Re: FreeBSD 11.1,11-stable,12-current on Dell H740p raid
Le 13/03/2018 à 16:52:15+, Gary Palmer a écrit > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:15:53PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I got issue with Dell PowerEdge R740/R640 server with H740p and FreeBSD > > 11.1-Release, 11-stable, 12-current > > > > In all version I don't able to find the raid controler, so no disk...so of > > course impossible to install anything. > > > > I don't know if it's the right mailing-list, but if they are someone can > > help > > > > In other way, I can do ? any ? test for making thing work and help the > > freebsd team. Because Dell are still a large provider for hardware, and > > that would > > be very sad if FreeBSD cannot run on Dell. > > > > I still got some time (~ 1 month) before the server go in to production. > > > > For information Debian with Linux kernel prio to 4.14 don't work either. > > Currently only > > RedHat 7 work out of the box. > > Download the driver from > > https://www.broadcom.com/products/storage/raid-controllers/megaraid-9460-8i#downloads > > and try that. Okay. So yes it's working. I just install the server. But...the documentation inside the archive s*cks. If you follow the doc with a standard memstick img it's not working because the mrsas driver is include inside the generic kernel. So you either need to build a personnal memstick with the src of the driver from broadcom, or you need to build a personnal memstick without mrsas driver and load the mrsas.so from broadcom. Looking inside the archive it's seem the mrsas driver from broadcom are in src version. Are someone know why they are not include in FreeBSD source ? I didn't see (but I'm not a specialist) anything (licence) against that Thanks for the help -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Heure local/Local time: Mon Mar 19 16:50:55 CET 2018 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD 11.1,11-stable,12-current on Dell H740p raid
Hi, I got issue with Dell PowerEdge R740/R640 server with H740p and FreeBSD 11.1-Release, 11-stable, 12-current In all version I don't able to find the raid controler, so no disk...so of course impossible to install anything. I don't know if it's the right mailing-list, but if they are someone can help In other way, I can do « any » test for making thing work and help the freebsd team. Because Dell are still a large provider for hardware, and that would be very sad if FreeBSD cannot run on Dell. I still got some time (~ 1 month) before the server go in to production. For information Debian with Linux kernel prio to 4.14 don't work either. Currently only RedHat 7 work out of the box. Regards. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: Tue Mar 13 17:10:42 CET 2018 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: vlan+iwn panic
Le 19/06/2012 ? 08:46:22+0200, Bernhard Schmidt a écrit > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > > Le 18/06/2012 ? 12:52:19+0200, David ROFFIAEN a écrit > >> Hi list, > >> > >> I encoutered a panic with FreeBSD 9 Stable creating vlan with wlan0 > >> (iwn0) parent. Panic occur when upping the vlan : > > > > I've same problem whitout vlan. Just sometime (rarely) when the signal > > of the wifi is very weak the system crash with something very close. > > Very close? Do you mean same backtrace? Write a report next time you > run into it please, preferably with a way to reproduce. Yes I known, my bad. In fact I'm in very hury when the second time the problem appear so I just push poweroff buttom. When I say it's very close is «a look» on the console. So is'nt a good comparaisonnot a comparaison at all. All I can say is when I'm near the wifi router, everything works fine. Regards. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mar 19 jui 2012 11:12:40 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: vlan+iwn panic
Le 18/06/2012 ? 12:52:19+0200, David ROFFIAEN a écrit > Hi list, > > I encoutered a panic with FreeBSD 9 Stable creating vlan with wlan0 > (iwn0) parent. Panic occur when upping the vlan : I've same problem whitout vlan. Just sometime (rarely) when the signal of the wifi is very weak the system crash with something very close. Regards. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: lun 18 jui 2012 15:28:58 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Load when idl on stable
Le 05/06/2012 ? 16:14:56-0400, Adam McDougall a écrit
> On 06/05/12 15:37, Albert Shih wrote:
> > Le 03/06/2012 ? 23:55:06+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit
> >> I think, this is the old thread:
> >> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html
> >
> > Yes. But because I didn't find any solution, I resent the problem.
> >>
> >> The interrupt rerouting does not help?
> >
> > Well I've no idea what you talking but I try every solution describe in the
> > thread you mentioned. I didn't find any solution.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > NB: I forget to say I'm not a developer, just sysadmin. I use Stable just
> > for report here any problem I got.
>
> Try changing kern.eventtimer.timer:
>
> % sysctl kern.eventtimer.timer=LAPIC
I have no idea what's that mean, but yes it's much better.
After 10 minutes the load drop to 0.08 (from 0.60-0.70)
last pid: 2876; load averages: 0.05, 0.06, 0.17 up 0+02:14:49
22:45:45
81 processes: 1 running, 80 sleeping
but still more than my desktop:
last pid: 10150; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 5+04:42:21
22:46:18
166 processes: 1 running, 165 sleeping
Regards.
JAS
--
Albert SHIH
DIO bâtiment 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71
xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr
Heure local/Local time:
mar 5 jui 2012 22:44:55 CEST
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Load when idl on stable
Le 05/06/2012 ? 12:40:19+0200, Matthias Gamsjager a écrit > > > >> > >> I've three PC, all are Dell. Two laptop and one desktop. > >> > >> All run FreeBSD 9-Stable amd64 > >> > >> Since 1 or 2 months I notice the load is never drop down 0.8-0.9 event > > when > >> nothing running but only on those laptop. > >> > >> I update today my desktop to last csup src and everything is fine on > the > >> desktop. > >> > >> On both laptop the load is still at 0.8 - 0.9 > >> > >> And in same time the usb mouse on the laptop stop working meaning I can > >> use the touchpad, but if I plug a usb mouse, the kernel see the device > >> but > >> the mouse not working on xorg. > >> > >> Is' not block my work so I can live with that. I just want report those > >> problems. > >> > > > did you enable device polling for your NIC? No it's standard configuration about NIC. I don't need to enable anything to got high load, I boot the laptop, log with root login that's enough (without X11) to got 0.6-0.7 load. Basicaly I use a wifi NIC, and most important I change nothing on the configuration since ... long time ago (maybe FreeBSD 6.x). First time I got a problem so strange with Stable. (Maybe third time I got a problem with stable ;-) ). Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mar 5 jui 2012 21:51:58 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Load when idl on stable
Le 04/06/2012 ? 06:22:34+0930, Matt Thyer a écrit > Hi, > Is this due to a high rate of interrupts ? No idea ;-) > i.e. can you see this with "systat -vm 1" with a large number in the "intr" > field. Well I don't known what you mean by «high rate», so I make a compraison between my desktop and my laptop. On the laptop (where the load is always high) I got ~500- 650 total Interrupts with ~490-500 from hpet0 uhci On my desktop (load is ~0) I got ~340- 360 total Interrupts with 320-350 from hpet0 20 > > If yes, run "vmstat -i" to see what interrupt is being hit. On my laptop (uptime ~ 1h): vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd07240 1 irq9: acpi07 0 irq12: psm044037 10 irq14: ata0 6590 1 irq17: wpi0 683770155 irq18: atapci1 15447 3 irq19: fwohci0 2 0 irq20: hpet0 uhci0* 2888037656 irq22: ehci0 uhci4 2 0 irq256: hdac0 270090 61 Total3915222890 On my destkop (uptime 5 days) interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 239742 0 irq12: psm0 999224 2 irq16: uhci0 4062873 9 irq17: fwohci0++ 1 0 irq20: hpet0 222779529500 irq22: uhci2 ehci0222967 0 irq24: vgapci0972589 2 irq256: hdac09881473 22 irq257: bge0 8422313 18 irq258: ahci05744209 12 Total 253324920568 > > Then tell us what hardware is on that irq (from grep irq /var/run/dmesg.boot). Here on the laptop: grep irq /var/run/dmesg.boot ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71,0x72-0x77 irq 8 on acpi0 attimer0: port 0x40-0x43,0x50-0x53 irq 2 on acpi0 vgapci0: port 0xdf00-0xdf7f mem 0xf500-0xf5ff,0xe000-0xefff,0xf200-0xf3ff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 uhci0: port 0x6f20-0x6f3f irq 20 at device 26.0 on pci0 uhci1: port 0x6f00-0x6f1f irq 21 at device 26.1 on pci0 ehci0: mem 0xfed1c400-0xfed1c7ff irq 22 at device 26.7 on pci0 hdac0: mem 0xf6ffc000-0xf6ff irq 21 at device 27.0 on pci0 wpi0: mem 0xf1fff000-0xf1ff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci12 bge0: mem 0xf1bf-0xf1bf irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci9 uhci2: port 0x6f80-0x6f9f irq 20 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci3: port 0x6f60-0x6f7f irq 21 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci4: port 0x6f40-0x6f5f irq 22 at device 29.2 on pci0 ehci1: mem 0xfed1c000-0xfed1c3ff irq 20 at device 29.7 on pci0 fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xf1aff800-0xf1af irq 19 at device 1.0 on pci3 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x6fa0-0x6faf irq 16 at device 31.1 on pci0 atapci1: port 0x6eb0-0x6eb7,0x6eb8-0x6ebb,0x6ec0-0x6ec7,0x6ec8-0x6ecb,0x6ee0-0x6eef,0xeff0-0xefff irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64,0x62,0x66 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mar 5 jui 2012 21:38:47 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Load when idl on stable
Le 03/06/2012 ? 23:55:06+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit > I think, this is the old thread: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html Yes. But because I didn't find any solution, I resent the problem. > > The interrupt rerouting does not help? Well I've no idea what you talking but I try every solution describe in the thread you mentioned. I didn't find any solution. Regards. NB: I forget to say I'm not a developer, just sysadmin. I use Stable just for report here any problem I got. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mar 5 jui 2012 21:34:35 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Load when idl on stable
Hi I already post a message about my problem I've three PC, all are Dell. Two laptop and one desktop. All run FreeBSD 9-Stable amd64 Since 1 or 2 months I notice the load is never drop down 0.8-0.9 event when nothing running but only on those laptop. I update today my desktop to last csup src and everything is fine on the desktop. On both laptop the load is still at 0.8 - 0.9 And in same time the usb mouse on the laptop stop working meaning I can use the touchpad, but if I plug a usb mouse, the kernel see the device but the mouse not working on xorg. Is' not block my work so I can live with that. I just want report those problems. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@jabber.obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: jeu 31 mai 2012 22:18:40 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [stable-9] Touchpad mouse stopped working
Le 17/05/2012 ? 13:01:55+0200, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven a écrit > After moving from 9.0-RELEASE to 9-STABLE yesterday, the touchpad mouse on > my netbook stopped working. When I do > # /etc/rc.d/moused onestart > the pointer appears and can be moved for a second or two, then it stops > responding. Any thoughts? > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD ace.skysmurf.nl 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Thu May 17 10:49:00 > CEST 2012 r...@ace.skysmurf.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I've something close too. I don't known exactly when, I post the first message at 27 april. But since the new version of Xorg or/and 9-Stable I definitely my ... external mouse. The touchpad working fine but when I plug a usb mouse on my laptop the kernel seem to see the mouse but he don't work. Same problem on my second laptop, both are Dell. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: jeu 17 mai 2012 17:26:30 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: High load event idl.
Le 27/04/2012 ? 22:30:13+0200, Albert Shih a écrit > Hi all > > I'm running 9-stable on all my computer. (csup yesterday). > > On my desktop everything is fine. But I've two laptop, (both are Dell). On > both latptop I've problem about the load, event when I do nothing I got a > load between 0.5-1. > > Here the result of a «top» on the laptop : > > last pid: 2434; load averages: 0.63, 0.67, 0.59 up 0+00:23:59 22:25:29 > 57 processes: 3 running, 54 sleeping > CPU: 2.7% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 1.4% interrupt, 92.2% idle > Mem: 89M Active, 92M Inact, 198M Wired, 13M Cache, 100M Buf, 3529M Free > Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free > > Here on the desktop : > > last pid: 61010; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 2+11:02:42 22:29:08 > 126 processes: 1 running, 125 sleeping > CPU: % user, % nice, % system, % interrupt, % idle > Mem: 803M Active, 2874M Inact, 1901M Wired, 112M Cache, 620M Buf, 202M Free > Swap: 6144M Total, 36M Used, 6107M Free > > On attachment the dmesg. > > Any idea ? > Any news about this problem ? I make a buildworld/kernel yesterday and nothing change. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: ven 4 mai 2012 21:43:25 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: High load event idl.
Le 28/04/2012 ? 09:55:41+0300, Alexander Motin a écrit > >>> > >>> last pid: 61010; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 2+11:02:42 > >>> 22:29:08 > >>> 126 processes: 1 running, 125 sleeping > >>> CPU: % user, % nice, % system, % interrupt, % idle > >>> Mem: 803M Active, 2874M Inact, 1901M Wired, 112M Cache, 620M Buf, 202M > >>> Free > >>> Swap: 6144M Total, 36M Used, 6107M Free > >>> > >> > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2012-April/048213.html > > > > What I understand of your message (I'm definitvly not a dev) is that's only > > a little problem of accounting. > > > > I'm not absolute sure of that because my laptop fan never stop... > > > > If you want any more information... > > Definitely, because here I don't see much. > > Generally, all CPU loads and load averages now calculated via sampling, > so theoretically with spiky load numbers may vary for many reasons. I > would start from collecting information about running processes. To find > fast switching processes that could hide from accounting try `top -SH -m > io -o vcsw`. To get more information about scheduler work, use > /usr/src/tools/sched/schedgraph.py (instruction inside it). I rebuild my kernel with KTR. But I'm not a dev so I have no idea what the schedgraph.py show...:-( If this can help to solve the problem you can find my ktr and my dmesg. http://dl.free.fr/csycL43ad http://dl.free.fr/j0XQFimPM Hope that can help you. If you need anything else Thanks. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: lun 30 avr 2012 12:10:13 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: High load event idl.
Le 28/04/2012 ? 09:55:41+0300, Alexander Motin a écrit
> On 04/28/12 00:34, Albert Shih wrote:
> Definitely, because here I don't see much.
>
Thanks.
