RE: [expert] network question

2000-03-13 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger


The full name.

Or at least with the full name, the httpd startup succeeds, and with
the first component it fails, so I assume it's correct . . .

On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, you wrote:
| Run linuxconf from a terminal.  It deals with such setup and other stuff, like 
| file systems and user accounts.  Linuxconf is your friend.
| 
| To replace the question with one of my own, I'm not really understanding the 
| "basic host information" group (that's where you set the host name).  In the 
| "host name" box, is that the full name (e.g., "vick.resnet.grinnell.edu") or 
| just the computer's name (e.g., "vick")?
| 
| -Andrew Vick
| 
| >= Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
| >I have just installed Mamdrake 7.0, My network admin gave me an static
| >ip.
| >When I enterned the ip information and the etc. my system couldnt see
| >the network.
| >
| >So I reloaded my system and selected DHCP. now my system will connect .
| >
| >But why is my hostname localhost.localdomain. ?
| >How can I name my system it something other than localhost.localdomain.?
-- 
I am "Brian, the man from babble-on" (Brian T. Schellenberger).
I can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I support http://www.eff.org & http://www.programming-freedom.org .
I boycott amazon.com.  See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html .



Re: [expert] network question

2000-03-11 Thread John Aldrich

On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> John Aldrich wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> > > Run linuxconf from a terminal.  It deals with such setup and other stuff, like
> > > file systems and user accounts.  Linuxconf is your friend.
> > >
> > > To replace the question with one of my own, I'm not really understanding the
> > > "basic host information" group (that's where you set the host name).  In the
> > > "host name" box, is that the full name (e.g., "vick.resnet.grinnell.edu") or
> > > just the computer's name (e.g., "vick")?
> > >
> > I believe the "hostname" is JUST the computer name.
> > John
> 
> hostname is the hostname not the computer name (i.e. localhost.localdomain or
> mindless.wonder)
> in xxx.yyy xxx is the computer name and yyy is the domainname
> 
I consider "computername" to be JUST the xxx, so we both agree. :-)
i.e the computer name on my personal machine is "slave1." The "Fully
qualified hostname" of my machine is slave1.chattanooga.net
John



Re: [expert] network question

2000-03-10 Thread Tom Berkley

John Aldrich wrote:

> On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> > Run linuxconf from a terminal.  It deals with such setup and other stuff, like
> > file systems and user accounts.  Linuxconf is your friend.
> >
> > To replace the question with one of my own, I'm not really understanding the
> > "basic host information" group (that's where you set the host name).  In the
> > "host name" box, is that the full name (e.g., "vick.resnet.grinnell.edu") or
> > just the computer's name (e.g., "vick")?
> >
> I believe the "hostname" is JUST the computer name.
> John

hostname is the hostname not the computer name (i.e. localhost.localdomain or
mindless.wonder)
in xxx.yyy xxx is the computer name and yyy is the domainname

Tom



RE: [expert] network question

2000-03-10 Thread John Aldrich

On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> Run linuxconf from a terminal.  It deals with such setup and other stuff, like 
> file systems and user accounts.  Linuxconf is your friend.
> 
> To replace the question with one of my own, I'm not really understanding the 
> "basic host information" group (that's where you set the host name).  In the 
> "host name" box, is that the full name (e.g., "vick.resnet.grinnell.edu") or 
> just the computer's name (e.g., "vick")?
> 
I believe the "hostname" is JUST the computer name.
John



Re: [expert] network question

2000-03-10 Thread huth

i think with netconf or linuxconf you can also name your host and your
domainname. if not maybe you can set it in /etc/sysconfig/network and/or
/etc/Hostname /etc/Domainname.



