Shell games
I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? J~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: What are the best gcc optimization options for Pentium 200 MMX
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adrian Chadd wrote: Its squid's DNS routines, not the shared libraries. heck the squid-dev archies on http://www.squid-cache.org/, as someone found the lines of asm which are wrongly generated. I'd welcome a more specific place. I just don't have the time to search the website from top. Martin -- % Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ BSD User Group Hamburg, Germany http://www.bsdhh.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
vinum raid5 panics
I just put together a 5 disk raid5 system using vinum on 4.0 from last Wed., and I am experiencing random panics. I can force the panic by working on the filesystem, but sometimes just having it mounted kills the machine. I compiled a debug kernel, and got a crash dump, but I am not an expert at debugging crash dumps, so any advice would be appreciated. Instead of dumping out fifty pages of kernel and hardware config could anyone who is working on this let me know what would be helpful... Thanks Chad To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: What are the best gcc optimization options for Pentium 200 MMX
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000, Martin Cracauer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adrian Chadd wrote: Its squid's DNS routines, not the shared libraries. heck the squid-dev archies on http://www.squid-cache.org/, as someone found the lines of asm which are wrongly generated. I'd welcome a more specific place. I just don't have the time to search the website from top. Martin -- % Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ BSD User Group Hamburg, Germany http://www.bsdhh.org/ http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/24/0025.html Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: vinum raid5 panics
It seems Chad David wrote: I just put together a 5 disk raid5 system using vinum on 4.0 from last Wed., and I am experiencing random panics. I can force the panic by working on the filesystem, but sometimes just having it mounted kills the machine. I compiled a debug kernel, and got a crash dump, but I am not an expert at debugging crash dumps, so any advice would be appreciated. Instead of dumping out fifty pages of kernel and hardware config could anyone who is working on this let me know what would be helpful... I bet you see the same problem as others do In my book vinum on 4.0 is plain broken. If its an option for you, vinum under -current works better but its still far from stable. BTW do you have a fxp netcard pr chance ?? -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: vinum raid5 panics
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:32:34PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Chad David wrote: I just put together a 5 disk raid5 system using vinum on 4.0 from last Wed., and I am experiencing random panics. I can force the panic by working on the filesystem, but sometimes just having it mounted kills the machine. I compiled a debug kernel, and got a crash dump, but I am not an expert at debugging crash dumps, so any advice would be appreciated. Instead of dumping out fifty pages of kernel and hardware config could anyone who is working on this let me know what would be helpful... I bet you see the same problem as others do In my book vinum on 4.0 is plain broken. RAID5 has problems, I have no problems with RAID0, RAID1 or RAID0+1 ... BTW do you have a fxp netcard pr chance ?? I do. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: vinum raid5 panics
Same here, I'm running 4 disks RAID-0'd under 4.0-current for Diablo, and it's running fine. Haven't updated anythign to RAID-5 support yet. On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:32:34PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Chad David wrote: I just put together a 5 disk raid5 system using vinum on 4.0 from last Wed., and I am experiencing random panics. I can force the panic by working on the filesystem, but sometimes just having it mounted kills the machine. I compiled a debug kernel, and got a crash dump, but I am not an expert at debugging crash dumps, so any advice would be appreciated. Instead of dumping out fifty pages of kernel and hardware config could anyone who is working on this let me know what would be helpful... I bet you see the same problem as others do In my book vinum on 4.0 is plain broken. RAID5 has problems, I have no problems with RAID0, RAID1 or RAID0+1 ... BTW do you have a fxp netcard pr chance ?? I do. /Jesper To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: vinum raid5 panics
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:32:34PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Chad David wrote: I just put together a 5 disk raid5 system using vinum on 4.0 from last Wed., and I am experiencing random panics. I can force the panic by working on the filesystem, but sometimes just having it mounted kills the machine. I compiled a debug kernel, and got a crash dump, but I am not an expert at debugging crash dumps, so any advice would be appreciated. Instead of dumping out fifty pages of kernel and hardware config could anyone who is working on this let me know what would be helpful... I bet you see the same problem as others do In my book vinum on 4.0 is plain broken. RAID5 has problems, I have no problems with RAID0, RAID1 or RAID0+1 ... To be a little more positive, are these problems being addressed, and is there any way that I can help? BTW do you have a fxp netcard pr chance ?? No, rl0. Chad I do. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
pcmcia copout.
