Re: Perl broken after upgrade
Specifics are always a good idea. What versions did you update from and to? What command did you use? (Pkg, portmaster, make reinstall, etc.) Thanks, Jim Trigg On August 20, 2017 8:42:31 PM EDT, AN wrote: >After a recent update, it seems things that depend on Perl are broken. >Any suggestions to fix are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. > > ># uname -aK >FreeBSD mail.x.x 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #3 r322714: Sun Aug >20 06:05:58 EDT 2017 root@mail.x.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL >amd64 1200040 > > ># sa-update >Socket.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got >handshake >key 0xd200080, needed 0xdf00080) > >___ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: zabbix32-server and frontend fails to build on poudriere
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:12:19AM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote: > Hello all, > > It seems zabbix32-server and zabbix32-frontend fails to build with > poudriere. > > This is the log from poudriere. > > zabbix32-frontend > > == > Unknown extension mysql for PHP 70. > *** Error code 1 That's because mysql extension does not exist in PHP 7.0+ This should fix zabbix32-frontend: https://people.freebsd.org/~dbaio/svn-patch-zabbix3-frontend-mysql.patch > > And this I get from zabbix32-server > > configure: error: Not found mysqlclient library > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to p...@pakhom.spb.ru [maintainer] and attach the > "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-mgmt/zabbix32-server/work/zabbix-3.2.7/config.log" > including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be > a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system > (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). > *** Error code 1 I wasn't able to reproduce this, could you send your list of port options and the full build log? Regards. -- Danilo G. Baio (dbaio) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Samba4 needs switch to turn off messages
On 21/8/17 4:13 am, scratch65...@att.net wrote: Whenever there is more than 1 Samba server running in the same netbios space, they INCESSANTLY put out the same worthless message every 5 minutes exactly, filling up disc space or disrupting whatever's happening on the console. The message always has the same form: "query name response: Multiple [n] reponses received on subnet [this ip address] for name [netbios group name]. This response was from [other ip address]." This has been a problem for years, but so far nobody seems to know how to stop the damned things. Log levels appear to have no effect on them. The server needs to have a switch to turn off such messages! Preferably as a patch, distributed s o o n. I'm just before lodging a bug report, because anyone trying to construe that message as a feature would be likely to spend time in hospital by reason of having herniated their imagination. I don't know the answer, but I suspect that the Samba forums would be the place to ask rather than the FreeBSD forums. __ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Perl broken after upgrade
After a recent update, it seems things that depend on Perl are broken. Any suggestions to fix are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. # uname -aK FreeBSD mail.x.x 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #3 r322714: Sun Aug 20 06:05:58 EDT 2017 root@mail.x.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 1200040 # sa-update Socket.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got handshake key 0xd200080, needed 0xdf00080) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
On Sunday, 20 August 2017 at 7:50:52 -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > ...as a dual-boot with W7, but discovered that, like Linux (or at > least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR. So no dual-boot with older > Windows. People, this question has nothing to do with ports. If you awnt a mailing list, choose one from https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources-mail.html freensd-questions used to be the way to go, but now people use forums, which you can find at https://forums.freebsd.org/ Please don't follow up here. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger g...@freebsd.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Samba4 needs switch to turn off messages
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 at 4:16 am, wrote: > Whenever there is more than 1 Samba server running in the same > netbios space, they INCESSANTLY put out the same worthless > message every 5 minutes exactly, filling up disc space or > disrupting whatever's happening on the console. > > The message always has the same form: > > "query name response: Multiple [n] reponses received on subnet > [this ip address] for name [netbios group name]. This response > was from [other ip address]." > > This has been a problem for years, but so far nobody seems to > know how to stop the damned things. Log levels appear to have no > effect on them. > > The server needs to have a switch to turn off such messages! > > Preferably as a patch, distributed s o o n. > > I'm just before lodging a bug report, because anyone trying to > construe that message as a feature would be likely to spend time > in hospital by reason of having herniated their imagination. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Hi scratch, I recommend asking your question about how these messages can be turned off on the samba mailing list. For best results, you probably want to leave out commentary like "worthless messages" and stick to the facts (not that I disagree with you, just might encourage more discussion). https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/ If you don't get much of a response, you could try raising an upstream samba bug report: https://bugzilla.samba.org/ Good luck! -Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woods...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
zabbix32-server and frontend fails to build on poudriere
Hello all, It seems zabbix32-server and zabbix32-frontend fails to build with poudriere. This is the log from poudriere. zabbix32-frontend == Unknown extension mysql for PHP 70. *** Error code 1 And this I get from zabbix32-server configure: error: Not found mysqlclient library ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to p...@pakhom.spb.ru [maintainer] and attach the "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-mgmt/zabbix32-server/work/zabbix-3.2.7/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). *** Error code 1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:28:01PM EDT, L.Bartoletti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would suggest to add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk
>
> Since, I think I am not competent to propose a patch, I ask for help.