Re: [expert] network question

2000-03-09 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 08 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> >%_I have just installed Mamdrake 7.0, My network admin gave me an static
> ip.
> When I enterned the ip information and the etc. my system couldnt see
> the network.
> 
> So I reloaded my system and selected DHCP. now my system will connect .
> 
> But why is my hostname localhost.localdomain. ?
> How can I name my system it something other than localhost.localdomain.?
> 

Easy. Edit your HOSTNAME file, or run LinuxConf and select your
"network" setup and change it there. I'm *guessing* the problem is
that your system is saying "Hi, I'm 'localhost.localdomain'" and your
gateway is saying "Heck, I don't know anyone by that name. Go away!"
Try configuring your Network and I'm guessing it'll work just fine.
John



RE: [expert] network question

2000-03-09 Thread Andrew Vick

Run linuxconf from a terminal.  It deals with such setup and other stuff, like 
file systems and user accounts.  Linuxconf is your friend.

To replace the question with one of my own, I'm not really understanding the 
"basic host information" group (that's where you set the host name).  In the 
"host name" box, is that the full name (e.g., "vick.resnet.grinnell.edu") or 
just the computer's name (e.g., "vick")?

-Andrew Vick

>= Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
>I have just installed Mamdrake 7.0, My network admin gave me an static
>ip.
>When I enterned the ip information and the etc. my system couldnt see
>the network.
>
>So I reloaded my system and selected DHCP. now my system will connect .
>
>But why is my hostname localhost.localdomain. ?
>How can I name my system it something other than localhost.localdomain.?



[expert] network question

2000-03-09 Thread Lee

I have just installed Mamdrake 7.0, My network admin gave me an static
ip.
When I enterned the ip information and the etc. my system couldnt see
the network.

So I reloaded my system and selected DHCP. now my system will connect .

But why is my hostname localhost.localdomain. ?
How can I name my system it something other than localhost.localdomain.?


begin:vcard 
n:Binkley;Robert
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:;DCFS
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:HP-ADMIN
x-mozilla-cpt:;6304
fn:Robert Binkley
end:vcard



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Jean-Louis Debert

Robert Binkley wrote:
> How do you settup ip Masq

IP Masquerade is a kernel function, basically it allows
a linux machine to do NAT (Network Address Translation)
and so allow machines on a private IP network, to access
another network (or the Internet) without having to be
known there (from the Internet, or the other network,
all traffic will seem to originate on the machine doing
the IP Masq).
So in your case you would probably configure your Linux
machine at work to do the routing/masquerading, and your
home machine could access the Internet (and/or your company
network, if you wish) without having to configure _anything_
on your workplace network (except for the linux machine).
  
You have to install:
1. a kernel with IP masq enabled (most distributions
will do).
2. management utilities for firewall rules (also most
distros have them).

As to configuration, you have the man pages for the utilities
(man ipchains) and the HOWTOs:
   . IP Masquerading  mini-Howto
   . IPCHAINS  Howto

   and of course you still have newsgroups and ML (such as here)
for more help ... but please read the doc FIRST !!!

-- 
Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 Annemasse  France
old Linux fan



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Albert E. Whale

Al's right, without the software being loaded (TFTP is a Great Choice)
the Xterm won't run.

Where is the Software Booted from now?  Can you move it to the Linux
Server?



Al Smith wrote:
> 
> Well the problem that you are having with the envizex terminal is not
> surprising. In order to get it to work you need the code for the xterminal
> either on a floppy disk or loaded on the linux box. Since the Xterminal is an
> HP and the software is propriatery software (Netstation 9 or 7.1) I doubt you
> will get it to work.
> 
> But if you do have the code loaded. How about using TFTP?
> 
> -Al
> 
> > Trevor Farrell wrote:
> >
> > > Yann Forget wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > lee binkley a écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > Al Smith wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Al
> > > > >
> > > > > I will nedd 2 nic .
> > > > > so in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> > > > > ipchains -P foward DENY
> > > > > ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> > > > > echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but in that order :
> > > >
> > > >  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
> > > >  ipchains -P foward DENY
> > > >  ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Yann
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ionix Services, les services réseaux d'aujourd'hui
> > > > http://www.ionix-services.com/
> > > > Tel 04 76 70 64 24
> > > > Fax 04 76 70 64 25
> > >
> > > I only had to type  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward once from the
> > > command line - the system saves that instruction into the
> > > /etc/sysconfig/network file, so you only need the two ipchains
> > > instruction in /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> >
> > I have another question:
> >
> > I have an XEnvixzex Xterminal in which my boss wants setup into his
> > office.
> > To Monitor 2 servers, using a progeam called gpm 9which is a gui
> > interface about your system.
> >
> > Is there a way to connect this Xterminal to my linux box , without have
> > to be nfs, the reason I dont want nfs is because out network sometin
> > hangs.
> >
> >

