Re: We are under a spam attack of sorts. Could you help me out.

2002-07-12 Thread Reto Inversini
Title: Message



Hi,

If dbcorp.ab.ca is the domain you are reffering to, 
then I guess the answer lies in your 
dns-configuration:

;  DiG 8.3  any 
dbcorp.ab.ca;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch;; got 
answer:;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 
4;; flags: qr aa ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1;; 
QUERY SECTION:;; dbcorp.ab.ca, type = ANY, 
class = IN

;; ANSWER 
SECTION:dbcorp.ab.ca. 
1H IN A 
207.54.97.121-- every mail for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be pointed to this 
address, unless a MX is specified

dbcorp.ab.ca. 
1H IN NS 
empire.dbcorp.com.dbcorp.ab.ca. 
1H IN NS 
ns2.terago.ca.dbcorp.ab.ca. 
1H IN SOA empire.dbcorp.com. mis.dbcorp.com. 
( 
30 
; 
serial 
15M ; 
refresh 
10M ; 
retry 
1D 
; 
expiry 
1H ) ; 
minimum

dbcorp.ab.ca. 
1H IN MX 10 mail.
-- I see an MX record ... 

;; ADDITIONAL 
SECTION:empire.dbcorp.com. 1H IN 
A 207.54.97.123

;; Total query time: 279 msec;; FROM: flagship 
to SERVER: default -- 212.254.207.10;; WHEN: Fri Jul 12 18:41:09 2002;; 
MSG SIZE sent: 30 rcvd: 178
hope this helps, 

regards reto

- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Rod 
  Cappon 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 5:57 PM
  Subject: We are under a spam attack of 
  sorts. Could you help me out.
  
  How are they doing 
  this.
  
  Someone out their 
  is sending out spam and for a return address they were specifying an email 
  address and [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Then 
  they used a open mail relay server to send out the spam. When they send a 
  email to a bad email address the receiving mail server sends a non delivery 
  report to our mail server. Our quick solution to that was to drop the MX 
  record for the dbcorp.ab.ca domain. We could do this mainly because it has not 
  been used for several years now. The only reason we had it was for legacy 
  support. Since we dropped the MX record I figured it would not be possible for 
  mail servers to send us NDR. But now we are receiving NDR at our web server 
  for the dbcorp.ab.cadomain. I don't understand why a mail server would 
  be sending NDR to that IP address. Right now we have set up a MX record under 
  dbcorp.ab.ca that points to the web server of the company that is sending out 
  the spam but I still see the NDR coming to us on our web server.I 
  assumed if there is no MX record there could be no mail delivery be it a NDR 
  or otherwise. How are they managing to make email servers point to our web 
  site for the NDRList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Re: SMTP gateway servers

2002-07-11 Thread Reto Inversini

hi gene,

linux with postfix as MTA and amavis (linked to any virus scanner you like)
works great as email gateway - and it doesn't cost you a cent.

regards
reto
- Original Message -
From: Gene Scruggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:26 PM
Subject: SMTP gateway servers


 Our company is working on upgrading our SMTP gateway servers and I am
 disillusioned with how our current software has evolved.  I would like to
 hear how others have implemented this concept and what product they used.

 TIA

 Gene A Scruggs
 American College of Emergency Physicians
 Technical Support Manager

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: INbound IMC mail conversion processing SLOW

2002-05-05 Thread Reto Inversini

 Messages/hr, Queued MTS-IN etc...)
 All seems fine until we start to receive 2800 - 3200 messages/hour
and then
 all goes painfully slow. The measure of Inbound bytes doesn't seem
to matter
 to much.

just guessing ... could the problem be elsewhere ... e.g. do you do
DNS-lookups for every mail received and then the DNS is the
bottleneck?

regards ... reto


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: You cannot enter an Internet address here.

2002-05-02 Thread Reto Inversini

permissions on the unix-box?

/reto
- Original Message -
From: Miguel Bosseloo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:27 PM
Subject: You cannot enter an Internet address here.


 I have a user that claims that he could take an attachment out of
outlook
 right click, select, Save As, in the save in addres bar, click the
arrow
 select an ftp location. He calim he could do it before we upgraded
to
 Windows 2000. When he tries it now he gets the following message.
You
 cannot enter an Internet address here. Enter a path that points to a
 location on your computer on the network. The fnny thing is that I
 configure this ftp location to a unix box I can brouse it but can
not save
 the file there any ideas.

 Exchange 5.5 Service Pack 4
 Windows 2000 Sevice Pack 2
 Outlook 2000

 Thanks, for your help.

 Miguel

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Reto Inversini
Title: RE: Mailbox size limits



... well, I don't use any quotas ... discspace is 
cheap and I don't like whining users ... but beware ... if you give them one 
finger they are going to take the whole hand :-) ... most users a reasonable and 
using between 5meg and say, 120meg ... but there are always a few, urmm, special 
cases ... until now the highscoreis 400meg - and then they start 
complaining that outlook is sooo slow ... 

/Reto

- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Precht, David 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:59 
PM
  Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits
  
  Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 Currently for client on Notes 50 Highest that I 
  have seen 300 
  BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to 
  get this, 1 gig ! 
  Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any 
  attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain 
  confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 
  disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
  recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
  the original message.
  -Original Message- From: Jon 
  Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox 
  size limits 
  I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size 
  limits. We have a user at one client who keeps 
  insisting that 90Mb isn't enough (we've already made 
  exceptions to get her to that point). I'd like to have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous. For 
  95% of the users, we use the defaults from Exchange 
  (45/60/80), which still seems large to me. Then 
  there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. Ever. 
  thanks, 
  Jon Farr 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Re: Listserve(s) for Exchange -- - vs. Linux

2002-04-19 Thread Reto Inversini

Hi,

I'm rather new on this list, so first of all: Hello all and thanks to
everyone who is contributing to this list.