> Generally, all CPU loads and load averages now calculated via sampling,
> so theoretically with spiky load numbers may vary for many reasons. I
> would start from collecting information about running processes. To find
> fast switching processes that could hide from accounting try `top -SH -m
> io -o vcsw`. To get more information about scheduler work, use
> /usr/src/tools/sched/schedgraph.py (instruction inside it).
I recompile my kernel this night and tell you tommorow.
Here the result of top with those strange option ;-)
last pid: 25530; load averages: 0.52, 0.58, 0.57
up 0+01:06:40 22:43:54
156 processes: 3 running, 134 sleeping, 19 waiting
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.6% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.4% idle
Mem: 67M Active, 52M Inact, 217M Wired, 11M Cache, 415M Buf, 3574M Free
Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free
PID USERNAME VCSW IVCSW READ WRITE FAULT TOTAL PERCENT COMMAND
11 root 277513 0 0 0 0 0.00% idle{idle:
cpu0}
12 root 246 3 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{irq12:
psm0}
25244 root 245 21 0 0 0 0 0.00% Xorg
12 root 220 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{irq20:
hpet0 uhc}
12 root 124 15 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{swi4:
clock}
12 root 65 1 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{irq17:
wpi0}
12 root 32 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{swi4:
clock}
11 root 21390 0 0 0 0 0.00% idle{idle:
cpu1}
0 root 20 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
kernel{fw0_taskq}
14 root 20 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% yarrow
25274 jas15 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% ion3
25022 root 11 3 0 0 0 0 0.00% powerd
25372 jas 9 2 0 0 0 0 0.00% xterm
0 root8 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
kernel{nvidia taskq}
12 root6 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{irq16:
vgapci0}
25166 root4 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
hald-addon-storage
12 root4 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{swi6:
Giant task}
12 root4 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{irq1:
atkbd0}
12 root3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{irq14:
ata0}
4 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% pfpurge
18 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% bufdaemon
20 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% syncer
21 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% softdepflush
25276 jas 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% ion-statusd
25526 jas 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% top
25345 jas 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% xterm
19 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% vnlru
25133 haldaemon 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% hald{hald}
12 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% intr{swi2:
cambio}
25364 root2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% top
7 root1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% pagedaemon
15 root1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% usb{usbus6}
15 root1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% usb{usbus2}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-kit-daemon{console-kit-daem}
25135 root0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
console-ki
Re: High load event idl.
Le 27/04/2012 ? 22:45:40+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit > > I'm running 9-stable on all my computer. (csup yesterday). > > > > On my desktop everything is fine. But I've two laptop, (both are Dell). On > > both latptop I've problem about the load, event when I do nothing I got a > > load between 0.5-1. > > > > Here the result of a «top» on the laptop : > > > > last pid: 2434; load averages: 0.63, 0.67, 0.59 up 0+00:23:59 > > 22:25:29 > > 57 processes: 3 running, 54 sleeping > > CPU: 2.7% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 1.4% interrupt, 92.2% idle > > Mem: 89M Active, 92M Inact, 198M Wired, 13M Cache, 100M Buf, 3529M Free > > Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free > > > > Here on the desktop : > > > > last pid: 61010; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 2+11:02:42 > > 22:29:08 > > 126 processes: 1 running, 125 sleeping > > CPU: % user, % nice, % system, % interrupt, % idle > > Mem: 803M Active, 2874M Inact, 1901M Wired, 112M Cache, 620M Buf, 202M Free > > Swap: 6144M Total, 36M Used, 6107M Free > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2012-April/048213.html What I understand of your message (I'm definitvly not a dev) is that's only a little problem of accounting. I'm not absolute sure of that because my laptop fan never stop... If you want any more information... Regards. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: ven 27 avr 2012 23:31:28 CEST ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
High load event idl.
Hi all I'm running 9-stable on all my computer. (csup yesterday). On my desktop everything is fine. But I've two laptop, (both are Dell). On both latptop I've problem about the load, event when I do nothing I got a load between 0.5-1. Here the result of a «top» on the laptop : last pid: 2434; load averages: 0.63, 0.67, 0.59 up 0+00:23:59 22:25:29 57 processes: 3 running, 54 sleeping CPU: 2.7% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 1.4% interrupt, 92.2% idle Mem: 89M Active, 92M Inact, 198M Wired, 13M Cache, 100M Buf, 3529M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free Here on the desktop : last pid: 61010; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 2+11:02:42 22:29:08 126 processes: 1 running, 125 sleeping CPU: % user, % nice, % system, % interrupt, % idle Mem: 803M Active, 2874M Inact, 1901M Wired, 112M Cache, 620M Buf, 202M Free Swap: 6144M Total, 36M Used, 6107M Free On attachment the dmesg. Any idea ? JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: j...@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: ven 27 avr 2012 22:29:15 CEST Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 26 04:42:08 CEST 2012 j...@io.chezmoi.fr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JAS amd64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9500 @ 2.60GHz (2592.82-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Family = 6 Model = 17 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x8e3bd AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) avail memory = 4081893376 (3892 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400 ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard hpet0: iomem 0xfed0-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 950 Event timer "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 450 Event timer "HPET1" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 440 Event timer "HPET2" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 440 acpi0: reservation of 0, 9f000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 10, dfd83c00 (3) failed cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71,0x72-0x77 irq 8 on acpi0 Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 attimer0: port 0x40-0x43,0x50-0x53 irq 2 on acpi0 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0xdf00-0xdf7f mem 0xf500-0xf5ff,0xe000-0xefff,0xf200-0xf3ff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 nvidia0: on vgapci0 vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io uhci0: port 0x6f20-0x6f3f irq 20 at device 26.0 on pci0 uhci0: LegSup = 0x2f00 usbus0 on uhci0 uhci1: port 0x6f00-0x6f1f irq 21 at device 26.1 on pci0 uhci1: LegSup = 0x2f00 usbus1 on uhci1 ehci0: mem 0xfed1c400-0xfed1c7ff irq 22 at device 26.7 on pci0 usbus2: EHCI version 1.0 usbus2 on ehci0 hdac0: mem 0xf6ffc000-0xf6ff irq 21 at device 27.0 on pci0 pcib2: at device 28.0 on pci0 pci11: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 28.1 on pci0 pci12: on pcib3 wpi0: mem 0xf1fff000-0xf1ff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci12 pcib4: at device 28.3 on pci0 pci13: on pcib4 pcib5: at device 28.5 on pci0 pci9: on pcib5 bge0: mem 0xf1bf-0xf1bf irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci9 bge0: CHIP ID 0xa200; ASIC REV 0x0a; CHIP REV 0xa2; PCI-E miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto, auto-flow bge0: Ethernet address: 00:21:70:b7:80:8c uhci2: port 0x6f80-0x6f9f irq 20 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci2: LegSup = 0x2f00 usbus3 on uhci2 uhci3: port 0x6f60-0x6f7f irq 21 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci3: LegSup = 0x2f00 usbus4 on uhci3 uhci4: port 0x6f40-0x6f5f irq 22 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci4: LegSup = 0x2f00 usbus5 on uhci4 ehci1: mem 0xfed1c000-0xfed1c3ff irq 20 at device 29.7 on pci0 usbus6: EHCI version 1.0 usbus6 on ehci1 pcib6: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib6 fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xf1aff800-0xf1af irq 19 at device 1.0 on pci3 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous cha
Re: Downgrade to 5.5
Le 09/11/2006 à 12:29:38+0100, Marko Lerota a écrit > Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I tried regularly like it was upgrade but it was downgrade from 6-STABLE > >> to 5.4-RELEASE and it didn't worked. > > > > Event you build on a different server (a server running 5.x) ? > > No, on the same. It was disaster. It was in pre production :) > Easier and quicker would be a clean installation. Down time could > be only 30min. With downgrade you only might get in trouble. WellI known but I can do that now. Because I can reboot the server, but I can re-install (I don't have access to the console). > > > I don't running QUOTA > > FreeBSD was once known for good NFS performance :( Yes...the same server running with 0 crash during 3.5 years in same configuration. After I pass to 6.x (01/2006) I loose the count of crash FreeBSD is the best NFS server (and best OS I known)...long time ago :-(( Personnaly I prefer to have a very stable NFS server, and I don't really care to have wpa or something like that. I'm not developper, then I don't known the problem of FreeBSD, but I'm very sad to see the situation of 6.x (em problem, watchdog, crash etc...). Now I'm looking of OpenBSD Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Nov 9 14:11:22 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Downgrade to 5.5
Le 09/11/2006 à 11:28:02+0100, Marko Lerota a écrit > Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well after this thing I want to downgrade to 5.x. Can I use this process: > > > > I make buildworld & buildkernel on a FreeBSD 5.x server. > > I make a tar.gz of /usr/obj and /usr/src > > I tranfert this two tar.gz on my 6-stable server. > > Untar on right place > > make installkernel on /usr/src from 5.x > > reboot > > make installworld. > > I tried regularly like it was upgrade but it was downgrade from 6-STABLE > to 5.4-RELEASE and it didn't worked. Event you build on a different server (a server running 5.x) ? > > > I don't really care if the 6-stable-/usr/local/bin running on my downgrade > > server. Because this server running only nfsd. > > I had the same problems, it happened only if you have QUOTA option in kernel. > Other-ways it worked OK. They said it would be fixed long time ago, but they > didn't. I don't running QUOTA Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Nov 9 12:09:52 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Downgrade to 5.5
Hi all I'm running 6-stable on my FreeBSD nfs server, and I've lots of lots of trouble. 1/ Sometime the server juste hang-on without any message (console or syslog) 2/ Sometime I've em* or bge* watchdog on the console, and when this append the server "loose" this nic after sometime. 3/ Event nfsd running, after 1 or 2 week of uptime, the daemon rpcbind don't answer anymore any request from client, event rpcbind running and listen on right ports (check with sockstat) I've got many message to tell Connection attempt to in my syslog (I've log_in_vain configured with sysctl). Now the server crash 2 times in 2 days (case 1). (With the new path on em.c) Well after this thing I want to downgrade to 5.x. Can I use this process: I make buildworld & buildkernel on a FreeBSD 5.x server. I make a tar.gz of /usr/obj and /usr/src I tranfert this two tar.gz on my 6-stable server. Untar on right place make installkernel on /usr/src from 5.x reboot make installworld. I don't really care if the 6-stable-/usr/local/bin running on my downgrade server. Because this server running only nfsd. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Nov 9 09:45:11 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
em network or rpc pb ?
Hi all I come again for my network problem. After I make this changement : The patch http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029224.html a kernel without USB. a kernel in no-SMP mode (the server is SMP). I don't have em* watchdog on the console. But my other problem still here : After someday the client cannot connect on rpcbind on server. If I restart rpcbind there are very strange thing : the daemon running, with sockstat -l or lsof we can see the rpcbind listen on correct ports and correct interface (all) but when a client want to connect to server on rpcbind port we got Connection attempt to TCP server_ip_add:111 from client_ip_add:40396 flags:0x02 at this point we can nothing. Only reboot can solve the problem. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Tel : 01 44 27 86 88 FAX : 01 44 27 69 35 GSM(UFR) : 06 85 05 58 43 Heure local/Local time: Mon Oct 23 18:11:36 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Strange with rpc
Le 18/10/2006 23:27:55+0200, Albert Shih a ?crit > Hi all > > I've strange (little) problem > > I've got many message like > > rpc.statd: Failed to contact host one_my_host_name > > but one_my_host_name is poweroff (off course he cannot contact). But why my > nfs server trying to contact a server is poweroff. > > I've try to find the name of one_my_host_name in /etc with (find ...) in > /var in /tmp nothing... (same thing with IP number). > > I don't event known why my server found the name (or IP number). > > I've event do reboot of my server. > > Any one have a idea ? > I found... it's in the man of rpc.statd Sorry for asking this quesiton. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 i?me ?tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Oct 19 01:49:15 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: em network issues
Le 19/10/2006 01:03:40+0200, Albert Shih a ?crit > Le 18/10/2006 10:46:30-0700, Jack Vogel a ?crit > > I think there may be a few different problems going on with the em driver > > on 6.2 that are being lumped under the general description of network > > hangs. In order to solve these I need a reproducible failure, either on a > > system here at Intel, or someone who is willing to be a remote guinea > > pig :) > > > > I need detailed reports, meaning EXACT system data, if its an OEM > > box, what model, what addons, a pciconf list, description of the > > network, and anything special that is connected with the problem > > occurence. OH, and if you have a 'before and after' situation, then > > please give driver deltas that worked, and which failed. > > Well > > BOX : HP Proliant ML350 G4 > All addons is HP > > Here the network config > > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) > status: active > em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) > status: active > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=1b > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > The pciconf -l > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pciconf -l > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:class=0x06 card=0x32000e11 chip=0x35908086 > rev=0x0c hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x0050 chip=0x35958086 > rev=0x0c hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4:0: class=0x060400 card=0x0050 chip=0x35978086 > rev=0x0c hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:0: class=0x060400 card=0x0050 chip=0x35998086 > rev=0x0c hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:28:0:class=0x060400 card=0x0050 chip=0x25ae8086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29:0:class=0x0c0300 card=0x32010e11 chip=0x25a98086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29:1:class=0x0c0300 card=0x32010e11 chip=0x25aa8086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29:4:class=0x088000 card=0x32010e11 chip=0x25ab8086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29:5:class=0x080020 card=0x32010e11 chip=0x25ac8086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29:7:class=0x0c0320 card=0x32010e11 chip=0x25ad8086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:0:class=0x060400 card=0x chip=0x244e8086 > rev=0x0a hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:0:class=0x060100 card=0x chip=0x25a18086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:1: class=0x01018a card=0x32010e11 chip=0x25a28086 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x0044 chip=0x03298086 > rev=0x09 hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:2: class=0x060400 card=0x0044 chip=0x032a8086 > rev=0x09 hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x0c0400 card=0x01000e11 chip=0x23121077 > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x00db0e11 chip=0x10108086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:1: class=0x02 card=0x00db0e11 chip=0x10108086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x010400 card=0x409a0e11 chip=0x00460e11 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00dc chip=0xb1548086 > rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class=0x01 card=0x00da0e11 chip=0x00301000 > rev=0x08 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:1: class=0x01 card=0x00da0e11 chip=0x00301000 > rev=0x08 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4:0: class=0x02 card=0xb1630e11 chip=0x12298086 > rev=0x08 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:5:0: class=0x02 card=0xb1630e11 chip=0x12298086 > rev=0x08 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x02 card=0x00e30e11 chip=0x165414e4 > rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class=0x03 card=0x001e0e11 chip=0x47521002 > rev=0x27 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4:0: class=0x088000 card=0x00d70e11 chip=0x00d70e11 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > I forgot : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 717 0 irq4: sio0 92430 2 irq6: fdc087 0 irq15: ata1 47 0 irq17: bge0 5812600139 irq24: mpt0 29 0 irq25: mpt1 17 0 irq26: fxp0 fxp1
Re: em network issues
r hang-on. I've make cvsup/buildworld/buildkernel. After some day the server hang-on again. When we are in polling mode I don't have the message ?em* watchdog?, but the server just hang-on (event on the console). When I make no polling I've got the em* watchdog message. Now I run (from yeasterday) in this mode : no-SMP no-polling the patch http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029224.html and I build a kernel without USB (because I've got many IRQ on usb). Of course it's to short to tell if the problem is solve. > hardware. There is a fix for this, you tell the portmapper to > not use ports below 665, in particular: > > sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast 665 (default is 600) > > So, if you have IPMI or AMT hardware, you should try this > change and see if it fixes hangs. I don't known if I've AMT but I put this on my sysctl.conf. > > There is also a hardware eeprom issue on systems with an 82573 > type NIC on SOME systems. There is a utility to fix that, if you and on HP ? I'm sorry for : 1/ My bad english 2/ The server is on production ... I can make many change or test but if I can help Thanks for all_FB_dev Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 i?me ?tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Oct 19 00:43:39 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Strange with rpc
Hi all I've strange (little) problem I've got many message like rpc.statd: Failed to contact host one_my_host_name but one_my_host_name is poweroff (off course he cannot contact). But why my nfs server trying to contact a server is poweroff. I've try to find the name of one_my_host_name in /etc with (find ...) in /var in /tmp nothing... (same thing with IP number). I don't event known why my server found the name (or IP number). I've event do reboot of my server. Any one have a idea ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 i?me ?tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed Oct 18 23:24:17 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: em, bge, network problems survey.
Le 05/10/2006 à 16:05:52-0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > All, > > > > I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem > > reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down further. > > I ask all of you who are having problems to take a minute to fill > > out this survey and return it to Kris Kennaway (on cc:) and myself. > > Thanks. > > > > 1. Are you experiencing network hangs and/or "timeout" messages on the > > console? If yes, please provide a _brief_ description of the problem. > > OK, next question, to all em users: > > If your em device is using a shared interrupt, and you are NOT > experiencing timeout problems when using this device, please let me > know: > > dalki# vmstat -i > interrupt total rate > irq4: sio0 2071 0 > irq6: fdc010 0 > irq14: ata0 47 0 > irq20: ahd021755 4 > irq23: em0124751 23 <-- not a shared interrupt > irq24: ahd1 15 0 > cpu0: timer 10453509 1999 > Total 10602158 2027 > > tyan# vmstat -i > interrupt total rate > irq14: ata0 58 0 > irq16: em0 fxp1 332832851 <-- shared interrupt > irq18: fxp0 973 2 > irq19: atapci1132883339 > cpu0: timer 774308 1980 > cpu1: timer 777136 1987 > Total2018190 5161 > > So far all of the em problems I have seen involve shared interrupts, > and conversely all em systems I have seen that do not have timeout > problems are not shared. > Personnaly I've very lots of problem with my em0 card (Proliant ML 380) I've lots of em0 watchdog problem (the interface disapeare) and I dont use shared interrupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 2 0 irq4: sio0 29520 2 irq6: fdc087 0 irq15: ata1 47 0 irq16: uhci026848237 2063 irq17: bge0 1881736144 irq24: mpt0 29 0 irq25: mpt1 17 0 irq26: fxp0 fxp1 2776380213 irq48: isp0 1537121118 irq72: ciss0 217837 16 irq76: em0 25144932 1932 irq77: em1 1818458139 cpu0: timer 25996358 1997 Total 86250761 6628 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Tue Oct 17 15:37:05 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability
Le 13/10/2006 à 16:31:30+0200, Buki a écrit > Hi, > > I searched the archives and web a little but found many different opinions > on stability/usability of using make -j# with buildworld (and buildkernel). > > So I am asking if it is a good idea to use make -j on production boxes. > On my new server Proliant DL 380 I use make -j 5 for buildworld without any problem (15 minutes for make -j 5 buildworld... :-) ). Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Fri Oct 13 22:31:25 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Polling overflow ?
Hi all I've very strange problem with my NFS server. This server running 6-Stable Last update (after crash :-( ) 23 september. I've very strange problem, after some days I got this kind of message on syslog nfs kernel: Connection attempt to TCP MY_NFS_IP_ADDR:111 from MY_NFS_CLIENT_IP_ADDR:43385 flags:0x02 I've in my /etc/sysctl.conf something like net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=1 net.inet.udp.log_in_vain=1 The problem is this message appear event my rpcbind working (well appear in ps auxwww) and when sockstat -l tell me root rpcbind932 6 udp6 *:111 *:* root rpcbind932 7 udp6 *:1023*:* root rpcbind932 8 tcp6 *:111 *:* root rpcbind932 9 udp4 *:111 *:* root rpcbind932 10 udp4 *:734 *:* root rpcbind932 11 tcp4 *:111 *:* Of course when this situation appear all my NFS client have big problem with any rpc calling (rpc.lock, remount nfs, etc...) How can the kernel tell this kind of message (what's I understand is the are a not welcome incomming connection) when the sockstat (and lsof) tell me the rpcbind listen is this port ? I've have restart rpcbind/nfsd/etc...nothing change. The server have all NIC in polling mode because without this flag the NIC disapear (em0 watchdog etc...) Today the only solution I've found is ... reboot the server :-( Any one have a explaination ? and solution.... Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Oct 12 22:52:54 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
/dev/null
Hi All >From someday I've some very strange thing sometime my /dev/null just vanish. Anyone have this problem ? I'm running FreeBSD RELENG_6 Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 i?me ?tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Fri Oct 6 00:40:33 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Linux & Stable
Hi All Yesterday I'm make a make buildworld/make buildkernel after cvsup (because security fix in openssh, but i update all). I'm running RELENG_6 After that I've one big linux software don't work (maple 9.5), before this update everything work fine. Now my question what can I do ? Are there any kind of technics to ?downgrad? a STABLE ? It's very important software for me, if I can make this software work, i must re-install all my server:-( Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 i?me ?tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Fri Oct 6 00:37:29 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ?