-- 
Albert E. Whale   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hky.com/aewhale.html
--
Sr. Database, Internet and Unix Systems Consultant

Pennsylvania Parenthood Initiative - PAPI
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/4688/papi.htm
The Father's Rights Network - http://www.hky.com/frn/frnhome.html
Parents without Partners - Past President
Co-Founder of The Purple Heart Foundation



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Al Smith

Well the problem that you are having with the envizex terminal is not
surprising. In order to get it to work you need the code for the xterminal
either on a floppy disk or loaded on the linux box. Since the Xterminal is an
HP and the software is propriatery software (Netstation 9 or 7.1) I doubt you
will get it to work.

But if you do have the code loaded. How about using TFTP?

-Al


> Trevor Farrell wrote:
>  
> > Yann Forget wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > lee binkley a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Al Smith wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Al
> > > >
> > > > I will nedd 2 nic .
> > > > so in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> > > > ipchains -P foward DENY
> > > > ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> > > > echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
> > >
> > > Yes, but in that order :
> > >
> > >  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
> > >  ipchains -P foward DENY
> > >  ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Yann
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ionix Services, les services réseaux d'aujourd'hui
> > > http://www.ionix-services.com/
> > > Tel 04 76 70 64 24
> > > Fax 04 76 70 64 25
> >
> > I only had to type  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward once from the
> > command line - the system saves that instruction into the
> > /etc/sysconfig/network file, so you only need the two ipchains
> > instruction in /etc/rc.d/rc.local
>  
> I have another question:
>  
> I have an XEnvixzex Xterminal in which my boss wants setup into his
> office.
> To Monitor 2 servers, using a progeam called gpm 9which is a gui
> interface about your system.
>  
> Is there a way to connect this Xterminal to my linux box , without have
> to be nfs, the reason I dont want nfs is because out network sometin
> hangs.
>  
>  



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Robert Binkley

Jean-Louis Debert wrote:

> Robert Binkley wrote:
> >  have located a product for about 300.00
> > called webrat
> > www.rampnet.com
>
> That's webramp, not webrat ...
>
> But, I don't understand: do you plan to put this
> on your workplace LAN as port of entry from your
> home ?
>
> Wouldn't it be much less expensive to put a modem on
> your workplace PC, and configure it (the workplace PC)
> as a router/firewall for your home PC ???
> That's easy to do with Linux (IP masq) and the home PC
> wouldn't even know the difference, even if it runs
> Windows ...
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 74 Annemasse  France
> old Linux fan

The answer to your first question is yes:

How do you settup ip Masq




Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Jean-Louis Debert

Robert Binkley wrote:
>  have located a product for about 300.00
> called webrat
> www.rampnet.com

That's webramp, not webrat ...

But, I don't understand: do you plan to put this
on your workplace LAN as port of entry from your
home ?

Wouldn't it be much less expensive to put a modem on
your workplace PC, and configure it (the workplace PC)
as a router/firewall for your home PC ???
That's easy to do with Linux (IP masq) and the home PC
wouldn't even know the difference, even if it runs
Windows ...