We use Exchange 5.5 for internal e-Mail and groupware and a Linux
based mailhub for external traffic, basically for two reasons:

- Virus Scanning at the border of our net (AMaViS in conjunction with
a command line scanner is the best AV product I have ever seen)
- Feeding Mailing Lists

So if you have the necessary Linux  sendmail (or qmail, postfix or
whatever you like) skills then I would do it like that. You gain some
security and a real powerful MTA at the border of your net.

Exporting and reimporting should not be a problem. You can export it
as .txt or .csv and then reformat it according to the needs of your
listserver and reimport it.

Please do not misunderstand me: Exchange _is_ a great product, we use
it for five years and it has proven to meet our needs and even more.
But I like it better to have Exchange inside the LAN and a dedicated
MTA on the gateway. I hope I'm not causing a flamewar :-)

best regards

reto inversini

- Original Message -
From: david burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: Listserve(s) for Exchange -- - vs. Linux


 I need to set up a few small listserve(s) for our non-profit.  Our
current
 email server is Exchange 5.5 (win2k Server). I also have a Linux
sendmail
 server for test and development purposes. Is there a stable Exchange
 compatible product, or should I set up the listserve of my linux
R/Hat
 box?  Is it possible to import my address books/mailing lists to the
Linux
 box from Exchange?  Or is it better to run all of our email from the
 Exchange server?  We are a small organization with only 10
users/client
 email accounts.
 tia,
 David Burrows
 Communications Director
 Pacific NorthWest Economic Region
 Seattle, WA

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: AOL postmaster errors

2002-04-19 Thread Reto Inversini
Title: Message



Hi,

As someone already statet, most probably a forged 
e-mail address ... if you are running a webserver on this box, I would also 
check for vulnerable scripts that could be abused to send out mails, eg. 
formail.pl ...

Regards

Reto Inversin

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sethi, 
  Ali 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:51 
PM
  Subject: AOL postmaster errors
  
  
  Has anyone seen this 
  before? It looks like someone is 
  using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails 
  out. We have NAV for Exchange 
  blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus attachments. The users is 
  complaining that she is getting a ton of these post master errors. Any suggestions on 
  how to eliminate this? We 
  are not setup as relaying.
  Exhange 5.5 
  sp4
  Windows 2k sp2 
  sr1
  
  Thanks,
  
  
  The original message was 
  received at Fri, 19 Apr 
  2002 15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from 
  logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132]
  
  
  *** ATTENTION 
  ***
  
  Your e-mail is being 
  returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is 
  listed in the section
  labeled: "- The following 
  addresses had permanent fatal errors -".
  
  The reason your mail is 
  being returned to you is listed in the section
  labeled: "- Transcript of 
  Session Follows -".
  
  The line beginning with 
  "" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be 
  delivered. The next line contains 
  a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail 
  servers.
  
  Please direct further 
  questions regarding this message to your e-mail 
  administrator.
  
  --AOL 
  Postmaster
  
  
  
   - The following addresses 
  had permanent fatal errors - 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   - Transcript of session 
  follows -
  550 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Host unknown (Name server: 
  sabertooth.victim.net: host not found)List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Re: OWA Requirements?

2002-01-07 Thread Reto Inversini

Hi,

If you have a bit of cash available but not that much as necessary for a
Checkpoint consider the sonicwall. I use them for an NGO and I just love it.
Easy to configure and maintain and yet rather powerful.

www.sonicwall.com

As Patrick Johanssons pointed out: If you have no cash at all (but
sufficient knowledge) then a Linux or *BSD  solution would do the trick.
There are plenty of them.

By the way: If you connect any Server to the Internet without appropriate
protection, my bet is that you have already been visited by some people, you
would not like to meet in your network. Look out for a Firewall - the sooner
the better. On a small network, protected by a sonicwall, I have about 5
Scans a day, 2 to 10 Attacks and about 20 times a day someone trying to
access a service I don't want to be accessed by someone from the outside.

Best regards

Reto Inversini


 -Original Message-
 From: ext aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 07 January, 2002 21:32
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: OWA Requirements?


 None Taken! It is something that is in process. Unfortunately, we are at
 the beginning of the process, and need a tremendous amount of help - and
 as usual with small non-profits - funds are extremely limited.
 Fortunately, we are on a 10.x.x.x range nated through the gateway
 router.

 Do you have any good suggestions for hardware or software firewall
 solutions?

 TIA,
 aci



  No offense, I have no firewall solution currently in place. Are you
 nuts?
 
  - Original Message -
  From: aci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:44
  Subject: RE: OWA Requirements?
 

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Exchange admin

2001-10-26 Thread Reto Inversini

Hi,

First time on this list, pleased to meet you all :-)

... VNC is really a great tool, I use it on my LAN. But always remember: It
does not provide
any encryption by itself ... so using it on a non-secured line is pretty
dangerous, unless you make
a ssh tunnel or something similar.

Regards
reto inversini

- Original Message -
From: Scott Erwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange admin


 Download VNC. It's small. Fits on a floppy.
 http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc

 Install vnc on your SBS machine and run WinVNC(app mode). Give it a
 password.

 run the vnc viewer on your machine and type in the name of your server.
 Enter the password.

 Now you can administrate it as if you were sitting at the machine.



 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:23 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exchange admin


 Thanks everybody for the input, everybody basically said the same thing
 which of course does not work, I would have figured that out on my own if
 it was so easy!  Unfortunately, perhaps becasue it is SBS4.5, the
 installation program requires that Small Business Server be installed.  I
 was kind of hoping someone would know of some switches or something.
 Please try again!!

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm