--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23
14:46 ---
Testcase:
struct temp
{
temp(){}
~temp(){}
temp(const temp&){}
};
struct crop
{
int ox, oy, dx, dy;
};
struct Parm
{
temp filename;
crop cp;
};
void Foo(Parm x);
void Bar1()
{
Parm p;
p.cp.dx = 0;
Foo(p);
}
void Bar2()
{
Parm p;
p.cp.dy = 0;
Foo(p);
}
the problem is that Parm's copy constructor is at line 21 which is wrong.
This is a regression from earlier 4.0's where the copy constructor was not
generated lazy.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-23 14:46:15
date||
Summary|Wrong line number in|[4.0 Regression] Wrong line
|diagnostic with gcc 4.0 |number in diagnostic with
||gcc 4.0
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20164