>
> I have ports to create where the sources are only available on GitLab.
> Like some other ports (audio/midi-matrix-lv2, audio/moony-lv2, etc.) I
> can fetch source using a direct link. But, it may be nice to have this
> possibility.
>
> As I can see, it can be similar (and maybe easier) than github.
>
> Archive can be dowload by this URL:
> https://gitlab.com/${GL_ACCOUNT}/${GL_PROJECT}/repository/${GL_TAGNAME}/archive.${EXTRACT_SUFX}
>
> ${EXTRACT_SUFX} can be zip, tar.gz, tar.bz2 and tar
>
> Is anyone already working on it or do you want to do it with me?
Assuming gitlab remains API compatible with github. I'm wondering if
gitlab.com, github.com, and gitlab hosted site support can be merged
into a single set of vars.
The main difference between gitlab, gitlab hosted, and github.com would
be the domain and a set of master sites? Everything else can be shared.
If you look at www/tt-rss we're using almost the same URL from above as
the master site. This is a gitlab hosted repo.
Having some type of control var to tell ports of the provider
(github GH, gitlab.com GL, gitlab hosted GLH) would control the master
site values.
...
USE_GITHUB=yes # Use github.com and set master sites according
...
USE_GITLAB=yes # Use gitlab.com and set master sites according
...
USE_GITLAB=example.com/path/to/base
...# Use gitlab hosted use URLish as master site
Or a single var
...
USE_GITHUB={yes|GH|GL|example.com/path/to/base}
...
If set ports would expect the same GH_* vars from the Porters handbook
Table 5.5
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Samba4 needs switch to turn off messages
Whenever there is more than 1 Samba server running in the same netbios space, they INCESSANTLY put out the same worthless message every 5 minutes exactly, filling up disc space or disrupting whatever's happening on the console. The message always has the same form: "query name response: Multiple [n] reponses received on subnet [this ip address] for name [netbios group name]. This response was from [other ip address]." This has been a problem for years, but so far nobody seems to know how to stop the damned things. Log levels appear to have no effect on them. The server needs to have a switch to turn off such messages! Preferably as a patch, distributed s o o n. I'm just before lodging a bug report, because anyone trying to construe that message as a feature would be likely to spend time in hospital by reason of having herniated their imagination. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
On 08/20/17 21:53, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > [Default] On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:09:13 +, Manish Jain > wrote: > >> >> >> On 08/20/17 19:57, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >>> That's quite interesting! What led me to believe it is that, >>> after installing windows, which required creating and formatting >>> an MBR partition, I tried to install 11.1 on the rest of the >>> disc. The first choice I was given was whole disc or partition. >>> I chose partition, of course. Whereupon it told me that MBR >>> isn't supported, and that I could either permit it to consume the >>> whole disc (for GPT, though it didn't actually say that), or back >>> up and choose differently. Functionally, the only choices on >>> offer were whole disc or quit. I quit. >>> >> >> Are you using UFS or ZFS for the root filesystem ? > > UFS. Not much point in choosing ZFS without copies= as a > precondition. Or a spare drive for a mirror. > UFS is great - always my first choice, particularly when dual-booting. Please try to keep as close as possible to my cheat-sheet. If you provide commands/output, I will try to help as much as I can. One additional tip : since you (like me) prefer MBR, run this command when install is finished : boot0cfg -B /dev/ada0 I am presuming that your disk is ada0. FreeBSD's boot0 manager is one of the great things you will like. Manish Jain ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
[Default] On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:09:13 +, Manish Jain wrote: > > >On 08/20/17 19:57, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> That's quite interesting! What led me to believe it is that, >> after installing windows, which required creating and formatting >> an MBR partition, I tried to install 11.1 on the rest of the >> disc. The first choice I was given was whole disc or partition. >> I chose partition, of course. Whereupon it told me that MBR >> isn't supported, and that I could either permit it to consume the >> whole disc (for GPT, though it didn't actually say that), or back >> up and choose differently. Functionally, the only choices on >> offer were whole disc or quit. I quit. >> > >Are you using UFS or ZFS for the root filesystem ? UFS. Not much point in choosing ZFS without copies= as a precondition. Or a spare drive for a mirror. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
