Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)
Thank you Don!!  I was trying to get a general feel for what to expect, 
a  ms, or us type of answer...


I was thinking of using the IF to avoid the DSP filters for just the 
reasons you cited.  I am sure you are correct about testing-- time to 
break out the scope...


Thanks again for your insight!

73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
Award Manager, 30MDG Grid Contest
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL OOC for Oregon

On 1/13/19 1:08 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Dave,

I would be cautious about looking only at the IF.  That is all in front 
of the DSP.
Certainly the DSP creates some latency, but that is not what we are 
talking about.  The DSP latency will delay all signals.


So test in the configuration that you will likely use.  If using the IF 
output, then test only at the IF.


Your question relates to the recovery time for the entire receiver.
And that does include the filters, both roofing filters and the DSP 
filtering.


Don't forget that the Hardware AGC cannot be turned off, but that does 
not come into play until the signal is greater than S-9+60


As A result, I believe you need to do actual testing with your 
particular K3 under various filtering conditions.
In other words, you are asking a very complex question, and you have not 
given us the other configuration settings and filters to be used - other 
than AGC OFF.  For that reason, your K3 may have a different answer than 
others.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 3:43 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hi Don,

Thanks for the combined brain power!  I have a plan for testing if it 
ever gets that far.  I am just trying to see if the K3 receiver 
recovers sufficiently fast in a general sort of way first.


I believe I could look at RF levels on the IF while transmitting, 
(using a different transmitter and a storage scope to look at the K3 
IF), then just drop the carrier while still looking at the levels with 
that scope.   When I see signals return to the IF I have the recovery 
time of the receiver.


I am just trying to skip that step hoping someone actually knows the 
recovery time of the receiver, as opposed to actual testing.


If the K3 is even close, I will set up test jig for it, if not, then 
I'll look for a better way.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Dave,

I would be cautious about looking only at the IF.  That is all in front 
of the DSP.
Certainly the DSP creates some latency, but that is not what we are 
talking about.  The DSP latency will delay all signals.


So test in the configuration that you will likely use.  If using the IF 
output, then test only at the IF.


Your question relates to the recovery time for the entire receiver.
And that does include the filters, both roofing filters and the DSP 
filtering.


Don't forget that the Hardware AGC cannot be turned off, but that does 
not come into play until the signal is greater than S-9+60


As A result, I believe you need to do actual testing with your 
particular K3 under various filtering conditions.
In other words, you are asking a very complex question, and you have not 
given us the other configuration settings and filters to be used - other 
than AGC OFF.  For that reason, your K3 may have a different answer than 
others.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 3:43 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hi Don,

Thanks for the combined brain power!  I have a plan for testing if it 
ever gets that far.  I am just trying to see if the K3 receiver recovers 
sufficiently fast in a general sort of way first.


I believe I could look at RF levels on the IF while transmitting, (using 
a different transmitter and a storage scope to look at the K3 IF), then 
just drop the carrier while still looking at the levels with that scope. 
  When I see signals return to the IF I have the recovery time of the 
receiver.


I am just trying to skip that step hoping someone actually knows the 
recovery time of the receiver, as opposed to actual testing.


If the K3 is even close, I will set up test jig for it, if not, then 
I'll look for a better way.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)

Hi Don,

Thanks for the combined brain power!  I have a plan for testing if it 
ever gets that far.  I am just trying to see if the K3 receiver recovers 
sufficiently fast in a general sort of way first.


I believe I could look at RF levels on the IF while transmitting, (using 
a different transmitter and a storage scope to look at the K3 IF), then 
just drop the carrier while still looking at the levels with that scope. 
 When I see signals return to the IF I have the recovery time of the 
receiver.


I am just trying to skip that step hoping someone actually knows the 
recovery time of the receiver, as opposed to actual testing.


If the K3 is even close, I will set up test jig for it, if not, then 
I'll look for a better way.


Thanks again for your thoughts here!

73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
Award Manager, 30MDG Grid Contest
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL OOC for Oregon

On 1/13/19 11:53 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Dave,

I am trying to think of how you might test it.
The best I can think of is to listen to both a noise source and an XG3 
sending a CW string of dots.  Increase the speed of the CW sent by the 
XG3 until you can no longer hear the noise source between dits.
Then either calculate the off times for the dits or measure it on an 
oscilloscope.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 2:07 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hi again Scott,

Thank you for your answer, but I am not being clear.

Not during break in, just sitting there in receive...  If the radio is 
hit with an S9+ signal, how long after the S9+ signal terminates 
before the K3 receiver recovers enough to show an weak signal on the 
IF...  No T/R happening, just sitting there in receive.


You are close to what I am looking for...  I am investigating the 
possibility of using the K3 as the receiver portion in a homebrew 
bistatic radar setup running in the HF spectrum.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread K9MA
You ought to be able to measure it by simply looking at the audio output 
with a scope. Just send some dits and look at how long it takes for the 
noise to reappear. You might have to use a noise source, or a low level 
carrier at a slightly different frequency.


Of course, with the AGC off and RF gain high enough to detect a weak 
signal, things are going to overload. I'd run the test first with a test 
signal which does not overload the receiver, and then one equivalent to 
a very strong signal. When actually listening to the radio with AGC off, 
of course, it is essential to use the audio clipper to prevent hearing 
damage. That may or may not affect recovery time.