-- 
Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 Annemasse  France
old Linux fan



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Robert Binkley

Trevor Farrell wrote:

> Yann Forget wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > lee binkley a écrit :
> > >
> > > Al Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such.
> > > >
> > > > -Al
> > >
> > > I will nedd 2 nic .
> > > so in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> > > ipchains -P foward DENY
> > > ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> > > echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
> >
> > Yes, but in that order :
> >
> >  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
> >  ipchains -P foward DENY
> >  ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yann
> >
> > --
> > Ionix Services, les services réseaux d'aujourd'hui
> > http://www.ionix-services.com/
> > Tel 04 76 70 64 24
> > Fax 04 76 70 64 25
>
> I only had to type  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward once from the
> command line - the system saves that instruction into the
> /etc/sysconfig/network file, so you only need the two ipchains
> instruction in /etc/rc.d/rc.local

I have another question:

I have an XEnvixzex Xterminal in which my boss wants setup into his
office.
To Monitor 2 servers, using a progeam called gpm 9which is a gui
interface about your system.

Is there a way to connect this Xterminal to my linux box , without have
to be nfs, the reason I dont want nfs is because out network sometin
hangs.




Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Robert Binkley

Jean-Louis Debert wrote:

> > I have 2 computers .
> >
> > 1: A mandrake 7.0 new install, 256 meg ram  Ethernet Card  ( System at
> > Work)  (T-1 Line)
> > 2: A  windows 2000 box at home  which also has 256 meg ram 600 Mhz
> > (Modem Line For Kids)
> >
> > Is it possible  that system 1 be connected to system 2 . So system 2
> > can  benifuit from the work T1 Line.
>
> Well, it's possible to connect system 2 to system 1 (will need some
> modem line on system 1, or its network, too...) but obviously
> you _cannot_ benefit fully of the T1 speed, because everything
> will be limited by your modem line's speed ...
>
> Now if your aim is only to avoid the ISP charging you for the
> modem connection, that's okay ... and if by chance you have
> a toll free number to your workplace, you may even avoid
> the phone line charge ...
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 74 Annemasse  France
> old Linux fan

 have located a product for about 300.00
called webrat
www.rampnet.com



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Trevor Farrell

Yann Forget wrote:

> Hi,
>
> lee binkley a écrit :
> >
> > Al Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such.
> > >
> > > -Al
> >
> > I will nedd 2 nic .
> > so in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> > ipchains -P foward DENY
> > ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> > echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
>
> Yes, but in that order :
>
>  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
>  ipchains -P foward DENY
>  ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
>
> Regards,
> Yann
>
> --
> Ionix Services, les services réseaux d'aujourd'hui
> http://www.ionix-services.com/
> Tel 04 76 70 64 24
> Fax 04 76 70 64 25

I only had to type  echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward once from the
command line - the system saves that instruction into the
/etc/sysconfig/network file, so you only need the two ipchains
instruction in /etc/rc.d/rc.local



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Yann Forget

lee binkley a écrit :
> 
> I have 2 computers .
> 
> 1: A mandrake 7.0 new install, 256 meg ram  Ethernet Card  ( System at
> Work)  (T-1 Line)
> 2: A  windows 2000 box at home  which also has 256 meg ram 600 Mhz
> (Modem Line For Kids)
> 
> Is it possible  that system 1 be connected to system 2 . So system 2
> can  benifuit from the work T1 Line.

HOWTO IP-Masquerade
Yann

-- 
Ionix Services, les services réseaux d'aujourd'hui
http://www.ionix-services.com/
Tel 04 76 70 64 24
Fax 04 76 70 64 25



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-03-01 Thread Yann Forget

Hi,

lee binkley a écrit :
> 
> Al Smith wrote:
> 
> > Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such.
> >
> > -Al
> 
> I will nedd 2 nic .
> so in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> ipchains -P foward DENY
> ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
> echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward

Yes, but in that order :

 echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
 ipchains -P foward DENY
 ipchains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ

Regards,
Yann

-- 
Ionix Services, les services réseaux d'aujourd'hui
http://www.ionix-services.com/
Tel 04 76 70 64 24
Fax 04 76 70 64 25



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-02-29 Thread Jean-Louis Debert

> I have 2 computers .
>
> 1: A mandrake 7.0 new install, 256 meg ram  Ethernet Card  ( System at
> Work)  (T-1 Line)
> 2: A  windows 2000 box at home  which also has 256 meg ram 600 Mhz
> (Modem Line For Kids)
>
> Is it possible  that system 1 be connected to system 2 . So system 2
> can  benifuit from the work T1 Line.