Le 09/06/2006 à 09:26:20+0200, Massimo Lusetti a écrit > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch > > for 6.1-Release. Albert wrote that he would prefer not > > to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine, > > therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1. > > If read right he is already running a RELENG_6. Wellyes but after many many crash during many mounth I've running a Releng_6 (6 April 2006) and it's don't crash. And I don't have update. Now the server crash yesterday (monday) and I'm asking if it's good idea to update again. > > > Of course, there might be good reasons to run RELENG_6 > > anyway, in case that significant NFS fixes have gone in > > after the release (which I'm not aware of). But that > > decision is up to Albert himself. > > Actually if i remember right the NFS fix are gone in the RELENG_6 and > not in RELENG_6_1 OK, that's mean if I update I need to update to RELENG_6 not RELENG_6_1. Lots of thanks. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Fri Jun 9 09:46:58 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ?
Hi all. I'm come back to ask you some question about what release I can use. I've nfs server running 6-Stable (5 April 2006) with some trouble but ... well approx stable. But today he crash again (after ~1.5 mounth). Now I'm like have some advise : 1/ I can upgrade to 6.1-Release, but I've see many problem with nfsd heavy load. And the only purpose of this server is .. nfsd. 2/ I can upgrade to 6-Stable...but it's for production server... 3/ I can downgrade to 5.5. I known this is legacy release but if it's workthat's enought for me... Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 i?me ?tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Jun 8 00:19:23 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Why snapshot files...
Hi all Why the README.softupdates and README.snapshot file is never update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ffs]# ls -ltr total 558 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel2087 8 jul 2000 README.softupdates -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel4625 12 déc 2002 README.snapshot -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel5789 7 jan 2005 ffs_tables.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel6773 7 jan 2005 ffs_subr.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26080 8 fév 2005 ffs_balloc.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26778 20 fév 2005 fs.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19223 5 avr 2005 ffs_inode.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel5833 14 mar 00:15 ffs_extern.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 70487 14 mar 00:15 ffs_alloc.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 31004 14 mar 00:15 softdep.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 46865 17 mai 00:27 ffs_vfsops.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 186742 17 mai 00:27 ffs_softdep.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 66922 17 mai 00:27 ffs_snapshot.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12289 17 mai 00:27 ffs_rawread.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 42639 17 mai 00:27 ffs_vnops.c [EMAIL PROTECTED] ffs]# pwd /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs [EMAIL PROTECTED] ffs]# I ask this because in the README.snapshot we can read * As is detailed in the operational information below, snapshots are definitely alpha-test code and are NOT yet ready for production use. Much remains to be done to make them really useful, but I wanted to let folks get a chance to try it out and start reporting bugs and other shortcomings. Such reports should be sent to * Is the status have change ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed May 17 00:33:43 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.1-RC1 Available
Le 13/04/2006 à 01:51:42-0600, Scott Long a écrit > Announcement > > > The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is pleased to announce the > availability of FreeBSD 6.1-RC1. It is meant to be a refinement of the > 6-STABLE, branch with few dramatic changes. A lot of bugfixes have been > made, some drivers have been updated, and some areas have been tweaked > for better performance, etc. but no large changes have been made to the > basic architecture. This RC is late in coming due to many more bugs > being fixed, as well as a keyboard multiplexer being added. This is > enabled by default via the 'kbdmux' driver and allows multiple keyboards > of any type to be plugged in and work at once. In turn, the boot menu > option to handle USB keyboards specially has been removed as it is no > longer needed. This feature has been tested for several months, but > more testing is always needed. > > We encourage people to help with testing so any final bugs can be > identified and worked out. Availability of ISO images is given below. > If you have an older system you want to update using the normal > CVS/cvsup source based upgrade the branch tag to use is RELENG_6_1. > Problem reports can be submitted using the send-pr(1) command. > > The FreeBSD 5.5 release process is on hold while we put the final > touches on 6.1. It will resume within 1-2 weeks with a 5.5-RC1 > release. > > The list of open issues and things still being worked on are on the > todo list: > > Hi all. Lots of thanks for your work. Just one question : You need some testing (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html) for example I see (the first) manual root mount lockmgr panicsNeeds testing but (maybe I'm little stupid), how can some standard users (like me) can we perform this testing if we don't know how do that ? I think it's great thing if (when it's possible of course) there some advice to tell how can we make this testing. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Apr 13 10:51:38 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Disappointed-new
Hi all
I've sent a message two days ago with "Disappointed" subject.
Many of you answer me I don't have describe the bug.
Well, first my english is very bad, and second I don't blame anyone, never
the developper. Personnaly I'm very impresse by the work you doing.
Now a fine description of my problem.
Hardware :
HP Proliant ML 350 G4
2 x Xeon 3.2 Ghz (HT disable)
1 Go Ram
1 bge network interface on mothercard
1 dual 1000Mbits/s (em chipset)
1 dual 100Mbits/s (fxp chipset)
1 Internal 641 Smart Array with 2 Hotplug disk in raid 1
1 MSA1000 with 14 disk on fiber channel attachement
Situation :
On every network card we have different IP subnet
Every network card have he's owne IP address
All interface is connected on Foundry 1000 Mbits/s switch L2
Purpose :
It's central nfs server (NetApp for «small» budget...), the server
run a dhcpd server and that's all.
There are no user account on this server.
The server is not routed on Internet.
The nfs is bind on 3 of 5 IP number (the 2 other is just running
ssh for scp)
There are 13 nfs clients running Linux (different version of
kernel)
There are also 4 nfs clients running FreeBSD (different version but
all > 5.2 and < 5.5)
In the time :
The 6-stable is installed on the server on begin of February 2006
Problems :
First time :
Kernel : SMP+ipfw
In first time the «main» nfsd is bind on the bge0 interface
(main=90% nfs traffic)
After 10-15 days of perfect running, the bge0 don't work, but the
other interface working perfectly. The server is up and the other
nfs clients can acces without problem the nfs partition. I can
logon the console. And I've try many
ifconfig bge0 down
ifconfig bge up
ifconfig bge0 delete
etc...
nothing work
On the console the are repeatly message like
bge0 watchdog timeout problems
bge0 watchdog timeout problems
Only (for me) reboot can make the system re-work. And after reboot
everything work fine.
But after some days the problem is come again. And in this second case
all
interfaces don't work. But the I always can logon in the console.
But the reboot is not clean (I need to make a big fsck)
Second time :
Kernel : NO_SMP +ipfw
After some advice on this mailing-list I switch to mono-proc
version of the kernel.
This time after some days working fine the bge0 don't work again
(same condition of first time)
third time :
Kernel : NO_SMP + ipfw
I switch the main nfs(=90% of traffic) interface to em0 and put a
not running nfs (only scp) ip number on the bge0.
Again after some days the em0 interface don't work. And this
time the message on console is
em0 watchdog timeout problems
sometime I have fxpX watchdog timeout problem too
forth time :
Kernel : NO_SMP + polling + ipfw
Now I'm running all interface in polling mode. And...I hope it's
work...(running from 2 days).
Information :
I can't tell if it's during heavy nfs load, but I really don't
think. There are on crash during saturday (and we don't have many
users in this day).
I cannot reproduce this bug. I've try to make a big nfs access (on
4 linux clients I'm running in same time something like
find . -type f -exec md5sum {} \;
but he won't crash. In this partition there are 30 Go.
I forget to tell I'm running a very close configuration (a old ML350G3 with
same MSA1000 in same condition) with 4.x during 4 years without any crash
(with the same clients etc...)
In attachement the dmesg just after the server boot.
