[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1
Alexander Strange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 > Added Files: > gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info > > --- NEW FILE: gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info --- > Package: gimp-freefonts > Version: 0.10 > Revision: 2 > Depends: xfontpath > PostInstScript: << > #!/bin/sh > if test -x %p/bin/xfontpath; then > %p/bin/xfontpath --silent install freefont > fi > if test -f /etc/X11/XftConfig; then > if grep -v -q `%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont /etc/X11/XftConfig; > then > echo dir \"`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont\" >> > /etc/X11/XftConfig > fi > fi > echo "All done. You may need to restart X to get antialiased fonts" > echo "in some applications." ><< I'm going kinda cross-eyed looking at all this, so I might have some fundamental misunderstand here, but... Why do you only sometimes do a -x test for xfontpath before calling it? If it's not present but XftXConfig is, this script will crash. I don't know much about xfontpath, but it appears that its presence affects the installation footprint of gimp-freefonts, which isn't right. I see you have a Depends:xfontpath, but I don't know if fink and dpkg have a deterministic order when installing multiple packages at once. Maybe you should first do a -x test and then crash with a "you must have xfontpath installed before attempting to install gimp-freefonts" message. You do the same thing in the PostRmScript, but now there's an even weirder dependency/ordering problem: you must have xfontpath installed in order to uninstall gimp-freefonts. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1
Alexander Strange wrote: On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:54 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: install -d -m 755 %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont install -c -m 644 * %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont I don't think this is legal.. it will make different .debs for different people. It'll be luck of the draw to work in the bindist. Have there been any problems with applesystemfonts and msttcorefonts? I copied those lines from them. Isn't `%p/bin/xfontpath basedir` just a complicated way for saying %p/lib/X11/fonts? What's wrong with it? -- Martin --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1
On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:54 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: install -d -m 755 %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont install -c -m 644 * %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont I don't think this is legal.. it will make different .debs for different people. It'll be luck of the draw to work in the bindist. -Ben Have there been any problems with applesystemfonts and msttcorefonts? I copied those lines from them. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1
On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: install -d -m 755 %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont install -c -m 644 * %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont I don't think this is legal.. it will make different .debs for different people. It'll be luck of the draw to work in the bindist. -Ben --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Colorizing info files in emacs.
On 23 Jan 2004, at 9:34 AM, Andrea Riciputi wrote: Hi, I was wondering if someone has tried to setup emacs in order to colorize fink's info files. I've no idea about how to get it, but I think it would be useful. Any suggestion? I have started writing a major mode for fink. It's still very much a work in progress. So far the following are highlighted: • Comments • field names • % expansions • Unrecognised % expansions • Description errors - Starting with "A" or "An" - Starting with lower case - Ending with "." - Longer than 45 characters • instances of package name where %n/%v should be used. It has some major problems too: • If you delete the Package: value, emacs goes into a tight loop It's been a long time since I've done anything with it. If anyone is interested I could send what I have so far... -- Rohan Lloyd --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Colorizing info files in emacs.
Hi, I was wondering if someone has tried to setup emacs in order to colorize fink's info files. I've no idea about how to get it, but I think it would be useful. Any suggestion? Cheers, Andrea. --- Andrea Riciputi "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- (Richard Feynman) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Again problems with ghostscript.
Thanks. It works now. Nevertheless I think it would be better to make the entire situation more friendly to the end-user. Cheers, Andrea. P.S.: To those interested system-ghostscript8 seems to work perfectly under 10.3 On 22 Jan 2004, at 22:54, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: The usual fix for the "node exists" error is to remove the package and have it be reinstalled by a dependency: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#node-exists --- Andrea Riciputi "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- (Richard Feynman) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Again problems with ghostscript.
The usual fix for the "node exists" error is to remove the package and have it be reinstalled by a dependency: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#node-exists -- Alexander Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX On Jan 22, 2004, at 4:47 PM, Andrea Riciputi wrote: Hi, the system-foo issue is getting intriguing. I'm trying to install PyX that depends on ghostscript and tetex. I've installed system-ghostscript8 (that I've adapted from 10.2-gcc3.3 tree without any problem) and system-tetex (since I've installed Gerben Wierda's teTeX distro). Now when I try to install PyX I get the following error message: Failed: Internal error: node for system-tetex already exists What's going on here?? I really don't understand it! Thanks in advance, Andrea. P.S.: As suggested by someone answering my previous post, I think this situation should be fixed as soon as possible. At the moment dealing with packages that depends on ghostscript and tetex could be a nightmare. --- Andrea Riciputi "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- (Richard Feynman) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Again problems with ghostscript.
Hi, the system-foo issue is getting intriguing. I'm trying to install PyX that depends on ghostscript and tetex. I've installed system-ghostscript8 (that I've adapted from 10.2-gcc3.3 tree without any problem) and system-tetex (since I've installed Gerben Wierda's teTeX distro). Now when I try to install PyX I get the following error message: Failed: Internal error: node for system-tetex already exists What's going on here?? I really don't understand it! Thanks in advance, Andrea. P.S.: As suggested by someone answering my previous post, I think this situation should be fixed as soon as possible. At the moment dealing with packages that depends on ghostscript and tetex could be a nightmare. --- Andrea Riciputi "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- (Richard Feynman) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