Hi. I have tried this in freebsd-questions twice now, so I guess I shall try here. This is a re-submission. I am still trying to do this install and from what I can ascertain, none of the settings present during the install will make this card work properly. Again, this card has been tested and is working. When this card was working (3.4 stable) I had to explicitly specify its irq in the pccard.conf, if i relied on auto negotiation it would come up but not work correctly. So now, already somewhat knowing the answer to my own question, how can I hax0r the boot disks to achieve this end, ie. hardcode? Original message... Architecture: Dell Latitude Cpi i386. OS: FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE NIC's: 3COM Etherlink III and 3COM Megahertz 56k modem. Media: Floppy disks / FTP via local lan to the internet. This box had 3.4-STABLE running without a hitch three days ago. I tried to cvsup it to 4.0-STABLE and for some reason while building, i decided to use the -k flag on make installworld :( . After I finally got it running again I made some backups i wiped the whole system clean. So with my shiny new install disks, the setup was goin fine, the card inits and the installation begins. However within a meg or two of transfer it dies. What I have tried: 1) all possible irq/memory configurations within sysinstalls limits. Including the default recommendations, which did not work. 2) dissabling as many devices as possible via dell's BIO's, to try and free up the pool. 3) tried the card in a different slot, and remove the other card. 4) a different server 5) set fire to my laptop. From the emergency shell if I bring the device down, then re-init, it begins transfer again, but only for a few seconds. Ping requests lag to around 300 until it goes down. Any ideas? Thanks. -- Paul. === Don't underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] BIO: http://bling.dyn.dhs.org GPG Key fingerprint: 2D7C A7E2 DB1F EA5F 8C6F D5EC 3D39 F274 4AA3E8B9 Public Key's available here: http://bling.dyn.dhs.org/texts/public.html === To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: pcmcia copout.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Halliday writes: : Any ideas? Error messages? Without them it is impossible to know what is going on. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: pcmcia copout.
Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Halliday writes: : Any ideas? Error messages? Without them it is impossible to know what is going on. Hence my need to submit this message, ei. there are none. The only way of determining that the box is down is by pinging it from another box. The device is comming down. And I have no idea why. The device is still up, according to ifconfig, then I bring it down then back up again. Yet when this is done, transfer begins again, then suddenly stops. Warner -- Paul H. === Don't underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] BIO: http://bling.dyn.dhs.org GPG Key fingerprint: 2D7C A7E2 DB1F EA5F 8C6F D5EC 3D39 F274 4AA3E8B9 Public Key's available here: http://bling.dyn.dhs.org/texts/public.html === To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Shell games
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, James Howard wrote: I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? No, it doesn't automatically mean that. The csh-tcsh update was a version upgrade (tcsh is a newer version of csh), which is a separate issue to replacing a shell with a completely different shell. There has been annoying discussion on -arch about this which you should read before replying further, though. Kris In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Shell games
I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? *groan* shame on you ! Everyone went a step further and targeted the sh - bash war ! I'm not sure why sanity won here though. I guess it'll be done the next time it comes up J~ -- Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org http://www.Awfulhak.org brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: vinum raid5 panics
On Tuesday, 18 April 2000 at 21:32:34 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Chad David wrote: I just put together a 5 disk raid5 system using vinum on 4.0 from last Wed., and I am experiencing random panics. I can force the panic by working on the filesystem, but sometimes just having it mounted kills the machine. I compiled a debug kernel, and got a crash dump, but I am not an expert at debugging crash dumps, so any advice would be appreciated. Instead of dumping out fifty pages of kernel and hardware config could anyone who is working on this let me know what would be helpful... Take a look at http://www.lemis.com/vinum/how-to-debug.html. I bet you see the same problem as others do In my book vinum on 4.0 is plain broken. I think that's overstating the case. We've seen some problems with Vinum RAID-5 on IDE drives, but I can't reproduce them here. Søren's looking at the problem. As Søren also indicates, the fxp board seems to aggravate the problem. If its an option for you, vinum under -current works better but its still far from stable. I believe we have exactly the same problems in -CURRENT. It's also currently not being maintained. Greg -- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Shell games
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Brian Somers wrote: I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? *groan* shame on you ! Everyone went a step further and targeted the sh - bash war ! I thought I would try to be reasonable ;) Anyway, someone pointed out the -arch discussions about it. I'll slink away now :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: PC Keyboard Scancodes
I've got a nice script and better version of scancodes.c to do this for me now, so here goes :) These are the keys on the Logitech cordless keyboard, and they are undoubtedly the same for the rest of the Logitech iTouch keyboards. Script or scancodes.c on request, of course :) I hope this will help whosoever decides to take upon the task. KeyPressed Released ------ Sleep-32, 95 -32, -33 Mute-32, 32 -32, -96 Decrease Volume-32, 46 -32, -82 Increase Volume-32, 48 -32, -80 Play-32, 34 -32, -94 Stop-32, 36 -32, -92 Rewind-32, 16 -32, -112 Fast Forward-32, 25 -32, -103 Mail-32, 108-32, -20 Search-32, 101-32, -27 Home-32, 50 -32, -78 Run-32, 102-32, -26 -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]`--' To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
