GitHub: https://github.com/lempiji/ddeps
Re: DMD metaprogramming enhancement
On Friday, 26 April 2019 at 06:29:04 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote: On Thursday, 25 April 2019 at 23:41:32 UTC, Suleyman wrote: [...] You have no idea how happy I am to hear this has been fixed! So many of my designs have been hamstrung by 5710, and it's been around since the dawn of time. -- Simen Boh, there’s a revert under discussion :( - https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9702 ( not merged yet but 路♂️)
Re: DStep 1.0.0
On 2019-04-26 10:33, Robert M. Münch wrote: Are there are any functional differences between the platforms? The short answer is yes. Or can I just use the OSX version and use the generated .d files with the DMD Windows version too? The longer answer is that it depends. DStep behaves the same way as the compiler (Clang in this case). That means that there are different predefined macro constants for different platforms. For example: #if _WIN32 #include DWORD foo(); #else int foo(); #endif If you run DStep on Windows it will output: extern (C): DWORD foo(); But on any other platform it will output: extern (C): int foo(); So it's a question if the header files contain any code like the above. The bindings that DStep uses for libclang are generated on macOS but are used unchanged on Windows and Linux as well. But these are the most forgiven headers that I've seen when it comes to create bindings. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: DMD metaprogramming enhancement
On Friday, 26 April 2019 at 06:34:26 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote: BTW, at least two people have promised money outside BountySource to have 5710 fixed: https://forum.dlang.org/post/gjzrklkxfmgjjdfor...@forum.dlang.org -- Simen And my offer still stands. Suleyman, do you have an email address I can contact you at to arrange payment?