73,
Scott K9MA

On 1/13/2019 13:53, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Dave,

I am trying to think of how you might test it.
The best I can think of is to listen to both a noise source and an XG3 
sending a CW string of dots.  Increase the speed of the CW sent by the 
XG3 until you can no longer hear the noise source between dits.
Then either calculate the off times for the dits or measure it on an 
oscilloscope.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 2:07 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hi again Scott,

Thank you for your answer, but I am not being clear.

Not during break in, just sitting there in receive...  If the radio 
is hit with an S9+ signal, how long after the S9+ signal terminates 
before the K3 receiver recovers enough to show an weak signal on the 
IF...  No T/R happening, just sitting there in receive.


You are close to what I am looking for...  I am investigating the 
possibility of using the K3 as the receiver portion in a homebrew 
bistatic radar setup running in the HF spectrum.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to k...@sdellington.us



--
Scott  K9MA

k...@sdellington.us

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Dave,

I am trying to think of how you might test it.
The best I can think of is to listen to both a noise source and an XG3 
sending a CW string of dots.  Increase the speed of the CW sent by the 
XG3 until you can no longer hear the noise source between dits.
Then either calculate the off times for the dits or measure it on an 
oscilloscope.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 2:07 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hi again Scott,

Thank you for your answer, but I am not being clear.

Not during break in, just sitting there in receive...  If the radio is 
hit with an S9+ signal, how long after the S9+ signal terminates before 
the K3 receiver recovers enough to show an weak signal on the IF...  No 
T/R happening, just sitting there in receive.


You are close to what I am looking for...  I am investigating the 
possibility of using the K3 as the receiver portion in a homebrew 
bistatic radar setup running in the HF spectrum.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)

Hi again Scott,

Thank you for your answer, but I am not being clear.

Not during break in, just sitting there in receive...  If the radio is 
hit with an S9+ signal, how long after the S9+ signal terminates before 
the K3 receiver recovers enough to show an weak signal on the IF...  No 
T/R happening, just sitting there in receive.


You are close to what I am looking for...  I am investigating the 
possibility of using the K3 as the receiver portion in a homebrew 
bistatic radar setup running in the HF spectrum.


73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
Award Manager, 30MDG Grid Contest
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL OOC for Oregon

On 1/13/19 10:25 AM, K9MA wrote:

On 1/13/2019 12:10, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Is it faster than .0001 ms?


Certainly not. I'm not sure whether it is recovery time or latency, but 
in full break-in mode, you hear nothing between the dits above something 
like 10 wpm. (Even with AGC off.) With other non-DSP receivers, one can 
hear between the dits up to at least 30 wpm with fast AGC. Perhaps it's 
just the price we pay for the power of DSP.


Many years ago, when there were sunspots, I recall hearing multiple 
echos on 15 meters. I timed them, and the time interval was about 133 
ms, just about the time it takes radio waves to circumnavigate the 
earth. I heard them go around at least twice, and that was receiving off 
the back of a beam. Talk about long path! That would not have been 
possible with a DSP receiver.


73,

Scott K9MA


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread K9MA

On 1/13/2019 12:10, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Is it faster than .0001 ms?


Certainly not. I'm not sure whether it is recovery time or latency, but 
in full break-in mode, you hear nothing between the dits above something 
like 10 wpm. (Even with AGC off.) With other non-DSP receivers, one can 
hear between the dits up to at least 30 wpm with fast AGC. Perhaps it's 
just the price we pay for the power of DSP.


Many years ago, when there were sunspots, I recall hearing multiple 
echos on 15 meters. I timed them, and the time interval was about 133 
ms, just about the time it takes radio waves to circumnavigate the 
earth. I heard them go around at least twice, and that was receiving off 
the back of a beam. Talk about long path! That would not have been 
possible with a DSP receiver.


73,

Scott K9MA

--
Scott  K9MA

k...@sdellington.us

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)

Is it faster than .0001 ms?

73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
Award Manager, 30MDG Grid Contest
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL OOC for Oregon

On 1/13/19 9:06 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Dave,

That depends on slow or fast AGC and the setting of the AGC DCY menu 
parameter.

Fast is very quick - just watch the S-meter to get some visual indication.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 11:49 AM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hello,

Anyone able to answer this question please?

In the presence of a strong signal, say -75 db, (or around S9), once 
that signal ceases, how long does it take the K3 receiver to return to 
normal receive capability again?



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)

Sorry, I forgot to add, AGC off...

73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
Award Manager, 30MDG Grid Contest
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL OOC for Oregon

On 1/13/19 9:06 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Dave,

That depends on slow or fast AGC and the setting of the AGC DCY menu 
parameter.

Fast is very quick - just watch the S-meter to get some visual indication.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 11:49 AM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hello,

Anyone able to answer this question please?

In the presence of a strong signal, say -75 db, (or around S9), once 
that signal ceases, how long does it take the K3 receiver to return to 
normal receive capability again?



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Dave,

That depends on slow or fast AGC and the setting of the AGC DCY menu 
parameter.

Fast is very quick - just watch the S-meter to get some visual indication.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/13/2019 11:49 AM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote:

Hello,

Anyone able to answer this question please?

In the presence of a strong signal, say -75 db, (or around S9), once 
that signal ceases, how long does it take the K3 receiver to return to 
normal receive capability again?



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K3: Receiver recovery time

2019-01-13 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)

Hello,

Anyone able to answer this question please?

In the presence of a strong signal, say -75 db, (or around S9), once 
that signal ceases, how long does it take the K3 receiver to return to 
normal receive capability again?


--
73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
Award Manager, 30MDG Grid Contest
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL OOC for Oregon
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com