Re: python 3

2017-06-07 Thread Michael J. Waters
Hi Jonathan,

I am excited for PETSc and wish I could help!

Is there any form adaptive mesh refinement on the horizon?

Best,

-Mike


On 6/7/17 4:03 PM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed) wrote:
> Yes. More likely to happen is that we'll add support for PETSc, but that's 
> not imminent, either.
>
>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Michael J. Waters  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> So FiPy running in Python 3 won't have MPI based parallelism until
>> PyTrilinos supports Python 3?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> On 6/7/17 2:01 PM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
>>> Hi Nils,
>>>
>>> FiPy is not written for Python 3, but it does work after applying
>>> 2to3. However, only the Scipy solvers are then available. See,
>>>
>>> 
>>> https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/USAGE.html#running-under-python-3
>>>
>>> To fully make the switch to Python 3, FiPy needs to be natively
>>> updated, which hasn't happened yet. Also, FiPy needs to move away from
>>> using Trilinos as PyTrilinos hasn't been updated to Python 3.
>>> Unfortunately, I can't give a timeline on when those changes will be
>>> made.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Nils Becker
>>>  wrote:
 hi,

 i'm considering updating my scripts from 2.7 to python 3.4 or 3.6.
 should i expect any problems? is fipy tested on py 3?

 thanks!

 ___
 fipy mailing list
 fipy@nist.gov
 http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]

>>>
>> ___
>> fipy mailing list
>> fipy@nist.gov
>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>   [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]

___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
  [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]


Re: python 3

2017-06-07 Thread Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed)
Yes. More likely to happen is that we'll add support for PETSc, but that's not 
imminent, either.

> On Jun 7, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Michael J. Waters  wrote:
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> So FiPy running in Python 3 won't have MPI based parallelism until 
> PyTrilinos supports Python 3?
> 
> Best,
> 
> -Mike
> 
> 
> On 6/7/17 2:01 PM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
>> Hi Nils,
>> 
>> FiPy is not written for Python 3, but it does work after applying
>> 2to3. However, only the Scipy solvers are then available. See,
>> 
>>
>> https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/USAGE.html#running-under-python-3
>> 
>> To fully make the switch to Python 3, FiPy needs to be natively
>> updated, which hasn't happened yet. Also, FiPy needs to move away from
>> using Trilinos as PyTrilinos hasn't been updated to Python 3.
>> Unfortunately, I can't give a timeline on when those changes will be
>> made.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Nils Becker
>>  wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> 
>>> i'm considering updating my scripts from 2.7 to python 3.4 or 3.6.
>>> should i expect any problems? is fipy tested on py 3?
>>> 
>>> thanks!
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> fipy mailing list
>>> fipy@nist.gov
>>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>>   [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>  [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]


___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
  [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]


Re: python 3

2017-06-07 Thread Michael J. Waters
Hi Daniel,

So FiPy running in Python 3 won't have MPI based parallelism until 
PyTrilinos supports Python 3?

Best,

-Mike


On 6/7/17 2:01 PM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
> Hi Nils,
>
> FiPy is not written for Python 3, but it does work after applying
> 2to3. However, only the Scipy solvers are then available. See,
>
> 
> https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/USAGE.html#running-under-python-3
>
> To fully make the switch to Python 3, FiPy needs to be natively
> updated, which hasn't happened yet. Also, FiPy needs to move away from
> using Trilinos as PyTrilinos hasn't been updated to Python 3.
> Unfortunately, I can't give a timeline on when those changes will be
> made.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Nils Becker
>  wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i'm considering updating my scripts from 2.7 to python 3.4 or 3.6.
>> should i expect any problems? is fipy tested on py 3?
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>> ___
>> fipy mailing list
>> fipy@nist.gov
>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>>
>
>

___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
  [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]


Re: python 3

2017-06-07 Thread Daniel Wheeler
Hi Nils,

FiPy is not written for Python 3, but it does work after applying
2to3. However, only the Scipy solvers are then available. See,

   
https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/USAGE.html#running-under-python-3

To fully make the switch to Python 3, FiPy needs to be natively
updated, which hasn't happened yet. Also, FiPy needs to move away from
using Trilinos as PyTrilinos hasn't been updated to Python 3.
Unfortunately, I can't give a timeline on when those changes will be
made.

Cheers,

Daniel




On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Nils Becker
 wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm considering updating my scripts from 2.7 to python 3.4 or 3.6.
> should i expect any problems? is fipy tested on py 3?
>
> thanks!
>
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>   [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>



-- 
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
  [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]