You're right, it was half my mistake. This motherboard's bios has a switch for EFI, legacy, and both. The factory setting was both, and, after defaulting to EFI, the installer evidently didn't know how to back up and try again when it found an MBR partition. I'll report the bug. I may have to have another go at Ubuntu -- perhaps it didn't know how to back up either. Thanks for the tipoff! [Default] On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:05:29 +, Manish Jain wrote: > > >On 08/20/17 17:20, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> discovered that, like Linux (or at >> least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR > > >Hi, > >There must be some misunderstanding here. Both Linux as well as FreeBSD >11 fully support MBR. I have installed 11 as well as 12-current using MBR. > >I do not know what leads you to that conclusion. If you could tell >precisely what you tried, perhaps someone will point out the actual >problem for your system. > >I have a cheat-sheet for troubleshooting FreeBSD installation when >things are not going right : > >1) Disable UEFI in the BIOS and force your disks to be presented as >Legacy devices > >2) Boot from optical media installer, not USB > >3) If using UFS, prefer MBR partitioning. For ZFS, be prepared to devote >a whole disk partitioned GPT. > >Could you please fill in some details after trying my suggestions above ? > >Regards >Manish Jain ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
On 08/20/17 19:57, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > That's quite interesting! What led me to believe it is that, > after installing windows, which required creating and formatting > an MBR partition, I tried to install 11.1 on the rest of the > disc. The first choice I was given was whole disc or partition. > I chose partition, of course. Whereupon it told me that MBR > isn't supported, and that I could either permit it to consume the > whole disc (for GPT, though it didn't actually say that), or back > up and choose differently. Functionally, the only choices on > offer were whole disc or quit. I quit. > Are you using UFS or ZFS for the root filesystem ? Thanks. Manish Jain ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
[Default] On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:05:29 +, Manish Jain wrote: > > >On 08/20/17 17:20, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> discovered that, like Linux (or at >> least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR > > >Hi, > >There must be some misunderstanding here. Both Linux as well as FreeBSD >11 fully support MBR. I have installed 11 as well as 12-current using MBR. > >I do not know what leads you to that conclusion. If you could tell >precisely what you tried, perhaps someone will point out the actual >problem for your system. That's quite interesting! What led me to believe it is that, after installing windows, which required creating and formatting an MBR partition, I tried to install 11.1 on the rest of the disc. The first choice I was given was whole disc or partition. I chose partition, of course. Whereupon it told me that MBR isn't supported, and that I could either permit it to consume the whole disc (for GPT, though it didn't actually say that), or back up and choose differently. Functionally, the only choices on offer were whole disc or quit. I quit. > >I have a cheat-sheet for troubleshooting FreeBSD installation when >things are not going right : > >1) Disable UEFI in the BIOS and force your disks to be presented as >Legacy devices > >2) Boot from optical media installer, not USB > >3) If using UFS, prefer MBR partitioning. For ZFS, be prepared to devote >a whole disk partitioned GPT. > >Could you please fill in some details after trying my suggestions above ? > >Regards >Manish Jain >___ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday
On 08/20/17 17:20, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > discovered that, like Linux (or at > least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR Hi, There must be some misunderstanding here. Both Linux as well as FreeBSD 11 fully support MBR. I have installed 11 as well as 12-current using MBR. I do not know what leads you to that conclusion. If you could tell precisely what you tried, perhaps someone will point out the actual problem for your system. I have a cheat-sheet for troubleshooting FreeBSD installation when things are not going right : 1) Disable UEFI in the BIOS and force your disks to be presented as Legacy devices 2) Boot from optical media installer, not USB 3) If using UFS, prefer MBR partitioning. For ZFS, be prepared to devote a whole disk partitioned GPT. Could you please fill in some details after trying my suggestions above ? Regards Manish Jain ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I went to install 11.1 yesterday
...as a dual-boot with W7, but discovered that, like Linux (or at least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR. So no dual-boot with older Windows. I reinstalled 10.3 instead. Will 10.4 still support MBR? What will happen to those who can't easily afford to buy a special disc for XP or 7 or some other MBR-based o/s? Then, going to install the Nvidia driver, I discovered that even the 10.3 port would install what looks like most of Linux Centos too, though the driver doesn't require it. And so two more steps have been taken along the road to FreeBSD becoming, in all but name, just another flavor of Linux. That sucks like a Vax. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ multimedia/audacious| 3.8.2 | 3.9 +-+ multimedia/audacious-plugins| 3.8.2 | 3.9 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