Next Monday I switch to DB kernel but now I just can reboot the server (600
users).
I hope that's can help you to make FreeBSD better than best OS ;-) .
Lots of thanks.
--
Albert SHIH
Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
Heure local/Local time:
Fri Apr 7 13:38:55 CEST 2006
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #1: Wed Apr 5 17:27:03 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS3-mono
ACPI APIC Table:
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3200.13-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Features=0xbfebfb
Re: Disappointed
Le 05/04/2006 à 16:21:00-0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:15:00PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > Le 05/04/2006 ? 16:07:27-0400, Kris Kennaway a ?crit > > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:03:41PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > I'm disappointed by the stablity of FreeBSD 6-stable (I known it's > > > > developpement branche). > > > > > > You forgot to provide pointers to your PRs. > > > > Well... I don't have make it because I can reproduce him. Last week I think > > this bug come when heavy load on network interface. Well I make very big > > read/write over nfs...and nothing...everthing work fine. > > Today It's not a ?big? day and the server crash (and I even can't log in > > console, need hard-reboot and big fsck). > > > > You think It's better I make a PR ? (and my english is very bad...) > > As a general rule: unless you can explain your problem in sufficient > detail, preferably including either how to reproduce it, or at least > an exact description of what happens when it fails, it's unlikely that > anyone can help you. OK I just do it. I just hope the maintainer can understand me... > > As a first step: you say your server crashed. Did it panic? Do you > have debugging settings (INVARIANTS, WITNESS) enabled? Do you have > DDB enabled? Read through the chapter on kernel debugging in the > developers' handbook and reconfigure your kernel accordingly, then > proceed from there. Well it's no so easy. I can try but there least 600 users waiting the big fsck when the server crash. I'm not sure I can spend many time to try this.. But I promise you I will try. Regards. NB: Why this kind of problem can happen ? I ask this because until 6. I never have this kind of problem. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Tel : 01 44 27 86 88 FAX : 01 44 27 69 35 GSM(UFR) : 06 85 05 58 43 Heure local/Local time: Wed Apr 5 22:34:54 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Disappointed
Le 05/04/2006 à 16:07:27-0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:03:41PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I'm disappointed by the stablity of FreeBSD 6-stable (I known it's > > developpement branche). > > You forgot to provide pointers to your PRs. Well... I don't have make it because I can reproduce him. Last week I think this bug come when heavy load on network interface. Well I make very big read/write over nfs...and nothing...everthing work fine. Today It's not a «big» day and the server crash (and I even can't log in console, need hard-reboot and big fsck). You think It's better I make a PR ? (and my english is very bad...) Thanks for your answer. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed Apr 5 22:11:52 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Disappointed
Hi all I'm disappointed by the stablity of FreeBSD 6-stable (I known it's developpement branche). I'm using FreeBSD from 3.4 and using regulary 5-stable in production. Now on my central server (nfs server) I make big update, and running 6-stable from 02/2006. From this date until today I've 4 or 5 big crash (the network interface just disapper (with watchdog message). But when I'm using 4.x I have zero crash during 3.5 years. And on my other servers (~ 15 ) running FreeBSD I never have so many crash, event on student's servers. I've send a message on this mailing-list. Now I follow the advise and today (after new crash) I'm running with polling on my network interface. I've already see some other users to have same problem. Maybe it's very hard to developper to fix this problem because I can't reproduce, just after 10-15 days the server crash. Sometime I don't have any prompt on the console, sometime I can make a clean reboot. But IMHO (please don't shoot me) fix this kind of problem is very very important and more more important to have some wifi device. If I going to www.freebsd.org I see FreeBSD power to serve and for «serve» we (sysadmin like me) need network interface. Personnaly I'm very sad to can't help anyone, I'm just user (sysadmin on Educational environnement) and I'm not developper (The more complexe "software" I ever made ishello_world.c). Thanks for all developpers. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed Apr 5 21:49:37 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: watchdog network card
Le 27/03/2006 à 07:46:04-0300, JoaoBR a écrit > On Monday 27 March 2006 07:37, Albert Shih wrote: > > > > > > > > Any idea ? > > Thanks for you answers. > > is your card in polling mode ? Well I don't known what's that mean. I just look the ifconfig's man...I just use default config, and I don't think I use poling mode. I don't understand : You think is better to put my card in polling mode or not ? > > it seems that since a month almost all NICs are having the timeout/up-down > trouble on releng_6 and it is worse when running SMP kernel OK I going to no-SMP kernel. > > It seems that sometimes and IRQ conflict is envolved and setting the > IRQs/Slots better the timeout do go away or running the cards in polling mode > also helps > > For FXP you may also try to download the microcode with `ifconfig fxp0 link0` Sorry but I'm no verry good in thiswhat's that mean ? What's ifconfig fxp0 link0 do ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Mar 27 12:56:35 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: watchdog network card
Le 27/03/2006 à 12:02:08+0200, Michel Le Cocq a écrit > I Jas > > I have the same type of trouble on a gigabythe motherboard with an > onboard ethernet card. > I run FreeBSD 6.0 but after 20 seconds ~ the card go Up again. > Before I was under 5.4 and I don't remember a such trouble. > > The only thing I sugest before the correction is to add a PCI card :-( I can't add another PCI card because all my PCI slot is in use. On my server I need 5 network Interface, and I've 2 bi-dual-gigabits PCI card and one on mothercard. And it's more complicate because the other card have same trouble... Of course I can remove all card ;-) but on nfs server it's little ...useless > > cat /var/log/messages > > Mar 25 21:49:29 rapace kernel: re0: 2 link states coalesced > Mar 25 21:49:29 rapace kernel: re0: link state changed to DOWN > Mar 25 21:49:31 rapace kernel: re0: 2 link states coalesced > Mar 25 21:49:31 rapace kernel: re0: link state changed to DOWN > > [...] > > Mar 25 21:49:45 rapace kernel: re0: link state changed to DOWN > Mar 25 21:49:46 rapace kernel: re0: link state changed to UP I don't have exactly same problem because when my bge0 going down he never comme back. I just stay in down and I just have lots of message like bge0 watchdog timeout problems fxp1 watchdog timeout problems Any idea ? Regards. > >and all my network card is down. Nothing can make the network card work > >again (only reboot working). > > > >There are only one service I need on this server and it'is nfsd (and rpc.* > >etc...) > > > >It's dual-pro ML350G4 proliant. > > > >What kind problem is it ? Software problem ? Hardward problem ? > > > >What kind of solution you think ? > > > >Do yo think if I go to no-SMP kernel the problem can be ... bypass ? > > > >Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Tel : 01 44 27 86 88 FAX : 01 44 27 69 35 GSM(UFR) : 06 85 05 58 43 Heure local/Local time: Mon Mar 27 12:33:23 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
watchdog network card
Hi all I've very big problem with my nfsd server. I'm running FreeBSD-stable and sometime (one time/week) i've this kind of message on the console : bge0 watchdog timeout problems fxp1 watchdog timeout problems and all my network card is down. Nothing can make the network card work again (only reboot working). There are only one service I need on this server and it'is nfsd (and rpc.* etc...) It's dual-pro ML350G4 proliant. What kind problem is it ? Software problem ? Hardward problem ? What kind of solution you think ? Do yo think if I go to no-SMP kernel the problem can be ... bypass ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Mar 27 11:25:08 CEST 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