Well, it's possible to connect system 2 to system 1 (will need some
modem line on system 1, or its network, too...) but obviously
you _cannot_ benefit fully of the T1 speed, because everything
will be limited by your modem line's speed ...

Now if your aim is only to avoid the ISP charging you for the 
modem connection, that's okay ... and if by chance you have
a toll free number to your workplace, you may even avoid
the phone line charge ...

-- 
Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 Annemasse  France
old Linux fan



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-02-29 Thread lee binkley

Al Smith wrote:

> Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such.
>
> -Al

I will nedd 2 nic .
so in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
ipchains -P foward DENY
ipcaahains -A foward -i eth1 -j MASQ
echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward



Re: [expert] Network Question:

2000-02-29 Thread Ramon Gandia


> > I have 2 computers .
> >
> > 1: A mandrake 7.0 new install, 256 meg ram  Ethernet Card  ( System at
> > Work)  (T-1 Line)
> > 2: A  windows 2000 box at home  which also has 256 meg ram 600 Mhz
> > (Modem Line For Kids)
> >
> > Is it possible  that system 1 be connected to system 2 . So system 2
> > can  benifuit from the work T1 Line.

You can do a mini-ISP thing.  Get a Web Ramp.  The model with
external modems is fine, like the 300e or 310e.  use a single
modem.  Your home computer then dials into the webramp via
its regular modem/phone line.  The webramp answers and puts
you on the ethernet at the office.  How you go from there is
up to you.  http://www.rampnet.com

Its a small box, size of a paperback or cigar box.  It has
3 serial ports for up to three modems.  Other end has a small
ethernet hub.  It is a complete dial in/dial out and IP Masquerade
solution in a small box with no moving parts.  About $300, far
cheaper than a computer.  From the ethernet side it is managed
via a built-in web server interface.  Out of the box it is
192.168.1.1, but that can be changed easily.  There are several
models; be sure you get one that allows dial-in.  

You can do the same thing with an older 486 or Pentium box
running IPMasquerade, Coyote Linux, Linux Router Project  or
FreeSCO (Linux based) or IPRoute (MSDOS based).  Of those, it
seems
Coyote has its act put together the best.  I am playing with one
here
right now.  Coyote does ether-ether and does not do PPP, but the
others all do ether-ether, ether-PPP or PPP-PPP.

In my experience, using a dedicated box like the WebRamp is
a better solution if it fits your requirements. Cisco, Bay,
Ascend and others make similar equipment.


-- 
Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin == Nook Net
http://www.nook.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
285 West First Avenue tel. 907-443-7575
P.O. Box 970  fax. 907-443-2487
Nome, Alaska 99762-0970  Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525



[expert] Network Question:

2000-02-29 Thread Al Smith

let me correct what I just sent.

if the 2 machines aren't at the same location you might have a problem and it
could be costly with having to purchasing routers and such.

-Al


> I have 2 computers .
> 
> 1: A mandrake 7.0 new install, 256 meg ram  Ethernet Card  ( System at
> Work)  (T-1 Line)
> 2: A  windows 2000 box at home  which also has 256 meg ram 600 Mhz
> (Modem Line For Kids)
> 
> Is it possible  that system 1 be connected to system 2 . So system 2
> can  benifuit from the work T1 Line.
> 
> 
> 



[expert] Network Question:

2000-02-29 Thread Al Smith

Yes it is possible if you use IP masquarding and such. 

-Al



[expert] Network Question:

2000-02-29 Thread lee binkley

I have 2 computers .

1: A mandrake 7.0 new install, 256 meg ram  Ethernet Card  ( System at
Work)  (T-1 Line)
2: A  windows 2000 box at home  which also has 256 meg ram 600 Mhz
(Modem Line For Kids)

Is it possible  that system 1 be connected to system 2 . So system 2
can  benifuit from the work T1 Line.