No net
Hi all Some bug (very low priority if it's bug) report ? I've strange thing on my FB-box running stable. When I boot the PC if I type Return many time (When BootLoader ask my if I want boot disk1 or disk2) and when I have the screen to chose the boot method...I don't have the network. I cannot ping anything. Event I make ifconfig down/up nothing work whit the network card, I need to reboot. Well you can tell me it's useless to type Return many time (one time is enough...)ok..ok... But in case... Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Mar 13 18:29:52 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: nfs woes in FreeBSD 6.0
Le 27/02/2006 à 10:18:07-0500, Mike Tancsa a écrit > At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote: > >I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the > >version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe). > > > >Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current > >version? > > Not really as there are many changes behind the scenes that impact > it. Its not just the nfsd binary that has changed. There are a lot > of kernel stuff in support of it that has changed. > > BTW, if you are using tcp mounts, and you have devices not on the > same subnet, setting > net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 > helps with performance. However, this is a separate issue to the > problems you are seeing. Is there any documentation to explain a newbie like me all (I mean really all of them) sysctl variable ? For example what net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 change ? What's purpose of this variable ? Lots of thanks. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Tue Feb 28 00:55:00 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Matlab
Le 27/02/2006 à 12:39:13+0100, Dimitry Andric a écrit > Albert Shih wrote: > > /usr/local/matlab/bin/matlab: line 1: /lib/libc.so.6: cannot execute binary > > file > > /usr/local/matlab-14/bin/glnx86/MATLAB: error while loading shared > > libraries: /usr/lib/libtermcap.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid > > > > But I've compile the kernel with linux option and maple (other soft using > > linux too) work fine. > > Do you have "linux_enable=YES" in your rc.conf? > Yes of course... If I don't maple can't run... Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Feb 27 13:14:16 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Matlab
Hi all I've a problem to running matlab (using linux_base-rh9) on my FreeBSD 6-stable (PAE kernel). On my old server (5-stable) everthing work fine but I'v make news fresh install with 6-stable (using PAE need because I have 4 Go). On the new server when I launch matlab I've got this message /usr/local/matlab/bin/matlab: line 1: /lib/libc.so.6: cannot execute binary file /usr/local/matlab-14/bin/glnx86/MATLAB: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libtermcap.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid But I've compile the kernel with linux option and maple (other soft using linux too) work fine. Anyone have a idea ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Feb 27 12:13:24 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
No important but...
Hi all It's not important (maybe not event a bug), but I just want to "report" I run FreeBSD stable with PAE kernel on SMP (two proc) AMD Opteron on FreeBSD i386 version. I've this when I use top PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 88552 root1 1190 14180K 13564K CPU1 0 2:46 102.07% xctfc I don't known it's normal to have more than 100% on one cpu ... Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Sat Feb 25 01:23:56 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: AMD64 or I386
Le 22/02/2006 à 18:29:37-0800, Atanas a écrit > Albert Shih said the following on 02/22/06 16:59: > >Hi all > > > >I've very strange problem with my new servers with AMD single core dual > >proc with 4 Go Ram. > > > >When I boot the i386 version of FreeBSD 6.0 he see 4 Go but tell me he > >can't not access to 4go but only 3 Go. I upgrade to FreeBSD 6-Stable and > >nothing change. > > > >When I boot the amd64 version of FreeBSD 6.0 he see 5 Go (!!) but tell me > >he can access only 4 go (well). When I upgrade to FreeBSD 6-Stable nothing > >change. > > > >My problem is I need i386 version (because I'need maxima who need > >sbcl...and sbcl don't run on amd64). > > > >If I tell the kernel I've 4 Go the system don't boot (kernel panic). > > > >What can I do. > > > You might need to compile a PAE enabled kernel, see the pae(4) man page > for more details. > Very thanks all of you... Everey thing work fine Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Feb 23 23:02:58 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ISIS-PAE ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 (2210.20-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20f51 Stepping = 1 Features=0x78bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800,LM,3DNow+,3DNow> real memory = 5368709120 (5120 MB) avail memory = 4182499328 (3988 MB) Very thanks again. You save my life (weeel no exactly ;-) but thanks...) -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Feb 23 23:15:02 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
AMD64 or I386
Hi all I've very strange problem with my new servers with AMD single core dual proc with 4 Go Ram. When I boot the i386 version of FreeBSD 6.0 he see 4 Go but tell me he can't not access to 4go but only 3 Go. I upgrade to FreeBSD 6-Stable and nothing change. When I boot the amd64 version of FreeBSD 6.0 he see 5 Go (!!) but tell me he can access only 4 go (well). When I upgrade to FreeBSD 6-Stable nothing change. My problem is I need i386 version (because I'need maxima who need sbcl...and sbcl don't run on amd64). If I tell the kernel I've 4 Go the system don't boot (kernel panic). What can I do. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Thu Feb 23 01:55:43 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
NFS problem with stable
Hi all I've some problem with my «first» server. This server have one and only one purpose : nfs server. Recently (last week) I've change the old server by the new one (HP Proliant ML 350 G4), the data is on a FC raid MSA1000 attach by Fiber Channel to my server. The old server running FreeBSD 4.x and everthing is fine. When I install the new server I would install a new release, for that I install...wellFreeBSD 6-Stable (I known that's not good idea to use Stable on production). After this upgrade everthing work fine ... until this morning. I've two problems and I don't known if there are any relation between this two events. First : one my nfs client (I've ~ 10 clients) running Linux 2.4.28 kernel have lost this nfs mount filesystem. After many «mount -a» he re-mount the nfs filesystem...and lost it after 10 minutes. I reboot the server and everthing working. Second (2 hours after the first problem) : On the 6-stable I forget two of my interface (I've 5 ethernet interfaces), and on console I've see some bge0 watchdog timeout problems fxp1 watchdog timeout problems I've search on archive of this mailing list and I've see some one already have this problem. Now I've make up2date all system (cvsup , make world, etc...) But what's you advice (all advice is welcome) if the problem come again ? Regards. NB: For some reason I don't know the dmesg is empty NB: The hardware configuration: ML350 G4 bi-pro 3.4 Ghz 1Go Ram ISP Qlogic FC connector dual 1000Mbits/s dual 100Mbits/s one 1000Mbits/s on mothercard. [EMAIL PROTECTED] vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd01309 0 irq4: sio0 48430 2 irq6: fdc087 0 irq13: npx01 0 irq15: ata1 41 0 irq16: uhci0 4525006207 irq17: bge0 14890202683 irq24: mpt0 28 0 irq25: mpt1 16 0 irq26: fxp0 fxp1 53026 2 irq48: isp0 839475 38 irq72: ciss0 96835 4 irq76: em0 3574512164 irq77: em1 2041072 93 cpu0: timer 43544839 1998 cpu1: timer 43533960 1998 Total 113148839 5193 -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Tel : 01 44 27 86 88 FAX : 01 44 27 69 35 GSM(UFR) : 06 85 05 58 43 Heure local/Local time: Tue Feb 14 20:46:39 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
